Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay

Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493
Hauptverfasser: Laurencet, Marie-Eva, Girardin, François, Rigamonti, Fabio, Bevand, Anne, Meyer, Philippe, Carballo, David, Roffi, Marco, Noble, Stéphane, Mach, François, Gencer, Baris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0161493
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Laurencet, Marie-Eva
Girardin, François
Rigamonti, Fabio
Bevand, Anne
Meyer, Philippe
Carballo, David
Roffi, Marco
Noble, Stéphane
Mach, François
Gencer, Baris
description Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire. Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care. Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0161493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1813621994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461410271</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_aa41f87a933c45e1acf02a7cdd5dc0a9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A461410271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvgDRBYqoRAIsFe75ELpKq0NFKkVglwa0182Dg4drC9QHgGHhq3TasE9QL5Yq3Z7__tGc9k2XOCR4TW5N3S9d6CGa2dlSNMKlK09EF2SFqaD6sc04c7-4PsSQhLjEvaVNXj7CCvy5I0FTnM_pyCNxv0UQe-AN9JpC2auJ_DqQ7f0CVELW0M6NyFtY5g9G8pkHIeHfM-SnTivLPgN2i2scK7lQzv0ZmEoOfa6Lh5i2agZNwgsAJNU9zZcK2-9M442yWvibRdXCCn0CzC5mn2SIEJ8tn2O8i-nJ1-PjkfTi4-jU-OJ0Ne52UcqiYnis9VXpUNVBxLUuOmbBs6LxUFXpUi5akUYC6qEup5ORdJJwDyltSkEXSQvbzxXRsX2LaQgZGG0ConbVskYnxDCAdLtvZ6ldJkDjS7DjjfMfBRcyMZQEFUU0NLKS9KSYArnEPNhSgFxyk8yD5sT-vnKyl4qqgHs2e6_8fqBevcD1akm7QVTQavtwbefe9liGyVnksaA1a6_vreLSlIVeOEHv2D3p_dluogJaCtculcfmXKjovUSATnNUnU6B4qLSFXmqeuUzrF9wRv9gSJifJX7KAPgY1n0_9nL77us6922IUEExfBmT7q1FD7YHEDcu9C8FLdFZlgdjU0t9VgV0PDtkOTZC92H-hOdDsl9C97gxNR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813621994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris</creator><contributor>Ahrens, Ingo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris ; Ahrens, Ingo</creatorcontrib><description>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire. Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care. Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27551861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndrome ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy ; Acute coronary syndromes ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angioplasty ; Bleeding ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Complications ; Diagnosis related groups ; Disorders ; DRGs ; Electrocardiography ; Ethics ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Forecasts and trends ; Global health ; Heart attacks ; Hospital admission and discharge ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Influence ; Internal medicine ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Rehabilitation ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk groups ; Severity of Illness Index ; Titration ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Laurencet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Laurencet et al 2016 Laurencet et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994963/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994963/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27902,27903,53768,53770,79345,79346</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ahrens, Ingo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girardin, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevand, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carballo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roffi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Baris</creatorcontrib><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire. Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care. Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndrome</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diagnosis related groups</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>DRGs</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospital admission and discharge</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Titration</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvgDRBYqoRAIsFe75ELpKq0NFKkVglwa0182Dg4drC9QHgGHhq3TasE9QL5Yq3Z7__tGc9k2XOCR4TW5N3S9d6CGa2dlSNMKlK09EF2SFqaD6sc04c7-4PsSQhLjEvaVNXj7CCvy5I0FTnM_pyCNxv0UQe-AN9JpC2auJ_DqQ7f0CVELW0M6NyFtY5g9G8pkHIeHfM-SnTivLPgN2i2scK7lQzv0ZmEoOfa6Lh5i2agZNwgsAJNU9zZcK2-9M442yWvibRdXCCn0CzC5mn2SIEJ8tn2O8i-nJ1-PjkfTi4-jU-OJ0Ne52UcqiYnis9VXpUNVBxLUuOmbBs6LxUFXpUi5akUYC6qEup5ORdJJwDyltSkEXSQvbzxXRsX2LaQgZGG0ConbVskYnxDCAdLtvZ6ldJkDjS7DjjfMfBRcyMZQEFUU0NLKS9KSYArnEPNhSgFxyk8yD5sT-vnKyl4qqgHs2e6_8fqBevcD1akm7QVTQavtwbefe9liGyVnksaA1a6_vreLSlIVeOEHv2D3p_dluogJaCtculcfmXKjovUSATnNUnU6B4qLSFXmqeuUzrF9wRv9gSJifJX7KAPgY1n0_9nL77us6922IUEExfBmT7q1FD7YHEDcu9C8FLdFZlgdjU0t9VgV0PDtkOTZC92H-hOdDsl9C97gxNR</recordid><startdate>20160823</startdate><enddate>20160823</enddate><creator>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creator><creator>Girardin, François</creator><creator>Rigamonti, Fabio</creator><creator>Bevand, Anne</creator><creator>Meyer, Philippe</creator><creator>Carballo, David</creator><creator>Roffi, Marco</creator><creator>Noble, Stéphane</creator><creator>Mach, François</creator><creator>Gencer, Baris</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160823</creationdate><title>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</title><author>Laurencet, Marie-Eva ; Girardin, François ; Rigamonti, Fabio ; Bevand, Anne ; Meyer, Philippe ; Carballo, David ; Roffi, Marco ; Noble, Stéphane ; Mach, François ; Gencer, Baris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f821fcbf2658a6c0e17085983b5f3ac65d538ffa0cd65a7b5bd725daa291718d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndrome</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diagnosis related groups</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>DRGs</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospital admission and discharge</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Titration</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girardin, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevand, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carballo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roffi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Baris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laurencet, Marie-Eva</au><au>Girardin, François</au><au>Rigamonti, Fabio</au><au>Bevand, Anne</au><au>Meyer, Philippe</au><au>Carballo, David</au><au>Roffi, Marco</au><au>Noble, Stéphane</au><au>Mach, François</au><au>Gencer, Baris</au><au>Ahrens, Ingo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-08-23</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0161493</spage><pages>e0161493-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Length of hospital stay (LHS) is an indicator of clinical effectiveness. Early hospital discharge (≤72 hours) is recommended in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at low risk of complications, but reasons for prolonged LHS poorly reported. We collected data of ACS patients hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals from 1st July 2013 to 30th June 2015 and used the Zwolle index score to identify patients at low risk (≤ 3 points). We assessed the proportion of eligible patients who were successfully discharged within 72 hours and the reasons for prolonged LHS. Outcomes were defined as adherence to recommended therapies, major adverse events at 30 days and patients' satisfaction using a Likert-scale patient-reported questionnaire. Among 370 patients with ACS, 255 (68.9%) were at low-risk of complications but only 128 (50.2%)were eligible for early discharge, because of other clinical reasons for prolonged LHS (e.g. staged coronary revascularization, cardiac monitoring) in 127 patients (49.8%). Of the latter, only 45 (35.2%) benefitted from an early discharge. Reasons for delay in discharge in the remaining 83 patients (51.2%) were mainly due to delays in additional investigations, titration of medical therapy, admission or discharge during weekends. In the early discharge group, at 30 days, only one patient (2.2%) had an adverse event (minor bleeding), 97% of patients were satisfied by the medical care. Early discharge was successfully achieved in one third of eligible ACS patients at low risk of complications and appeared sufficiently safe while being overall appreciated by the patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27551861</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0161493</doi><tpages>e0161493</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161493
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1813621994
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acute coronary syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis
Acute Coronary Syndrome - epidemiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy
Acute coronary syndromes
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty
Bleeding
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease
Care and treatment
Complications
Diagnosis related groups
Disorders
DRGs
Electrocardiography
Ethics
Feasibility studies
Female
Forecasts and trends
Global health
Heart attacks
Hospital admission and discharge
Hospitals
Humans
Influence
Internal medicine
Length of Stay
Male
Medical care quality
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Patient Discharge
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Prospective Studies
Rehabilitation
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Risk groups
Severity of Illness Index
Titration
Toxicology
title Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Discharge%20in%20Low-Risk%20Patients%20Hospitalized%20for%20Acute%20Coronary%20Syndromes:%20Feasibility,%20Safety%20and%20Reasons%20for%20Prolonged%20Length%20of%20Stay&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Laurencet,%20Marie-Eva&rft.date=2016-08-23&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0161493&rft.pages=e0161493-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0161493&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA461410271%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813621994&rft_id=info:pmid/27551861&rft_galeid=A461410271&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_aa41f87a933c45e1acf02a7cdd5dc0a9&rfr_iscdi=true