Rabies in Kazakhstan

Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease. There is a sparsity of data on this disease with regard to the incidence of human and animal disease in many low and middle income countries. Furthermore, rabies results in a large economic impact and a high human burden of disease. Kazakhstan is a large landl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2016-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0004889-e0004889
Hauptverfasser: Sultanov, Akmetzhan A, Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K, Abdybekova, Aida M, Karatayev, Bolat S, Torgerson, Paul R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0004889
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0004889
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 10
creator Sultanov, Akmetzhan A
Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K
Abdybekova, Aida M
Karatayev, Bolat S
Torgerson, Paul R
description Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease. There is a sparsity of data on this disease with regard to the incidence of human and animal disease in many low and middle income countries. Furthermore, rabies results in a large economic impact and a high human burden of disease. Kazakhstan is a large landlocked middle income country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 and is endemic for rabies. We used detailed public health and veterinary surveillance data from 2003 to 2015 to map where livestock rabies is occurring. We also estimate the economic impact and human burden of rabies. Livestock and canine rabies occurred over most of Kazakhstan, but there were regional variations in disease distribution. There were a mean of 7.1 officially recorded human fatalities due to rabies per year resulting in approximately 457 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A mean of 64,289 individuals per annum underwent post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) which may have resulted in an additional 1140 DALYs annually. PEP is preventing at least 118 cases of human rabies each year or possibly as many as 1184 at an estimated cost of $1193 or $119 per DALY averted respectively. The estimated economic impact of rabies in Kazakhstan is $20.9 million per annum, with nearly half of this cost being attributed to the cost of PEP and the loss of income whilst being treated. A further $5.4 million per annum was estimated to be the life time loss of income for fatal cases. Animal vaccination programmes and animal control programmes also contributed substantially to the economic losses. The direct costs due to rabies fatalities of agricultural animals was relatively low. This study demonstrates that in Kazakhstan there is a substantial economic cost and health impact of rabies. These costs could be reduced by modifying the vaccination programme that is now practised. The study also fills some data gaps on the epidemiology and economic effects of rabies in respect to Kazakhstan.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1820282531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A479419652</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cf678b90aebc4203822bf3737e976fa9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A479419652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-c0667740b171af89ebc12eaf17e8e6e3772bce8e319b4adea478ae77399106873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19WbR9EFQbzMmK9OJRdhWfxYXBBEz6E6XT2Tsacz2-kW9NebdnqXGVlySKi8evVe8YriBWdLLoG_28Sx77Bd7rqhXjLGlDH2QXHKrSwXAmT58OB9UjxJacNYaUvDHxcnApTRoNRp8fwbVoHSeejOv-Af_LlOA3ZPi0cNtomezfdZ8ePjh--XnxfXXz9dXV5cL7wWalh4pjWAYhUHjo2xVHkuCBsOZEiTBBCVz0_JbaWwJlRgkACktZxpA_KseLXn3bUxudlQctwIJowoJc-Iqz2ijrhxuz5ssf_tIgb3rxD7lcN-CL4l5xsNprIMswwlmDRCVI0ECWRBN2gz1_t52lhtqfbUDT22R6THP11Yu1X85ZQFodgk5u1M0MebkdLgtiF5alvsKI6TbmY1KwEmZ6__g97vbkatMBsIXRPzXD-RugsFVnGrS5FRy3tQ-dS0DT521IRcP2p4c9CwJmyHdYrtOITYpWOg2gN9H1PqqblbBmduCtmtajeFzM0hy20vDxd513SbKvkXNjnLGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1820282531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rabies in Kazakhstan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A ; Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K ; Abdybekova, Aida M ; Karatayev, Bolat S ; Torgerson, Paul R</creator><creatorcontrib>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A ; Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K ; Abdybekova, Aida M ; Karatayev, Bolat S ; Torgerson, Paul R</creatorcontrib><description>Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease. There is a sparsity of data on this disease with regard to the incidence of human and animal disease in many low and middle income countries. Furthermore, rabies results in a large economic impact and a high human burden of disease. Kazakhstan is a large landlocked middle income country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 and is endemic for rabies. We used detailed public health and veterinary surveillance data from 2003 to 2015 to map where livestock rabies is occurring. We also estimate the economic impact and human burden of rabies. Livestock and canine rabies occurred over most of Kazakhstan, but there were regional variations in disease distribution. There were a mean of 7.1 officially recorded human fatalities due to rabies per year resulting in approximately 457 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A mean of 64,289 individuals per annum underwent post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) which may have resulted in an additional 1140 DALYs annually. PEP is preventing at least 118 cases of human rabies each year or possibly as many as 1184 at an estimated cost of $1193 or $119 per DALY averted respectively. The estimated economic impact of rabies in Kazakhstan is $20.9 million per annum, with nearly half of this cost being attributed to the cost of PEP and the loss of income whilst being treated. A further $5.4 million per annum was estimated to be the life time loss of income for fatal cases. Animal vaccination programmes and animal control programmes also contributed substantially to the economic losses. The direct costs due to rabies fatalities of agricultural animals was relatively low. This study demonstrates that in Kazakhstan there is a substantial economic cost and health impact of rabies. These costs could be reduced by modifying the vaccination programme that is now practised. The study also fills some data gaps on the epidemiology and economic effects of rabies in respect to Kazakhstan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27486744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal bites ; Animal control ; Animal diseases ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs ; Disease transmission ; Dogs ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Epidemiology ; Estimates ; Fatalities ; Foxes ; Funding ; Health surveillance ; Humans ; Immunization ; Incidence ; Income ; Kazakhstan - epidemiology ; Livestock ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mortality ; People and Places ; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis ; Prophylaxis ; Public Health ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Rabies ; Rabies - economics ; Rabies - epidemiology ; Rabies - veterinary ; Rabies vaccines ; Rabies Vaccines - immunology ; Rabies virus ; Regression Analysis ; Risk factors ; Tropical diseases ; Vaccination ; Zoonoses ; Zoonoses - economics ; Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0004889-e0004889</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Sultanov AA, Abdrakhmanov SK, Abdybekova AM, Karatayev BS, Torgerson PR (2016) Rabies in Kazakhstan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(8): e0004889. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889</rights><rights>2016 Sultanov et al 2016 Sultanov et al</rights><rights>2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Sultanov AA, Abdrakhmanov SK, Abdybekova AM, Karatayev BS, Torgerson PR (2016) Rabies in Kazakhstan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(8): e0004889. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-c0667740b171af89ebc12eaf17e8e6e3772bce8e319b4adea478ae77399106873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-c0667740b171af89ebc12eaf17e8e6e3772bce8e319b4adea478ae77399106873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972401/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972401/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdybekova, Aida M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatayev, Bolat S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torgerson, Paul R</creatorcontrib><title>Rabies in Kazakhstan</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease. There is a sparsity of data on this disease with regard to the incidence of human and animal disease in many low and middle income countries. Furthermore, rabies results in a large economic impact and a high human burden of disease. Kazakhstan is a large landlocked middle income country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 and is endemic for rabies. We used detailed public health and veterinary surveillance data from 2003 to 2015 to map where livestock rabies is occurring. We also estimate the economic impact and human burden of rabies. Livestock and canine rabies occurred over most of Kazakhstan, but there were regional variations in disease distribution. There were a mean of 7.1 officially recorded human fatalities due to rabies per year resulting in approximately 457 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A mean of 64,289 individuals per annum underwent post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) which may have resulted in an additional 1140 DALYs annually. PEP is preventing at least 118 cases of human rabies each year or possibly as many as 1184 at an estimated cost of $1193 or $119 per DALY averted respectively. The estimated economic impact of rabies in Kazakhstan is $20.9 million per annum, with nearly half of this cost being attributed to the cost of PEP and the loss of income whilst being treated. A further $5.4 million per annum was estimated to be the life time loss of income for fatal cases. Animal vaccination programmes and animal control programmes also contributed substantially to the economic losses. The direct costs due to rabies fatalities of agricultural animals was relatively low. This study demonstrates that in Kazakhstan there is a substantial economic cost and health impact of rabies. These costs could be reduced by modifying the vaccination programme that is now practised. The study also fills some data gaps on the epidemiology and economic effects of rabies in respect to Kazakhstan.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal bites</subject><subject>Animal control</subject><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Kazakhstan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Post-Exposure Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Rabies</subject><subject>Rabies - economics</subject><subject>Rabies - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rabies - veterinary</subject><subject>Rabies vaccines</subject><subject>Rabies Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Rabies virus</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><subject>Zoonoses - economics</subject><subject>Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19WbR9EFQbzMmK9OJRdhWfxYXBBEz6E6XT2Tsacz2-kW9NebdnqXGVlySKi8evVe8YriBWdLLoG_28Sx77Bd7rqhXjLGlDH2QXHKrSwXAmT58OB9UjxJacNYaUvDHxcnApTRoNRp8fwbVoHSeejOv-Af_LlOA3ZPi0cNtomezfdZ8ePjh--XnxfXXz9dXV5cL7wWalh4pjWAYhUHjo2xVHkuCBsOZEiTBBCVz0_JbaWwJlRgkACktZxpA_KseLXn3bUxudlQctwIJowoJc-Iqz2ijrhxuz5ssf_tIgb3rxD7lcN-CL4l5xsNprIMswwlmDRCVI0ECWRBN2gz1_t52lhtqfbUDT22R6THP11Yu1X85ZQFodgk5u1M0MebkdLgtiF5alvsKI6TbmY1KwEmZ6__g97vbkatMBsIXRPzXD-RugsFVnGrS5FRy3tQ-dS0DT521IRcP2p4c9CwJmyHdYrtOITYpWOg2gN9H1PqqblbBmduCtmtajeFzM0hy20vDxd513SbKvkXNjnLGg</recordid><startdate>20160803</startdate><enddate>20160803</enddate><creator>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A</creator><creator>Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K</creator><creator>Abdybekova, Aida M</creator><creator>Karatayev, Bolat S</creator><creator>Torgerson, Paul R</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160803</creationdate><title>Rabies in Kazakhstan</title><author>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A ; Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K ; Abdybekova, Aida M ; Karatayev, Bolat S ; Torgerson, Paul R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-c0667740b171af89ebc12eaf17e8e6e3772bce8e319b4adea478ae77399106873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal bites</topic><topic>Animal control</topic><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Kazakhstan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Post-Exposure Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Rabies</topic><topic>Rabies - economics</topic><topic>Rabies - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rabies - veterinary</topic><topic>Rabies vaccines</topic><topic>Rabies Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Rabies virus</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><topic>Zoonoses - economics</topic><topic>Zoonoses - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdybekova, Aida M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karatayev, Bolat S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torgerson, Paul R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sultanov, Akmetzhan A</au><au>Abdrakhmanov, Sarsenbay K</au><au>Abdybekova, Aida M</au><au>Karatayev, Bolat S</au><au>Torgerson, Paul R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rabies in Kazakhstan</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2016-08-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0004889</spage><epage>e0004889</epage><pages>e0004889-e0004889</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease. There is a sparsity of data on this disease with regard to the incidence of human and animal disease in many low and middle income countries. Furthermore, rabies results in a large economic impact and a high human burden of disease. Kazakhstan is a large landlocked middle income country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 and is endemic for rabies. We used detailed public health and veterinary surveillance data from 2003 to 2015 to map where livestock rabies is occurring. We also estimate the economic impact and human burden of rabies. Livestock and canine rabies occurred over most of Kazakhstan, but there were regional variations in disease distribution. There were a mean of 7.1 officially recorded human fatalities due to rabies per year resulting in approximately 457 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). A mean of 64,289 individuals per annum underwent post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) which may have resulted in an additional 1140 DALYs annually. PEP is preventing at least 118 cases of human rabies each year or possibly as many as 1184 at an estimated cost of $1193 or $119 per DALY averted respectively. The estimated economic impact of rabies in Kazakhstan is $20.9 million per annum, with nearly half of this cost being attributed to the cost of PEP and the loss of income whilst being treated. A further $5.4 million per annum was estimated to be the life time loss of income for fatal cases. Animal vaccination programmes and animal control programmes also contributed substantially to the economic losses. The direct costs due to rabies fatalities of agricultural animals was relatively low. This study demonstrates that in Kazakhstan there is a substantial economic cost and health impact of rabies. These costs could be reduced by modifying the vaccination programme that is now practised. The study also fills some data gaps on the epidemiology and economic effects of rabies in respect to Kazakhstan.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27486744</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0004889-e0004889
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1820282531
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Analysis
Animal bites
Animal control
Animal diseases
Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Cattle
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs
Disease transmission
Dogs
Economic aspects
Economic impact
Economics
Epidemiology
Estimates
Fatalities
Foxes
Funding
Health surveillance
Humans
Immunization
Incidence
Income
Kazakhstan - epidemiology
Livestock
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mortality
People and Places
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
Prophylaxis
Public Health
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Rabies
Rabies - economics
Rabies - epidemiology
Rabies - veterinary
Rabies vaccines
Rabies Vaccines - immunology
Rabies virus
Regression Analysis
Risk factors
Tropical diseases
Vaccination
Zoonoses
Zoonoses - economics
Zoonoses - epidemiology
title Rabies in Kazakhstan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A35%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rabies%20in%20Kazakhstan&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Sultanov,%20Akmetzhan%20A&rft.date=2016-08-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0004889&rft.epage=e0004889&rft.pages=e0004889-e0004889&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004889&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA479419652%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820282531&rft_id=info:pmid/27486744&rft_galeid=A479419652&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cf678b90aebc4203822bf3737e976fa9&rfr_iscdi=true