Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data
Several methods predict activity changes of transcription factors (TFs) from a given regulatory network and measured expression data. But available gene regulatory networks are incomplete and contain many condition-dependent regulations that are not relevant for the specific expression measurement....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164513-e0164513 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0164513 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0164513 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Berchtold, Evi Csaba, Gergely Zimmer, Ralf |
description | Several methods predict activity changes of transcription factors (TFs) from a given regulatory network and measured expression data. But available gene regulatory networks are incomplete and contain many condition-dependent regulations that are not relevant for the specific expression measurement. It is not known which combination of active TFs is needed to cause a change in the expression of a target gene. A method to systematically evaluate the inferred activity changes is missing. We present such an evaluation strategy that indicates for how many target genes the observed expression changes can be explained by a given set of active TFs. To overcome the problem that the exact combination of active TFs needed to activate a gene is typically not known, we assume a gene to be explained if there exists any combination for which the predicted active TFs can possibly explain the observed change of the gene. We introduce the i-score (inconsistency score), which quantifies how many genes could not be explained by the set of activity changes of TFs. We observe that, even for these minimal requirements, published methods yield many unexplained target genes, i.e. large i-scores. This holds for all methods and all expression datasets we evaluated. We provide new optimization methods to calculate the best possible (minimal) i-score given the network and measured expression data. The evaluation of this optimized i-score on a large data compendium yields many unexplained target genes for almost every case. This indicates that currently available regulatory networks are still far from being complete. Both the presented Act-SAT and Act-A* methods produce optimal sets of TF activity changes, which can be used to investigate the difficult interplay of expression and network data. A web server and a command line tool to calculate our i-score and to find the active TFs associated with the minimal i-score is available from https://services.bio.ifi.lmu.de/i-score. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0164513 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1827623595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471855732</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_06a8fb2f24b7497895fd15aa8c0dcb04</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A471855732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-4e0fa4c8fe72004105efa1e9574341721895332f1d035dafc8cacc8310917f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbF39B6IDgujFrvmczNwIpW5roVCwq7fhbCaZTZlNtkmmtP_ejLstXelFyUVC8rzvSc7JKYr3GM0wFfjblR-Cg3628U7PEK4Yx_RFcYgbSqYVQfTlo_VB8SbGK4Q4ravqdXFAhCBUCH5YdPMb6AdI1nXlIoCLKthNst6VJ6CSD-WRSvbGprvyeAWu07Fc3pWXyodR8Nvp200P1um2XEDodCpPtcuMdeX8dhN0jKPTD0jwtnhloI_63W6eFIuT-eL45_T84vTs-Oh8qgThaco0MsBUbbQgCDGMuDaAdcMFowwLguuGU0oMbhHlLRhVK1Cqphg1WBhGJ8XHre2m91HuUhQlromoCOVZPCnOtkTr4Upugl1DuJMerPy34UMnISSrei1RBbVZEkPYUrBG5NCmxRygVqhVSzRG-76LNizXulXapQD9nun-ibMr2fkbyRGvRK7OpPiyMwj-etAxybWNSvc9OO2H8d5UkIZXDX4OyhnmDUMZ_fQf-nQidlQH-a3WGZ-vqEZTecQErjkXlGRq9gSVR6vXVuWvZ2ze3xN83RNkJunb1MEQozy7_PV89uLPPvv5EbvS0KdV9P0w_tW4D7ItqIKPMWjzUA-M5Ng599mQY-fIXedk2YfHtXwQ3bcK_QvehRK-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827623595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Berchtold, Evi ; Csaba, Gergely ; Zimmer, Ralf</creator><contributor>Provero, Paolo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berchtold, Evi ; Csaba, Gergely ; Zimmer, Ralf ; Provero, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>Several methods predict activity changes of transcription factors (TFs) from a given regulatory network and measured expression data. But available gene regulatory networks are incomplete and contain many condition-dependent regulations that are not relevant for the specific expression measurement. It is not known which combination of active TFs is needed to cause a change in the expression of a target gene. A method to systematically evaluate the inferred activity changes is missing. We present such an evaluation strategy that indicates for how many target genes the observed expression changes can be explained by a given set of active TFs. To overcome the problem that the exact combination of active TFs needed to activate a gene is typically not known, we assume a gene to be explained if there exists any combination for which the predicted active TFs can possibly explain the observed change of the gene. We introduce the i-score (inconsistency score), which quantifies how many genes could not be explained by the set of activity changes of TFs. We observe that, even for these minimal requirements, published methods yield many unexplained target genes, i.e. large i-scores. This holds for all methods and all expression datasets we evaluated. We provide new optimization methods to calculate the best possible (minimal) i-score given the network and measured expression data. The evaluation of this optimized i-score on a large data compendium yields many unexplained target genes for almost every case. This indicates that currently available regulatory networks are still far from being complete. Both the presented Act-SAT and Act-A* methods produce optimal sets of TF activity changes, which can be used to investigate the difficult interplay of expression and network data. A web server and a command line tool to calculate our i-score and to find the active TFs associated with the minimal i-score is available from https://services.bio.ifi.lmu.de/i-score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27723775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acids ; Animals ; Binding sites ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Databases, Genetic ; DNA binding proteins ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - methods ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Genes ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Humans ; Internet ; Mathematical analysis ; Methods ; Models, Genetic ; Optimization ; Physical Sciences ; Production methods ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Servers ; Transcription factors ; Transcription Factors - genetics ; Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164513-e0164513</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Berchtold et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Berchtold et al 2016 Berchtold et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-4e0fa4c8fe72004105efa1e9574341721895332f1d035dafc8cacc8310917f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-4e0fa4c8fe72004105efa1e9574341721895332f1d035dafc8cacc8310917f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056719/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056719/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2101,2927,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79471,79472</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Provero, Paolo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berchtold, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csaba, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Several methods predict activity changes of transcription factors (TFs) from a given regulatory network and measured expression data. But available gene regulatory networks are incomplete and contain many condition-dependent regulations that are not relevant for the specific expression measurement. It is not known which combination of active TFs is needed to cause a change in the expression of a target gene. A method to systematically evaluate the inferred activity changes is missing. We present such an evaluation strategy that indicates for how many target genes the observed expression changes can be explained by a given set of active TFs. To overcome the problem that the exact combination of active TFs needed to activate a gene is typically not known, we assume a gene to be explained if there exists any combination for which the predicted active TFs can possibly explain the observed change of the gene. We introduce the i-score (inconsistency score), which quantifies how many genes could not be explained by the set of activity changes of TFs. We observe that, even for these minimal requirements, published methods yield many unexplained target genes, i.e. large i-scores. This holds for all methods and all expression datasets we evaluated. We provide new optimization methods to calculate the best possible (minimal) i-score given the network and measured expression data. The evaluation of this optimized i-score on a large data compendium yields many unexplained target genes for almost every case. This indicates that currently available regulatory networks are still far from being complete. Both the presented Act-SAT and Act-A* methods produce optimal sets of TF activity changes, which can be used to investigate the difficult interplay of expression and network data. A web server and a command line tool to calculate our i-score and to find the active TFs associated with the minimal i-score is available from https://services.bio.ifi.lmu.de/i-score.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Databases, Genetic</subject><subject>DNA binding proteins</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Servers</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbF39B6IDgujFrvmczNwIpW5roVCwq7fhbCaZTZlNtkmmtP_ejLstXelFyUVC8rzvSc7JKYr3GM0wFfjblR-Cg3628U7PEK4Yx_RFcYgbSqYVQfTlo_VB8SbGK4Q4ravqdXFAhCBUCH5YdPMb6AdI1nXlIoCLKthNst6VJ6CSD-WRSvbGprvyeAWu07Fc3pWXyodR8Nvp200P1um2XEDodCpPtcuMdeX8dhN0jKPTD0jwtnhloI_63W6eFIuT-eL45_T84vTs-Oh8qgThaco0MsBUbbQgCDGMuDaAdcMFowwLguuGU0oMbhHlLRhVK1Cqphg1WBhGJ8XHre2m91HuUhQlromoCOVZPCnOtkTr4Upugl1DuJMerPy34UMnISSrei1RBbVZEkPYUrBG5NCmxRygVqhVSzRG-76LNizXulXapQD9nun-ibMr2fkbyRGvRK7OpPiyMwj-etAxybWNSvc9OO2H8d5UkIZXDX4OyhnmDUMZ_fQf-nQidlQH-a3WGZ-vqEZTecQErjkXlGRq9gSVR6vXVuWvZ2ze3xN83RNkJunb1MEQozy7_PV89uLPPvv5EbvS0KdV9P0w_tW4D7ItqIKPMWjzUA-M5Ng599mQY-fIXedk2YfHtXwQ3bcK_QvehRK-</recordid><startdate>20161010</startdate><enddate>20161010</enddate><creator>Berchtold, Evi</creator><creator>Csaba, Gergely</creator><creator>Zimmer, Ralf</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161010</creationdate><title>Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data</title><author>Berchtold, Evi ; Csaba, Gergely ; Zimmer, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-4e0fa4c8fe72004105efa1e9574341721895332f1d035dafc8cacc8310917f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Databases, Genetic</topic><topic>DNA binding proteins</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Servers</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berchtold, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csaba, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berchtold, Evi</au><au>Csaba, Gergely</au><au>Zimmer, Ralf</au><au>Provero, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-10-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0164513</spage><epage>e0164513</epage><pages>e0164513-e0164513</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Several methods predict activity changes of transcription factors (TFs) from a given regulatory network and measured expression data. But available gene regulatory networks are incomplete and contain many condition-dependent regulations that are not relevant for the specific expression measurement. It is not known which combination of active TFs is needed to cause a change in the expression of a target gene. A method to systematically evaluate the inferred activity changes is missing. We present such an evaluation strategy that indicates for how many target genes the observed expression changes can be explained by a given set of active TFs. To overcome the problem that the exact combination of active TFs needed to activate a gene is typically not known, we assume a gene to be explained if there exists any combination for which the predicted active TFs can possibly explain the observed change of the gene. We introduce the i-score (inconsistency score), which quantifies how many genes could not be explained by the set of activity changes of TFs. We observe that, even for these minimal requirements, published methods yield many unexplained target genes, i.e. large i-scores. This holds for all methods and all expression datasets we evaluated. We provide new optimization methods to calculate the best possible (minimal) i-score given the network and measured expression data. The evaluation of this optimized i-score on a large data compendium yields many unexplained target genes for almost every case. This indicates that currently available regulatory networks are still far from being complete. Both the presented Act-SAT and Act-A* methods produce optimal sets of TF activity changes, which can be used to investigate the difficult interplay of expression and network data. A web server and a command line tool to calculate our i-score and to find the active TFs associated with the minimal i-score is available from https://services.bio.ifi.lmu.de/i-score.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27723775</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0164513</doi><tpages>e0164513</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164513-e0164513 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1827623595 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acids Animals Binding sites Biology Biology and Life Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Databases, Genetic DNA binding proteins Evaluation Experiments Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling - methods Gene Expression Regulation Genes Genomes Genomics Humans Internet Mathematical analysis Methods Models, Genetic Optimization Physical Sciences Production methods Saccharomyces cerevisiae Servers Transcription factors Transcription Factors - genetics Transcription Factors - metabolism |
title | Evaluating Transcription Factor Activity Changes by Scoring Unexplained Target Genes in Expression Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A24%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Transcription%20Factor%20Activity%20Changes%20by%20Scoring%20Unexplained%20Target%20Genes%20in%20Expression%20Data&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Berchtold,%20Evi&rft.date=2016-10-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0164513&rft.epage=e0164513&rft.pages=e0164513-e0164513&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0164513&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA471855732%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827623595&rft_id=info:pmid/27723775&rft_galeid=A471855732&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_06a8fb2f24b7497895fd15aa8c0dcb04&rfr_iscdi=true |