Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation?
The W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) ecosystem, shared among Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, represents the last lion stronghold of West Africa. To assess the impact of trophy hunting on lion populations in hunting areas of the WAP, we analyzed trends in harvest rates from 1999 to 2014. We also investigated whe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155763-e0155763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0155763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0155763 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Bouché, Philippe Crosmary, William Kafando, Pierre Doamba, Benoit Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude Vermeulen, Cédric Chardonnet, Philippe |
description | The W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) ecosystem, shared among Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, represents the last lion stronghold of West Africa. To assess the impact of trophy hunting on lion populations in hunting areas of the WAP, we analyzed trends in harvest rates from 1999 to 2014. We also investigated whether the hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity experienced steeper declines in lion harvest between 1999 and 2014, and whether lion densities in hunting areas were lower than in national parks. Lion harvest rate remained overall constant in the WAP. At initial hunting intensities below 1.5 lions/1000km2, most hunting areas experienced an increase in lion harvest rate, although that increase was of lower magnitude for hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity. The proportion of hunting areas that experienced a decline in lion harvest rate increased at initial hunting intensities above 1.5 lions/1000km2. In 2014, the lion population of the WAP was estimated with a spoor count at 418 (230-648) adults and sub-adult individuals, comparable to the 311 (123-498) individuals estimated in the previous 2012 spoor survey. We found no significant lion spoor density differences between national parks and hunting areas. Hunting areas with higher mean harvest rates did not have lower lion densities. The ratio of large adult males, females and sub-adults was similar between the national parks and the hunting areas. These results suggested that the lion population was not significantly affected by hunting in the WAP. We concluded that a quota of 1 lion/1000km2 would be sustainable for the WAP. Based on our results, an import embargo on lion trophies from the WAP would not be justified. It could ruin the incentive of local actors to conserve lions in hunting areas, and lead to a drastic reduction of lion range in West Africa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0155763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1789207375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453370036</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5ba9859591d44b81af31f41fb2b9a820</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453370036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-b7c2a5856714976ed6c290eb725353235a753685a7734a5c814a3719ccc21e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNU1Gr0zAULqJ4r9N_IBoQRB82m6RpUh-UMab3wuSCDn0MaXbaZbTNbtIO_fdma-9llfsggSZNvu87yXfOiaKXOJ5hyvGHne1co6rZ3jYwizFjPKWPokucUTJNSUwfn60vomfe7-KYUZGmT6MLwrEgmWCXkVnWuXKlRbZBKxM-V13TmqZEa2f3WwMeFc7W6Bf4Fs0LZ7T6iOYNWhYF6NYcAH0D5TsHyDqk0HrrQLWotb3WwjYe3EG14efz8-hJoSoPL4Z5Eq2_LNeLq-nq5uv1Yr6aak7TdppzTRQTLOU4yXgKm1STLIacE0YZJZQpzmgqwsRpopgWOFHBjkxrTTCkdBK97mX3lfVyMMlLzEVGYk4DeRJd94iNVTu5d6ZW7o-0ysjThnWlVK41ugLJchVcyliGN0mSC6wKiosEFznJMyWCsZPo0xCty2vYaGhap6qR6PikMVtZ2oNMRCooE0GA9gKVgRJC8NzIAzkRT-uuCrfRMgdJSCokDpZkSWC9G8I6e9uF3MjaeA1VpRqwXf9aHgqC0AB98w_0YU8GVKnCs01T2HBbfRSV84RRyuOYHr2dPYAKYwO10aEOCxP2R4T3I0LAtPC7LVXnvbz-8f3_sTc_x9i3Z9gtqKrdelt1x0LzY2DSA7Wz3jso7lODY3lsozs35LGN5NBGgfbqPK33pLu-oX8BsG8UoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789207375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Bouché, Philippe ; Crosmary, William ; Kafando, Pierre ; Doamba, Benoit ; Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude ; Vermeulen, Cédric ; Chardonnet, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouché, Philippe ; Crosmary, William ; Kafando, Pierre ; Doamba, Benoit ; Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude ; Vermeulen, Cédric ; Chardonnet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>The W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) ecosystem, shared among Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, represents the last lion stronghold of West Africa. To assess the impact of trophy hunting on lion populations in hunting areas of the WAP, we analyzed trends in harvest rates from 1999 to 2014. We also investigated whether the hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity experienced steeper declines in lion harvest between 1999 and 2014, and whether lion densities in hunting areas were lower than in national parks. Lion harvest rate remained overall constant in the WAP. At initial hunting intensities below 1.5 lions/1000km2, most hunting areas experienced an increase in lion harvest rate, although that increase was of lower magnitude for hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity. The proportion of hunting areas that experienced a decline in lion harvest rate increased at initial hunting intensities above 1.5 lions/1000km2. In 2014, the lion population of the WAP was estimated with a spoor count at 418 (230-648) adults and sub-adult individuals, comparable to the 311 (123-498) individuals estimated in the previous 2012 spoor survey. We found no significant lion spoor density differences between national parks and hunting areas. Hunting areas with higher mean harvest rates did not have lower lion densities. The ratio of large adult males, females and sub-adults was similar between the national parks and the hunting areas. These results suggested that the lion population was not significantly affected by hunting in the WAP. We concluded that a quota of 1 lion/1000km2 would be sustainable for the WAP. Based on our results, an import embargo on lion trophies from the WAP would not be justified. It could ruin the incentive of local actors to conserve lions in hunting areas, and lead to a drastic reduction of lion range in West Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27182985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adults ; Africa, Western ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Endangered & extinct species ; Environmental sciences & ecology ; Females ; Geography ; Habitats ; Humans ; Hunting ; Large mammals ; Life sciences ; Lion ; Lions ; Males ; Management ; National parks ; Panthera ; Panthera leo ; Parks & recreation areas ; People and Places ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; Protection and preservation ; Sciences de l’environnement & écologie ; Sciences du vivant ; WAP ; West Africa ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155763-e0155763</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Bouché et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Bouché et al 2016 Bouché et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-b7c2a5856714976ed6c290eb725353235a753685a7734a5c814a3719ccc21e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-b7c2a5856714976ed6c290eb725353235a753685a7734a5c814a3719ccc21e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868358/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868358/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27182985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouché, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosmary, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kafando, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doamba, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardonnet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation?</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) ecosystem, shared among Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, represents the last lion stronghold of West Africa. To assess the impact of trophy hunting on lion populations in hunting areas of the WAP, we analyzed trends in harvest rates from 1999 to 2014. We also investigated whether the hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity experienced steeper declines in lion harvest between 1999 and 2014, and whether lion densities in hunting areas were lower than in national parks. Lion harvest rate remained overall constant in the WAP. At initial hunting intensities below 1.5 lions/1000km2, most hunting areas experienced an increase in lion harvest rate, although that increase was of lower magnitude for hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity. The proportion of hunting areas that experienced a decline in lion harvest rate increased at initial hunting intensities above 1.5 lions/1000km2. In 2014, the lion population of the WAP was estimated with a spoor count at 418 (230-648) adults and sub-adult individuals, comparable to the 311 (123-498) individuals estimated in the previous 2012 spoor survey. We found no significant lion spoor density differences between national parks and hunting areas. Hunting areas with higher mean harvest rates did not have lower lion densities. The ratio of large adult males, females and sub-adults was similar between the national parks and the hunting areas. These results suggested that the lion population was not significantly affected by hunting in the WAP. We concluded that a quota of 1 lion/1000km2 would be sustainable for the WAP. Based on our results, an import embargo on lion trophies from the WAP would not be justified. It could ruin the incentive of local actors to conserve lions in hunting areas, and lead to a drastic reduction of lion range in West Africa.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Africa, Western</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental sciences & ecology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Large mammals</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Lion</subject><subject>Lions</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Panthera</subject><subject>Panthera leo</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Sciences de l’environnement & écologie</subject><subject>Sciences du vivant</subject><subject>WAP</subject><subject>West Africa</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNU1Gr0zAULqJ4r9N_IBoQRB82m6RpUh-UMab3wuSCDn0MaXbaZbTNbtIO_fdma-9llfsggSZNvu87yXfOiaKXOJ5hyvGHne1co6rZ3jYwizFjPKWPokucUTJNSUwfn60vomfe7-KYUZGmT6MLwrEgmWCXkVnWuXKlRbZBKxM-V13TmqZEa2f3WwMeFc7W6Bf4Fs0LZ7T6iOYNWhYF6NYcAH0D5TsHyDqk0HrrQLWotb3WwjYe3EG14efz8-hJoSoPL4Z5Eq2_LNeLq-nq5uv1Yr6aak7TdppzTRQTLOU4yXgKm1STLIacE0YZJZQpzmgqwsRpopgWOFHBjkxrTTCkdBK97mX3lfVyMMlLzEVGYk4DeRJd94iNVTu5d6ZW7o-0ysjThnWlVK41ugLJchVcyliGN0mSC6wKiosEFznJMyWCsZPo0xCty2vYaGhap6qR6PikMVtZ2oNMRCooE0GA9gKVgRJC8NzIAzkRT-uuCrfRMgdJSCokDpZkSWC9G8I6e9uF3MjaeA1VpRqwXf9aHgqC0AB98w_0YU8GVKnCs01T2HBbfRSV84RRyuOYHr2dPYAKYwO10aEOCxP2R4T3I0LAtPC7LVXnvbz-8f3_sTc_x9i3Z9gtqKrdelt1x0LzY2DSA7Wz3jso7lODY3lsozs35LGN5NBGgfbqPK33pLu-oX8BsG8UoA</recordid><startdate>20160516</startdate><enddate>20160516</enddate><creator>Bouché, Philippe</creator><creator>Crosmary, William</creator><creator>Kafando, Pierre</creator><creator>Doamba, Benoit</creator><creator>Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Cédric</creator><creator>Chardonnet, Philippe</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>Q33</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160516</creationdate><title>Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation?</title><author>Bouché, Philippe ; Crosmary, William ; Kafando, Pierre ; Doamba, Benoit ; Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude ; Vermeulen, Cédric ; Chardonnet, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-b7c2a5856714976ed6c290eb725353235a753685a7734a5c814a3719ccc21e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Africa, Western</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental sciences & ecology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Large mammals</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Lion</topic><topic>Lions</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Panthera</topic><topic>Panthera leo</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Sciences de l’environnement & écologie</topic><topic>Sciences du vivant</topic><topic>WAP</topic><topic>West Africa</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouché, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosmary, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kafando, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doamba, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chardonnet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouché, Philippe</au><au>Crosmary, William</au><au>Kafando, Pierre</au><au>Doamba, Benoit</au><au>Kidjo, Ferdinand Claude</au><au>Vermeulen, Cédric</au><au>Chardonnet, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation?</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-05-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0155763</spage><epage>e0155763</epage><pages>e0155763-e0155763</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The W-Arly-Pendjari (WAP) ecosystem, shared among Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger, represents the last lion stronghold of West Africa. To assess the impact of trophy hunting on lion populations in hunting areas of the WAP, we analyzed trends in harvest rates from 1999 to 2014. We also investigated whether the hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity experienced steeper declines in lion harvest between 1999 and 2014, and whether lion densities in hunting areas were lower than in national parks. Lion harvest rate remained overall constant in the WAP. At initial hunting intensities below 1.5 lions/1000km2, most hunting areas experienced an increase in lion harvest rate, although that increase was of lower magnitude for hunting areas with higher initial hunting intensity. The proportion of hunting areas that experienced a decline in lion harvest rate increased at initial hunting intensities above 1.5 lions/1000km2. In 2014, the lion population of the WAP was estimated with a spoor count at 418 (230-648) adults and sub-adult individuals, comparable to the 311 (123-498) individuals estimated in the previous 2012 spoor survey. We found no significant lion spoor density differences between national parks and hunting areas. Hunting areas with higher mean harvest rates did not have lower lion densities. The ratio of large adult males, females and sub-adults was similar between the national parks and the hunting areas. These results suggested that the lion population was not significantly affected by hunting in the WAP. We concluded that a quota of 1 lion/1000km2 would be sustainable for the WAP. Based on our results, an import embargo on lion trophies from the WAP would not be justified. It could ruin the incentive of local actors to conserve lions in hunting areas, and lead to a drastic reduction of lion range in West Africa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27182985</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0155763</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155763-e0155763 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1789207375 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adults Africa, Western Animal populations Animals Biology and Life Sciences Conservation Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Endangered & extinct species Environmental sciences & ecology Females Geography Habitats Humans Hunting Large mammals Life sciences Lion Lions Males Management National parks Panthera Panthera leo Parks & recreation areas People and Places Population Density Population Dynamics Protection and preservation Sciences de l’environnement & écologie Sciences du vivant WAP West Africa Wildlife conservation |
title | Embargo on Lion Hunting Trophies from West Africa: An Effective Measure or a Threat to Lion Conservation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embargo%20on%20Lion%20Hunting%20Trophies%20from%20West%20Africa:%20An%20Effective%20Measure%20or%20a%20Threat%20to%20Lion%20Conservation?&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bouch%C3%A9,%20Philippe&rft.date=2016-05-16&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0155763&rft.epage=e0155763&rft.pages=e0155763-e0155763&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155763&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453370036%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789207375&rft_id=info:pmid/27182985&rft_galeid=A453370036&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5ba9859591d44b81af31f41fb2b9a820&rfr_iscdi=true |