Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom
Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies du...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0168258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0168258 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Scheffer, Paul Guy-Coichard, Christian Outh-Gauer, David Calet-Froissart, Zoéline Boursier, Mathilde Mintzes, Barbara Borde, Jean-Sébastien |
description | Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies during the last decade. We asked whether similar steps had been taken in France. We hypothesized that such policies may have been introduced following a 2009-2010 drug safety scandal (benfluorex, Mediator) in which COIs in medicine received prominent press attention.
We searched the websites of all 37 French Faculties of Medicine in May 2015 for COI policies and curriculum, using standardized keyword searches. We also surveyed all deans of medicine on institutional COI policies and curriculum, based on criteria developed in similar US and Canadian surveys. Personal contacts were also consulted. We calculated a summary score per faculty based on 13 criteria. [range 0-26; higher scores denoting stronger policies].
In total, we found that 9/37 (24%) of French medical schools had either introduced related curriculum or implemented a COI-related policy. Of these, only 1 (2.5%) had restrictive policies for any category. No official COI policies were found at any of the schools. However, at 2 (5%), informal policies were reported. The maximum score per faculty was 5/26, with 28 (76%) scoring 0.
This is the first survey in France to examine COI policies at medical faculties. We found little evidence that protection of medical students from undue commercial influence is a priority, either through institutional policies or education. This is despite national transparency legislation on industry financing of health professionals and limits on gifts. The French National Medical Students Association (ANEMF) has called for more attention to COI in medical education; our results strongly support such a call. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0168258 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1856859685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476889707</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3ec9b3a0b15a45c3b5ce1e8a1cee5914</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476889707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a1b1e976e8949b74c06a3eb4a148d4f17a322374bf4e813d4ba2a067da588443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gWBNGHXZvmZ-9BOBdPF05OXfU1pOl0myNt1iYV_e9N3d6xlXs4QkiYfOY7yUwmSZ6ibIkwR2-u3NB3yi53roNlhpjIqbiXHKMC5wuWZ_j-wf4oeeT9VZZRLBh7mBzlImMCs_w4-bJyXW2NDqmr03UXoAcf0s8umgz4VIX0vIdON-knqIxWNt3oxjnrT9NNUH0w3Tate9emoYH0nQvBtY-TB7WyHp5M60ny_fz9t9XHxcXlh_Xq7GKheU7DIleoRFBwBqIgRcmJzpjCUBKFiKhIjbjCeY45KWsCAuGKlCpXGeOVokIQgk-S53vdnXVeTtnwEgnKBC3ijMR6T1ROXcldb1rV_5FOGfnP4PqtHJ-gLUgMuiixykpEFaEal1QDAqGQBqAFGqO9naINZQuVhi70ys5E5yedaeTW_ZI0zxGnLAq8mgR693OISZat8RqsVR24Ybx3rAihiJM7oJTjWEFSRPTFf-jtiZiorYpvNV3t4hX1KCrPCGdCFDzjkVreQsVRQWt0_GW1ifaZw-uZQ2QC_A5bNXgv15uvd2cvf8zZlwdsA8qGxjs7BOM6PwfJHtS9876H-qYeKJNjk1xnQ45NIqcmiW7PDmt543TdFfgv-3wK9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856859685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Scheffer, Paul ; Guy-Coichard, Christian ; Outh-Gauer, David ; Calet-Froissart, Zoéline ; Boursier, Mathilde ; Mintzes, Barbara ; Borde, Jean-Sébastien</creator><contributor>Wray, K. Brad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Paul ; Guy-Coichard, Christian ; Outh-Gauer, David ; Calet-Froissart, Zoéline ; Boursier, Mathilde ; Mintzes, Barbara ; Borde, Jean-Sébastien ; Wray, K. Brad</creatorcontrib><description>Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies during the last decade. We asked whether similar steps had been taken in France. We hypothesized that such policies may have been introduced following a 2009-2010 drug safety scandal (benfluorex, Mediator) in which COIs in medicine received prominent press attention.
We searched the websites of all 37 French Faculties of Medicine in May 2015 for COI policies and curriculum, using standardized keyword searches. We also surveyed all deans of medicine on institutional COI policies and curriculum, based on criteria developed in similar US and Canadian surveys. Personal contacts were also consulted. We calculated a summary score per faculty based on 13 criteria. [range 0-26; higher scores denoting stronger policies].
In total, we found that 9/37 (24%) of French medical schools had either introduced related curriculum or implemented a COI-related policy. Of these, only 1 (2.5%) had restrictive policies for any category. No official COI policies were found at any of the schools. However, at 2 (5%), informal policies were reported. The maximum score per faculty was 5/26, with 28 (76%) scoring 0.
This is the first survey in France to examine COI policies at medical faculties. We found little evidence that protection of medical students from undue commercial influence is a priority, either through institutional policies or education. This is despite national transparency legislation on industry financing of health professionals and limits on gifts. The French National Medical Students Association (ANEMF) has called for more attention to COI in medical education; our results strongly support such a call.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28068362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Classrooms ; Conflict of Interest - legislation & jurisprudence ; Conflicts of interest ; Criteria ; Curriculum ; Education ; Faculty, Medical ; France ; Health education ; Health facilities ; Humans ; Influence ; Internet ; Legislation ; Management ; Medical personnel ; Medical practices ; Medical schools ; Medical students ; Medical technology ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacovigilance ; Physicians ; Policies ; Polls & surveys ; Regulation ; Schools ; Schools, Medical - ethics ; Schools, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Textbooks ; Transparency ; Websites</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0168258</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Scheffer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Scheffer et al 2017 Scheffer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a1b1e976e8949b74c06a3eb4a148d4f17a322374bf4e813d4ba2a067da588443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a1b1e976e8949b74c06a3eb4a148d4f17a322374bf4e813d4ba2a067da588443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28068362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wray, K. Brad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy-Coichard, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outh-Gauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calet-Froissart, Zoéline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boursier, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintzes, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borde, Jean-Sébastien</creatorcontrib><title>Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies during the last decade. We asked whether similar steps had been taken in France. We hypothesized that such policies may have been introduced following a 2009-2010 drug safety scandal (benfluorex, Mediator) in which COIs in medicine received prominent press attention.
We searched the websites of all 37 French Faculties of Medicine in May 2015 for COI policies and curriculum, using standardized keyword searches. We also surveyed all deans of medicine on institutional COI policies and curriculum, based on criteria developed in similar US and Canadian surveys. Personal contacts were also consulted. We calculated a summary score per faculty based on 13 criteria. [range 0-26; higher scores denoting stronger policies].
In total, we found that 9/37 (24%) of French medical schools had either introduced related curriculum or implemented a COI-related policy. Of these, only 1 (2.5%) had restrictive policies for any category. No official COI policies were found at any of the schools. However, at 2 (5%), informal policies were reported. The maximum score per faculty was 5/26, with 28 (76%) scoring 0.
This is the first survey in France to examine COI policies at medical faculties. We found little evidence that protection of medical students from undue commercial influence is a priority, either through institutional policies or education. This is despite national transparency legislation on industry financing of health professionals and limits on gifts. The French National Medical Students Association (ANEMF) has called for more attention to COI in medical education; our results strongly support such a call.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Conflict of Interest - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical practices</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - ethics</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gWBNGHXZvmZ-9BOBdPF05OXfU1pOl0myNt1iYV_e9N3d6xlXs4QkiYfOY7yUwmSZ6ibIkwR2-u3NB3yi53roNlhpjIqbiXHKMC5wuWZ_j-wf4oeeT9VZZRLBh7mBzlImMCs_w4-bJyXW2NDqmr03UXoAcf0s8umgz4VIX0vIdON-knqIxWNt3oxjnrT9NNUH0w3Tate9emoYH0nQvBtY-TB7WyHp5M60ny_fz9t9XHxcXlh_Xq7GKheU7DIleoRFBwBqIgRcmJzpjCUBKFiKhIjbjCeY45KWsCAuGKlCpXGeOVokIQgk-S53vdnXVeTtnwEgnKBC3ijMR6T1ROXcldb1rV_5FOGfnP4PqtHJ-gLUgMuiixykpEFaEal1QDAqGQBqAFGqO9naINZQuVhi70ys5E5yedaeTW_ZI0zxGnLAq8mgR693OISZat8RqsVR24Ybx3rAihiJM7oJTjWEFSRPTFf-jtiZiorYpvNV3t4hX1KCrPCGdCFDzjkVreQsVRQWt0_GW1ifaZw-uZQ2QC_A5bNXgv15uvd2cvf8zZlwdsA8qGxjs7BOM6PwfJHtS9876H-qYeKJNjk1xnQ45NIqcmiW7PDmt543TdFfgv-3wK9g</recordid><startdate>20170109</startdate><enddate>20170109</enddate><creator>Scheffer, Paul</creator><creator>Guy-Coichard, Christian</creator><creator>Outh-Gauer, David</creator><creator>Calet-Froissart, Zoéline</creator><creator>Boursier, Mathilde</creator><creator>Mintzes, Barbara</creator><creator>Borde, Jean-Sébastien</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170109</creationdate><title>Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom</title><author>Scheffer, Paul ; Guy-Coichard, Christian ; Outh-Gauer, David ; Calet-Froissart, Zoéline ; Boursier, Mathilde ; Mintzes, Barbara ; Borde, Jean-Sébastien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a1b1e976e8949b74c06a3eb4a148d4f17a322374bf4e813d4ba2a067da588443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Conflict of Interest - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical practices</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - ethics</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy-Coichard, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outh-Gauer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calet-Froissart, Zoéline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boursier, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintzes, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borde, Jean-Sébastien</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheffer, Paul</au><au>Guy-Coichard, Christian</au><au>Outh-Gauer, David</au><au>Calet-Froissart, Zoéline</au><au>Boursier, Mathilde</au><au>Mintzes, Barbara</au><au>Borde, Jean-Sébastien</au><au>Wray, K. Brad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-01-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0168258</spage><pages>e0168258-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Medical faculties have a role in ensuring that their students are protected from undue commercial influence during their training, and are educated about professional-industry interactions. In North America, many medical faculties have introduced more stringent conflict of interest (COI) policies during the last decade. We asked whether similar steps had been taken in France. We hypothesized that such policies may have been introduced following a 2009-2010 drug safety scandal (benfluorex, Mediator) in which COIs in medicine received prominent press attention.
We searched the websites of all 37 French Faculties of Medicine in May 2015 for COI policies and curriculum, using standardized keyword searches. We also surveyed all deans of medicine on institutional COI policies and curriculum, based on criteria developed in similar US and Canadian surveys. Personal contacts were also consulted. We calculated a summary score per faculty based on 13 criteria. [range 0-26; higher scores denoting stronger policies].
In total, we found that 9/37 (24%) of French medical schools had either introduced related curriculum or implemented a COI-related policy. Of these, only 1 (2.5%) had restrictive policies for any category. No official COI policies were found at any of the schools. However, at 2 (5%), informal policies were reported. The maximum score per faculty was 5/26, with 28 (76%) scoring 0.
This is the first survey in France to examine COI policies at medical faculties. We found little evidence that protection of medical students from undue commercial influence is a priority, either through institutional policies or education. This is despite national transparency legislation on industry financing of health professionals and limits on gifts. The French National Medical Students Association (ANEMF) has called for more attention to COI in medical education; our results strongly support such a call.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28068362</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0168258</doi><tpages>e0168258</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0168258 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1856859685 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Analysis Classrooms Conflict of Interest - legislation & jurisprudence Conflicts of interest Criteria Curriculum Education Faculty, Medical France Health education Health facilities Humans Influence Internet Legislation Management Medical personnel Medical practices Medical schools Medical students Medical technology Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Pharmaceutical industry Pharmacovigilance Physicians Policies Polls & surveys Regulation Schools Schools, Medical - ethics Schools, Medical - legislation & jurisprudence Science Policy Social Sciences Students Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Textbooks Transparency Websites |
title | Conflict of Interest Policies at French Medical Schools: Starting from the Bottom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A07%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conflict%20of%20Interest%20Policies%20at%20French%20Medical%20Schools:%20Starting%20from%20the%20Bottom&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Scheffer,%20Paul&rft.date=2017-01-09&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0168258&rft.pages=e0168258-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0168258&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476889707%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856859685&rft_id=info:pmid/28068362&rft_galeid=A476889707&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3ec9b3a0b15a45c3b5ce1e8a1cee5914&rfr_iscdi=true |