Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa
South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0165614 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0165614 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Gilbert, Jennifer A Shenoi, Sheela V Moll, Anthony P Friedland, Gerald H Paltiel, A David Galvani, Alison P |
description | South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0165614 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1845247428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472311033</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cb94e971643f4439aa87dfcd94216e53</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A472311033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPTi1rB-2XwZp6NZAoNB0fdVk-ZQoc6TUksv6309e3BKPPhSBJE6f-0p3p4ui9yidIJyj043tWiOayc4amKSIUYbIi-gYlThLWJbilwf7o-iNc5s0pbhg7HV0lOVlysqCHUe_Ztb55FwpkF7fgQHnYqvimd1uO6P9fXImHNTx9dnpxfwmXsoWwGizioWp44U2v8UKYm_jmWgh1ia-6lrRxEvb-XU8Va2W4m30SonGwbthPYl-fj-_nl0ki8sf89l0kcg8oz7JWIHzDDMEYaK0TGkFrKyIJBiyCtNC4apElBWACMIqpVBViCpCQShUpQqfRB_3urvGOj4kx3FUEJqRnGRFIOZ7orZiw3et3or2nluh-T-DbVdctF7LBrisSgJljhjBihBcClHktZJ1STLEgOKg9W24rau2UEswPgQ-Eh2fGL3mK3vHKcKoLEkQ-DIItPa2A-f5VjsJTSMM2K5_d0gICiV9DkpokWWE9ein_9CnEzFQKxFi1UbZ8ETZi_IpCUVAKMV9iJMnqDBq2GoZPp3SwT5y-DpyCIyHP34lOuf4fHn1fPbyZsx-PmDXIBq_drbpvLbGjUGyB2VrnWtBPdYDpbzvmYds8L5n-NAzwe3DYS0fnR6aBP8FSUkNvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845247428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P</creator><contributor>Landay, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P ; Landay, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27906986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adult ; AIDS ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics ; Disease transmission ; Drug resistance ; Dynamic models ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health care ; Health care costs ; Health screening ; HIV ; HIV infections ; HIV Infections - economics ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - transmission ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Lentivirus ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Parameter identification ; Parameter sensitivity ; Parameter uncertainty ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patients ; Retroviridae ; Risk factors ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Screening ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social Sciences ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Systematic review ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - economics ; Tuberculosis - epidemiology ; Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Gilbert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Gilbert et al 2016 Gilbert et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131994/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131994/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27906986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Landay, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoi, Sheela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedland, Gerald H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paltiel, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvani, Alison P</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV infections</subject><subject>HIV Infections - economics</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lentivirus</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retroviridae</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPTi1rB-2XwZp6NZAoNB0fdVk-ZQoc6TUksv6309e3BKPPhSBJE6f-0p3p4ui9yidIJyj043tWiOayc4amKSIUYbIi-gYlThLWJbilwf7o-iNc5s0pbhg7HV0lOVlysqCHUe_Ztb55FwpkF7fgQHnYqvimd1uO6P9fXImHNTx9dnpxfwmXsoWwGizioWp44U2v8UKYm_jmWgh1ia-6lrRxEvb-XU8Va2W4m30SonGwbthPYl-fj-_nl0ki8sf89l0kcg8oz7JWIHzDDMEYaK0TGkFrKyIJBiyCtNC4apElBWACMIqpVBViCpCQShUpQqfRB_3urvGOj4kx3FUEJqRnGRFIOZ7orZiw3et3or2nluh-T-DbVdctF7LBrisSgJljhjBihBcClHktZJ1STLEgOKg9W24rau2UEswPgQ-Eh2fGL3mK3vHKcKoLEkQ-DIItPa2A-f5VjsJTSMM2K5_d0gICiV9DkpokWWE9ein_9CnEzFQKxFi1UbZ8ETZi_IpCUVAKMV9iJMnqDBq2GoZPp3SwT5y-DpyCIyHP34lOuf4fHn1fPbyZsx-PmDXIBq_drbpvLbGjUGyB2VrnWtBPdYDpbzvmYds8L5n-NAzwe3DYS0fnR6aBP8FSUkNvQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Shenoi, Sheela V</creator><creator>Moll, Anthony P</creator><creator>Friedland, Gerald H</creator><creator>Paltiel, A David</creator><creator>Galvani, Alison P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><author>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV infections</topic><topic>HIV Infections - economics</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lentivirus</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retroviridae</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoi, Sheela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedland, Gerald H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paltiel, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvani, Alison P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Jennifer A</au><au>Shenoi, Sheela V</au><au>Moll, Anthony P</au><au>Friedland, Gerald H</au><au>Paltiel, A David</au><au>Galvani, Alison P</au><au>Landay, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0165614</spage><epage>e0165614</epage><pages>e0165614-e0165614</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27906986</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0165614</doi><tpages>e0165614</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1845247428 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Adult AIDS Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Cost analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics Disease transmission Drug resistance Dynamic models Epidemiology Female Health care Health care costs Health screening HIV HIV infections HIV Infections - economics HIV Infections - epidemiology HIV Infections - transmission Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Lentivirus Male Mass Screening Medical diagnosis Medicine and Health Sciences Parameter identification Parameter sensitivity Parameter uncertainty Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patients Retroviridae Risk factors Rural areas Rural Population Screening Sensitivity analysis Social Sciences South Africa - epidemiology Systematic review Tuberculosis Tuberculosis - economics Tuberculosis - epidemiology Tuberculosis - transmission |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20of%20Community-Based%20TB/HIV%20Screening%20and%20Linkage%20to%20Care%20in%20Rural%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Jennifer%20A&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0165614&rft.epage=e0165614&rft.pages=e0165614-e0165614&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0165614&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA472311033%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845247428&rft_id=info:pmid/27906986&rft_galeid=A472311033&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cb94e971643f4439aa87dfcd94216e53&rfr_iscdi=true |