Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England
Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0166950-e0166950 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0166950 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0166950 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ziv, Guy Mullin, Karen Boeuf, Blandine Fincham, William Taylor, Nigel Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna von Vittorelli, Laura Wolf, Christine Fritsch, Oliver Strauch, Michael Seppelt, Ralf Volk, Martin Beckmann, Michael |
description | Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0166950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1842507479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471898279</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_34c4b9aab3334bbbb7df02fd7c35c1c1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A471898279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-6e3a04211e71d9619288f4d6ec8184b1daa452b86aedc12ff84f95b97aa43b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLts_2BshsHYLpLpy_q4GZSSrYFCu-7rUsiylKg4VirJY_33UxK3xKMXtTEWR897dPRKpyheQzCDmMFP174PnWpnG9-ZGYCUigo8KY6hwGhKEcBPD8ZHxYsYrwGoMKf0eXGEGGdVRdFxMf-tkgnlt161Lt2Wi1iq8tL7UF4G0zid8sjb8sroYFRyPi9YnvkUN_krXVfOu2WruuZl8cyqNppXw39S_Pwy_3F6Nj2_-Lo4PTmfaoaqNKUGK0AQhIbBRlAoEOeWNNRoDjmpYaMUqVDNqTKNhshaTqyoasFyHNe0wpPi7T7vpvVRDg5EmcWoAowwkYnFnmi8upab4NYq3EqvnNwFfFhKFZLTrZGYaFILpWqMManzwxoLkG2YxpWGGuZcn4fV-nqdKzJdCqodJR3PdG4ll_6PrCAUPNs-KT4MCYK_6U1Mcu2iNm22zPh-W3eumnJExCNQggUCYGfCu__Qh40YqKXKe3Wd9blEvU0qTwiDPBe4o2YPUPltzNrpfLOsy_GR4ONIkJlk_qal6mOUi-9Xj2cvfo3Z9wfsyqg2raJv--2di2OQ7EEdfIzB2PvzgEBuG-PODbltDDk0Rpa9OTzLe9FdJ-B_yPkHAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1842507479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ziv, Guy ; Mullin, Karen ; Boeuf, Blandine ; Fincham, William ; Taylor, Nigel ; Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna ; von Vittorelli, Laura ; Wolf, Christine ; Fritsch, Oliver ; Strauch, Michael ; Seppelt, Ralf ; Volk, Martin ; Beckmann, Michael</creator><contributor>Chen, Yanguang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ziv, Guy ; Mullin, Karen ; Boeuf, Blandine ; Fincham, William ; Taylor, Nigel ; Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna ; von Vittorelli, Laura ; Wolf, Christine ; Fritsch, Oliver ; Strauch, Michael ; Seppelt, Ralf ; Volk, Martin ; Beckmann, Michael ; Chen, Yanguang</creatorcontrib><description>Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27875562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Age composition ; Analysis ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Boating ; Canals ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystem restoration ; Ecosystem services ; Engineering and Technology ; England ; Fishing ; Fishing (Recreation) ; Freshwater ; Geospatial data ; Humans ; Lake shores ; Landscape ecology ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Models, Biological ; Parks, Recreational ; People and places ; Perceptions ; Population density ; Protection and preservation ; Public access ; Recreation ; Restoration ; River basins ; Rivers ; Science education ; Swimming ; Tourism ; Ultrasonic testing ; Water management ; Water Quality ; Water resource management</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0166950-e0166950</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Ziv et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Ziv et al 2016 Ziv et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-6e3a04211e71d9619288f4d6ec8184b1daa452b86aedc12ff84f95b97aa43b653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-6e3a04211e71d9619288f4d6ec8184b1daa452b86aedc12ff84f95b97aa43b653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6776-0763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119820/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119820/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Yanguang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ziv, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeuf, Blandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincham, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Vittorelli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seppelt, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Age composition</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Boating</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing (Recreation)</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lake shores</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Public access</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Ultrasonic testing</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water resource management</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLts_2BshsHYLpLpy_q4GZSSrYFCu-7rUsiylKg4VirJY_33UxK3xKMXtTEWR897dPRKpyheQzCDmMFP174PnWpnG9-ZGYCUigo8KY6hwGhKEcBPD8ZHxYsYrwGoMKf0eXGEGGdVRdFxMf-tkgnlt161Lt2Wi1iq8tL7UF4G0zid8sjb8sroYFRyPi9YnvkUN_krXVfOu2WruuZl8cyqNppXw39S_Pwy_3F6Nj2_-Lo4PTmfaoaqNKUGK0AQhIbBRlAoEOeWNNRoDjmpYaMUqVDNqTKNhshaTqyoasFyHNe0wpPi7T7vpvVRDg5EmcWoAowwkYnFnmi8upab4NYq3EqvnNwFfFhKFZLTrZGYaFILpWqMManzwxoLkG2YxpWGGuZcn4fV-nqdKzJdCqodJR3PdG4ll_6PrCAUPNs-KT4MCYK_6U1Mcu2iNm22zPh-W3eumnJExCNQggUCYGfCu__Qh40YqKXKe3Wd9blEvU0qTwiDPBe4o2YPUPltzNrpfLOsy_GR4ONIkJlk_qal6mOUi-9Xj2cvfo3Z9wfsyqg2raJv--2di2OQ7EEdfIzB2PvzgEBuG-PODbltDDk0Rpa9OTzLe9FdJ-B_yPkHAA</recordid><startdate>20161122</startdate><enddate>20161122</enddate><creator>Ziv, Guy</creator><creator>Mullin, Karen</creator><creator>Boeuf, Blandine</creator><creator>Fincham, William</creator><creator>Taylor, Nigel</creator><creator>Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna</creator><creator>von Vittorelli, Laura</creator><creator>Wolf, Christine</creator><creator>Fritsch, Oliver</creator><creator>Strauch, Michael</creator><creator>Seppelt, Ralf</creator><creator>Volk, Martin</creator><creator>Beckmann, Michael</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-0763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161122</creationdate><title>Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England</title><author>Ziv, Guy ; Mullin, Karen ; Boeuf, Blandine ; Fincham, William ; Taylor, Nigel ; Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna ; von Vittorelli, Laura ; Wolf, Christine ; Fritsch, Oliver ; Strauch, Michael ; Seppelt, Ralf ; Volk, Martin ; Beckmann, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-6e3a04211e71d9619288f4d6ec8184b1daa452b86aedc12ff84f95b97aa43b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Age composition</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Boating</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing (Recreation)</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lake shores</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Public access</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Ultrasonic testing</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water resource management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziv, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeuf, Blandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincham, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Vittorelli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seppelt, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziv, Guy</au><au>Mullin, Karen</au><au>Boeuf, Blandine</au><au>Fincham, William</au><au>Taylor, Nigel</au><au>Villalobos-Jiménez, Giovanna</au><au>von Vittorelli, Laura</au><au>Wolf, Christine</au><au>Fritsch, Oliver</au><au>Strauch, Michael</au><au>Seppelt, Ralf</au><au>Volk, Martin</au><au>Beckmann, Michael</au><au>Chen, Yanguang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-11-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0166950</spage><epage>e0166950</epage><pages>e0166950-e0166950</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Maintaining and improving water quality is key to the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems, which provide important benefits to society. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) defines water quality based on a set of biological, hydro-morphological and chemical targets, and aims to reach good quality conditions in all river bodies by the year 2027. While recently it has been argued that achieving these goals will deliver and enhance ecosystem services, in particular recreational services, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating so. Here we test the hypothesis that good water quality is associated with increased utilization of recreational services, combining four surveys covering walking, boating, fishing and swimming visits, together with water quality data for all water bodies in eight River Basin Districts (RBDs) in England. We compared the percentage of visits in areas of good water quality to a set of null models accounting for population density, income, age distribution, travel distance, public access, and substitutability. We expect such association to be positive, at least for fishing (which relies on fish stocks) and swimming (with direct contact to water). We also test if these services have stronger association with water quality relative to boating and walking alongside rivers, canals or lakeshores. In only two of eight RBDs (Northumbria and Anglian) were both criteria met (positive association, strongest for fishing and swimming) when comparing to at least one of the null models. This conclusion is robust to variations in dataset size. Our study suggests that achieving the WFD water quality goals may not enhance recreational ecosystem services, and calls for further empirical research on the connection between water quality and ecosystem services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27875562</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0166950</doi><tpages>e0166950</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-0763</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0166950-e0166950 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1842507479 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Accounting Age composition Analysis Aquatic ecosystems Biology Biology and Life Sciences Boating Canals Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Ecosystem biology Ecosystem restoration Ecosystem services Engineering and Technology England Fishing Fishing (Recreation) Freshwater Geospatial data Humans Lake shores Landscape ecology Medicine and Health Sciences Models, Biological Parks, Recreational People and places Perceptions Population density Protection and preservation Public access Recreation Restoration River basins Rivers Science education Swimming Tourism Ultrasonic testing Water management Water Quality Water resource management |
title | Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20Quality%20Is%20a%20Poor%20Predictor%20of%20Recreational%20Hotspots%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ziv,%20Guy&rft.date=2016-11-22&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0166950&rft.epage=e0166950&rft.pages=e0166950-e0166950&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0166950&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA471898279%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1842507479&rft_id=info:pmid/27875562&rft_galeid=A471898279&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_34c4b9aab3334bbbb7df02fd7c35c1c1&rfr_iscdi=true |