Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task
Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167119-e0167119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0167119 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0167119 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ghinescu, Rodica Schachtman, Todd R Ramsey, Ashley K Gratton, Gabriele Fabiani, Monica |
description | Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0167119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1848103590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A473671666</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_61ca4f40deaa404389a7571720630b9a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A473671666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-5f0502dc5c88f55e1e967ea25720f007acea5ae593411eaace362d2395b6aed33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2LEzEYhQdR3HX1H4gOCOJNa74zuVkow64uFARZr8PbTKZNO01qMiP4781sZ5dWvDA3-Xpy8ubkFMVbjOaYSvx5G4booZsfgrdzhIXEWD0rLrGiZCYIos9PxhfFq5S2CHFaCfGyuCBSMaykvCy-18G3nTN9uWjg0EPvgi_BN2U92LIO-4Pt3cNaM0Tn1-XSQvTjwI1YeRPdLllf3nbgdzaW95B2r4sXLXTJvpn6q-LH7c19_XW2_Pblrl4sZ0bgqp_xFnFEGsNNVbWcW2yVkBYIlwS1CEkwFjhYrijD2EKeUkEaQhVfCbANpVfF-6PuoQtJT3YkjStWYUS5Qpm4OxJNgK0-RLeH-FsHcPphIcS1htg701ktsAHWMtTkmxhitFIgucS5FkHRSkHWup5uG1Z72xjr-wjdmej5jncbvQ6_NMecVJhngU-TQAw_B5t6vXfJ2C47Z8Mw1s0Vk4xz8T8oEblVJKMf_kL_bcRErSG_1fk25BLNKKoXTNKcnayWqY8n1MZC129S6Ibx_9M5yI6giSGlaNsnGzDSYzgfi9BjOPUUznzs3amFT4ce00j_AGL433U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1848103590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Ghinescu, Rodica ; Schachtman, Todd R ; Ramsey, Ashley K ; Gratton, Gabriele ; Fabiani, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghinescu, Rodica ; Schachtman, Todd R ; Ramsey, Ashley K ; Gratton, Gabriele ; Fabiani, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27941977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adult ; Associative learning ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Compatibility ; Competition ; Competition (Psychology) ; Conflict, Psychological ; Cues ; Emotional Adjustment ; Experimental psychology ; Explicit knowledge ; Female ; Humans ; Information processing ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Learning ; Male ; Memory ; Physical Stimulation ; Physiological psychology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Retrieval cues (Memory) ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Testing ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167119-e0167119</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Ghinescu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Ghinescu et al 2016 Ghinescu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-5f0502dc5c88f55e1e967ea25720f007acea5ae593411eaace362d2395b6aed33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-5f0502dc5c88f55e1e967ea25720f007acea5ae593411eaace362d2395b6aed33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2312-0323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152815/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152815/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghinescu, Rodica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachtman, Todd R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Ashley K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gratton, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Associative learning</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Compatibility</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Conflict, Psychological</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Emotional Adjustment</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Explicit knowledge</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Physical Stimulation</subject><subject>Physiological psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Retrieval cues (Memory)</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2LEzEYhQdR3HX1H4gOCOJNa74zuVkow64uFARZr8PbTKZNO01qMiP4781sZ5dWvDA3-Xpy8ubkFMVbjOaYSvx5G4booZsfgrdzhIXEWD0rLrGiZCYIos9PxhfFq5S2CHFaCfGyuCBSMaykvCy-18G3nTN9uWjg0EPvgi_BN2U92LIO-4Pt3cNaM0Tn1-XSQvTjwI1YeRPdLllf3nbgdzaW95B2r4sXLXTJvpn6q-LH7c19_XW2_Pblrl4sZ0bgqp_xFnFEGsNNVbWcW2yVkBYIlwS1CEkwFjhYrijD2EKeUkEaQhVfCbANpVfF-6PuoQtJT3YkjStWYUS5Qpm4OxJNgK0-RLeH-FsHcPphIcS1htg701ktsAHWMtTkmxhitFIgucS5FkHRSkHWup5uG1Z72xjr-wjdmej5jncbvQ6_NMecVJhngU-TQAw_B5t6vXfJ2C47Z8Mw1s0Vk4xz8T8oEblVJKMf_kL_bcRErSG_1fk25BLNKKoXTNKcnayWqY8n1MZC129S6Ibx_9M5yI6giSGlaNsnGzDSYzgfi9BjOPUUznzs3amFT4ce00j_AGL433U</recordid><startdate>20161212</startdate><enddate>20161212</enddate><creator>Ghinescu, Rodica</creator><creator>Schachtman, Todd R</creator><creator>Ramsey, Ashley K</creator><creator>Gratton, Gabriele</creator><creator>Fabiani, Monica</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-0323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161212</creationdate><title>Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task</title><author>Ghinescu, Rodica ; Schachtman, Todd R ; Ramsey, Ashley K ; Gratton, Gabriele ; Fabiani, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-5f0502dc5c88f55e1e967ea25720f007acea5ae593411eaace362d2395b6aed33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Associative learning</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Compatibility</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Conflict, Psychological</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Emotional Adjustment</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Explicit knowledge</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Physical Stimulation</topic><topic>Physiological psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Retrieval cues (Memory)</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghinescu, Rodica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachtman, Todd R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Ashley K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gratton, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghinescu, Rodica</au><au>Schachtman, Todd R</au><au>Ramsey, Ashley K</au><au>Gratton, Gabriele</au><au>Fabiani, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0167119</spage><epage>e0167119</epage><pages>e0167119-e0167119</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Two experiments investigated competition between cues that predicted the correct target response to a target stimulus in a response conflict procedure using a flanker task. Subjects received trials with five-character arrays with a central target character and distractor flanker characters that matched (compatible) or did not match (incompatible) the central target. Subjects' expectancies for compatible and incompatible trials were manipulated by presenting pre-trial cues that signaled the occurrence of compatible or incompatible trials. On some trials, a single cue predicted the target stimulus and the required target response. On other trials, a second redundant, predictive cue was also present on such trials. The results showed an effect of competition between cues for control over strategic responding to the target stimuli, a finding that is predicted by associative learning theories. The finding of competition between pre-trial cues that predict incompatible trials, but not cues that predict compatible trials, suggests that different strategic processes may occur during adaptation to conflict when different kinds of trials are expected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27941977</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0167119</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-0323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167119-e0167119 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1848103590 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adaptation Adult Associative learning Biology and Life Sciences Cognition & reasoning Compatibility Competition Competition (Psychology) Conflict, Psychological Cues Emotional Adjustment Experimental psychology Explicit knowledge Female Humans Information processing Inhibition (Psychology) Learning Male Memory Physical Stimulation Physiological psychology Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Reproducibility of Results Research and Analysis Methods Retrieval cues (Memory) Social Sciences Studies Testing Young Adult |
title | Conflict Adaptation and Cue Competition during Learning in an Eriksen Flanker Task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conflict%20Adaptation%20and%20Cue%20Competition%20during%20Learning%20in%20an%20Eriksen%20Flanker%20Task&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ghinescu,%20Rodica&rft.date=2016-12-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0167119&rft.epage=e0167119&rft.pages=e0167119-e0167119&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167119&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA473671666%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1848103590&rft_id=info:pmid/27941977&rft_galeid=A473671666&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_61ca4f40deaa404389a7571720630b9a&rfr_iscdi=true |