Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis
To investigate the impact of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). One hundred and sixty-five patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were selected from a consecutive single-center observational cohort based on the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168958-e0168958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0168958 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0168958 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Park, Jun Won Kwon, Hyun Mi Park, Jin Kyun Choi, Ja-Young Lee, Eun Bong Song, Yeong Wook Lee, Eun Young |
description | To investigate the impact of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
One hundred and sixty-five patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were selected from a consecutive single-center observational cohort based on the availability of radiographs at baseline and after two- and/or four-years of follow up. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded readers using the modified Stokes AS Spinal Score (mSASSS). Radiographic progression in patients treated with standard-dose TNFi (standard-dose group, n = 49) was compared with patients whose dosage was tapered during the treatment (tapering group, n = 116) using linear mixed models.
Baseline characteristics between two groups were comparable except for higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 6.3, p = 0.003) in the standard-dose group. At two years after the treatment, mean dose quotient (S.D.) of the tapering group was 0.59 (0.17). During follow up, rate of radiographic progression in overall patients was 0.90 mSASSS units/year. Radiographic progression over time between the two groups was similar at the entire group level. However, in the subgroup of patients with baseline syndesmophytes, progression occurred significantly faster in the tapering group after the adjustment for baseline status (1.23 vs. 1.72 mSASSS units/year, p = 0.023). Results were consistent when radiographic progression was assessed by the number of newly developed syndesmophytes (0.52 vs. 0.73/year, p = 0.047). Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation of missing radiographs also showed similar results.
A dose tapering strategy of TNFi is associated with more rapid radiographic progression in AS patients who have syndesmophytes at baseline. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0168958 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1854113799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A475402496</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f939df83ffd64167b37b1dde71252e4d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A475402496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2d45daea3ce83acf4bbbe776feab2881015f7479ecd5edb5ad2a97cae28626423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvJM4NUjUYVJoY2gq3lmOftC5JHOwE0X-Ps2ZTg3Yx5SLHx895c3I-ouglRgtMM_xhZ3vXyGrR2gYWCKc8T_ij6BTnlMxTgujjI_skeub9DqGE8jR9Gp0QjihlBJ1G7apupepiW8afrId4LVtwptkMjnVfWxd_A-WsNz4-D1w4r5qtKcxg2Sa-ktrYjZPt1qj4uwsmeG_ChWniZfNrX4XIIHYdktT7ynTGP4-elLLy8GJ8z6If55_XZ1_nF5dfVmfLi7nKSNLNiWaJliCpAk6lKllRFJBlaQmyIJxjhJMyY1kOSiegi0RqIvNMSSA8JSkjdBa9Pui2IQcxFssLzBOGQ_3yPBCrA6Gt3InWmVq6vbDSiBuHdRshXWdUBaLMaa5LTstSpwynWUGzAmsNGSYJAaaD1sfxa31Rg1bQdE5WE9HpTWO2YmP_iATnOUI8CLwbBZz93YPvRG28gqqSDdj-Ju-c8QSR7CEoSzHnoe-z6M1_6P2FGKmNDP9qmtKGFNUgKpYsSxgiLE8DtbiHCo-G2qgwhKUJ_knA-0lAYDr4221k771YXV89nL38OWXfHrFbkFW39bbquzB3fgqyAzgMsHdQ3vUDIzHs0G01xLBDYtyhEPbquJd3QbdLQ_8B2N8YVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854113799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Park, Jun Won ; Kwon, Hyun Mi ; Park, Jin Kyun ; Choi, Ja-Young ; Lee, Eun Bong ; Song, Yeong Wook ; Lee, Eun Young</creator><contributor>Rosenbaum, James T.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun Won ; Kwon, Hyun Mi ; Park, Jin Kyun ; Choi, Ja-Young ; Lee, Eun Bong ; Song, Yeong Wook ; Lee, Eun Young ; Rosenbaum, James T.</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the impact of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
One hundred and sixty-five patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were selected from a consecutive single-center observational cohort based on the availability of radiographs at baseline and after two- and/or four-years of follow up. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded readers using the modified Stokes AS Spinal Score (mSASSS). Radiographic progression in patients treated with standard-dose TNFi (standard-dose group, n = 49) was compared with patients whose dosage was tapered during the treatment (tapering group, n = 116) using linear mixed models.
Baseline characteristics between two groups were comparable except for higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 6.3, p = 0.003) in the standard-dose group. At two years after the treatment, mean dose quotient (S.D.) of the tapering group was 0.59 (0.17). During follow up, rate of radiographic progression in overall patients was 0.90 mSASSS units/year. Radiographic progression over time between the two groups was similar at the entire group level. However, in the subgroup of patients with baseline syndesmophytes, progression occurred significantly faster in the tapering group after the adjustment for baseline status (1.23 vs. 1.72 mSASSS units/year, p = 0.023). Results were consistent when radiographic progression was assessed by the number of newly developed syndesmophytes (0.52 vs. 0.73/year, p = 0.047). Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation of missing radiographs also showed similar results.
A dose tapering strategy of TNFi is associated with more rapid radiographic progression in AS patients who have syndesmophytes at baseline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168958</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28033420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adalimumab - pharmacology ; Adalimumab - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Analysis ; Ankylosing spondylitis ; Arthritis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cohort Studies ; Development and progression ; Disease Progression ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug dosages ; Etanercept ; Etanercept - pharmacology ; Etanercept - therapeutic use ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genetic aspects ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Inhibitors ; Internal medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine and health sciences ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Necrosis ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Patients ; Physiological aspects ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Review boards ; Rheumatic diseases ; Rheumatism ; Rheumatology ; Sensitivity analysis ; Spondylitis ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - diagnostic imaging ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy ; Studies ; Tapering ; Time Factors ; TNF inhibitors ; Tumor necrosis factor ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - antagonists & inhibitors ; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168958-e0168958</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Park et al 2016 Park et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2d45daea3ce83acf4bbbe776feab2881015f7479ecd5edb5ad2a97cae28626423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2d45daea3ce83acf4bbbe776feab2881015f7479ecd5edb5ad2a97cae28626423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6975-8627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199008/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199008/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2101,2927,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79471,79472</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28033420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rosenbaum, James T.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Hyun Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ja-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Bong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yeong Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To investigate the impact of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
One hundred and sixty-five patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were selected from a consecutive single-center observational cohort based on the availability of radiographs at baseline and after two- and/or four-years of follow up. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded readers using the modified Stokes AS Spinal Score (mSASSS). Radiographic progression in patients treated with standard-dose TNFi (standard-dose group, n = 49) was compared with patients whose dosage was tapered during the treatment (tapering group, n = 116) using linear mixed models.
Baseline characteristics between two groups were comparable except for higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 6.3, p = 0.003) in the standard-dose group. At two years after the treatment, mean dose quotient (S.D.) of the tapering group was 0.59 (0.17). During follow up, rate of radiographic progression in overall patients was 0.90 mSASSS units/year. Radiographic progression over time between the two groups was similar at the entire group level. However, in the subgroup of patients with baseline syndesmophytes, progression occurred significantly faster in the tapering group after the adjustment for baseline status (1.23 vs. 1.72 mSASSS units/year, p = 0.023). Results were consistent when radiographic progression was assessed by the number of newly developed syndesmophytes (0.52 vs. 0.73/year, p = 0.047). Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation of missing radiographs also showed similar results.
A dose tapering strategy of TNFi is associated with more rapid radiographic progression in AS patients who have syndesmophytes at baseline.</description><subject>Adalimumab - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adalimumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Ankylosing spondylitis</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Etanercept</subject><subject>Etanercept - pharmacology</subject><subject>Etanercept - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and health sciences</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Rheumatic diseases</subject><subject>Rheumatism</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Spondylitis</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tapering</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>TNF inhibitors</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor</subject><subject>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvJM4NUjUYVJoY2gq3lmOftC5JHOwE0X-Ps2ZTg3Yx5SLHx895c3I-ouglRgtMM_xhZ3vXyGrR2gYWCKc8T_ij6BTnlMxTgujjI_skeub9DqGE8jR9Gp0QjihlBJ1G7apupepiW8afrId4LVtwptkMjnVfWxd_A-WsNz4-D1w4r5qtKcxg2Sa-ktrYjZPt1qj4uwsmeG_ChWniZfNrX4XIIHYdktT7ynTGP4-elLLy8GJ8z6If55_XZ1_nF5dfVmfLi7nKSNLNiWaJliCpAk6lKllRFJBlaQmyIJxjhJMyY1kOSiegi0RqIvNMSSA8JSkjdBa9Pui2IQcxFssLzBOGQ_3yPBCrA6Gt3InWmVq6vbDSiBuHdRshXWdUBaLMaa5LTstSpwynWUGzAmsNGSYJAaaD1sfxa31Rg1bQdE5WE9HpTWO2YmP_iATnOUI8CLwbBZz93YPvRG28gqqSDdj-Ju-c8QSR7CEoSzHnoe-z6M1_6P2FGKmNDP9qmtKGFNUgKpYsSxgiLE8DtbiHCo-G2qgwhKUJ_knA-0lAYDr4221k771YXV89nL38OWXfHrFbkFW39bbquzB3fgqyAzgMsHdQ3vUDIzHs0G01xLBDYtyhEPbquJd3QbdLQ_8B2N8YVg</recordid><startdate>20161229</startdate><enddate>20161229</enddate><creator>Park, Jun Won</creator><creator>Kwon, Hyun Mi</creator><creator>Park, Jin Kyun</creator><creator>Choi, Ja-Young</creator><creator>Lee, Eun Bong</creator><creator>Song, Yeong Wook</creator><creator>Lee, Eun Young</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161229</creationdate><title>Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis</title><author>Park, Jun Won ; Kwon, Hyun Mi ; Park, Jin Kyun ; Choi, Ja-Young ; Lee, Eun Bong ; Song, Yeong Wook ; Lee, Eun Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2d45daea3ce83acf4bbbe776feab2881015f7479ecd5edb5ad2a97cae28626423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adalimumab - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adalimumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Ankylosing spondylitis</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Etanercept</topic><topic>Etanercept - pharmacology</topic><topic>Etanercept - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and health sciences</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Rheumatic diseases</topic><topic>Rheumatism</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Spondylitis</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tapering</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>TNF inhibitors</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor</topic><topic>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Jun Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Hyun Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ja-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Bong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yeong Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Jun Won</au><au>Kwon, Hyun Mi</au><au>Park, Jin Kyun</au><au>Choi, Ja-Young</au><au>Lee, Eun Bong</au><au>Song, Yeong Wook</au><au>Lee, Eun Young</au><au>Rosenbaum, James T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-29</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0168958</spage><epage>e0168958</epage><pages>e0168958-e0168958</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To investigate the impact of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
One hundred and sixty-five patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were selected from a consecutive single-center observational cohort based on the availability of radiographs at baseline and after two- and/or four-years of follow up. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded readers using the modified Stokes AS Spinal Score (mSASSS). Radiographic progression in patients treated with standard-dose TNFi (standard-dose group, n = 49) was compared with patients whose dosage was tapered during the treatment (tapering group, n = 116) using linear mixed models.
Baseline characteristics between two groups were comparable except for higher BASDAI (7.1 vs. 6.3, p = 0.003) in the standard-dose group. At two years after the treatment, mean dose quotient (S.D.) of the tapering group was 0.59 (0.17). During follow up, rate of radiographic progression in overall patients was 0.90 mSASSS units/year. Radiographic progression over time between the two groups was similar at the entire group level. However, in the subgroup of patients with baseline syndesmophytes, progression occurred significantly faster in the tapering group after the adjustment for baseline status (1.23 vs. 1.72 mSASSS units/year, p = 0.023). Results were consistent when radiographic progression was assessed by the number of newly developed syndesmophytes (0.52 vs. 0.73/year, p = 0.047). Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation of missing radiographs also showed similar results.
A dose tapering strategy of TNFi is associated with more rapid radiographic progression in AS patients who have syndesmophytes at baseline.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28033420</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0168958</doi><tpages>e0168958</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8627</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168958-e0168958 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1854113799 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adalimumab - pharmacology Adalimumab - therapeutic use Adult Analysis Ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Cohort Studies Development and progression Disease Progression Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug dosages Etanercept Etanercept - pharmacology Etanercept - therapeutic use Female Follow-Up Studies Genetic aspects Humans Inflammation Inhibitors Internal medicine Male Medicine Medicine and health sciences Monoclonal antibodies Necrosis NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Patients Physiological aspects Radiographs Radiography Research and Analysis Methods Review boards Rheumatic diseases Rheumatism Rheumatology Sensitivity analysis Spondylitis Spondylitis, Ankylosing - diagnostic imaging Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy Studies Tapering Time Factors TNF inhibitors Tumor necrosis factor Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - antagonists & inhibitors Tumor necrosis factor-TNF |
title | Impact of Dose Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Dose%20Tapering%20of%20Tumor%20Necrosis%20Factor%20Inhibitor%20on%20Radiographic%20Progression%20in%20Ankylosing%20Spondylitis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Park,%20Jun%20Won&rft.date=2016-12-29&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0168958&rft.epage=e0168958&rft.pages=e0168958-e0168958&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0168958&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA475402496%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854113799&rft_id=info:pmid/28033420&rft_galeid=A475402496&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f939df83ffd64167b37b1dde71252e4d&rfr_iscdi=true |