Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the interve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2016-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e1002092-e1002092 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1002092 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e1002092 |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | O'Reilly, Sharleen L Dunbar, James A Versace, Vincent Janus, Edward Best, James D Carter, Rob Oats, Jeremy J N Skinner, Timothy Ackland, Michael Phillips, Paddy A Ebeling, Peter R Reynolds, John Shih, Sophy T F Hagger, Virginia Coates, Michael Wildey, Carol |
description | Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year.
In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.
Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1811731793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A479484177</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b61190951b2d43de90a37e39db9e966e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A479484177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-dbfedf12c306ae4242a42fc2bf4fcb040a2800f6bdd0b6120cde20f408bde56c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCIxMt4SPGvJDUPSFEHZdImJjSeLcc-d67SuLPTSTzyn3Ol2dSiKg852Z_73t3Xl2VvKZlQXtNPy7CJve4m6xXYCSWEEcmeZae0FLKgVV0934tPslcpLZGRRJKX2QmrRSlLwk6zP9dhuIOYcu0GiPkc0qAHH1A4v_C6hQFS7vu82aQh6s7r_Py6mV80Hz_nTf5T9zasfAKbz0I_xNB1GN5Gj8nB5Tq_CWno9bCvdRPhAfptBQzDIurV6-yF012CN-P_LPv17evt7Htx9WN-OWuuClNxOhS2dWAdZYaTSoNggmnBnGGtE860RBDNpoS4qrWWtBVlxFhgxAkybS2UleFn2fud7roLSY3uJUWnlNac1pIjcbkjbNBLtY5-peNvFbRX_w5CXCgdB286UFiBopclbZkV3IIkmtfApW0lyKoC1PoyVtu0-EAGZ0b_DkQPb3p_pxbhQQlZUcElCpyPAjHcb_BZFDptoOt0D2Gz7ZvUJWeETxH98B96fLqRWmgcwPcuYF2zFVWNqKWYClrXSBVHqAX0gE2GHpzH4wN-coTHz8LKm6MJYpdgYkgpgnvyhBK1XezH5tV2sdW42Jj2bt_Pp6THTeZ_AXu-9bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811731793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>O'Reilly, Sharleen L ; Dunbar, James A ; Versace, Vincent ; Janus, Edward ; Best, James D ; Carter, Rob ; Oats, Jeremy J N ; Skinner, Timothy ; Ackland, Michael ; Phillips, Paddy A ; Ebeling, Peter R ; Reynolds, John ; Shih, Sophy T F ; Hagger, Virginia ; Coates, Michael ; Wildey, Carol</creator><contributor>Wareham, Nicholas J</contributor><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Sharleen L ; Dunbar, James A ; Versace, Vincent ; Janus, Edward ; Best, James D ; Carter, Rob ; Oats, Jeremy J N ; Skinner, Timothy ; Ackland, Michael ; Phillips, Paddy A ; Ebeling, Peter R ; Reynolds, John ; Shih, Sophy T F ; Hagger, Virginia ; Coates, Michael ; Wildey, Carol ; MAGDA Study Group ; Wareham, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><description>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year.
In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.
Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27459502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Australia ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Body weight ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control ; Diabetes therapy ; Diabetes, Gestational - prevention & control ; Ethics ; Fasting ; Female ; Funding ; Gestational diabetes ; Glucose ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intervention ; Lifestyles ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mothers ; Postnatal Care - methods ; Pregnancy ; Prevention programs ; Researchers ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Type 2 diabetes ; Waist Circumference ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2016-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e1002092-e1002092</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: O'Reilly SL, Dunbar JA, Versace V, Janus E, Best JD, Carter R, et al. (2016) Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program. PLoS Med 13(7): e1002092. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092</rights><rights>2016 O’Reilly et al 2016 O’Reilly et al</rights><rights>2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: O'Reilly SL, Dunbar JA, Versace V, Janus E, Best JD, Carter R, et al. (2016) Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program. PLoS Med 13(7): e1002092. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-dbfedf12c306ae4242a42fc2bf4fcb040a2800f6bdd0b6120cde20f408bde56c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-dbfedf12c306ae4242a42fc2bf4fcb040a2800f6bdd0b6120cde20f408bde56c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0213-4515 ; 0000-0002-8825-8625 ; 0000-0003-0866-4365 ; 0000-0002-0018-6963 ; 0000-0002-9985-7631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961439/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961439/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27459502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wareham, Nicholas J</contributor><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Sharleen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janus, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oats, Jeremy J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackland, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Paddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Sophy T F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagger, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildey, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGDA Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year.
In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.
Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Diabetes therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Postnatal Care - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCIxMt4SPGvJDUPSFEHZdImJjSeLcc-d67SuLPTSTzyn3Ol2dSiKg852Z_73t3Xl2VvKZlQXtNPy7CJve4m6xXYCSWEEcmeZae0FLKgVV0934tPslcpLZGRRJKX2QmrRSlLwk6zP9dhuIOYcu0GiPkc0qAHH1A4v_C6hQFS7vu82aQh6s7r_Py6mV80Hz_nTf5T9zasfAKbz0I_xNB1GN5Gj8nB5Tq_CWno9bCvdRPhAfptBQzDIurV6-yF012CN-P_LPv17evt7Htx9WN-OWuuClNxOhS2dWAdZYaTSoNggmnBnGGtE860RBDNpoS4qrWWtBVlxFhgxAkybS2UleFn2fud7roLSY3uJUWnlNac1pIjcbkjbNBLtY5-peNvFbRX_w5CXCgdB286UFiBopclbZkV3IIkmtfApW0lyKoC1PoyVtu0-EAGZ0b_DkQPb3p_pxbhQQlZUcElCpyPAjHcb_BZFDptoOt0D2Gz7ZvUJWeETxH98B96fLqRWmgcwPcuYF2zFVWNqKWYClrXSBVHqAX0gE2GHpzH4wN-coTHz8LKm6MJYpdgYkgpgnvyhBK1XezH5tV2sdW42Jj2bt_Pp6THTeZ_AXu-9bQ</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>O'Reilly, Sharleen L</creator><creator>Dunbar, James A</creator><creator>Versace, Vincent</creator><creator>Janus, Edward</creator><creator>Best, James D</creator><creator>Carter, Rob</creator><creator>Oats, Jeremy J N</creator><creator>Skinner, Timothy</creator><creator>Ackland, Michael</creator><creator>Phillips, Paddy A</creator><creator>Ebeling, Peter R</creator><creator>Reynolds, John</creator><creator>Shih, Sophy T F</creator><creator>Hagger, Virginia</creator><creator>Coates, Michael</creator><creator>Wildey, Carol</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-4515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-8625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0866-4365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0018-6963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-7631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program</title><author>O'Reilly, Sharleen L ; Dunbar, James A ; Versace, Vincent ; Janus, Edward ; Best, James D ; Carter, Rob ; Oats, Jeremy J N ; Skinner, Timothy ; Ackland, Michael ; Phillips, Paddy A ; Ebeling, Peter R ; Reynolds, John ; Shih, Sophy T F ; Hagger, Virginia ; Coates, Michael ; Wildey, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-dbfedf12c306ae4242a42fc2bf4fcb040a2800f6bdd0b6120cde20f408bde56c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Diabetes therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Postnatal Care - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Sharleen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janus, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oats, Jeremy J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackland, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Paddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Sophy T F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagger, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildey, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGDA Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Reilly, Sharleen L</au><au>Dunbar, James A</au><au>Versace, Vincent</au><au>Janus, Edward</au><au>Best, James D</au><au>Carter, Rob</au><au>Oats, Jeremy J N</au><au>Skinner, Timothy</au><au>Ackland, Michael</au><au>Phillips, Paddy A</au><au>Ebeling, Peter R</au><au>Reynolds, John</au><au>Shih, Sophy T F</au><au>Hagger, Virginia</au><au>Coates, Michael</au><au>Wildey, Carol</au><au>Wareham, Nicholas J</au><aucorp>MAGDA Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e1002092</spage><epage>e1002092</epage><pages>e1002092-e1002092</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year.
In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.
Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27459502</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-4515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-8625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0866-4365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0018-6963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-7631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2016-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e1002092-e1002092 |
issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1811731793 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Analysis Australia Biology and Life Sciences Body Mass Index Body weight Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - etiology Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control Diabetes therapy Diabetes, Gestational - prevention & control Ethics Fasting Female Funding Gestational diabetes Glucose Health aspects Hospitals Humans Intervention Lifestyles Medicine and Health Sciences Mothers Postnatal Care - methods Pregnancy Prevention programs Researchers Risk Factors Studies Treatment Outcome Type 2 diabetes Waist Circumference Womens health |
title | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T00%3A12%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mothers%20after%20Gestational%20Diabetes%20in%20Australia%20(MAGDA):%20A%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial%20of%20a%20Postnatal%20Diabetes%20Prevention%20Program&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=O'Reilly,%20Sharleen%20L&rft.aucorp=MAGDA%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e1002092&rft.epage=e1002092&rft.pages=e1002092-e1002092&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA479484177%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811731793&rft_id=info:pmid/27459502&rft_galeid=A479484177&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b61190951b2d43de90a37e39db9e966e&rfr_iscdi=true |