Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption
The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the cons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169589 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0169589 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Evers, Eric G Pielaat, Annemarie Smid, Joost H van Duijkeren, Engeline Vennemann, Francy B C Wijnands, Lucas M Chardon, Jurgen E |
description | The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the consumption of meat from different food animals. Calculations were done with a simplified Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) model. The model took the effect of pre-retail processing, storage at the consumers home and preparation in the kitchen (cross-contamination and heating) on EEC numbers on/in the raw meat products into account. The contribution of beef products (78%) to the total EEC exposure of the Dutch population through the consumption of meat was much higher than for chicken (18%), pork (4.5%), veal (0.1%) and lamb (0%). After slaughter, chicken meat accounted for 97% of total EEC load on meat, but chicken meat experienced a relatively large effect of heating during food preparation. Exposure via consumption of filet americain (a minced beef product consumed raw) was predicted to be highest (61% of total EEC exposure), followed by chicken fillet (13%). It was estimated that only 18% of EEC exposure occurred via cross-contamination during preparation in the kitchen, which was the only route by which EEC survived for surface-contaminated products. Sensitivity analysis showed that model output is not sensitive for most parameters. However, EEC concentration on meat other than chicken meat was an important data gap. In conclusion, the model assessed that consumption of beef products led to a higher exposure to EEC than chicken products, although the prevalence of EEC on raw chicken meat was much higher than on beef. The (relative) risk of this exposure for public health is yet unknown given the lack of a modelling framework and of exposure studies for other potential transmission routes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0169589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1855775970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476655359</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ccca6070bba744109c48ce0a857fb899</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476655359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-a50958504ee0749ec34759617d2c36a52c35519b8aef18bc96248ffdd0639cc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEnz0eRmYRxGHRhZcdUbL0Kapm2GtqlJu6z_3nSnu0xlL5ZAU5LnvDl5T04UvYRgCVEKP-zt4FpZLzvb6iWAlBPGH0WnkKNkQROAHh_9n0TPvN8DQBCj9Gl0kjBAKGDwNPq9tk0nnezNlY431531g9PxynvtfaPbPrZFvLn8uFt8czYflGnLeONVpZ1RlZGxsrWJ-8rZoazir1r28dq2fmi63tj2efSkkLXXL6b5LPr5afNj_WWxu_i8Xa92C0UJ6ReSgJA7AVhrkGKuFcIp4RSmeaIQlSR8CYE8Y1IXkGWK0wSzoshzQBFXCqOz6PVBt6utF5MvXkBGSBqUUhCI7YHIrdyLzplGur_CSiNuFqwrhXS9UbUWSilJQQqyTKYYQ8AVZkoDyUhaZIzzoHU-nTZkjc5VMMnJeiY632lNJUp7JUgCCUdjuu8mAWf_DNr3ojFe6bqWrbbDTd4cs5Qn_CEoDVZRjAL65j_0fiMmqpThrqYtbEhRjaJihVMa6oHIeOzyHiqMXDdGhfdWmLA-C3g_CwhMr6_7Ug7ei-3l94ezF7_m7NsjttKy7itv62F8XX4O4gOonPXe6eKuHhCIsV1u3RBju4ipXULYq-Na3gXd9gf6B7eDDw8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855775970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Evers, Eric G ; Pielaat, Annemarie ; Smid, Joost H ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Vennemann, Francy B C ; Wijnands, Lucas M ; Chardon, Jurgen E</creator><creatorcontrib>Evers, Eric G ; Pielaat, Annemarie ; Smid, Joost H ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Vennemann, Francy B C ; Wijnands, Lucas M ; Chardon, Jurgen E</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the consumption of meat from different food animals. Calculations were done with a simplified Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) model. The model took the effect of pre-retail processing, storage at the consumers home and preparation in the kitchen (cross-contamination and heating) on EEC numbers on/in the raw meat products into account. The contribution of beef products (78%) to the total EEC exposure of the Dutch population through the consumption of meat was much higher than for chicken (18%), pork (4.5%), veal (0.1%) and lamb (0%). After slaughter, chicken meat accounted for 97% of total EEC load on meat, but chicken meat experienced a relatively large effect of heating during food preparation. Exposure via consumption of filet americain (a minced beef product consumed raw) was predicted to be highest (61% of total EEC exposure), followed by chicken fillet (13%). It was estimated that only 18% of EEC exposure occurred via cross-contamination during preparation in the kitchen, which was the only route by which EEC survived for surface-contaminated products. Sensitivity analysis showed that model output is not sensitive for most parameters. However, EEC concentration on meat other than chicken meat was an important data gap. In conclusion, the model assessed that consumption of beef products led to a higher exposure to EEC than chicken products, although the prevalence of EEC on raw chicken meat was much higher than on beef. The (relative) risk of this exposure for public health is yet unknown given the lack of a modelling framework and of exposure studies for other potential transmission routes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28056081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Bacteria ; Beef ; Beta lactamases ; beta-Lactamases - metabolism ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Chickens ; Child ; Contamination ; Disease control ; E coli ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - enzymology ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Exposure ; Female ; Food chains ; Food consumption ; Food contamination ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food Microbiology ; Health aspects ; Heat resistance ; Heating ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Measurement ; Meat ; Meat - microbiology ; Meat products ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Netherlands ; Parameter sensitivity ; People and Places ; Pork ; Poultry ; Public health ; Red Meat - microbiology ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social Sciences ; Veal ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169589</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Evers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Evers et al 2017 Evers et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-a50958504ee0749ec34759617d2c36a52c35519b8aef18bc96248ffdd0639cc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-a50958504ee0749ec34759617d2c36a52c35519b8aef18bc96248ffdd0639cc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4689-3169</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215934/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215934/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056081$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evers, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pielaat, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smid, Joost H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vennemann, Francy B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnands, Lucas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardon, Jurgen E</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the consumption of meat from different food animals. Calculations were done with a simplified Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) model. The model took the effect of pre-retail processing, storage at the consumers home and preparation in the kitchen (cross-contamination and heating) on EEC numbers on/in the raw meat products into account. The contribution of beef products (78%) to the total EEC exposure of the Dutch population through the consumption of meat was much higher than for chicken (18%), pork (4.5%), veal (0.1%) and lamb (0%). After slaughter, chicken meat accounted for 97% of total EEC load on meat, but chicken meat experienced a relatively large effect of heating during food preparation. Exposure via consumption of filet americain (a minced beef product consumed raw) was predicted to be highest (61% of total EEC exposure), followed by chicken fillet (13%). It was estimated that only 18% of EEC exposure occurred via cross-contamination during preparation in the kitchen, which was the only route by which EEC survived for surface-contaminated products. Sensitivity analysis showed that model output is not sensitive for most parameters. However, EEC concentration on meat other than chicken meat was an important data gap. In conclusion, the model assessed that consumption of beef products led to a higher exposure to EEC than chicken products, although the prevalence of EEC on raw chicken meat was much higher than on beef. The (relative) risk of this exposure for public health is yet unknown given the lack of a modelling framework and of exposure studies for other potential transmission routes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beta lactamases</subject><subject>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - enzymology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heat resistance</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Red Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Veal</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEnz0eRmYRxGHRhZcdUbL0Kapm2GtqlJu6z_3nSnu0xlL5ZAU5LnvDl5T04UvYRgCVEKP-zt4FpZLzvb6iWAlBPGH0WnkKNkQROAHh_9n0TPvN8DQBCj9Gl0kjBAKGDwNPq9tk0nnezNlY431531g9PxynvtfaPbPrZFvLn8uFt8czYflGnLeONVpZ1RlZGxsrWJ-8rZoazir1r28dq2fmi63tj2efSkkLXXL6b5LPr5afNj_WWxu_i8Xa92C0UJ6ReSgJA7AVhrkGKuFcIp4RSmeaIQlSR8CYE8Y1IXkGWK0wSzoshzQBFXCqOz6PVBt6utF5MvXkBGSBqUUhCI7YHIrdyLzplGur_CSiNuFqwrhXS9UbUWSilJQQqyTKYYQ8AVZkoDyUhaZIzzoHU-nTZkjc5VMMnJeiY632lNJUp7JUgCCUdjuu8mAWf_DNr3ojFe6bqWrbbDTd4cs5Qn_CEoDVZRjAL65j_0fiMmqpThrqYtbEhRjaJihVMa6oHIeOzyHiqMXDdGhfdWmLA-C3g_CwhMr6_7Ug7ei-3l94ezF7_m7NsjttKy7itv62F8XX4O4gOonPXe6eKuHhCIsV1u3RBju4ipXULYq-Na3gXd9gf6B7eDDw8</recordid><startdate>20170105</startdate><enddate>20170105</enddate><creator>Evers, Eric G</creator><creator>Pielaat, Annemarie</creator><creator>Smid, Joost H</creator><creator>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creator><creator>Vennemann, Francy B C</creator><creator>Wijnands, Lucas M</creator><creator>Chardon, Jurgen E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-3169</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170105</creationdate><title>Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption</title><author>Evers, Eric G ; Pielaat, Annemarie ; Smid, Joost H ; van Duijkeren, Engeline ; Vennemann, Francy B C ; Wijnands, Lucas M ; Chardon, Jurgen E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-a50958504ee0749ec34759617d2c36a52c35519b8aef18bc96248ffdd0639cc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beta lactamases</topic><topic>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - enzymology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heat resistance</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Red Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Veal</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evers, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pielaat, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smid, Joost H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijkeren, Engeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vennemann, Francy B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnands, Lucas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardon, Jurgen E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evers, Eric G</au><au>Pielaat, Annemarie</au><au>Smid, Joost H</au><au>van Duijkeren, Engeline</au><au>Vennemann, Francy B C</au><au>Wijnands, Lucas M</au><au>Chardon, Jurgen E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-01-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0169589</spage><pages>e0169589-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmidic AmpC (pAmpC) producing Escherichia coli (EEC) in food animals, especially broilers, has become a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to quantify the EEC exposure of humans in The Netherlands through the consumption of meat from different food animals. Calculations were done with a simplified Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) model. The model took the effect of pre-retail processing, storage at the consumers home and preparation in the kitchen (cross-contamination and heating) on EEC numbers on/in the raw meat products into account. The contribution of beef products (78%) to the total EEC exposure of the Dutch population through the consumption of meat was much higher than for chicken (18%), pork (4.5%), veal (0.1%) and lamb (0%). After slaughter, chicken meat accounted for 97% of total EEC load on meat, but chicken meat experienced a relatively large effect of heating during food preparation. Exposure via consumption of filet americain (a minced beef product consumed raw) was predicted to be highest (61% of total EEC exposure), followed by chicken fillet (13%). It was estimated that only 18% of EEC exposure occurred via cross-contamination during preparation in the kitchen, which was the only route by which EEC survived for surface-contaminated products. Sensitivity analysis showed that model output is not sensitive for most parameters. However, EEC concentration on meat other than chicken meat was an important data gap. In conclusion, the model assessed that consumption of beef products led to a higher exposure to EEC than chicken products, although the prevalence of EEC on raw chicken meat was much higher than on beef. The (relative) risk of this exposure for public health is yet unknown given the lack of a modelling framework and of exposure studies for other potential transmission routes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28056081</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0169589</doi><tpages>e0169589</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-3169</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169589 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1855775970 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Animals Bacteria Beef Beta lactamases beta-Lactamases - metabolism Biology and Life Sciences Campylobacter Campylobacter jejuni Chickens Child Contamination Disease control E coli Enterobacteriaceae Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - enzymology Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Exposure Female Food chains Food consumption Food contamination Food contamination & poisoning Food Microbiology Health aspects Heat resistance Heating Humans Infections Infectious diseases Male Measurement Meat Meat - microbiology Meat products Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Models, Theoretical Netherlands Parameter sensitivity People and Places Pork Poultry Public health Red Meat - microbiology Risk Assessment Sensitivity analysis Social Sciences Veal Young Adult |
title | Comparative Exposure Assessment of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli through Meat Consumption |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Exposure%20Assessment%20of%20ESBL-Producing%20Escherichia%20coli%20through%20Meat%20Consumption&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Evers,%20Eric%20G&rft.date=2017-01-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0169589&rft.pages=e0169589-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0169589&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476655359%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855775970&rft_id=info:pmid/28056081&rft_galeid=A476655359&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ccca6070bba744109c48ce0a857fb899&rfr_iscdi=true |