Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa

South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614
Hauptverfasser: Gilbert, Jennifer A, Shenoi, Sheela V, Moll, Anthony P, Friedland, Gerald H, Paltiel, A David, Galvani, Alison P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0165614
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0165614
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Gilbert, Jennifer A
Shenoi, Sheela V
Moll, Anthony P
Friedland, Gerald H
Paltiel, A David
Galvani, Alison P
description South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0165614
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1845247428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A472311033</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cb94e971643f4439aa87dfcd94216e53</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A472311033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPTi1rB-2XwZp6NZAoNB0fdVk-ZQoc6TUksv6309e3BKPPhSBJE6f-0p3p4ui9yidIJyj043tWiOayc4amKSIUYbIi-gYlThLWJbilwf7o-iNc5s0pbhg7HV0lOVlysqCHUe_Ztb55FwpkF7fgQHnYqvimd1uO6P9fXImHNTx9dnpxfwmXsoWwGizioWp44U2v8UKYm_jmWgh1ia-6lrRxEvb-XU8Va2W4m30SonGwbthPYl-fj-_nl0ki8sf89l0kcg8oz7JWIHzDDMEYaK0TGkFrKyIJBiyCtNC4apElBWACMIqpVBViCpCQShUpQqfRB_3urvGOj4kx3FUEJqRnGRFIOZ7orZiw3et3or2nluh-T-DbVdctF7LBrisSgJljhjBihBcClHktZJ1STLEgOKg9W24rau2UEswPgQ-Eh2fGL3mK3vHKcKoLEkQ-DIItPa2A-f5VjsJTSMM2K5_d0gICiV9DkpokWWE9ein_9CnEzFQKxFi1UbZ8ETZi_IpCUVAKMV9iJMnqDBq2GoZPp3SwT5y-DpyCIyHP34lOuf4fHn1fPbyZsx-PmDXIBq_drbpvLbGjUGyB2VrnWtBPdYDpbzvmYds8L5n-NAzwe3DYS0fnR6aBP8FSUkNvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845247428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P</creator><contributor>Landay, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P ; Landay, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27906986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adult ; AIDS ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics ; Disease transmission ; Drug resistance ; Dynamic models ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health care ; Health care costs ; Health screening ; HIV ; HIV infections ; HIV Infections - economics ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - transmission ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Lentivirus ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Parameter identification ; Parameter sensitivity ; Parameter uncertainty ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patients ; Retroviridae ; Risk factors ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Screening ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social Sciences ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Systematic review ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - economics ; Tuberculosis - epidemiology ; Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Gilbert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Gilbert et al 2016 Gilbert et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131994/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131994/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27906986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Landay, Alan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoi, Sheela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedland, Gerald H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paltiel, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvani, Alison P</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV infections</subject><subject>HIV Infections - economics</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lentivirus</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retroviridae</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - transmission</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPTi1rB-2XwZp6NZAoNB0fdVk-ZQoc6TUksv6309e3BKPPhSBJE6f-0p3p4ui9yidIJyj043tWiOayc4amKSIUYbIi-gYlThLWJbilwf7o-iNc5s0pbhg7HV0lOVlysqCHUe_Ztb55FwpkF7fgQHnYqvimd1uO6P9fXImHNTx9dnpxfwmXsoWwGizioWp44U2v8UKYm_jmWgh1ia-6lrRxEvb-XU8Va2W4m30SonGwbthPYl-fj-_nl0ki8sf89l0kcg8oz7JWIHzDDMEYaK0TGkFrKyIJBiyCtNC4apElBWACMIqpVBViCpCQShUpQqfRB_3urvGOj4kx3FUEJqRnGRFIOZ7orZiw3et3or2nluh-T-DbVdctF7LBrisSgJljhjBihBcClHktZJ1STLEgOKg9W24rau2UEswPgQ-Eh2fGL3mK3vHKcKoLEkQ-DIItPa2A-f5VjsJTSMM2K5_d0gICiV9DkpokWWE9ein_9CnEzFQKxFi1UbZ8ETZi_IpCUVAKMV9iJMnqDBq2GoZPp3SwT5y-DpyCIyHP34lOuf4fHn1fPbyZsx-PmDXIBq_drbpvLbGjUGyB2VrnWtBPdYDpbzvmYds8L5n-NAzwe3DYS0fnR6aBP8FSUkNvQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Shenoi, Sheela V</creator><creator>Moll, Anthony P</creator><creator>Friedland, Gerald H</creator><creator>Paltiel, A David</creator><creator>Galvani, Alison P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</title><author>Gilbert, Jennifer A ; Shenoi, Sheela V ; Moll, Anthony P ; Friedland, Gerald H ; Paltiel, A David ; Galvani, Alison P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-268372361e23655905be69b4c43e2b358f3b91568e1413f05ebb15f45eaf1b0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV infections</topic><topic>HIV Infections - economics</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lentivirus</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retroviridae</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoi, Sheela V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedland, Gerald H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paltiel, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvani, Alison P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Jennifer A</au><au>Shenoi, Sheela V</au><au>Moll, Anthony P</au><au>Friedland, Gerald H</au><au>Paltiel, A David</au><au>Galvani, Alison P</au><au>Landay, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0165614</spage><epage>e0165614</epage><pages>e0165614-e0165614</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>South Africa has one of the highest burdens of TB worldwide, driven by the country's widespread prevalence of HIV, and further complicated by drug resistance. Active case finding within the community, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited, can significantly improve diagnosis and treatment coverage in high-incidence settings. We evaluated the potential health and economic consequences of implementing community-based TB/HIV screening and linkage to care. Using a dynamic model of TB and HIV transmission over a time horizon of 10 years, we compared status quo TB/HIV control to community-based TB/HIV screening at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months. We also considered the impact of extending IPT from 36 months for TST positive and 12 months for TST negative or unknown patients (36/12) to lifetime use for all HIV-infected patients. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness results. We identified four strategies that saved the most life years for a given outlay: status quo TB/HIV control with 36/12 months of IPT and TB/HIV screening strategies at frequencies of once every two years, one year, and six months with lifetime IPT. All of these strategies were very cost-effective at a threshold of $6,618 per life year saved (the per capita GDP of South Africa). Community-based TB/HIV screening with linkage to care is therefore very cost-effective in rural South Africa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27906986</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0165614</doi><tpages>e0165614</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0165614-e0165614
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1845247428
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Adult
AIDS
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Care and treatment
Cost analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics
Disease transmission
Drug resistance
Dynamic models
Epidemiology
Female
Health care
Health care costs
Health screening
HIV
HIV infections
HIV Infections - economics
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Infections - transmission
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Lentivirus
Male
Mass Screening
Medical diagnosis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Parameter identification
Parameter sensitivity
Parameter uncertainty
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patients
Retroviridae
Risk factors
Rural areas
Rural Population
Screening
Sensitivity analysis
Social Sciences
South Africa - epidemiology
Systematic review
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis - economics
Tuberculosis - epidemiology
Tuberculosis - transmission
title Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20of%20Community-Based%20TB/HIV%20Screening%20and%20Linkage%20to%20Care%20in%20Rural%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Jennifer%20A&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0165614&rft.epage=e0165614&rft.pages=e0165614-e0165614&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0165614&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA472311033%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845247428&rft_id=info:pmid/27906986&rft_galeid=A472311033&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cb94e971643f4439aa87dfcd94216e53&rfr_iscdi=true