Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour

Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2016-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e0159017-e0159017
Hauptverfasser: Sanders, Jet G, Jenkins, Rob
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0159017
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0159017
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Sanders, Jet G
Jenkins, Rob
description Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectly via voting intentions, gathered from 81,564 responses across 70 opinion polls ahead of the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 (Study 2) and 149,064 responses across 77 opinion polls ahead of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum of 2016 (Study 3). In all three studies, risk-tolerance decreased from Monday to Thursday before returning to a higher level on Friday. This pattern is politically significant because UK elections and referendums are traditionally held on a Thursday-the lowest point for risk tolerance. In particular, it raises the possibility that voting outcomes in the UK could be systematically risk-averse. In line with our analysis, the actual proportion of Yes votes in the Scottish Independence Referendum was 4% lower than forecast. Taken together, our findings reveal that the seven-day weekly cycle may have unexpected consequences for human decision-making. They also suggest that the day on which a vote is held could determine its outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1802585878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A457357790</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9352c770215e42e1a0639bc02d54f1c9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A457357790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-987ead45569131c9b26a4f261ac80774fae1267f27549a3ffb1ddf8450b923d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B6ILgujDnfm5SXwQarF6UCjUWh9DNpvc5ZpLzs1usf-9ubttuZU-lDwkJJ_5zkxmpiheQzCFmMFPy9i3QfnpOgYzBZAKANmT4hAKjCYVAvjp3vmgeJHSEgCKeVU9Lw4QwwIBBA6Lz7-Nufa35anvdderzsWQShfKC5euy8voTauCNqUKTXkVOxfm5VezUDcuO39ZPLPKJ_Nq2I-KX6ffLk9-TM7Ov89Ojs8mmiHaTQRnRjWE0kpADLWoUaWIRRVUmgPGiFUGoopZxCgRCltbw6axnFBQC4QbiI-KtzvdtY9JDmknCTlAlFPOeCZmO6KJainXrVup9lZG5eT2IrZzqdrOaW-kwBRpxgCC1BBkoAIVFrUGqKHE5uiy1pfBW1-vTKNN6FrlR6Ljl-AWch5vJBGYU4KzwIdBoI1_epM6uXJJG-9VMLHfxs2rnCvnj0ExB7lsm7De_Yc-_BEDNVc5VxdszCHqjag8JpRhypgAmZo-QOXVmJXTuZ2sy_cjg48jg8x05m83V31Kcvbz4vHs-dWYfb_HLozy3SJF32-7cAySHajbmFJr7H09IJCbabj7DbmZBjlMQzZ7s1_Le6O79sf_AKiwAZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802585878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Sanders, Jet G ; Jenkins, Rob</creator><contributor>Georgantzis, Nikolaos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Jet G ; Jenkins, Rob ; Georgantzis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><description>Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectly via voting intentions, gathered from 81,564 responses across 70 opinion polls ahead of the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 (Study 2) and 149,064 responses across 77 opinion polls ahead of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum of 2016 (Study 3). In all three studies, risk-tolerance decreased from Monday to Thursday before returning to a higher level on Friday. This pattern is politically significant because UK elections and referendums are traditionally held on a Thursday-the lowest point for risk tolerance. In particular, it raises the possibility that voting outcomes in the UK could be systematically risk-averse. In line with our analysis, the actual proportion of Yes votes in the Scottish Independence Referendum was 4% lower than forecast. Taken together, our findings reveal that the seven-day weekly cycle may have unexpected consequences for human decision-making. They also suggest that the day on which a vote is held could determine its outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27392020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Conservatism ; Decision Making ; Earnings ; Elections ; EU membership ; Female ; Humans ; Independence ; Labor unions ; Laboratories ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Opinion polls ; Parliamentary elections ; People and places ; Personality ; Political aspects ; Politics ; Public opinion surveys ; Referendums ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Risk Factors ; Social Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Time Factors ; Tolerance ; Union membership ; United Kingdom ; Variation ; Voter behavior ; Voting</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e0159017-e0159017</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Sanders, Jenkins. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Sanders, Jenkins 2016 Sanders, Jenkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-987ead45569131c9b26a4f261ac80774fae1267f27549a3ffb1ddf8450b923d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-987ead45569131c9b26a4f261ac80774fae1267f27549a3ffb1ddf8450b923d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938543/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4938543/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,12844,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Georgantzis, Nikolaos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Jet G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Rob</creatorcontrib><title>Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectly via voting intentions, gathered from 81,564 responses across 70 opinion polls ahead of the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 (Study 2) and 149,064 responses across 77 opinion polls ahead of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum of 2016 (Study 3). In all three studies, risk-tolerance decreased from Monday to Thursday before returning to a higher level on Friday. This pattern is politically significant because UK elections and referendums are traditionally held on a Thursday-the lowest point for risk tolerance. In particular, it raises the possibility that voting outcomes in the UK could be systematically risk-averse. In line with our analysis, the actual proportion of Yes votes in the Scottish Independence Referendum was 4% lower than forecast. Taken together, our findings reveal that the seven-day weekly cycle may have unexpected consequences for human decision-making. They also suggest that the day on which a vote is held could determine its outcome.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>EU membership</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independence</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Opinion polls</subject><subject>Parliamentary elections</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tolerance</subject><subject>Union membership</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B6ILgujDnfm5SXwQarF6UCjUWh9DNpvc5ZpLzs1usf-9ubttuZU-lDwkJJ_5zkxmpiheQzCFmMFPy9i3QfnpOgYzBZAKANmT4hAKjCYVAvjp3vmgeJHSEgCKeVU9Lw4QwwIBBA6Lz7-Nufa35anvdderzsWQShfKC5euy8voTauCNqUKTXkVOxfm5VezUDcuO39ZPLPKJ_Nq2I-KX6ffLk9-TM7Ov89Ojs8mmiHaTQRnRjWE0kpADLWoUaWIRRVUmgPGiFUGoopZxCgRCltbw6axnFBQC4QbiI-KtzvdtY9JDmknCTlAlFPOeCZmO6KJainXrVup9lZG5eT2IrZzqdrOaW-kwBRpxgCC1BBkoAIVFrUGqKHE5uiy1pfBW1-vTKNN6FrlR6Ljl-AWch5vJBGYU4KzwIdBoI1_epM6uXJJG-9VMLHfxs2rnCvnj0ExB7lsm7De_Yc-_BEDNVc5VxdszCHqjag8JpRhypgAmZo-QOXVmJXTuZ2sy_cjg48jg8x05m83V31Kcvbz4vHs-dWYfb_HLozy3SJF32-7cAySHajbmFJr7H09IJCbabj7DbmZBjlMQzZ7s1_Le6O79sf_AKiwAZE</recordid><startdate>20160708</startdate><enddate>20160708</enddate><creator>Sanders, Jet G</creator><creator>Jenkins, Rob</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160708</creationdate><title>Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour</title><author>Sanders, Jet G ; Jenkins, Rob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-987ead45569131c9b26a4f261ac80774fae1267f27549a3ffb1ddf8450b923d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>EU membership</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independence</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Opinion polls</topic><topic>Parliamentary elections</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tolerance</topic><topic>Union membership</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Jet G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Rob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanders, Jet G</au><au>Jenkins, Rob</au><au>Georgantzis, Nikolaos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-07-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0159017</spage><epage>e0159017</epage><pages>e0159017-e0159017</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Risk tolerance is fundamental to decision-making and behaviour. Here we show that individuals' tolerance of risk follows a weekly cycle. We observed this cycle directly in a behavioural experiment using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., 2002; Study 1). We also observed it indirectly via voting intentions, gathered from 81,564 responses across 70 opinion polls ahead of the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014 (Study 2) and 149,064 responses across 77 opinion polls ahead of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum of 2016 (Study 3). In all three studies, risk-tolerance decreased from Monday to Thursday before returning to a higher level on Friday. This pattern is politically significant because UK elections and referendums are traditionally held on a Thursday-the lowest point for risk tolerance. In particular, it raises the possibility that voting outcomes in the UK could be systematically risk-averse. In line with our analysis, the actual proportion of Yes votes in the Scottish Independence Referendum was 4% lower than forecast. Taken together, our findings reveal that the seven-day weekly cycle may have unexpected consequences for human decision-making. They also suggest that the day on which a vote is held could determine its outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27392020</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0159017</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e0159017-e0159017
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1802585878
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attitudes
Biology and Life Sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Conservatism
Decision Making
Earnings
Elections
EU membership
Female
Humans
Independence
Labor unions
Laboratories
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Models, Theoretical
Opinion polls
Parliamentary elections
People and places
Personality
Political aspects
Politics
Public opinion surveys
Referendums
Research and Analysis Methods
Risk
Risk aversion
Risk Factors
Social Behavior
Social Sciences
Time Factors
Tolerance
Union membership
United Kingdom
Variation
Voter behavior
Voting
title Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weekly%20Fluctuations%20in%20Risk%20Tolerance%20and%20Voting%20Behaviour&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sanders,%20Jet%20G&rft.date=2016-07-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0159017&rft.epage=e0159017&rft.pages=e0159017-e0159017&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0159017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA457357790%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802585878&rft_id=info:pmid/27392020&rft_galeid=A457357790&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9352c770215e42e1a0639bc02d54f1c9&rfr_iscdi=true