Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol
Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0162333-e0162333 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0162333 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0162333 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Laverty, James T Underwood, Sonia M Matz, Rebecca L Posey, Lynmarie A Carmel, Justin H Caballero, Marcos D Fata-Hartley, Cori L Ebert-May, Diane Jardeleza, Sarah E Cooper, Melanie M |
| description | Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0162333 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1817860264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470941702</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_eca1c9d2a0574cc5a84fa1cd5cacb48a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A470941702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-3cd9f409604acdcdbbb0bad2348b458f3a5324df9fd1df926929c96a5d447c723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLvxLtAqspXpUpDbHCJ5dhO6smNi50g4NfjrNlo0C6mKLF18ryvj499suwpBHOIC_jm0vehlW6-862ZA8gQxvhedgw5RjOGAL5_MD_KHsV4CQDFJWMPsyNUMMBYAY-z78uNDFJ1Jtg_tm3ypXfONCY_V9a0yuSLGE2MW9N28TS_2Jj0BmNm72wKRetTAvnayNAO2n9s_jn4zivvHmcPaumieTKOJ9nXD-8vlp9m67OPq-ViPVMFot0MK81rAjgDRCqtdFVVoJIaYVJWhJY1lhQjomtea5i-iHHEFWeSakKKZIFPsud7353zUYyliQKWsCgZQIwkYrUntJeXYhfsVobfwksrrgI-NEKGzipnhFESKq6RBLQgSlFZkjpFNFVSVaSUyevtuFpfbY1WacdBuonp9E9rN6LxPwUFkJaYJ4NXo0HwP3oTO7G1URnnZGt8P-SNipIjTPEdUFhiTPkV-uI_9PZCjFQj015tW_uUohpMxYIUgBNYgKGg81uo9GiztSpdudqm-ETweiJITGd-dY3sYxSr8y93Z8--TdmXB-zGSNdtond9ly5fnIJkD6rgYwymvjkPCMTQMdfVEEPHiLFjkuzZ4VneiK5bBP8Fnf4RqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817860264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><description>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162333</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27606671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Active learning ; Assessments ; Biology ; Biology - education ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemistry ; Chemistry - education ; Cognition & reasoning ; Colleges & universities ; Core curriculum ; Curriculum ; Education ; Educational assessment ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Engineering ; Engineering - education ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental assessment ; Higher education ; Knowledge ; Learning ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Physics ; Physics - education ; Protocol ; Reproducibility of Results ; Science - education ; Social Sciences ; STEM education ; Students ; Taxonomy ; Teaching ; Transformation ; Universities ; Universities and colleges</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0162333-e0162333</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Laverty et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Laverty et al 2016 Laverty et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-3cd9f409604acdcdbbb0bad2348b458f3a5324df9fd1df926929c96a5d447c723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-3cd9f409604acdcdbbb0bad2348b458f3a5324df9fd1df926929c96a5d447c723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5788-8539</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015839/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015839/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Sonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matz, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posey, Lynmarie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Justin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Marcos D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert-May, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</description><subject>Active learning</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology - education</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry - education</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational assessment</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering - education</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics - education</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Science - education</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Universities and colleges</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLvxLtAqspXpUpDbHCJ5dhO6smNi50g4NfjrNlo0C6mKLF18ryvj499suwpBHOIC_jm0vehlW6-862ZA8gQxvhedgw5RjOGAL5_MD_KHsV4CQDFJWMPsyNUMMBYAY-z78uNDFJ1Jtg_tm3ypXfONCY_V9a0yuSLGE2MW9N28TS_2Jj0BmNm72wKRetTAvnayNAO2n9s_jn4zivvHmcPaumieTKOJ9nXD-8vlp9m67OPq-ViPVMFot0MK81rAjgDRCqtdFVVoJIaYVJWhJY1lhQjomtea5i-iHHEFWeSakKKZIFPsud7353zUYyliQKWsCgZQIwkYrUntJeXYhfsVobfwksrrgI-NEKGzipnhFESKq6RBLQgSlFZkjpFNFVSVaSUyevtuFpfbY1WacdBuonp9E9rN6LxPwUFkJaYJ4NXo0HwP3oTO7G1URnnZGt8P-SNipIjTPEdUFhiTPkV-uI_9PZCjFQj015tW_uUohpMxYIUgBNYgKGg81uo9GiztSpdudqm-ETweiJITGd-dY3sYxSr8y93Z8--TdmXB-zGSNdtond9ly5fnIJkD6rgYwymvjkPCMTQMdfVEEPHiLFjkuzZ4VneiK5bBP8Fnf4RqQ</recordid><startdate>20160908</startdate><enddate>20160908</enddate><creator>Laverty, James T</creator><creator>Underwood, Sonia M</creator><creator>Matz, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Posey, Lynmarie A</creator><creator>Carmel, Justin H</creator><creator>Caballero, Marcos D</creator><creator>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creator><creator>Ebert-May, Diane</creator><creator>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creator><creator>Cooper, Melanie M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-8539</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160908</creationdate><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><author>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-3cd9f409604acdcdbbb0bad2348b458f3a5324df9fd1df926929c96a5d447c723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Active learning</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology - education</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry - education</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational assessment</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering - education</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics - education</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Science - education</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Universities and colleges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Sonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matz, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posey, Lynmarie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Justin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Marcos D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert-May, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverty, James T</au><au>Underwood, Sonia M</au><au>Matz, Rebecca L</au><au>Posey, Lynmarie A</au><au>Carmel, Justin H</au><au>Caballero, Marcos D</au><au>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</au><au>Ebert-May, Diane</au><au>Jardeleza, Sarah E</au><au>Cooper, Melanie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-09-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0162333</spage><epage>e0162333</epage><pages>e0162333-e0162333</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27606671</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0162333</doi><tpages>e0162333</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-8539</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2016-09, Vol.11 (9), p.e0162333-e0162333 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1817860264 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Active learning Assessments Biology Biology - education Biology and Life Sciences Chemistry Chemistry - education Cognition & reasoning Colleges & universities Core curriculum Curriculum Education Educational assessment Educational Measurement - methods Engineering Engineering - education Engineering and Technology Environmental assessment Higher education Knowledge Learning People and Places Physical Sciences Physics Physics - education Protocol Reproducibility of Results Science - education Social Sciences STEM education Students Taxonomy Teaching Transformation Universities Universities and colleges |
| title | Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20College%20Science%20Assessments:%20The%20Three-Dimensional%20Learning%20Assessment%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Laverty,%20James%20T&rft.date=2016-09-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0162333&rft.epage=e0162333&rft.pages=e0162333-e0162333&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0162333&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA470941702%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817860264&rft_id=info:pmid/27606671&rft_galeid=A470941702&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_eca1c9d2a0574cc5a84fa1cd5cacb48a&rfr_iscdi=true |