Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar
The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem service...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168575-e0168575 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0168575 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0168575 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Neugarten, Rachel A Honzák, Miroslav Carret, Pierre Koenig, Kellee Andriamaro, Luciano Cano, Carlos Andres Grantham, Hedley S Hole, David Juhn, Daniel McKinnon, Madeleine Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa Steininger, Marc Wright, Timothy Max Turner, Will R |
description | The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0168575 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1851683350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A474759888</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e7d398c005f641c288e9dda165a29eb1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A474759888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b37f1fed87454a40f183c897e7372536cadc35aba8dbf090d5a8aa83e74c51813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1Fv0zAQxyMEYqPwDRBEQkLw0BLHcey8TOqqAZWGhjbgEetqX1pXSVzspKLfHmfNphbtYfKDz77fne3_-aLoNUkmhHLyaW0710A12dgGJwnJBePsSXRKCpqO8zShTw_sk-iF9-skYVTk-fPoJBVJkoflafT7GjZGx1Pv0fsamza2ZXyhrN_5Fuv4Bt3WKIxndnyODZam9T1wbqw2W3TetLv4uzPW9cbUIfjYNPE30LAEr8C9jJ6VUHl8Ncyj6Ofnix-zr-PLqy_z2fRyrHjK2vGC8pKUqAXPWAZZUhJBlSg4chr8NFegFWWwAKEXZVIkmoEAEBR5phgRhI6it_u8m8p6OUjjJREsCEMpSwIx3xPawlpunKnB7aQFI283rFtKcK1RFUrkmhZCBX3KPCMqFQILrYHkDNICF_1pZ8Np3aJGrYJsDqqjpMeexqzk0m4lI7wgoSqj6MOQwNk_HfpW1sYrrCpo0Ha39y4yUaSMPAZNOS8y0j_x3X_ow0IM1BLCW01T2nBF1SeV04xnnBVCiEBNHqDC0FgbZfuvEPaPAj4eBQSmxb_tEjrv5fzm-vHs1a9j9v0Bu0Ko2pW3Vdca2_hjMNuDylnvHZb39SCJ7DvmTg3Zd4wcOiaEvTms5X3QXYvQfz5eEC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1851683350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Neugarten, Rachel A ; Honzák, Miroslav ; Carret, Pierre ; Koenig, Kellee ; Andriamaro, Luciano ; Cano, Carlos Andres ; Grantham, Hedley S ; Hole, David ; Juhn, Daniel ; McKinnon, Madeleine ; Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa ; Steininger, Marc ; Wright, Timothy Max ; Turner, Will R</creator><creatorcontrib>Neugarten, Rachel A ; Honzák, Miroslav ; Carret, Pierre ; Koenig, Kellee ; Andriamaro, Luciano ; Cano, Carlos Andres ; Grantham, Hedley S ; Hole, David ; Juhn, Daniel ; McKinnon, Madeleine ; Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa ; Steininger, Marc ; Wright, Timothy Max ; Turner, Will R</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28006005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Assessments ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Coastal flooding ; Coastal protection ; Coastal zone management ; Conservation ; Conservation of natural resources ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Consultation ; Data processing ; Decision Making ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Emergency preparedness ; Environmental impact analysis ; Environmental protection ; Environmental risk ; Fisheries ; Flood management ; Flood risk ; Forest products ; Forests ; Humans ; Hunting ; Hydroelectric power ; International ; Internet ; Investment strategy ; Investments ; Madagascar ; Mitigation ; Non-timber forest resources ; People and Places ; Provisioning ; Risk reduction ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial data ; Tourism ; Well being</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168575-e0168575</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Neugarten et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Neugarten et al 2016 Neugarten et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b37f1fed87454a40f183c897e7372536cadc35aba8dbf090d5a8aa83e74c51813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b37f1fed87454a40f183c897e7372536cadc35aba8dbf090d5a8aa83e74c51813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0647-0516</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179119/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179119/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28006005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neugarten, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honzák, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carret, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Kellee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamaro, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano, Carlos Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Hedley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steininger, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Timothy Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Will R</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Coastal flooding</subject><subject>Coastal protection</subject><subject>Coastal zone management</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of natural resources</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Environmental impact analysis</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Investment strategy</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Madagascar</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Non-timber forest resources</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1Fv0zAQxyMEYqPwDRBEQkLw0BLHcey8TOqqAZWGhjbgEetqX1pXSVzspKLfHmfNphbtYfKDz77fne3_-aLoNUkmhHLyaW0710A12dgGJwnJBePsSXRKCpqO8zShTw_sk-iF9-skYVTk-fPoJBVJkoflafT7GjZGx1Pv0fsamza2ZXyhrN_5Fuv4Bt3WKIxndnyODZam9T1wbqw2W3TetLv4uzPW9cbUIfjYNPE30LAEr8C9jJ6VUHl8Ncyj6Ofnix-zr-PLqy_z2fRyrHjK2vGC8pKUqAXPWAZZUhJBlSg4chr8NFegFWWwAKEXZVIkmoEAEBR5phgRhI6it_u8m8p6OUjjJREsCEMpSwIx3xPawlpunKnB7aQFI283rFtKcK1RFUrkmhZCBX3KPCMqFQILrYHkDNICF_1pZ8Np3aJGrYJsDqqjpMeexqzk0m4lI7wgoSqj6MOQwNk_HfpW1sYrrCpo0Ha39y4yUaSMPAZNOS8y0j_x3X_ow0IM1BLCW01T2nBF1SeV04xnnBVCiEBNHqDC0FgbZfuvEPaPAj4eBQSmxb_tEjrv5fzm-vHs1a9j9v0Bu0Ko2pW3Vdca2_hjMNuDylnvHZb39SCJ7DvmTg3Zd4wcOiaEvTms5X3QXYvQfz5eEC0</recordid><startdate>20161222</startdate><enddate>20161222</enddate><creator>Neugarten, Rachel A</creator><creator>Honzák, Miroslav</creator><creator>Carret, Pierre</creator><creator>Koenig, Kellee</creator><creator>Andriamaro, Luciano</creator><creator>Cano, Carlos Andres</creator><creator>Grantham, Hedley S</creator><creator>Hole, David</creator><creator>Juhn, Daniel</creator><creator>McKinnon, Madeleine</creator><creator>Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa</creator><creator>Steininger, Marc</creator><creator>Wright, Timothy Max</creator><creator>Turner, Will R</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-0516</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161222</creationdate><title>Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar</title><author>Neugarten, Rachel A ; Honzák, Miroslav ; Carret, Pierre ; Koenig, Kellee ; Andriamaro, Luciano ; Cano, Carlos Andres ; Grantham, Hedley S ; Hole, David ; Juhn, Daniel ; McKinnon, Madeleine ; Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa ; Steininger, Marc ; Wright, Timothy Max ; Turner, Will R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-b37f1fed87454a40f183c897e7372536cadc35aba8dbf090d5a8aa83e74c51813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Coastal flooding</topic><topic>Coastal protection</topic><topic>Coastal zone management</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of natural resources</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Environmental impact analysis</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Investment strategy</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Madagascar</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Non-timber forest resources</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neugarten, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honzák, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carret, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Kellee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andriamaro, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano, Carlos Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Hedley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steininger, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Timothy Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Will R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neugarten, Rachel A</au><au>Honzák, Miroslav</au><au>Carret, Pierre</au><au>Koenig, Kellee</au><au>Andriamaro, Luciano</au><au>Cano, Carlos Andres</au><au>Grantham, Hedley S</au><au>Hole, David</au><au>Juhn, Daniel</au><au>McKinnon, Madeleine</au><au>Rasolohery, Andriambolantsoa</au><au>Steininger, Marc</au><au>Wright, Timothy Max</au><au>Turner, Will R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0168575</spage><epage>e0168575</epage><pages>e0168575-e0168575</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28006005</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0168575</doi><tpages>e0168575</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-0516</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168575-e0168575 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1851683350 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Agriculture Assessments Biodiversity Biological diversity Biology and Life Sciences Climate change Climate change mitigation Coastal flooding Coastal protection Coastal zone management Conservation Conservation of natural resources Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Consultation Data processing Decision Making Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Ecosystem assessment Ecosystem services Ecosystems Emergency preparedness Environmental impact analysis Environmental protection Environmental risk Fisheries Flood management Flood risk Forest products Forests Humans Hunting Hydroelectric power International Internet Investment strategy Investments Madagascar Mitigation Non-timber forest resources People and Places Provisioning Risk reduction Spatial analysis Spatial data Tourism Well being |
title | Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A38%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Assessment%20of%20Ecosystem%20Service%20Co-Benefits%20of%20Biodiversity%20Priority%20Areas%20in%20Madagascar&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Neugarten,%20Rachel%20A&rft.date=2016-12-22&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0168575&rft.epage=e0168575&rft.pages=e0168575-e0168575&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0168575&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA474759888%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1851683350&rft_id=info:pmid/28006005&rft_galeid=A474759888&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e7d398c005f641c288e9dda165a29eb1&rfr_iscdi=true |