National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States
To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare). Cross-sectional analysis using the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, annual probability samples of outp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151610-e0151610 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0151610 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0151610 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Nguyen, Oanh Kieu Makam, Anil N Halm, Ethan A |
description | To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare).
Cross-sectional analysis using the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, annual probability samples of outpatient visits in the U.S. We estimated national prevalence of safety-net visits using weighted percentages to account for the complex survey design. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine characteristics associated with safety-net clinic use.
More than one-third (35.0%) of all primary care safety-net clinic visits were among adults with non-Medicaid primary insurance, representing 6,642,000 annual visits nationally. The strongest predictors of safety-net use among non-Medicaid insured adults were: being from a high-poverty neighborhood (AOR 9.53, 95% CI 4.65-19.53), being dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.38-3.30), and being black (AOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.66) or Hispanic (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.32-3.93). Compared to non-safety-net users, non-Medicaid insured adults who used safety-net clinics had a higher prevalence of diabetes (23.5% vs. 15.0%, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0151610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1777088720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453451849</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a640c5cdf6a3403c9c3fab33ebc8ee44</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453451849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7018081df160da1ec7308d0e75901811c149486dfe3d5a202d2e73a9479003483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12PEyEUhidG467Vf2CUxMToxVQYmGHmxqRp_Giy7hprvSUUzrQ0U-gCo-6_l9rZTWv2wnABgee8h_PCybLnBI8J5eTdxvXeym68cxbGmJSkIvhBdk4aWuRVgenDo_VZ9iSEDcYlravqcXZWcFzwivDz7PpSRuOSDloEQK5Fc9lCvMkvIaJpZ6xRAbXOo6_ebKW_QVPpAcmtsys00X0XA_pl4hpdOpt_AW2UNBrNbOi9tAqQsSiuAS2siaDRPMoI4Wn2qJVdgGfDPMoWHz98n37OL64-zaaTi1xVTRFzjkmNa6JbUmEtCShOca0x8LJJJ4QowhpWV7oFqktZ4EIXwKlsGG8wpqymo-zlQXfXuSAGt4IgnHNc1zy5MspmB0I7uRG7Q4XCSSP-bji_EtJHozoQsmJYlUq3laQMU9Uo2solpbBUNQBjSev9kK1fbkErsNHL7kT09MSatVi5n4LVhBHCk8CbQcC76x5CFFsTFHSdtOD6w72bOpnQJPTVP-j91Q3USqYCjG1dyqv2omLCSspKUrO91vgeKg0NW6PS12pN2j8JeHsSkJgIv-NK9iGI2fzb_7NXP07Z10fsGmQX18F1_f53hlOQHUDlXQge2juTCRb7zrh1Q-w7QwydkcJeHD_QXdBtK9A_8IEHKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777088720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu ; Makam, Anil N ; Halm, Ethan A</creator><contributor>Gorlova, Olga Y</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu ; Makam, Anil N ; Halm, Ethan A ; Gorlova, Olga Y</creatorcontrib><description>To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare).
Cross-sectional analysis using the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, annual probability samples of outpatient visits in the U.S. We estimated national prevalence of safety-net visits using weighted percentages to account for the complex survey design. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine characteristics associated with safety-net clinic use.
More than one-third (35.0%) of all primary care safety-net clinic visits were among adults with non-Medicaid primary insurance, representing 6,642,000 annual visits nationally. The strongest predictors of safety-net use among non-Medicaid insured adults were: being from a high-poverty neighborhood (AOR 9.53, 95% CI 4.65-19.53), being dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.38-3.30), and being black (AOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.66) or Hispanic (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.32-3.93). Compared to non-safety-net users, non-Medicaid insured adults who used safety-net clinics had a higher prevalence of diabetes (23.5% vs. 15.0%, p<0.001), hypertension (49.4% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001), multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions; 53.5% vs. 40.9%, p<0.001) and polypharmacy (≥4 medications; 48.8% vs. 34.0%, p<0.001). Nearly one-third (28.9%) of Medicare beneficiaries in the safety-net were dual eligibles, compared to only 6.8% of Medicare beneficiaries in non-safety-net clinics (p<0.001).
Safety net clinics are important primary care delivery sites for non-Medicaid insured minority and low-income populations with a high burden of chronic illness. The critical role of safety-net clinics in care delivery is likely to persist despite expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27027617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Analysis ; Bivariate analysis ; Care and treatment ; Chronic conditions ; Chronic diseases ; Chronic illnesses ; Diabetes mellitus ; Earth Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Female ; Government programs ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Indigent care ; Insurance ; Insurance coverage ; Low income groups ; Male ; Management ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Minority Groups ; People and Places ; Polls & surveys ; Poverty ; Primary care nursing ; Primary Health Care ; Regression analysis ; Safety ; Safety and security measures ; Safety-net Providers ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; United States</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151610-e0151610</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Nguyen et al 2016 Nguyen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7018081df160da1ec7308d0e75901811c149486dfe3d5a202d2e73a9479003483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7018081df160da1ec7308d0e75901811c149486dfe3d5a202d2e73a9479003483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4814117/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4814117/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gorlova, Olga Y</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makam, Anil N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halm, Ethan A</creatorcontrib><title>National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare).
Cross-sectional analysis using the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, annual probability samples of outpatient visits in the U.S. We estimated national prevalence of safety-net visits using weighted percentages to account for the complex survey design. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine characteristics associated with safety-net clinic use.
More than one-third (35.0%) of all primary care safety-net clinic visits were among adults with non-Medicaid primary insurance, representing 6,642,000 annual visits nationally. The strongest predictors of safety-net use among non-Medicaid insured adults were: being from a high-poverty neighborhood (AOR 9.53, 95% CI 4.65-19.53), being dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.38-3.30), and being black (AOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.66) or Hispanic (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.32-3.93). Compared to non-safety-net users, non-Medicaid insured adults who used safety-net clinics had a higher prevalence of diabetes (23.5% vs. 15.0%, p<0.001), hypertension (49.4% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001), multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions; 53.5% vs. 40.9%, p<0.001) and polypharmacy (≥4 medications; 48.8% vs. 34.0%, p<0.001). Nearly one-third (28.9%) of Medicare beneficiaries in the safety-net were dual eligibles, compared to only 6.8% of Medicare beneficiaries in non-safety-net clinics (p<0.001).
Safety net clinics are important primary care delivery sites for non-Medicaid insured minority and low-income populations with a high burden of chronic illness. The critical role of safety-net clinics in care delivery is likely to persist despite expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic conditions</subject><subject>Chronic diseases</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Indigent care</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Primary care nursing</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Safety-net Providers</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12PEyEUhidG467Vf2CUxMToxVQYmGHmxqRp_Giy7hprvSUUzrQ0U-gCo-6_l9rZTWv2wnABgee8h_PCybLnBI8J5eTdxvXeym68cxbGmJSkIvhBdk4aWuRVgenDo_VZ9iSEDcYlravqcXZWcFzwivDz7PpSRuOSDloEQK5Fc9lCvMkvIaJpZ6xRAbXOo6_ebKW_QVPpAcmtsys00X0XA_pl4hpdOpt_AW2UNBrNbOi9tAqQsSiuAS2siaDRPMoI4Wn2qJVdgGfDPMoWHz98n37OL64-zaaTi1xVTRFzjkmNa6JbUmEtCShOca0x8LJJJ4QowhpWV7oFqktZ4EIXwKlsGG8wpqymo-zlQXfXuSAGt4IgnHNc1zy5MspmB0I7uRG7Q4XCSSP-bji_EtJHozoQsmJYlUq3laQMU9Uo2solpbBUNQBjSev9kK1fbkErsNHL7kT09MSatVi5n4LVhBHCk8CbQcC76x5CFFsTFHSdtOD6w72bOpnQJPTVP-j91Q3USqYCjG1dyqv2omLCSspKUrO91vgeKg0NW6PS12pN2j8JeHsSkJgIv-NK9iGI2fzb_7NXP07Z10fsGmQX18F1_f53hlOQHUDlXQge2juTCRb7zrh1Q-w7QwydkcJeHD_QXdBtK9A_8IEHKg</recordid><startdate>20160330</startdate><enddate>20160330</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu</creator><creator>Makam, Anil N</creator><creator>Halm, Ethan A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160330</creationdate><title>National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States</title><author>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu ; Makam, Anil N ; Halm, Ethan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7018081df160da1ec7308d0e75901811c149486dfe3d5a202d2e73a9479003483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic conditions</topic><topic>Chronic diseases</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Indigent care</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Primary care nursing</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Safety-net Providers</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makam, Anil N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halm, Ethan A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Oanh Kieu</au><au>Makam, Anil N</au><au>Halm, Ethan A</au><au>Gorlova, Olga Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-03-30</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0151610</spage><epage>e0151610</epage><pages>e0151610-e0151610</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare).
Cross-sectional analysis using the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, annual probability samples of outpatient visits in the U.S. We estimated national prevalence of safety-net visits using weighted percentages to account for the complex survey design. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine characteristics associated with safety-net clinic use.
More than one-third (35.0%) of all primary care safety-net clinic visits were among adults with non-Medicaid primary insurance, representing 6,642,000 annual visits nationally. The strongest predictors of safety-net use among non-Medicaid insured adults were: being from a high-poverty neighborhood (AOR 9.53, 95% CI 4.65-19.53), being dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (AOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.38-3.30), and being black (AOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.66) or Hispanic (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.32-3.93). Compared to non-safety-net users, non-Medicaid insured adults who used safety-net clinics had a higher prevalence of diabetes (23.5% vs. 15.0%, p<0.001), hypertension (49.4% vs. 36.0%, p<0.001), multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions; 53.5% vs. 40.9%, p<0.001) and polypharmacy (≥4 medications; 48.8% vs. 34.0%, p<0.001). Nearly one-third (28.9%) of Medicare beneficiaries in the safety-net were dual eligibles, compared to only 6.8% of Medicare beneficiaries in non-safety-net clinics (p<0.001).
Safety net clinics are important primary care delivery sites for non-Medicaid insured minority and low-income populations with a high burden of chronic illness. The critical role of safety-net clinics in care delivery is likely to persist despite expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27027617</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0151610</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151610-e0151610 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1777088720 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Adults Analysis Bivariate analysis Care and treatment Chronic conditions Chronic diseases Chronic illnesses Diabetes mellitus Earth Sciences Engineering and Technology Female Government programs Health care Health care policy Health insurance Humans Hypertension Indigent care Insurance Insurance coverage Low income groups Male Management Medicaid Medicare Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Minority Groups People and Places Polls & surveys Poverty Primary care nursing Primary Health Care Regression analysis Safety Safety and security measures Safety-net Providers Social Sciences Statistical analysis United States |
title | National Use of Safety-Net Clinics for Primary Care among Adults with Non-Medicaid Insurance in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T18%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20Use%20of%20Safety-Net%20Clinics%20for%20Primary%20Care%20among%20Adults%20with%20Non-Medicaid%20Insurance%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Oanh%20Kieu&rft.date=2016-03-30&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0151610&rft.epage=e0151610&rft.pages=e0151610-e0151610&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151610&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453451849%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777088720&rft_id=info:pmid/27027617&rft_galeid=A453451849&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a640c5cdf6a3403c9c3fab33ebc8ee44&rfr_iscdi=true |