The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival
Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsam...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151683-e0151683 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0151683 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e0151683 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Kordjazi, Ziya Frusher, Stewart Buxton, Colin Gardner, Caleb Bird, Tomas |
| description | Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsampling from each annual survey. This process of random subsampling was also used to create 12 datasets of different levels of effort based on three levels of the number of traps (15, 30 and 50 traps per day) and four levels of the number of sampling-days (2, 4, 6 and 7 days). The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model for estimating survival probability shifted from a constant model towards sex-dependent models with increasing sample size and effort. A sample of 500 lobsters or 50 traps used on four consecutive sampling-days was required for obtaining precise survival estimations for males and females, separately. Reduced sampling effort of 30 traps over four sampling days was sufficient if a survival estimate for both sexes combined was sufficient for management of the fishery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0151683 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1774316872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453470908</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b883fddd6c7145e4a2fdde00d9dc7ff9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453470908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10264890b14e25f8fbd023972bf0976c252bb261fa21a386e80afe6d1e1208dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WI7iRPfIE1TgUpFk9qNW8txjtt0rt3ZTrX9e9w1mxq0C-QLfz3nPcfHb5K8x2iMsxJ_W9vOGaHHW2tgjHCBaZW9SE4xy8iIEpS9PFqfJG-8XyNUZBWlr5MTQhlDBcWnyfXVCtKpUboDIyG1Kv0t3M1oDlJsQ-cgXYjNVrdmmU6Usi6k1qQTH9qNCOD3-NzKm3Rmax_ApYvO7dqd0G-TV0poD-_6-Sy5_jG5uvg1ml3-nF6cz0aSMhJGGBGaVwzVOAdSqErVDSIZK0mtECupJAWpa0KxEgSLWDpUSCigDQZMUNXI7Cz5eNDdaut53xHPcVnmWexHSSIxPRCNFWu-dbFwd8-taPnDgXVLLlxopQZeV1WmmqahssR5AbkgcQcINayRpVIsan3vs3X1BhoJJjihB6LDG9Ou-NLueF6yiuA8CnzpBZy97cAHvmm9BK2FAds91B1_CKGSRvTTP-jzr-uppYgPaI2yMa_ci_LzvMjyEjFURWr8DBVHA5tWRvuoNp4PAr4OAiIT4C4sRec9ny7m_89e_hmyn4_YFQgdVt7qLrTW-CGYH0DprPcO1FOTMeJ79z92g-_dz3v3x7APxx_0FPRo9-wv4Gj-sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774316872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin ; Gardner, Caleb ; Bird, Tomas</creator><contributor>Hwang, Jiang-Shiou</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin ; Gardner, Caleb ; Bird, Tomas ; Hwang, Jiang-Shiou</creatorcontrib><description>Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsampling from each annual survey. This process of random subsampling was also used to create 12 datasets of different levels of effort based on three levels of the number of traps (15, 30 and 50 traps per day) and four levels of the number of sampling-days (2, 4, 6 and 7 days). The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model for estimating survival probability shifted from a constant model towards sex-dependent models with increasing sample size and effort. A sample of 500 lobsters or 50 traps used on four consecutive sampling-days was required for obtaining precise survival estimations for males and females, separately. Reduced sampling effort of 30 traps over four sampling days was sufficient if a survival estimate for both sexes combined was sufficient for management of the fishery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26990561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Migration ; Animals ; Australia ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biometrics ; Capture-recapture studies ; Crustacea ; Crustaceans ; Datasets ; Demography - statistics & numerical data ; Distribution ; Earth Sciences ; Estimates ; Female ; Females ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Jasus edwardsii ; Lobsters ; Male ; Males ; Methods ; Models, Biological ; Palinuridae - physiology ; People and Places ; Physiological aspects ; Polls & surveys ; Population Density ; Probability ; Sampling ; Sampling (Statistics) ; Sampling Studies ; Science Policy ; Studies ; Surveys ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Traps</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151683-e0151683</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Kordjazi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Kordjazi et al 2016 Kordjazi et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10264890b14e25f8fbd023972bf0976c252bb261fa21a386e80afe6d1e1208dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10264890b14e25f8fbd023972bf0976c252bb261fa21a386e80afe6d1e1208dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798214/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798214/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26990561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hwang, Jiang-Shiou</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusher, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Tomas</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsampling from each annual survey. This process of random subsampling was also used to create 12 datasets of different levels of effort based on three levels of the number of traps (15, 30 and 50 traps per day) and four levels of the number of sampling-days (2, 4, 6 and 7 days). The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model for estimating survival probability shifted from a constant model towards sex-dependent models with increasing sample size and effort. A sample of 500 lobsters or 50 traps used on four consecutive sampling-days was required for obtaining precise survival estimations for males and females, separately. Reduced sampling effort of 30 traps over four sampling days was sufficient if a survival estimate for both sexes combined was sufficient for management of the fishery.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Migration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Demography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Jasus edwardsii</subject><subject>Lobsters</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Palinuridae - physiology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling (Statistics)</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Traps</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0WI7iRPfIE1TgUpFk9qNW8txjtt0rt3ZTrX9e9w1mxq0C-QLfz3nPcfHb5K8x2iMsxJ_W9vOGaHHW2tgjHCBaZW9SE4xy8iIEpS9PFqfJG-8XyNUZBWlr5MTQhlDBcWnyfXVCtKpUboDIyG1Kv0t3M1oDlJsQ-cgXYjNVrdmmU6Usi6k1qQTH9qNCOD3-NzKm3Rmax_ApYvO7dqd0G-TV0poD-_6-Sy5_jG5uvg1ml3-nF6cz0aSMhJGGBGaVwzVOAdSqErVDSIZK0mtECupJAWpa0KxEgSLWDpUSCigDQZMUNXI7Cz5eNDdaut53xHPcVnmWexHSSIxPRCNFWu-dbFwd8-taPnDgXVLLlxopQZeV1WmmqahssR5AbkgcQcINayRpVIsan3vs3X1BhoJJjihB6LDG9Ou-NLueF6yiuA8CnzpBZy97cAHvmm9BK2FAds91B1_CKGSRvTTP-jzr-uppYgPaI2yMa_ci_LzvMjyEjFURWr8DBVHA5tWRvuoNp4PAr4OAiIT4C4sRec9ny7m_89e_hmyn4_YFQgdVt7qLrTW-CGYH0DprPcO1FOTMeJ79z92g-_dz3v3x7APxx_0FPRo9-wv4Gj-sg</recordid><startdate>20160318</startdate><enddate>20160318</enddate><creator>Kordjazi, Ziya</creator><creator>Frusher, Stewart</creator><creator>Buxton, Colin</creator><creator>Gardner, Caleb</creator><creator>Bird, Tomas</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160318</creationdate><title>The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival</title><author>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin ; Gardner, Caleb ; Bird, Tomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-10264890b14e25f8fbd023972bf0976c252bb261fa21a386e80afe6d1e1208dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Migration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Demography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Jasus edwardsii</topic><topic>Lobsters</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Palinuridae - physiology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling (Statistics)</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Traps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusher, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Tomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kordjazi, Ziya</au><au>Frusher, Stewart</au><au>Buxton, Colin</au><au>Gardner, Caleb</au><au>Bird, Tomas</au><au>Hwang, Jiang-Shiou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-03-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0151683</spage><epage>e0151683</epage><pages>e0151683-e0151683</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsampling from each annual survey. This process of random subsampling was also used to create 12 datasets of different levels of effort based on three levels of the number of traps (15, 30 and 50 traps per day) and four levels of the number of sampling-days (2, 4, 6 and 7 days). The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model for estimating survival probability shifted from a constant model towards sex-dependent models with increasing sample size and effort. A sample of 500 lobsters or 50 traps used on four consecutive sampling-days was required for obtaining precise survival estimations for males and females, separately. Reduced sampling effort of 30 traps over four sampling days was sufficient if a survival estimate for both sexes combined was sufficient for management of the fishery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26990561</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0151683</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151683-e0151683 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1774316872 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Animal behavior Animal Migration Animals Australia Biology and Life Sciences Biometrics Capture-recapture studies Crustacea Crustaceans Datasets Demography - statistics & numerical data Distribution Earth Sciences Estimates Female Females Fisheries Fishing Jasus edwardsii Lobsters Male Males Methods Models, Biological Palinuridae - physiology People and Places Physiological aspects Polls & surveys Population Density Probability Sampling Sampling (Statistics) Sampling Studies Science Policy Studies Surveys Survival Survival Analysis Traps |
| title | The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A56%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Mark-Recapture%20Sampling%20Effort%20on%20Estimates%20of%20Rock%20Lobster%20Survival&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kordjazi,%20Ziya&rft.date=2016-03-18&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0151683&rft.epage=e0151683&rft.pages=e0151683-e0151683&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151683&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453470908%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774316872&rft_id=info:pmid/26990561&rft_galeid=A453470908&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b883fddd6c7145e4a2fdde00d9dc7ff9&rfr_iscdi=true |