Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation
Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0156962-e0156962 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0156962 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0156962 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Asakawa-Haas, Kenji Schiestl, Martina Bugnyar, Thomas Massen, Jorg J M |
description | Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens, Corvus corax, in triads, giving them first the choice to cooperate with either a highly familiar or a rather unfamiliar partner and, second, with either a friend or a non-friend using a cooperative string-pulling task. In either test, the ravens had a second choice and could cooperate with the other partner, given that this one had not pulled the string in the meantime. We show that during the experiments, these partner ravens indeed learn to wait and inhibit pulling, respectively. Moreover, the results of these two experiments show that ravens' preferences for a specific cooperation partner are not based on familiarity. In contrast, the ravens did show a preference based on relationship quality, as they did choose to cooperate significantly more with friends than with non-friends and they were also more proficient when cooperating with a friend. In order to further identify the proximate mechanism of this preference, we designed an open-choice experiment for the whole group where all birds were free to cooperate on two separate apparatuses. This set-up allowed us to distinguish between preferences for close proximity and preferences to cooperate. The results revealed that friends preferred staying close to each other, but did not necessarily cooperate with one another, suggesting that tolerance of proximity and not relationship quality as a whole may be the driving force behind partner choice in raven cooperation. Consequently, we stress the importance of experiments that allow such titrations and, suggest that these results have important implications for the interpretations of cooperation studies that did not include open partner choice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0156962 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1795664512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A454759932</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_40ec1b7c625d4afca2676c82a8feb750</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A454759932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-dadef6e2fa4cfd9b89ba42c5bfabee0b278148a7ee1a96e2ab1e839c07b93e823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk21r2zAQx83YWLtu32BshsFoXySTZFkPbwYl7CFQ6Oge3oqzfE4cHCuT7NB9-8mLW-JR2NALidPv_ro73SXJS0rmNJP03cb1voVmvnMtzgnNhRbsUXJKdcZmgpHs8dH5JHkWwoaQPFNCPE1OmGRKMC5PE_YFfNeiTxdrV1tM6za9gT226fnC-X0fUus83F6kC-d26KGrXfs8eVJBE_DFuJ8l3z9--Lb4PLu6_rRcXF7NrNS0m5VQYiWQVcBtVepC6QI4s3lRQYFICiYV5QokIgUdOSgoqkxbIgudoWLZWfL6oLtrXDBjusFQqXMheE4HYnkgSgcbs_P1Fvwv46A2fwzOr0zMrrYNGk7Q0kJawfKSQ2WBCSmsYqAqLGROotb78bW-2GJpse08NBPR6U1br83K7Q3XhLF8COZ8FPDuZ4-hM9s6WGwaaNH1MW5FlGRcK_pvVGohlFScR_TNX-jDhRipFcRc67ZyMUQ7iJpLnnOZ69gJkZo_QMVV4ra2sY2qOtonDhcTh8h0eNutoA_BLL_e_D97_WPKvj1i1whNtw6u6YfuClOQH0DrXQgeq_v_oMQMU3BXDTNMgRmnILq9Ov7Le6e7ts9-AwZXATA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795664512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji ; Schiestl, Martina ; Bugnyar, Thomas ; Massen, Jorg J M</creator><contributor>Sánchez, Angel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji ; Schiestl, Martina ; Bugnyar, Thomas ; Massen, Jorg J M ; Sánchez, Angel</creatorcontrib><description>Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens, Corvus corax, in triads, giving them first the choice to cooperate with either a highly familiar or a rather unfamiliar partner and, second, with either a friend or a non-friend using a cooperative string-pulling task. In either test, the ravens had a second choice and could cooperate with the other partner, given that this one had not pulled the string in the meantime. We show that during the experiments, these partner ravens indeed learn to wait and inhibit pulling, respectively. Moreover, the results of these two experiments show that ravens' preferences for a specific cooperation partner are not based on familiarity. In contrast, the ravens did show a preference based on relationship quality, as they did choose to cooperate significantly more with friends than with non-friends and they were also more proficient when cooperating with a friend. In order to further identify the proximate mechanism of this preference, we designed an open-choice experiment for the whole group where all birds were free to cooperate on two separate apparatuses. This set-up allowed us to distinguish between preferences for close proximity and preferences to cooperate. The results revealed that friends preferred staying close to each other, but did not necessarily cooperate with one another, suggesting that tolerance of proximity and not relationship quality as a whole may be the driving force behind partner choice in raven cooperation. Consequently, we stress the importance of experiments that allow such titrations and, suggest that these results have important implications for the interpretations of cooperation studies that did not include open partner choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27286247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Behavior ; Behavior, Animal ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Choice Behavior ; Cooperation ; Cooperative Behavior ; Corvus corax ; Crows - physiology ; Experiments ; Exploratory Behavior ; Familiarity ; Female ; Friendship ; Male ; Mating behavior ; Medical research ; Physiological aspects ; Preferences ; Problem solving ; Quality ; Ravens ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sexual Behavior, Animal ; Social Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0156962-e0156962</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Asakawa-Haas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Asakawa-Haas et al 2016 Asakawa-Haas et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-dadef6e2fa4cfd9b89ba42c5bfabee0b278148a7ee1a96e2ab1e839c07b93e823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-dadef6e2fa4cfd9b89ba42c5bfabee0b278148a7ee1a96e2ab1e839c07b93e823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27286247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sánchez, Angel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiestl, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnyar, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massen, Jorg J M</creatorcontrib><title>Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens, Corvus corax, in triads, giving them first the choice to cooperate with either a highly familiar or a rather unfamiliar partner and, second, with either a friend or a non-friend using a cooperative string-pulling task. In either test, the ravens had a second choice and could cooperate with the other partner, given that this one had not pulled the string in the meantime. We show that during the experiments, these partner ravens indeed learn to wait and inhibit pulling, respectively. Moreover, the results of these two experiments show that ravens' preferences for a specific cooperation partner are not based on familiarity. In contrast, the ravens did show a preference based on relationship quality, as they did choose to cooperate significantly more with friends than with non-friends and they were also more proficient when cooperating with a friend. In order to further identify the proximate mechanism of this preference, we designed an open-choice experiment for the whole group where all birds were free to cooperate on two separate apparatuses. This set-up allowed us to distinguish between preferences for close proximity and preferences to cooperate. The results revealed that friends preferred staying close to each other, but did not necessarily cooperate with one another, suggesting that tolerance of proximity and not relationship quality as a whole may be the driving force behind partner choice in raven cooperation. Consequently, we stress the importance of experiments that allow such titrations and, suggest that these results have important implications for the interpretations of cooperation studies that did not include open partner choice.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Corvus corax</subject><subject>Crows - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Exploratory Behavior</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Ravens</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk21r2zAQx83YWLtu32BshsFoXySTZFkPbwYl7CFQ6Oge3oqzfE4cHCuT7NB9-8mLW-JR2NALidPv_ro73SXJS0rmNJP03cb1voVmvnMtzgnNhRbsUXJKdcZmgpHs8dH5JHkWwoaQPFNCPE1OmGRKMC5PE_YFfNeiTxdrV1tM6za9gT226fnC-X0fUus83F6kC-d26KGrXfs8eVJBE_DFuJ8l3z9--Lb4PLu6_rRcXF7NrNS0m5VQYiWQVcBtVepC6QI4s3lRQYFICiYV5QokIgUdOSgoqkxbIgudoWLZWfL6oLtrXDBjusFQqXMheE4HYnkgSgcbs_P1Fvwv46A2fwzOr0zMrrYNGk7Q0kJawfKSQ2WBCSmsYqAqLGROotb78bW-2GJpse08NBPR6U1br83K7Q3XhLF8COZ8FPDuZ4-hM9s6WGwaaNH1MW5FlGRcK_pvVGohlFScR_TNX-jDhRipFcRc67ZyMUQ7iJpLnnOZ69gJkZo_QMVV4ra2sY2qOtonDhcTh8h0eNutoA_BLL_e_D97_WPKvj1i1whNtw6u6YfuClOQH0DrXQgeq_v_oMQMU3BXDTNMgRmnILq9Ov7Le6e7ts9-AwZXATA</recordid><startdate>20160610</startdate><enddate>20160610</enddate><creator>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji</creator><creator>Schiestl, Martina</creator><creator>Bugnyar, Thomas</creator><creator>Massen, Jorg J M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160610</creationdate><title>Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation</title><author>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji ; Schiestl, Martina ; Bugnyar, Thomas ; Massen, Jorg J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-dadef6e2fa4cfd9b89ba42c5bfabee0b278148a7ee1a96e2ab1e839c07b93e823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Corvus corax</topic><topic>Crows - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Exploratory Behavior</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Ravens</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiestl, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnyar, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massen, Jorg J M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asakawa-Haas, Kenji</au><au>Schiestl, Martina</au><au>Bugnyar, Thomas</au><au>Massen, Jorg J M</au><au>Sánchez, Angel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-06-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0156962</spage><epage>e0156962</epage><pages>e0156962-e0156962</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens, Corvus corax, in triads, giving them first the choice to cooperate with either a highly familiar or a rather unfamiliar partner and, second, with either a friend or a non-friend using a cooperative string-pulling task. In either test, the ravens had a second choice and could cooperate with the other partner, given that this one had not pulled the string in the meantime. We show that during the experiments, these partner ravens indeed learn to wait and inhibit pulling, respectively. Moreover, the results of these two experiments show that ravens' preferences for a specific cooperation partner are not based on familiarity. In contrast, the ravens did show a preference based on relationship quality, as they did choose to cooperate significantly more with friends than with non-friends and they were also more proficient when cooperating with a friend. In order to further identify the proximate mechanism of this preference, we designed an open-choice experiment for the whole group where all birds were free to cooperate on two separate apparatuses. This set-up allowed us to distinguish between preferences for close proximity and preferences to cooperate. The results revealed that friends preferred staying close to each other, but did not necessarily cooperate with one another, suggesting that tolerance of proximity and not relationship quality as a whole may be the driving force behind partner choice in raven cooperation. Consequently, we stress the importance of experiments that allow such titrations and, suggest that these results have important implications for the interpretations of cooperation studies that did not include open partner choice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27286247</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0156962</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0156962-e0156962 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1795664512 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Behavior Behavior, Animal Biology Biology and Life Sciences Birds Choice Behavior Cooperation Cooperative Behavior Corvus corax Crows - physiology Experiments Exploratory Behavior Familiarity Female Friendship Male Mating behavior Medical research Physiological aspects Preferences Problem solving Quality Ravens Recognition (Psychology) Research and Analysis Methods Sexual Behavior, Animal Social Behavior Social Sciences Veterinary medicine |
title | Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partner%20Choice%20in%20Raven%20(Corvus%20corax)%20Cooperation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Asakawa-Haas,%20Kenji&rft.date=2016-06-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0156962&rft.epage=e0156962&rft.pages=e0156962-e0156962&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0156962&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA454759932%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795664512&rft_id=info:pmid/27286247&rft_galeid=A454759932&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_40ec1b7c625d4afca2676c82a8feb750&rfr_iscdi=true |