The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography
The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the crack of a cracked tooth on an artificial simulation model with Periapical Radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vitro, providing the basis for early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan. Forty-four teeth with d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169150-e0169150 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0169150 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0169150 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Wang, Shuang Xu, Yiran Shen, Zhengyan Wang, Lijun Qiao, Feng Zhang, Xu Li, Minghua Wu, Ligeng |
| description | The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the crack of a cracked tooth on an artificial simulation model with Periapical Radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vitro, providing the basis for early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan.
Forty-four teeth with different extents of artificial cracks, created by exposure to liquid nitrogen after hot water at 100°C, were collected. They were subjected to PR and CBCT. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) examination, regarded as a relatively more accurate measurement than others, was used to measure and record the crack depth. Three observers, an endodontic graduate student, an experienced endodontist, and an experienced radiologist, examined the PR and CBCT results independently, and the presence or absence of cracks with PR and CBCT were respectively recorded. The external consistency ICC with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to analyze the consistency among the graduate student, endodontist, and radiologist; ROC curves were used for the analysis of diagnostic performance of both radiographic modalities for tooth cracks with crack depth.
For the interpretation of the PR results, there were statistically significant differences among the three different observers (P < 0.001), and the interpretation of the CBCT results (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the graduate student, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 77.27% and 22.73%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the endodontist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 81.81% and 8.19%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the radiologist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 88.64% and 11.36%, respectively (P < 0.001). As for CBCT diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 3.20 mm, 2.06 mm, and 1.24 mm, respectively. For the PR diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 6.12 mm, 6.94 mm, and 6.94 mm, respectively.
Within the limitations of this study, on an artificial simulation model of cracked teeth for early diagnosis, we recommend that it would be better for a cracked tooth to be diagnosed by a radiologist with CBCT than PR, CBCT with a minimum depth of 1.24 mm. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0169150 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1855313700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476434129</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_810f38f80ad045ba8cf740f02f154fc9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476434129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b4f21a6364def98898a1b5965dff36403561a1c6e9ffa4a5c9da1d4d4276dad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WLHH3FuJpVqQKWhoa1whWSd-qPxSONiJ7D9e9w1m1q0iykXiU-e8_qc1z5Z9hKjMSYl_nDp-9BCM1771owR5hVm6FF2iCtSjHiByOOd74PsWYyXCDEiOH-aHRQCsQIX_DD7Oa9NfnLVmbbLvc27tJoGUL9y3-aT0DnrlIMmv3CrvoHOpehXr00T87-uq_Ppx-k8h1bn30xwsHYqoeegnV8GWNfXz7MnFppoXgzvo-z7p5P59Mvo9OzzbDo5HamyYN1oQW2BgRNOtbGVEJUAvGAVZ9raFESEcQxYcVNZCxSYqjRgTTUtSq5BU3KUvd7qrhsf5WBMlFgwRpJXCCVitiW0h0u5Dm4F4Vp6cPIm4MNSQupWNUYKjCwRViDQiLIFCGVLiiwqLGbUqippHQ-79YuV0SpZF6DZE93_07paLv0fmSxnBSFJ4N0gEPzv3sROrlxUpmmgNb6_qbuigvIKPQRlpSirQiT0zX_o_UYM1BJSr661PpWoNqJyQktOCcXFpsXxPVR6tFk5lS6cdSm-l_B-LyExnbnqltDHKGcX5w9nz37ss2932NpA09XRN_3mJsZ9kG5BFXyMwdi788BIbubl1g25mRc5zEtKe7V7lndJtwNC_gHiag4x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855313700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Shuang ; Xu, Yiran ; Shen, Zhengyan ; Wang, Lijun ; Qiao, Feng ; Zhang, Xu ; Li, Minghua ; Wu, Ligeng</creator><contributor>Roeder, Ryan K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuang ; Xu, Yiran ; Shen, Zhengyan ; Wang, Lijun ; Qiao, Feng ; Zhang, Xu ; Li, Minghua ; Wu, Ligeng ; Roeder, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the crack of a cracked tooth on an artificial simulation model with Periapical Radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vitro, providing the basis for early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan.
Forty-four teeth with different extents of artificial cracks, created by exposure to liquid nitrogen after hot water at 100°C, were collected. They were subjected to PR and CBCT. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) examination, regarded as a relatively more accurate measurement than others, was used to measure and record the crack depth. Three observers, an endodontic graduate student, an experienced endodontist, and an experienced radiologist, examined the PR and CBCT results independently, and the presence or absence of cracks with PR and CBCT were respectively recorded. The external consistency ICC with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to analyze the consistency among the graduate student, endodontist, and radiologist; ROC curves were used for the analysis of diagnostic performance of both radiographic modalities for tooth cracks with crack depth.
For the interpretation of the PR results, there were statistically significant differences among the three different observers (P < 0.001), and the interpretation of the CBCT results (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the graduate student, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 77.27% and 22.73%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the endodontist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 81.81% and 8.19%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the radiologist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 88.64% and 11.36%, respectively (P < 0.001). As for CBCT diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 3.20 mm, 2.06 mm, and 1.24 mm, respectively. For the PR diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 6.12 mm, 6.94 mm, and 6.94 mm, respectively.
Within the limitations of this study, on an artificial simulation model of cracked teeth for early diagnosis, we recommend that it would be better for a cracked tooth to be diagnosed by a radiologist with CBCT than PR, CBCT with a minimum depth of 1.24 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169150</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28052126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; CAT scans ; Computation ; Computed tomography ; Computer simulation ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Confidence intervals ; Consistency ; Cracks ; Dental caries ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Enamel ; Hospitals ; Hot water ; Humans ; Liquid nitrogen ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Observers ; Pathology ; People and Places ; Radiography ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sensitivity ; Simulation ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Surgery ; Teeth ; Tooth - diagnostic imaging ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169150-e0169150</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Wang et al 2017 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b4f21a6364def98898a1b5965dff36403561a1c6e9ffa4a5c9da1d4d4276dad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b4f21a6364def98898a1b5965dff36403561a1c6e9ffa4a5c9da1d4d4276dad43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215233/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215233/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Roeder, Ryan K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Zhengyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ligeng</creatorcontrib><title>The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the crack of a cracked tooth on an artificial simulation model with Periapical Radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vitro, providing the basis for early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan.
Forty-four teeth with different extents of artificial cracks, created by exposure to liquid nitrogen after hot water at 100°C, were collected. They were subjected to PR and CBCT. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) examination, regarded as a relatively more accurate measurement than others, was used to measure and record the crack depth. Three observers, an endodontic graduate student, an experienced endodontist, and an experienced radiologist, examined the PR and CBCT results independently, and the presence or absence of cracks with PR and CBCT were respectively recorded. The external consistency ICC with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to analyze the consistency among the graduate student, endodontist, and radiologist; ROC curves were used for the analysis of diagnostic performance of both radiographic modalities for tooth cracks with crack depth.
For the interpretation of the PR results, there were statistically significant differences among the three different observers (P < 0.001), and the interpretation of the CBCT results (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the graduate student, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 77.27% and 22.73%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the endodontist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 81.81% and 8.19%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the radiologist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 88.64% and 11.36%, respectively (P < 0.001). As for CBCT diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 3.20 mm, 2.06 mm, and 1.24 mm, respectively. For the PR diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 6.12 mm, 6.94 mm, and 6.94 mm, respectively.
Within the limitations of this study, on an artificial simulation model of cracked teeth for early diagnosis, we recommend that it would be better for a cracked tooth to be diagnosed by a radiologist with CBCT than PR, CBCT with a minimum depth of 1.24 mm.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Cracks</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hot water</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liquid nitrogen</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WLHH3FuJpVqQKWhoa1whWSd-qPxSONiJ7D9e9w1m1q0iykXiU-e8_qc1z5Z9hKjMSYl_nDp-9BCM1771owR5hVm6FF2iCtSjHiByOOd74PsWYyXCDEiOH-aHRQCsQIX_DD7Oa9NfnLVmbbLvc27tJoGUL9y3-aT0DnrlIMmv3CrvoHOpehXr00T87-uq_Ppx-k8h1bn30xwsHYqoeegnV8GWNfXz7MnFppoXgzvo-z7p5P59Mvo9OzzbDo5HamyYN1oQW2BgRNOtbGVEJUAvGAVZ9raFESEcQxYcVNZCxSYqjRgTTUtSq5BU3KUvd7qrhsf5WBMlFgwRpJXCCVitiW0h0u5Dm4F4Vp6cPIm4MNSQupWNUYKjCwRViDQiLIFCGVLiiwqLGbUqippHQ-79YuV0SpZF6DZE93_07paLv0fmSxnBSFJ4N0gEPzv3sROrlxUpmmgNb6_qbuigvIKPQRlpSirQiT0zX_o_UYM1BJSr661PpWoNqJyQktOCcXFpsXxPVR6tFk5lS6cdSm-l_B-LyExnbnqltDHKGcX5w9nz37ss2932NpA09XRN_3mJsZ9kG5BFXyMwdi788BIbubl1g25mRc5zEtKe7V7lndJtwNC_gHiag4x</recordid><startdate>20170104</startdate><enddate>20170104</enddate><creator>Wang, Shuang</creator><creator>Xu, Yiran</creator><creator>Shen, Zhengyan</creator><creator>Wang, Lijun</creator><creator>Qiao, Feng</creator><creator>Zhang, Xu</creator><creator>Li, Minghua</creator><creator>Wu, Ligeng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170104</creationdate><title>The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography</title><author>Wang, Shuang ; Xu, Yiran ; Shen, Zhengyan ; Wang, Lijun ; Qiao, Feng ; Zhang, Xu ; Li, Minghua ; Wu, Ligeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b4f21a6364def98898a1b5965dff36403561a1c6e9ffa4a5c9da1d4d4276dad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Cracks</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hot water</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liquid nitrogen</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Zhengyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ligeng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Shuang</au><au>Xu, Yiran</au><au>Shen, Zhengyan</au><au>Wang, Lijun</au><au>Qiao, Feng</au><au>Zhang, Xu</au><au>Li, Minghua</au><au>Wu, Ligeng</au><au>Roeder, Ryan K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-01-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0169150</spage><epage>e0169150</epage><pages>e0169150-e0169150</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the crack of a cracked tooth on an artificial simulation model with Periapical Radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vitro, providing the basis for early diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan.
Forty-four teeth with different extents of artificial cracks, created by exposure to liquid nitrogen after hot water at 100°C, were collected. They were subjected to PR and CBCT. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) examination, regarded as a relatively more accurate measurement than others, was used to measure and record the crack depth. Three observers, an endodontic graduate student, an experienced endodontist, and an experienced radiologist, examined the PR and CBCT results independently, and the presence or absence of cracks with PR and CBCT were respectively recorded. The external consistency ICC with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to analyze the consistency among the graduate student, endodontist, and radiologist; ROC curves were used for the analysis of diagnostic performance of both radiographic modalities for tooth cracks with crack depth.
For the interpretation of the PR results, there were statistically significant differences among the three different observers (P < 0.001), and the interpretation of the CBCT results (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the graduate student, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 77.27% and 22.73%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the endodontist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 81.81% and 8.19%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the group of results read by the radiologist, the sensitivity of diagnosis with CBCT and PR was 88.64% and 11.36%, respectively (P < 0.001). As for CBCT diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 3.20 mm, 2.06 mm, and 1.24 mm, respectively. For the PR diagnosis, the critical value for the graduate, endodontist, and radiologist was 6.12 mm, 6.94 mm, and 6.94 mm, respectively.
Within the limitations of this study, on an artificial simulation model of cracked teeth for early diagnosis, we recommend that it would be better for a cracked tooth to be diagnosed by a radiologist with CBCT than PR, CBCT with a minimum depth of 1.24 mm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28052126</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0169150</doi><tpages>e0169150</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169150-e0169150 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1855313700 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Analysis Biology and Life Sciences CAT scans Computation Computed tomography Computer simulation Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods Confidence intervals Consistency Cracks Dental caries Dentin Dentistry Dentists Diagnosis Diagnostic systems Enamel Hospitals Hot water Humans Liquid nitrogen Medical diagnosis Medical prognosis Medicine and Health Sciences Observers Pathology People and Places Radiography Research and Analysis Methods Sensitivity Simulation Statistical analysis Studies Surgery Teeth Tooth - diagnostic imaging X-Ray Microtomography |
| title | The Extent of the Crack on Artificial Simulation Models with CBCT and Periapical Radiography |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Extent%20of%20the%20Crack%20on%20Artificial%20Simulation%20Models%20with%20CBCT%20and%20Periapical%20Radiography&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Shuang&rft.date=2017-01-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0169150&rft.epage=e0169150&rft.pages=e0169150-e0169150&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0169150&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476434129%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855313700&rft_id=info:pmid/28052126&rft_galeid=A476434129&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_810f38f80ad045ba8cf740f02f154fc9&rfr_iscdi=true |