Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry

Binaural pitch diplacusis refers to a perceptual anomaly whereby the same sound is perceived as having a different pitch depending on whether it is presented in the left or the right ear. Results in the literature suggest that this phenomenon is more prevalent, and larger, in individuals with asymme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0159975-e0159975
Hauptverfasser: Colin, David, Micheyl, Christophe, Girod, Anneline, Truy, Eric, Gallégo, Stéphane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0159975
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0159975
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Colin, David
Micheyl, Christophe
Girod, Anneline
Truy, Eric
Gallégo, Stéphane
description Binaural pitch diplacusis refers to a perceptual anomaly whereby the same sound is perceived as having a different pitch depending on whether it is presented in the left or the right ear. Results in the literature suggest that this phenomenon is more prevalent, and larger, in individuals with asymmetric hearing loss than in individuals with symmetric hearing. However, because studies devoted to this effect have thus far involved small samples, the prevalence of the effect, and its relationship with interaural asymmetries in hearing thresholds, remain unclear. In this study, psychometric functions for interaural pitch comparisons were measured in 55 subjects, including 12 normal-hearing and 43 hearing-impaired participants. Statistically significant pitch differences between the left and right ears were observed in normal-hearing participants, but the effect was usually small (less than 1.5/16 octave, or about 7%). For the hearing-impaired participants, statistically significant interaural pitch differences were found in about three-quarters of the cases. Moreover, for about half of these participants, the difference exceeded 1.5/16 octaves and, in some participants, was as large as or larger than 1/4 octave. This was the case even for the lowest frequency tested, 500 Hz. The pitch differences were weakly, but significantly, correlated with the difference in hearing thresholds between the two ears, such that larger threshold asymmetries were statistically associated with larger pitch differences. For the vast majority of the hearing-impaired participants, the direction of the pitch differences was such that pitch was perceived as higher on the side with the higher (i.e., 'worse') hearing thresholds than on the opposite side. These findings are difficult to reconcile with purely temporal models of pitch perception, but may be accounted for by place-based or spectrotemporal models.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0159975
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1812825536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461034722</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_45a9f705db4d4392a402e1ccfb540afb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A461034722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-18246caa1048a4d309038eb9bfbf457f0e2755778ffb368417ddca6fba4bc48f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYqPwHyCIhITgocV27MR-QSrjxypNmjQGr9bFsRtPTlziBOh_j9tmU4P2MPnB1vlz5-_d-ZLkJUYLnBX4w40fuhbcYuNbvUCYCVGwR8kpFhmZ5wRlj4_OJ8mzEG4QYhnP86fJCSlYlnNOT5PVJ9vC0IFLP9uNAzUEG1Joq3TVh_RKO-itb0NtN-kf29fpuYbOtuv5dd3pUHtXpcuwbRrdd9vnyRMDLugX4z5Lfnz9cn12Pr-4_LY6W17MVUFYP8ec0FwBYEQ50CpDAmVcl6I0paGsMEhHcawouDFl1EhxUVUKclMCLRXlJpslrw9xN84HOVYhSMwx4YTFvCKxOhCVhxu56WwD3VZ6sHJv8N1aQtdb5bSkDIQpEKtKWtFMEKCIaKyUKRlFEBXMko_ja0PZ6Erpto_FmgSd3rS2lmv_W1IhEI65zZJ3Y4DO_xp06GVjg9LOQav9sNfNcsEIxQ9BCeeF4CKib_5D7y_ESK0h5mpb46NEtQsqlzTHKKMFIZFa3EPFVenGqvi7jI32icP7iUNkev23X8MQglx9v3o4e_lzyr49YmsNrq-Dd8P-C05BegBV50PotLnrB0ZyNxy31ZC74ZDjcES3V8e9vHO6nYbsHyPkCQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812825536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Colin, David ; Micheyl, Christophe ; Girod, Anneline ; Truy, Eric ; Gallégo, Stéphane</creator><contributor>Elhilali, Mounya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Colin, David ; Micheyl, Christophe ; Girod, Anneline ; Truy, Eric ; Gallégo, Stéphane ; Elhilali, Mounya</creatorcontrib><description>Binaural pitch diplacusis refers to a perceptual anomaly whereby the same sound is perceived as having a different pitch depending on whether it is presented in the left or the right ear. Results in the literature suggest that this phenomenon is more prevalent, and larger, in individuals with asymmetric hearing loss than in individuals with symmetric hearing. However, because studies devoted to this effect have thus far involved small samples, the prevalence of the effect, and its relationship with interaural asymmetries in hearing thresholds, remain unclear. In this study, psychometric functions for interaural pitch comparisons were measured in 55 subjects, including 12 normal-hearing and 43 hearing-impaired participants. Statistically significant pitch differences between the left and right ears were observed in normal-hearing participants, but the effect was usually small (less than 1.5/16 octave, or about 7%). For the hearing-impaired participants, statistically significant interaural pitch differences were found in about three-quarters of the cases. Moreover, for about half of these participants, the difference exceeded 1.5/16 octaves and, in some participants, was as large as or larger than 1/4 octave. This was the case even for the lowest frequency tested, 500 Hz. The pitch differences were weakly, but significantly, correlated with the difference in hearing thresholds between the two ears, such that larger threshold asymmetries were statistically associated with larger pitch differences. For the vast majority of the hearing-impaired participants, the direction of the pitch differences was such that pitch was perceived as higher on the side with the higher (i.e., 'worse') hearing thresholds than on the opposite side. These findings are difficult to reconcile with purely temporal models of pitch perception, but may be accounted for by place-based or spectrotemporal models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27536884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Asymmetry ; Auditory Threshold ; Binaural hearing ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Ear ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Female ; Frequency ; Functional Laterality ; Hearing disorders ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neurosciences ; Octaves ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Pitch Perception ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistical significance ; Studies ; Thresholds ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0159975-e0159975</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Colin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Colin et al 2016 Colin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-18246caa1048a4d309038eb9bfbf457f0e2755778ffb368417ddca6fba4bc48f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-18246caa1048a4d309038eb9bfbf457f0e2755778ffb368417ddca6fba4bc48f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990190/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4990190/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Elhilali, Mounya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Colin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheyl, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girod, Anneline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truy, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallégo, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><title>Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Binaural pitch diplacusis refers to a perceptual anomaly whereby the same sound is perceived as having a different pitch depending on whether it is presented in the left or the right ear. Results in the literature suggest that this phenomenon is more prevalent, and larger, in individuals with asymmetric hearing loss than in individuals with symmetric hearing. However, because studies devoted to this effect have thus far involved small samples, the prevalence of the effect, and its relationship with interaural asymmetries in hearing thresholds, remain unclear. In this study, psychometric functions for interaural pitch comparisons were measured in 55 subjects, including 12 normal-hearing and 43 hearing-impaired participants. Statistically significant pitch differences between the left and right ears were observed in normal-hearing participants, but the effect was usually small (less than 1.5/16 octave, or about 7%). For the hearing-impaired participants, statistically significant interaural pitch differences were found in about three-quarters of the cases. Moreover, for about half of these participants, the difference exceeded 1.5/16 octaves and, in some participants, was as large as or larger than 1/4 octave. This was the case even for the lowest frequency tested, 500 Hz. The pitch differences were weakly, but significantly, correlated with the difference in hearing thresholds between the two ears, such that larger threshold asymmetries were statistically associated with larger pitch differences. For the vast majority of the hearing-impaired participants, the direction of the pitch differences was such that pitch was perceived as higher on the side with the higher (i.e., 'worse') hearing thresholds than on the opposite side. These findings are difficult to reconcile with purely temporal models of pitch perception, but may be accounted for by place-based or spectrotemporal models.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Binaural hearing</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Ear</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Hearing disorders</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Octaves</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYqPwHyCIhITgocV27MR-QSrjxypNmjQGr9bFsRtPTlziBOh_j9tmU4P2MPnB1vlz5-_d-ZLkJUYLnBX4w40fuhbcYuNbvUCYCVGwR8kpFhmZ5wRlj4_OJ8mzEG4QYhnP86fJCSlYlnNOT5PVJ9vC0IFLP9uNAzUEG1Joq3TVh_RKO-itb0NtN-kf29fpuYbOtuv5dd3pUHtXpcuwbRrdd9vnyRMDLugX4z5Lfnz9cn12Pr-4_LY6W17MVUFYP8ec0FwBYEQ50CpDAmVcl6I0paGsMEhHcawouDFl1EhxUVUKclMCLRXlJpslrw9xN84HOVYhSMwx4YTFvCKxOhCVhxu56WwD3VZ6sHJv8N1aQtdb5bSkDIQpEKtKWtFMEKCIaKyUKRlFEBXMko_ja0PZ6Erpto_FmgSd3rS2lmv_W1IhEI65zZJ3Y4DO_xp06GVjg9LOQav9sNfNcsEIxQ9BCeeF4CKib_5D7y_ESK0h5mpb46NEtQsqlzTHKKMFIZFa3EPFVenGqvi7jI32icP7iUNkev23X8MQglx9v3o4e_lzyr49YmsNrq-Dd8P-C05BegBV50PotLnrB0ZyNxy31ZC74ZDjcES3V8e9vHO6nYbsHyPkCQQ</recordid><startdate>20160818</startdate><enddate>20160818</enddate><creator>Colin, David</creator><creator>Micheyl, Christophe</creator><creator>Girod, Anneline</creator><creator>Truy, Eric</creator><creator>Gallégo, Stéphane</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160818</creationdate><title>Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry</title><author>Colin, David ; Micheyl, Christophe ; Girod, Anneline ; Truy, Eric ; Gallégo, Stéphane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-18246caa1048a4d309038eb9bfbf457f0e2755778ffb368417ddca6fba4bc48f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Binaural hearing</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Ear</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Hearing disorders</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Octaves</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheyl, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girod, Anneline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truy, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallégo, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colin, David</au><au>Micheyl, Christophe</au><au>Girod, Anneline</au><au>Truy, Eric</au><au>Gallégo, Stéphane</au><au>Elhilali, Mounya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-08-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0159975</spage><epage>e0159975</epage><pages>e0159975-e0159975</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Binaural pitch diplacusis refers to a perceptual anomaly whereby the same sound is perceived as having a different pitch depending on whether it is presented in the left or the right ear. Results in the literature suggest that this phenomenon is more prevalent, and larger, in individuals with asymmetric hearing loss than in individuals with symmetric hearing. However, because studies devoted to this effect have thus far involved small samples, the prevalence of the effect, and its relationship with interaural asymmetries in hearing thresholds, remain unclear. In this study, psychometric functions for interaural pitch comparisons were measured in 55 subjects, including 12 normal-hearing and 43 hearing-impaired participants. Statistically significant pitch differences between the left and right ears were observed in normal-hearing participants, but the effect was usually small (less than 1.5/16 octave, or about 7%). For the hearing-impaired participants, statistically significant interaural pitch differences were found in about three-quarters of the cases. Moreover, for about half of these participants, the difference exceeded 1.5/16 octaves and, in some participants, was as large as or larger than 1/4 octave. This was the case even for the lowest frequency tested, 500 Hz. The pitch differences were weakly, but significantly, correlated with the difference in hearing thresholds between the two ears, such that larger threshold asymmetries were statistically associated with larger pitch differences. For the vast majority of the hearing-impaired participants, the direction of the pitch differences was such that pitch was perceived as higher on the side with the higher (i.e., 'worse') hearing thresholds than on the opposite side. These findings are difficult to reconcile with purely temporal models of pitch perception, but may be accounted for by place-based or spectrotemporal models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27536884</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0159975</doi><tpages>e0159975</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0159975-e0159975
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1812825536
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Aged
Asymmetry
Auditory Threshold
Binaural hearing
Biology and Life Sciences
Case-Control Studies
Ear
Ears & hearing
Female
Frequency
Functional Laterality
Hearing disorders
Hearing loss
Hearing Loss - physiopathology
Hearing Tests
Humans
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Neurosciences
Octaves
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Pitch Perception
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Statistical significance
Studies
Thresholds
Young Adult
title Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Binaural%20Diplacusis%20and%20Its%20Relationship%20with%20Hearing-Threshold%20Asymmetry&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Colin,%20David&rft.date=2016-08-18&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0159975&rft.epage=e0159975&rft.pages=e0159975-e0159975&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0159975&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA461034722%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812825536&rft_id=info:pmid/27536884&rft_galeid=A461034722&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_45a9f705db4d4392a402e1ccfb540afb&rfr_iscdi=true