Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis
Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mix...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155050-e0155050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0155050 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0155050 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Klement, Rainer J Champ, Colin E Otto, Christoph Kämmerer, Ulrike |
description | Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mixed results concerning tumor growth retardation. The aim was therefore to synthesize the evidence for a growth inhibiting effect of KDs when used as a monotherapy in mice.
We conducted a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on all studies assessing the survival (defined as the time to reach a pre-defined endpoint such as tumor volume) of mice on an unrestricted KD compared to a high carbohydrate standard diet (SD). For 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria either a mean survival time ratio (MR) or hazard ratio (HR) between the KD and SD groups could be obtained. The posterior estimates for the MR and HR averaged over four priors on the between-study heterogeneity τ2 were MR = 0.85 (95% highest posterior density interval (HPDI) = [0.73, 0.97]) and HR = 0.55 (95% HPDI = [0.26, 0.87]), indicating a significant overall benefit of the KD in terms of prolonged mean survival times and reduced hazard rate. All studies that used a brain tumor model also chose a late starting point for the KD (at least one day after tumor initiation) which accounted for 26% of the heterogeneity. In this subgroup the KD was less effective (MR = 0.89, 95% HPDI = [0.76, 1.04]).
There was an overall tumor growth delaying effect of unrestricted KDs in mice. Future experiments should aim at differentiating the effects of KD timing versus tumor location, since external evidence is currently consistent with an influence of both of these factors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0155050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1787763983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453370548</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6094e1f38ca14cb594d29a53d7a53ad4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453370548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-6f6c4e4e4335687f397024ca0b286d3e9ab837bd42b657d221c36ec1151997163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfRi1nwn04vCUqsuthS0ehsymTO7KbOTdZIR--_NdqdlR3ohgSScPOc9OcmbZS8xmmEq8YdrP_SdaWcb38EMYc4RR4-yQ1xSUgiC6OO9_UH2LIRrhDhVQjzNDojEvCRYHWYn8y664mpY-z4_axqwMeS-yb9C9EvonM0_Okgh1-UXzsJxPs8vIJpinirfBBeeZ08a0wZ4Ma5H2Y9PZ1enX4rzy8-L0_l5YSVXsRCNsAzSoJQLJRtaSkSYNagiStQUSlMpKquakUpwWROCLRVgMea4LCUW9Ch7vdPdtD7osfWgsVRSCloqmojFjqi9udab3q1Nf6O9cfo24PulNn10tgUtUMkAN1RZg5mteMlqUhpOa5kmU7OkdTJWG6o11Ba62Jt2Ijo96dxKL_1vzZTAlG0v824U6P2vAULUaxcstK3pwA-391aECCTLhL75B324u5FamtSA6xqf6tqtqJ4zTqlEnKlEzR6g0qhh7WzySeNSfJLwfpKQmAh_4tIMIejF92__z17-nLJv99gVmDaugm-H6HwXpiDbgbb3IfTQ3D8yRnpr87vX0Fub69HmKe3V_gfdJ935mv4Fsdzz0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787763983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Klement, Rainer J ; Champ, Colin E ; Otto, Christoph ; Kämmerer, Ulrike</creator><contributor>Canoll, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Klement, Rainer J ; Champ, Colin E ; Otto, Christoph ; Kämmerer, Ulrike ; Canoll, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mixed results concerning tumor growth retardation. The aim was therefore to synthesize the evidence for a growth inhibiting effect of KDs when used as a monotherapy in mice.
We conducted a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on all studies assessing the survival (defined as the time to reach a pre-defined endpoint such as tumor volume) of mice on an unrestricted KD compared to a high carbohydrate standard diet (SD). For 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria either a mean survival time ratio (MR) or hazard ratio (HR) between the KD and SD groups could be obtained. The posterior estimates for the MR and HR averaged over four priors on the between-study heterogeneity τ2 were MR = 0.85 (95% highest posterior density interval (HPDI) = [0.73, 0.97]) and HR = 0.55 (95% HPDI = [0.26, 0.87]), indicating a significant overall benefit of the KD in terms of prolonged mean survival times and reduced hazard rate. All studies that used a brain tumor model also chose a late starting point for the KD (at least one day after tumor initiation) which accounted for 26% of the heterogeneity. In this subgroup the KD was less effective (MR = 0.89, 95% HPDI = [0.76, 1.04]).
There was an overall tumor growth delaying effect of unrestricted KDs in mice. Future experiments should aim at differentiating the effects of KD timing versus tumor location, since external evidence is currently consistent with an influence of both of these factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27159218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Animal models ; Animals ; Anticancer properties ; Bayesian analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain ; Brain cancer ; Brain tumors ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cancer treatment ; Carbohydrates ; Convulsions & seizures ; Diabetes ; Diet ; Diet, Ketogenic ; Fasting ; Fatty acids ; Gene expression ; Glucose ; Growth rate ; Health aspects ; Heterogeneity ; High fat diet ; Insulin ; Mathematical models ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Metabolism ; Methods ; Mice ; Neoplasms - diet therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Studies ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Systematic review ; Triglycerides</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155050-e0155050</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Klement et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Klement et al 2016 Klement et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-6f6c4e4e4335687f397024ca0b286d3e9ab837bd42b657d221c36ec1151997163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-6f6c4e4e4335687f397024ca0b286d3e9ab837bd42b657d221c36ec1151997163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861343/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4861343/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159218$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Canoll, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Klement, Rainer J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champ, Colin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kämmerer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mixed results concerning tumor growth retardation. The aim was therefore to synthesize the evidence for a growth inhibiting effect of KDs when used as a monotherapy in mice.
We conducted a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on all studies assessing the survival (defined as the time to reach a pre-defined endpoint such as tumor volume) of mice on an unrestricted KD compared to a high carbohydrate standard diet (SD). For 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria either a mean survival time ratio (MR) or hazard ratio (HR) between the KD and SD groups could be obtained. The posterior estimates for the MR and HR averaged over four priors on the between-study heterogeneity τ2 were MR = 0.85 (95% highest posterior density interval (HPDI) = [0.73, 0.97]) and HR = 0.55 (95% HPDI = [0.26, 0.87]), indicating a significant overall benefit of the KD in terms of prolonged mean survival times and reduced hazard rate. All studies that used a brain tumor model also chose a late starting point for the KD (at least one day after tumor initiation) which accounted for 26% of the heterogeneity. In this subgroup the KD was less effective (MR = 0.89, 95% HPDI = [0.76, 1.04]).
There was an overall tumor growth delaying effect of unrestricted KDs in mice. Future experiments should aim at differentiating the effects of KD timing versus tumor location, since external evidence is currently consistent with an influence of both of these factors.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Convulsions & seizures</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Ketogenic</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>High fat diet</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diet therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Triglycerides</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EBQfRi1nwn04vCUqsuthS0ehsymTO7KbOTdZIR--_NdqdlR3ohgSScPOc9OcmbZS8xmmEq8YdrP_SdaWcb38EMYc4RR4-yQ1xSUgiC6OO9_UH2LIRrhDhVQjzNDojEvCRYHWYn8y664mpY-z4_axqwMeS-yb9C9EvonM0_Okgh1-UXzsJxPs8vIJpinirfBBeeZ08a0wZ4Ma5H2Y9PZ1enX4rzy8-L0_l5YSVXsRCNsAzSoJQLJRtaSkSYNagiStQUSlMpKquakUpwWROCLRVgMea4LCUW9Ch7vdPdtD7osfWgsVRSCloqmojFjqi9udab3q1Nf6O9cfo24PulNn10tgUtUMkAN1RZg5mteMlqUhpOa5kmU7OkdTJWG6o11Ba62Jt2Ijo96dxKL_1vzZTAlG0v824U6P2vAULUaxcstK3pwA-391aECCTLhL75B324u5FamtSA6xqf6tqtqJ4zTqlEnKlEzR6g0qhh7WzySeNSfJLwfpKQmAh_4tIMIejF92__z17-nLJv99gVmDaugm-H6HwXpiDbgbb3IfTQ3D8yRnpr87vX0Fub69HmKe3V_gfdJ935mv4Fsdzz0A</recordid><startdate>20160509</startdate><enddate>20160509</enddate><creator>Klement, Rainer J</creator><creator>Champ, Colin E</creator><creator>Otto, Christoph</creator><creator>Kämmerer, Ulrike</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160509</creationdate><title>Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Klement, Rainer J ; Champ, Colin E ; Otto, Christoph ; Kämmerer, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-6f6c4e4e4335687f397024ca0b286d3e9ab837bd42b657d221c36ec1151997163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Convulsions & seizures</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Ketogenic</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>High fat diet</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diet therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Triglycerides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klement, Rainer J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champ, Colin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kämmerer, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klement, Rainer J</au><au>Champ, Colin E</au><au>Otto, Christoph</au><au>Kämmerer, Ulrike</au><au>Canoll, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-05-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0155050</spage><epage>e0155050</epage><pages>e0155050-e0155050</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mixed results concerning tumor growth retardation. The aim was therefore to synthesize the evidence for a growth inhibiting effect of KDs when used as a monotherapy in mice.
We conducted a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on all studies assessing the survival (defined as the time to reach a pre-defined endpoint such as tumor volume) of mice on an unrestricted KD compared to a high carbohydrate standard diet (SD). For 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria either a mean survival time ratio (MR) or hazard ratio (HR) between the KD and SD groups could be obtained. The posterior estimates for the MR and HR averaged over four priors on the between-study heterogeneity τ2 were MR = 0.85 (95% highest posterior density interval (HPDI) = [0.73, 0.97]) and HR = 0.55 (95% HPDI = [0.26, 0.87]), indicating a significant overall benefit of the KD in terms of prolonged mean survival times and reduced hazard rate. All studies that used a brain tumor model also chose a late starting point for the KD (at least one day after tumor initiation) which accounted for 26% of the heterogeneity. In this subgroup the KD was less effective (MR = 0.89, 95% HPDI = [0.76, 1.04]).
There was an overall tumor growth delaying effect of unrestricted KDs in mice. Future experiments should aim at differentiating the effects of KD timing versus tumor location, since external evidence is currently consistent with an influence of both of these factors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27159218</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0155050</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0155050-e0155050 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1787763983 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abnormalities Animal models Animals Anticancer properties Bayesian analysis Biology and Life Sciences Brain Brain cancer Brain tumors Cancer Cancer therapies Cancer treatment Carbohydrates Convulsions & seizures Diabetes Diet Diet, Ketogenic Fasting Fatty acids Gene expression Glucose Growth rate Health aspects Heterogeneity High fat diet Insulin Mathematical models Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Metabolism Methods Mice Neoplasms - diet therapy Patient outcomes Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods Studies Survival Survival analysis Systematic review Triglycerides |
title | Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A55%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-Tumor%20Effects%20of%20Ketogenic%20Diets%20in%20Mice:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Klement,%20Rainer%20J&rft.date=2016-05-09&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0155050&rft.epage=e0155050&rft.pages=e0155050-e0155050&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0155050&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453370548%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787763983&rft_id=info:pmid/27159218&rft_galeid=A453370548&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6094e1f38ca14cb594d29a53d7a53ad4&rfr_iscdi=true |