Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay
Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0161493 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Laurencet, Marie-Eva Girardin, François Rigamonti, Fabio Bevand, Anne Meyer, Philippe Carballo, David Roffi, Marco Noble, Stéphane Mach, François Gencer, Baris |
description | Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported.
We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire.
Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care.
Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0161493 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1813621994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461410271</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_aa41f87a933c45e1acf02a7cdd5dc0a9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A461410271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvgDRBYqoRAIsFe75ELpKq0NFKkVglwa0182Dg4drC9QHgGHhq3TasE9QL5Yq3Z7__tGc9k2XOCR4TW5N3S9d6CGa2dlSNMKlK09EF2SFqaD6sc04c7-4PsSQhLjEvaVNXj7CCvy5I0FTnM_pyCNxv0UQe-AN9JpC2auJ_DqQ7f0CVELW0M6NyFtY5g9G8pkHIeHfM-SnTivLPgN2i2scK7lQzv0ZmEoOfa6Lh5i2agZNwgsAJNU9zZcK2-9M442yWvibRdXCCn0CzC5mn2SIEJ8tn2O8i-nJ1-PjkfTi4-jU-OJ0Ne52UcqiYnis9VXpUNVBxLUuOmbBs6LxUFXpUi5akUYC6qEup5ORdJJwDyltSkEXSQvbzxXRsX2LaQgZGG0ConbVskYnxDCAdLtvZ6ldJkDjS7DjjfMfBRcyMZQEFUU0NLKS9KSYArnEPNhSgFxyk8yD5sT-vnKyl4qqgHs2e6_8fqBevcD1akm7QVTQavtwbefe9liGyVnksaA1a6_vreLSlIVeOEHv2D3p_dluogJaCtculcfmXKjovUSATnNUnU6B4qLSFXmqeuUzrF9wRv9gSJifJX7KAPgY1n0_9nL77us6922IUEExfBmT7q1FD7YHEDcu9C8FLdFZlgdjU0t9VgV0PDtkOTZC92H-hOdDsl9C97gxNR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813621994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris</creator><contributor>Ahrens, Ingo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris ; Ahrens, Ingo</creatorcontrib><description>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported.
We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire.
Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care.
Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27551861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndrome ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy ; Acute coronary syndromes ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angioplasty ; Bleeding ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Complications ; Diagnosis related groups ; Disorders ; DRGs ; Electrocardiography ; Ethics ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Forecasts and trends ; Global health ; Heart attacks ; Hospital admission and discharge ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Influence ; Internal medicine ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Rehabilitation ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk groups ; Severity of Illness Index ; Titration ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Laurencet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Laurencet et al 2016 Laurencet et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994963/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994963/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27902,27903,53768,53770,79345,79346</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ahrens, Ingo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girardin, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevand, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carballo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roffi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Baris</creatorcontrib><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported.
We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire.
Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care.
Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndrome</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diagnosis related groups</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>DRGs</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospital admission and discharge</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Titration</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvgDRBYqoRAIsFe75ELpKq0NFKkVglwa0182Dg4drC9QHgGHhq3TasE9QL5Yq3Z7__tGc9k2XOCR4TW5N3S9d6CGa2dlSNMKlK09EF2SFqaD6sc04c7-4PsSQhLjEvaVNXj7CCvy5I0FTnM_pyCNxv0UQe-AN9JpC2auJ_DqQ7f0CVELW0M6NyFtY5g9G8pkHIeHfM-SnTivLPgN2i2scK7lQzv0ZmEoOfa6Lh5i2agZNwgsAJNU9zZcK2-9M442yWvibRdXCCn0CzC5mn2SIEJ8tn2O8i-nJ1-PjkfTi4-jU-OJ0Ne52UcqiYnis9VXpUNVBxLUuOmbBs6LxUFXpUi5akUYC6qEup5ORdJJwDyltSkEXSQvbzxXRsX2LaQgZGG0ConbVskYnxDCAdLtvZ6ldJkDjS7DjjfMfBRcyMZQEFUU0NLKS9KSYArnEPNhSgFxyk8yD5sT-vnKyl4qqgHs2e6_8fqBevcD1akm7QVTQavtwbefe9liGyVnksaA1a6_vreLSlIVeOEHv2D3p_dluogJaCtculcfmXKjovUSATnNUnU6B4qLSFXmqeuUzrF9wRv9gSJifJX7KAPgY1n0_9nL77us6922IUEExfBmT7q1FD7YHEDcu9C8FLdFZlgdjU0t9VgV0PDtkOTZC92H-hOdDsl9C97gxNR</recordid><startdate>20160823</startdate><enddate>20160823</enddate><creator>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creator><creator>Girardin, François</creator><creator>Rigamonti, Fabio</creator><creator>Bevand, Anne</creator><creator>Meyer, Philippe</creator><creator>Carballo, David</creator><creator>Roffi, Marco</creator><creator>Noble, Stéphane</creator><creator>Mach, François</creator><creator>Gencer, Baris</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160823</creationdate><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><author>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndrome</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diagnosis related groups</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>DRGs</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospital admission and discharge</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Titration</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girardin, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevand, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carballo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roffi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Baris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</au><au>Girardin, François</au><au>Rigamonti, Fabio</au><au>Bevand, Anne</au><au>Meyer, Philippe</au><au>Carballo, David</au><au>Roffi, Marco</au><au>Noble, Stéphane</au><au>Mach, François</au><au>Gencer, Baris</au><au>Ahrens, Ingo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-08-23</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0161493</spage><pages>e0161493-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported.
We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire.
Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care.
Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27551861</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0161493</doi><tpages>e0161493</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1813621994 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acute coronary syndrome Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy Acute coronary syndromes Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Angioplasty Bleeding Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Care and treatment Complications Diagnosis related groups Disorders DRGs Electrocardiography Ethics Feasibility studies Female Forecasts and trends Global health Heart attacks Hospital admission and discharge Hospitals Humans Influence Internal medicine Length of Stay Male Medical care quality Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Patient Discharge Patient Satisfaction Patients Prospective Studies Rehabilitation Risk Assessment Risk Factors Risk groups Severity of Illness Index Titration Toxicology |
title | Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Discharge%20in%20Low-Risk%20Patients%20Hospitalized%20for%20Acute%20Coronary%20Syndromes:%20Feasibility,%20Safety%20and%20Reasons%20for%20Prolonged%20Length%20of%20Stay&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Laurencet,%20Marie-Eva&rft.date=2016-08-23&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0161493&rft.pages=e0161493-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0161493&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA461410271%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813621994&rft_id=info:pmid/27551861&rft_galeid=A461410271&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_aa41f87a933c45e1acf02a7cdd5dc0a9&rfr_iscdi=true |