The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving "conflict" in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945-2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-04, Vol.11 (4), p.e0154148-e0154148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0154148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0154148 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Van Holt, Tracy Johnson, Jeffery C Moates, Shiloh Carley, Kathleen M |
description | We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving "conflict" in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945-2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed-such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957-1971 where ideas didn't persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0154148 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1785219401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453418216</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fa2fc0ee7c514e1e90e4b4cecc5cda18</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453418216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ebe90f8f1b80e1995ae2c5b77ac56ed5c94c9d398354ae14dce7fd532386fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjE2btM2LsIyrDiwszA6-hvT2Zpohk4xN6p9vb8bpLlPZB-lDys3vnpzcnCR5SbI5KSryYeuG3koz3zuL84wwSmj9KDknvMhnZZ4Vj0_-z5Jn3m-zjBV1WT5NzvKK5JSV_Dy5WneYrpzB1Kn0kwzSY_Cps-ktaLRBKw3p0iozoAVMf-rQaZsuXKxoCOkKPcoeuufJEyWNxxfjepGsP1-tF19n1zdflovL6xmUPA8zbJBnqlakqTMknDOJObCmqiSwElsGnAJvC14XjEoktAWsVMuKPNpWDSsuktdH2b1xXowD8IJUNcsJpxmJxPJItE5uxb7XO9n_Fk5q8bfg-o2QfdBgUCiZK8gQK2CEIonOkDYUEIBBK0kdtT6Opw3NDqMXG3ppJqLTHas7sXE_BK0pr7KDwLtRoHffB_RB7LQHNEZadMPRd0V5NB7RN_-gD99upDYyXkBb5eK5cBAVl5QVlNQ5KSM1f4CKX4s7DTEtSsf6pOH9pCEyAX-FjRy8F8vb1f-zN9-m7NsTtkNpQuedGYJ21k9BegShd973qO6HTDJxCPvdNMQh7GIMe2x7dfpA90136S7-AN4c-bE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785219401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Van Holt, Tracy ; Johnson, Jeffery C ; Moates, Shiloh ; Carley, Kathleen M</creator><contributor>Du, Wen-Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Van Holt, Tracy ; Johnson, Jeffery C ; Moates, Shiloh ; Carley, Kathleen M ; Du, Wen-Bo</creatorcontrib><description>We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving "conflict" in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945-2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed-such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957-1971 where ideas didn't persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27124569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bibliometrics ; Citation analysis ; Civil war ; Coherence ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Conflict ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Critical path ; Critical path analysis ; Critical path method ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Datasets as Topic ; Democracy ; Drugs ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Geography ; Humans ; Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) ; Negotiating - psychology ; Network analysis ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research Design - trends ; Resource availability ; Science ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-04, Vol.11 (4), p.e0154148-e0154148</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Van Holt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Van Holt et al 2016 Van Holt et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ebe90f8f1b80e1995ae2c5b77ac56ed5c94c9d398354ae14dce7fd532386fb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ebe90f8f1b80e1995ae2c5b77ac56ed5c94c9d398354ae14dce7fd532386fb53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849708/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849708/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2104,2930,23873,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27124569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Du, Wen-Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Van Holt, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffery C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moates, Shiloh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving "conflict" in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945-2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed-such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957-1971 where ideas didn't persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Citation analysis</subject><subject>Civil war</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Critical path</subject><subject>Critical path analysis</subject><subject>Critical path method</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Datasets as Topic</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Negotiating - psychology</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research Design - trends</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjE2btM2LsIyrDiwszA6-hvT2Zpohk4xN6p9vb8bpLlPZB-lDys3vnpzcnCR5SbI5KSryYeuG3koz3zuL84wwSmj9KDknvMhnZZ4Vj0_-z5Jn3m-zjBV1WT5NzvKK5JSV_Dy5WneYrpzB1Kn0kwzSY_Cps-ktaLRBKw3p0iozoAVMf-rQaZsuXKxoCOkKPcoeuufJEyWNxxfjepGsP1-tF19n1zdflovL6xmUPA8zbJBnqlakqTMknDOJObCmqiSwElsGnAJvC14XjEoktAWsVMuKPNpWDSsuktdH2b1xXowD8IJUNcsJpxmJxPJItE5uxb7XO9n_Fk5q8bfg-o2QfdBgUCiZK8gQK2CEIonOkDYUEIBBK0kdtT6Opw3NDqMXG3ppJqLTHas7sXE_BK0pr7KDwLtRoHffB_RB7LQHNEZadMPRd0V5NB7RN_-gD99upDYyXkBb5eK5cBAVl5QVlNQ5KSM1f4CKX4s7DTEtSsf6pOH9pCEyAX-FjRy8F8vb1f-zN9-m7NsTtkNpQuedGYJ21k9BegShd973qO6HTDJxCPvdNMQh7GIMe2x7dfpA90136S7-AN4c-bE</recordid><startdate>20160428</startdate><enddate>20160428</enddate><creator>Van Holt, Tracy</creator><creator>Johnson, Jeffery C</creator><creator>Moates, Shiloh</creator><creator>Carley, Kathleen M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160428</creationdate><title>The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research</title><author>Van Holt, Tracy ; Johnson, Jeffery C ; Moates, Shiloh ; Carley, Kathleen M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ebe90f8f1b80e1995ae2c5b77ac56ed5c94c9d398354ae14dce7fd532386fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Citation analysis</topic><topic>Civil war</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Critical path</topic><topic>Critical path analysis</topic><topic>Critical path method</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Datasets as Topic</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Negotiating - psychology</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research Design - trends</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Holt, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffery C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moates, Shiloh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Kathleen M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Holt, Tracy</au><au>Johnson, Jeffery C</au><au>Moates, Shiloh</au><au>Carley, Kathleen M</au><au>Du, Wen-Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-04-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0154148</spage><epage>e0154148</epage><pages>e0154148-e0154148</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving "conflict" in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945-2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed-such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957-1971 where ideas didn't persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27124569</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0154148</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-04, Vol.11 (4), p.e0154148-e0154148 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1785219401 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Bibliometrics Citation analysis Civil war Coherence Computer and Information Sciences Conflict Conflict (Psychology) Critical path Critical path analysis Critical path method Data processing Datasets Datasets as Topic Democracy Drugs Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Geography Humans Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) Negotiating - psychology Network analysis People and Places Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods Research Design - trends Resource availability Science Social networks Social organization Social Sciences |
title | The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T09%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Datasets%20on%20Scientific%20Influence%20within%20Conflict%20Research&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Van%20Holt,%20Tracy&rft.date=2016-04-28&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0154148&rft.epage=e0154148&rft.pages=e0154148-e0154148&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0154148&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453418216%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785219401&rft_id=info:pmid/27124569&rft_galeid=A453418216&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fa2fc0ee7c514e1e90e4b4cecc5cda18&rfr_iscdi=true |