Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups
Lameness and lesions to the skin and claws of sows in group housing are commonly occurring indicators of reduced welfare. Typically, these problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Group management type (dynamic versus static) and stage of gestation influence the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0163625-e0163625 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0163625 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0163625 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Bos, Emilie-Julie Maes, Dominiek van Riet, Miriam M J Millet, Sam Ampe, Bart Janssens, Geert P J Tuyttens, Frank A M |
| description | Lameness and lesions to the skin and claws of sows in group housing are commonly occurring indicators of reduced welfare. Typically, these problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Group management type (dynamic versus static) and stage of gestation influence the behavior of the animals, which in turn influences the occurrence of these problems. The present study compared prevalence, incidence and mean scores of lameness and skin and claw lesions in static versus dynamic group housed sows at different stages of gestation during three consecutive reproductive cycles. A total of 10 Belgian sow herds were monitored; 5 in which dynamic groups and 5 in which static groups were utilized. All sows were visually assessed for lameness and skin lesions three times per cycle and the claws of the hind limbs were assessed once per cycle. Lameness and claw lesions were assessed using visual analogue scales. Static groups, in comparison with dynamic groups, demonstrated lower lameness scores (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0163625 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1825255729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471780042</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5ee27212e5c64241b706eb59f2cd0199</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A471780042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a5fe5643a8311c8d9029277ba3c04360713003ac96dd10139c47529b8eae284c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2I5vkKYOukqVJlHg1nKdkzQjtTs72di_x1mzqUG7mHxh6_g5b07e45MkbzGaYirwl0vXeaub6c5ZmCLMKSfsWXKMJSUTThB9fnA-Sl6FcIkQoznnL5MjIniOuGDHSbV0xm1dWzubntXB-QJ8SLUt0tWf2t4dZo2-SZcQIhLSGJtDaHVb2ypduZuQnrsuQNFfnN1ava1Neh0lupCuesqkc--6XXidvCh1E-DNsJ8kv75_-zk7nywv5ovZ6XJiBGHtRLMSGM-ozinGJi8kIpIIsdbUoIxyJDBFiGojeVFghKk0mWBErnPQQPLM0JPk_V5317igBo-CwjlhhDFBZCQWe6Jw-lLtfL3V_lY5Xau7gPOV0j4W3oBiAEQQTIAZnpEMrwXisGayJKZAWPZaX4evdestFAZs63UzEh3f2HqjKnetGMoQlSIKfBoEvLvqorFqWwcDTaMtRF9j3ZQxigXlT0CJkATLvEc__Ic-bsRAVTr-a21LF0s0vag6zQQWOUIZidT0ESquAmKv49sr6xgfJXweJUSmhb9tpbsQ1GL14-nsxe8x-_GA3YBu2k1wTdc_3TAGsz1ovAvBQ_nQD4xUPzr3bqh-dNQwOjHt3WEvH5LuZ4X-A4lTETk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825255729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bos, Emilie-Julie ; Maes, Dominiek ; van Riet, Miriam M J ; Millet, Sam ; Ampe, Bart ; Janssens, Geert P J ; Tuyttens, Frank A M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bos, Emilie-Julie ; Maes, Dominiek ; van Riet, Miriam M J ; Millet, Sam ; Ampe, Bart ; Janssens, Geert P J ; Tuyttens, Frank A M</creatorcontrib><description>Lameness and lesions to the skin and claws of sows in group housing are commonly occurring indicators of reduced welfare. Typically, these problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Group management type (dynamic versus static) and stage of gestation influence the behavior of the animals, which in turn influences the occurrence of these problems. The present study compared prevalence, incidence and mean scores of lameness and skin and claw lesions in static versus dynamic group housed sows at different stages of gestation during three consecutive reproductive cycles. A total of 10 Belgian sow herds were monitored; 5 in which dynamic groups and 5 in which static groups were utilized. All sows were visually assessed for lameness and skin lesions three times per cycle and the claws of the hind limbs were assessed once per cycle. Lameness and claw lesions were assessed using visual analogue scales. Static groups, in comparison with dynamic groups, demonstrated lower lameness scores (P<0.05) and decreased skin lesion prevalence (24.9 vs. 47.3%, P<0.05) at the end of gestation. There was no difference between treatment group regarding claw lesion prevalence with 75.5% of sows demonstrating claw lesions regardless of group management. Prevalences of lameness (22.4 vs. 8.9%, P<0.05) and skin lesions (46.6 vs. 4.4%, P<0.05) were highest during the group-housed phase compared to the individually housed phases. Although the prevalence of lameness and skin lesions did not differ three days after grouping versus at the end of the group-housing phase, their incidence peaked during the first three days after moving from the insemination stalls to the group. In conclusion, the first three days after grouping was the most risky period for lameness incidence, but there was no significant difference between static or dynamic group management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27680675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aggressiveness ; Animal behavior ; Animal sciences ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Claws ; Comparative analysis ; Feeds ; Fisheries ; Gestation ; Hogs ; Housing ; Incidence ; Lesions ; Locomotion ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nutrition ; Obstetrics ; Pain ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive cycle ; Reproductive status ; Risk factors ; Skin ; Skin diseases ; Social Sciences ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0163625-e0163625</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Bos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Bos et al 2016 Bos et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a5fe5643a8311c8d9029277ba3c04360713003ac96dd10139c47529b8eae284c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a5fe5643a8311c8d9029277ba3c04360713003ac96dd10139c47529b8eae284c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040397/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040397/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27680675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bos, Emilie-Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Riet, Miriam M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Geert P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, Frank A M</creatorcontrib><title>Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Lameness and lesions to the skin and claws of sows in group housing are commonly occurring indicators of reduced welfare. Typically, these problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Group management type (dynamic versus static) and stage of gestation influence the behavior of the animals, which in turn influences the occurrence of these problems. The present study compared prevalence, incidence and mean scores of lameness and skin and claw lesions in static versus dynamic group housed sows at different stages of gestation during three consecutive reproductive cycles. A total of 10 Belgian sow herds were monitored; 5 in which dynamic groups and 5 in which static groups were utilized. All sows were visually assessed for lameness and skin lesions three times per cycle and the claws of the hind limbs were assessed once per cycle. Lameness and claw lesions were assessed using visual analogue scales. Static groups, in comparison with dynamic groups, demonstrated lower lameness scores (P<0.05) and decreased skin lesion prevalence (24.9 vs. 47.3%, P<0.05) at the end of gestation. There was no difference between treatment group regarding claw lesion prevalence with 75.5% of sows demonstrating claw lesions regardless of group management. Prevalences of lameness (22.4 vs. 8.9%, P<0.05) and skin lesions (46.6 vs. 4.4%, P<0.05) were highest during the group-housed phase compared to the individually housed phases. Although the prevalence of lameness and skin lesions did not differ three days after grouping versus at the end of the group-housing phase, their incidence peaked during the first three days after moving from the insemination stalls to the group. In conclusion, the first three days after grouping was the most risky period for lameness incidence, but there was no significant difference between static or dynamic group management.</description><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Claws</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive cycle</subject><subject>Reproductive status</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2I5vkKYOukqVJlHg1nKdkzQjtTs72di_x1mzqUG7mHxh6_g5b07e45MkbzGaYirwl0vXeaub6c5ZmCLMKSfsWXKMJSUTThB9fnA-Sl6FcIkQoznnL5MjIniOuGDHSbV0xm1dWzubntXB-QJ8SLUt0tWf2t4dZo2-SZcQIhLSGJtDaHVb2ypduZuQnrsuQNFfnN1ava1Neh0lupCuesqkc--6XXidvCh1E-DNsJ8kv75_-zk7nywv5ovZ6XJiBGHtRLMSGM-ozinGJi8kIpIIsdbUoIxyJDBFiGojeVFghKk0mWBErnPQQPLM0JPk_V5317igBo-CwjlhhDFBZCQWe6Jw-lLtfL3V_lY5Xau7gPOV0j4W3oBiAEQQTIAZnpEMrwXisGayJKZAWPZaX4evdestFAZs63UzEh3f2HqjKnetGMoQlSIKfBoEvLvqorFqWwcDTaMtRF9j3ZQxigXlT0CJkATLvEc__Ic-bsRAVTr-a21LF0s0vag6zQQWOUIZidT0ESquAmKv49sr6xgfJXweJUSmhb9tpbsQ1GL14-nsxe8x-_GA3YBu2k1wTdc_3TAGsz1ovAvBQ_nQD4xUPzr3bqh-dNQwOjHt3WEvH5LuZ4X-A4lTETk</recordid><startdate>20160928</startdate><enddate>20160928</enddate><creator>Bos, Emilie-Julie</creator><creator>Maes, Dominiek</creator><creator>van Riet, Miriam M J</creator><creator>Millet, Sam</creator><creator>Ampe, Bart</creator><creator>Janssens, Geert P J</creator><creator>Tuyttens, Frank A M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160928</creationdate><title>Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups</title><author>Bos, Emilie-Julie ; Maes, Dominiek ; van Riet, Miriam M J ; Millet, Sam ; Ampe, Bart ; Janssens, Geert P J ; Tuyttens, Frank A M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-a5fe5643a8311c8d9029277ba3c04360713003ac96dd10139c47529b8eae284c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Claws</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive cycle</topic><topic>Reproductive status</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bos, Emilie-Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Riet, Miriam M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ampe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Geert P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuyttens, Frank A M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bos, Emilie-Julie</au><au>Maes, Dominiek</au><au>van Riet, Miriam M J</au><au>Millet, Sam</au><au>Ampe, Bart</au><au>Janssens, Geert P J</au><au>Tuyttens, Frank A M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-09-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0163625</spage><epage>e0163625</epage><pages>e0163625-e0163625</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Lameness and lesions to the skin and claws of sows in group housing are commonly occurring indicators of reduced welfare. Typically, these problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Group management type (dynamic versus static) and stage of gestation influence the behavior of the animals, which in turn influences the occurrence of these problems. The present study compared prevalence, incidence and mean scores of lameness and skin and claw lesions in static versus dynamic group housed sows at different stages of gestation during three consecutive reproductive cycles. A total of 10 Belgian sow herds were monitored; 5 in which dynamic groups and 5 in which static groups were utilized. All sows were visually assessed for lameness and skin lesions three times per cycle and the claws of the hind limbs were assessed once per cycle. Lameness and claw lesions were assessed using visual analogue scales. Static groups, in comparison with dynamic groups, demonstrated lower lameness scores (P<0.05) and decreased skin lesion prevalence (24.9 vs. 47.3%, P<0.05) at the end of gestation. There was no difference between treatment group regarding claw lesion prevalence with 75.5% of sows demonstrating claw lesions regardless of group management. Prevalences of lameness (22.4 vs. 8.9%, P<0.05) and skin lesions (46.6 vs. 4.4%, P<0.05) were highest during the group-housed phase compared to the individually housed phases. Although the prevalence of lameness and skin lesions did not differ three days after grouping versus at the end of the group-housing phase, their incidence peaked during the first three days after moving from the insemination stalls to the group. In conclusion, the first three days after grouping was the most risky period for lameness incidence, but there was no significant difference between static or dynamic group management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27680675</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0163625</doi><tpages>e0163625</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0163625-e0163625 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1825255729 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Aggressiveness Animal behavior Animal sciences Biology and Life Sciences Claws Comparative analysis Feeds Fisheries Gestation Hogs Housing Incidence Lesions Locomotion Management Medicine and Health Sciences Nutrition Obstetrics Pain Pregnancy Reproductive cycle Reproductive status Risk factors Skin Skin diseases Social Sciences Veterinary medicine |
| title | Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Locomotion%20Disorders%20and%20Skin%20and%20Claw%20Lesions%20in%20Gestating%20Sows%20Housed%20in%20Dynamic%20versus%20Static%20Groups&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bos,%20Emilie-Julie&rft.date=2016-09-28&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0163625&rft.epage=e0163625&rft.pages=e0163625-e0163625&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163625&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA471780042%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825255729&rft_id=info:pmid/27680675&rft_galeid=A471780042&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5ee27212e5c64241b706eb59f2cd0199&rfr_iscdi=true |