Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does
Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0165544-e0165544 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0165544 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0165544 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Gulcu, Anil Akman, Alp Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas Kaleli, Ilknur Bir, Ferda |
description | Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related preventive technologies. Fosfomycin is an alternative antimicrobial agent that lacks the cross-resistance presented by other classes of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis of 10% fosfomycin-containing poly(D,L-lactide) (PDL) coated K-wires in a rat IRI model and compared it with uncoated (Control 1), PDL-coated (Control 2), and 10% gentamicin-containing PDL-coated groups with a single layer of coating. Stainless steel K-wires were implanted and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) suspensions (103 CFU/10 μl) were injected into a cavity in the left tibiae. Thereafter, K-wires were removed and cultured in tryptic soy broth and then 5% sheep blood agar mediums. Sliced sections were removed from the tibiae, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and semi-quantitatively evaluated with X-rays. The addition of fosfomycin into PDL did not affect the X-ray and histopathological evaluation scores; however, the addition of gentamicin lowered them. The addition of gentamicin showed a protective effect after the 28th day of X-ray evaluations. PDL-only coating provided no protection, while adding fosfomycin to PDL offered a 20% level protection and adding gentamicin offered 80%. Furthermore, there were 103 CFU level growths in the gentamicin-added group, while the other groups had 105. Thus, the addition of fosfomycin to PDL does not affect the efficacy of prophylaxis, but the addition of gentamicin does. We therefore do not advise the use of fosfomycin as a single antimicrobial agent in coating for IRI prophylaxis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0165544 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1835681230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471806417</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0b4be59608fa444d8253892e51745e28</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A471806417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5414-ac70e8e0d498d6f318720bd1c8a6043de2bb74a9634969ede6572bd3ae5490dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUl1v0zAUjRCIjcI_QGCJlyEtxd9JXpBK90GlAtM0ni3Hvmk9JXFJXER_Cv8Wh2bTivaA_GDr-pxzr49PkrwmeEpYRj7c-m3X6nq68S1MMZFCcP4kOSYFo6mkmD19cD5KXvT9LcaC5VI-T45olmOJM3Kc_L7wfeWbnXEtmlnrgvMtCh5d-Xp3cna6TJfaBGfhPZp7HVy7QmceevTVBzSrKjABXXV-s97V-pfr0XlVOaPNDkW1ax3QotnUug3pNdQ6gEWLdqAMLb54C_Up-rQN6GYdkb5Cl9AG3bhhkqHHy-RZpeseXo37JPl-cX4z_5wuv10u5rNlagQnPNUmw5ADtrzIrawYyTOKS0tMriXmzAIty4zrQjJeyAIsSJHR0jINghfYWjZJ3u51N7Xv1ehqr0jOhMwJZTgiFnuE9fpWbTrX6G6nvHbqb8F3K6W74EwNCpe8BFFInFeac25zGi0vKAiScQE0j1ofx27bsgFr4ps7XR-IHt60bq1W_qcSuCBF_MBJcjIKdP7HFvqgGtcbqKPP4LfD3FxynFHG_wPKhKCUEBKh7_6BPm7EiFrp-FbXVj6OaAZRNeMZiZniJIuo6SOouCzE341prVysHxD4nmA63_cdVPd2EKyGrN8No4asqzHrkfbmoZX3pLtwsz_b5PoP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835681230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gulcu, Anil ; Akman, Alp ; Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir ; Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas ; Kaleli, Ilknur ; Bir, Ferda</creator><contributor>Floto, Andres R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gulcu, Anil ; Akman, Alp ; Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir ; Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas ; Kaleli, Ilknur ; Bir, Ferda ; Floto, Andres R.</creatorcontrib><description>Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related preventive technologies. Fosfomycin is an alternative antimicrobial agent that lacks the cross-resistance presented by other classes of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis of 10% fosfomycin-containing poly(D,L-lactide) (PDL) coated K-wires in a rat IRI model and compared it with uncoated (Control 1), PDL-coated (Control 2), and 10% gentamicin-containing PDL-coated groups with a single layer of coating. Stainless steel K-wires were implanted and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) suspensions (103 CFU/10 μl) were injected into a cavity in the left tibiae. Thereafter, K-wires were removed and cultured in tryptic soy broth and then 5% sheep blood agar mediums. Sliced sections were removed from the tibiae, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and semi-quantitatively evaluated with X-rays. The addition of fosfomycin into PDL did not affect the X-ray and histopathological evaluation scores; however, the addition of gentamicin lowered them. The addition of gentamicin showed a protective effect after the 28th day of X-ray evaluations. PDL-only coating provided no protection, while adding fosfomycin to PDL offered a 20% level protection and adding gentamicin offered 80%. Furthermore, there were 103 CFU level growths in the gentamicin-added group, while the other groups had 105. Thus, the addition of fosfomycin to PDL does not affect the efficacy of prophylaxis, but the addition of gentamicin does. We therefore do not advise the use of fosfomycin as a single antimicrobial agent in coating for IRI prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165544</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27806071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Agar ; Aminoglycosides ; Animals ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Automation ; Biofilms ; Biology and life sciences ; Bone Wires - microbiology ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible - administration & dosage ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology ; Coating effects ; Coatings ; Comparative analysis ; Cross-resistance ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug resistance ; Effectiveness ; Engineering and Technology ; Fosfomycin ; Fosfomycin - administration & dosage ; Fosfomycin - pharmacology ; Gentamicin ; Gentamicins - administration & dosage ; Gentamicins - pharmacology ; Growth factors ; Health aspects ; Infection ; Infections ; Medicine ; Medicine and health sciences ; Methicillin ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development ; Microbial drug resistance ; Orthopedics ; Osteomyelitis - prevention & control ; Ovis aries ; Physical Sciences ; Polyesters - administration & dosage ; Prophylaxis ; Protective coatings ; Rats ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sheep ; Stainless steel ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus infections ; Studies ; Transplants & implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Wire]]></subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0165544-e0165544</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Gulcu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Gulcu et al 2016 Gulcu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5414-ac70e8e0d498d6f318720bd1c8a6043de2bb74a9634969ede6572bd3ae5490dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5414-ac70e8e0d498d6f318720bd1c8a6043de2bb74a9634969ede6572bd3ae5490dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091905/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091905/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27806071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Floto, Andres R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gulcu, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akman, Alp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaleli, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bir, Ferda</creatorcontrib><title>Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related preventive technologies. Fosfomycin is an alternative antimicrobial agent that lacks the cross-resistance presented by other classes of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis of 10% fosfomycin-containing poly(D,L-lactide) (PDL) coated K-wires in a rat IRI model and compared it with uncoated (Control 1), PDL-coated (Control 2), and 10% gentamicin-containing PDL-coated groups with a single layer of coating. Stainless steel K-wires were implanted and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) suspensions (103 CFU/10 μl) were injected into a cavity in the left tibiae. Thereafter, K-wires were removed and cultured in tryptic soy broth and then 5% sheep blood agar mediums. Sliced sections were removed from the tibiae, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and semi-quantitatively evaluated with X-rays. The addition of fosfomycin into PDL did not affect the X-ray and histopathological evaluation scores; however, the addition of gentamicin lowered them. The addition of gentamicin showed a protective effect after the 28th day of X-ray evaluations. PDL-only coating provided no protection, while adding fosfomycin to PDL offered a 20% level protection and adding gentamicin offered 80%. Furthermore, there were 103 CFU level growths in the gentamicin-added group, while the other groups had 105. Thus, the addition of fosfomycin to PDL does not affect the efficacy of prophylaxis, but the addition of gentamicin does. We therefore do not advise the use of fosfomycin as a single antimicrobial agent in coating for IRI prophylaxis.</description><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Aminoglycosides</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Bone Wires - microbiology</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology</subject><subject>Coating effects</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross-resistance</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Fosfomycin</subject><subject>Fosfomycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Fosfomycin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Gentamicins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Gentamicins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and health sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</subject><subject>Microbial drug resistance</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ovis aries</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Polyesters - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Protective coatings</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUl1v0zAUjRCIjcI_QGCJlyEtxd9JXpBK90GlAtM0ni3Hvmk9JXFJXER_Cv8Wh2bTivaA_GDr-pxzr49PkrwmeEpYRj7c-m3X6nq68S1MMZFCcP4kOSYFo6mkmD19cD5KXvT9LcaC5VI-T45olmOJM3Kc_L7wfeWbnXEtmlnrgvMtCh5d-Xp3cna6TJfaBGfhPZp7HVy7QmceevTVBzSrKjABXXV-s97V-pfr0XlVOaPNDkW1ax3QotnUug3pNdQ6gEWLdqAMLb54C_Up-rQN6GYdkb5Cl9AG3bhhkqHHy-RZpeseXo37JPl-cX4z_5wuv10u5rNlagQnPNUmw5ADtrzIrawYyTOKS0tMriXmzAIty4zrQjJeyAIsSJHR0jINghfYWjZJ3u51N7Xv1ehqr0jOhMwJZTgiFnuE9fpWbTrX6G6nvHbqb8F3K6W74EwNCpe8BFFInFeac25zGi0vKAiScQE0j1ofx27bsgFr4ps7XR-IHt60bq1W_qcSuCBF_MBJcjIKdP7HFvqgGtcbqKPP4LfD3FxynFHG_wPKhKCUEBKh7_6BPm7EiFrp-FbXVj6OaAZRNeMZiZniJIuo6SOouCzE341prVysHxD4nmA63_cdVPd2EKyGrN8No4asqzHrkfbmoZX3pLtwsz_b5PoP</recordid><startdate>20161102</startdate><enddate>20161102</enddate><creator>Gulcu, Anil</creator><creator>Akman, Alp</creator><creator>Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir</creator><creator>Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas</creator><creator>Kaleli, Ilknur</creator><creator>Bir, Ferda</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161102</creationdate><title>Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does</title><author>Gulcu, Anil ; Akman, Alp ; Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir ; Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas ; Kaleli, Ilknur ; Bir, Ferda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5414-ac70e8e0d498d6f318720bd1c8a6043de2bb74a9634969ede6572bd3ae5490dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Aminoglycosides</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Bone Wires - microbiology</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology</topic><topic>Coating effects</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross-resistance</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Fosfomycin</topic><topic>Fosfomycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Fosfomycin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Gentamicins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Gentamicins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and health sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</topic><topic>Microbial drug resistance</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ovis aries</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Polyesters - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Protective coatings</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gulcu, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akman, Alp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaleli, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bir, Ferda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gulcu, Anil</au><au>Akman, Alp</au><au>Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir</au><au>Yorukoglu, Ali Cagdas</au><au>Kaleli, Ilknur</au><au>Bir, Ferda</au><au>Floto, Andres R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-11-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0165544</spage><epage>e0165544</epage><pages>e0165544-e0165544</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Gentamicin is the preferred antimicrobial agent used in implant coating for the prevention of implant-related infections (IRI). However, the present heavy local and systemic administration of gentamicin can lead to increased resistance, which has made its future use uncertain, together with related preventive technologies. Fosfomycin is an alternative antimicrobial agent that lacks the cross-resistance presented by other classes of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis of 10% fosfomycin-containing poly(D,L-lactide) (PDL) coated K-wires in a rat IRI model and compared it with uncoated (Control 1), PDL-coated (Control 2), and 10% gentamicin-containing PDL-coated groups with a single layer of coating. Stainless steel K-wires were implanted and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) suspensions (103 CFU/10 μl) were injected into a cavity in the left tibiae. Thereafter, K-wires were removed and cultured in tryptic soy broth and then 5% sheep blood agar mediums. Sliced sections were removed from the tibiae, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and semi-quantitatively evaluated with X-rays. The addition of fosfomycin into PDL did not affect the X-ray and histopathological evaluation scores; however, the addition of gentamicin lowered them. The addition of gentamicin showed a protective effect after the 28th day of X-ray evaluations. PDL-only coating provided no protection, while adding fosfomycin to PDL offered a 20% level protection and adding gentamicin offered 80%. Furthermore, there were 103 CFU level growths in the gentamicin-added group, while the other groups had 105. Thus, the addition of fosfomycin to PDL does not affect the efficacy of prophylaxis, but the addition of gentamicin does. We therefore do not advise the use of fosfomycin as a single antimicrobial agent in coating for IRI prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27806071</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0165544</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0165544-e0165544 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1835681230 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agar Aminoglycosides Animals Antibiotic Prophylaxis Antibiotics Antiinfectives and antibacterials Automation Biofilms Biology and life sciences Bone Wires - microbiology Coated Materials, Biocompatible - administration & dosage Coated Materials, Biocompatible - pharmacology Coating effects Coatings Comparative analysis Cross-resistance Disease Models, Animal Drug resistance Effectiveness Engineering and Technology Fosfomycin Fosfomycin - administration & dosage Fosfomycin - pharmacology Gentamicin Gentamicins - administration & dosage Gentamicins - pharmacology Growth factors Health aspects Infection Infections Medicine Medicine and health sciences Methicillin Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development Microbial drug resistance Orthopedics Osteomyelitis - prevention & control Ovis aries Physical Sciences Polyesters - administration & dosage Prophylaxis Protective coatings Rats Research and Analysis Methods Sheep Stainless steel Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus infections Studies Transplants & implants Treatment Outcome Wire |
title | Fosfomycin Addition to Poly(D,L-Lactide) Coating Does Not Affect Prophylaxis Efficacy in Rat Implant-Related Infection Model, But That of Gentamicin Does |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fosfomycin%20Addition%20to%20Poly(D,L-Lactide)%20Coating%20Does%20Not%20Affect%20Prophylaxis%20Efficacy%20in%20Rat%20Implant-Related%20Infection%20Model,%20But%20That%20of%20Gentamicin%20Does&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gulcu,%20Anil&rft.date=2016-11-02&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0165544&rft.epage=e0165544&rft.pages=e0165544-e0165544&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0165544&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA471806417%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835681230&rft_id=info:pmid/27806071&rft_galeid=A471806417&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0b4be59608fa444d8253892e51745e28&rfr_iscdi=true |