Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization

Selecting a subset of relevant properties from a large set of features that describe a dataset is a challenging machine learning task. In biology, for instance, the advances in the available technologies enable the generation of a very large number of biomarkers that describe the data. Choosing the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0150652-e0150652
Hauptverfasser: Zawbaa, Hossam M, Emary, E, Grosan, Crina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0150652
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0150652
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Zawbaa, Hossam M
Emary, E
Grosan, Crina
description Selecting a subset of relevant properties from a large set of features that describe a dataset is a challenging machine learning task. In biology, for instance, the advances in the available technologies enable the generation of a very large number of biomarkers that describe the data. Choosing the more informative markers along with performing a high-accuracy classification over the data can be a daunting task, particularly if the data are high dimensional. An often adopted approach is to formulate the feature selection problem as a biobjective optimization problem, with the aim of maximizing the performance of the data analysis model (the quality of the data training fitting) while minimizing the number of features used. We propose an optimization approach for the feature selection problem that considers a "chaotic" version of the antlion optimizer method, a nature-inspired algorithm that mimics the hunting mechanism of antlions in nature. The balance between exploration of the search space and exploitation of the best solutions is a challenge in multi-objective optimization. The exploration/exploitation rate is controlled by the parameter I that limits the random walk range of the ants/prey. This variable is increased iteratively in a quasi-linear manner to decrease the exploration rate as the optimization progresses. The quasi-linear decrease in the variable I may lead to immature convergence in some cases and trapping in local minima in other cases. The chaotic system proposed here attempts to improve the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. The methodology is evaluated using different chaotic maps on a number of feature selection datasets. To ensure generality, we used ten biological datasets, but we also used other types of data from various sources. The results are compared with the particle swarm optimizer and with genetic algorithm variants for feature selection using a set of quality metrics.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0150652
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1772157111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453531222</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4471985bbeba4c759f0ab5f38708f614</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453531222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e923bd7d964f18cb3c09aa0baf4822ce6d6c79d9c8aef8ee2ffc9951e6a485833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBNGLGfPRpMmNMAyuDiwMuOptSNOTmQxtM9uki_rrTZ3uMpW9kFwknDznPTknb5a9xGiBaYE_7H3ftbpeHHwLC4QZ4ow8ys6xpGTOCaKPT85n2bMQ9ggxKjh_mp0RLnnSYOcZuQQd-w5m11CDic63s1unZ6ud9tGZ2bKN9RDbHKJr3G89AM-zJ1bXAV6M-0X2_fLTt9WX-dXm83q1vJobLkmcgyS0rIpK8txiYUpqkNQaldrmghADvOKmkJU0QoMVAMRaIyXDwHUumKD0Int91D3UPqix3aBwURDMCoxxItZHovJ6rw6da3T3S3nt1N-A77ZKd6mNGlSeF1gKVpZQ6twUTFqkS2apKJCwHOdJ6-NYrS8bqAy0sdP1RHR607qd2vpblReCYyqTwLtRoPM3PYSoGhcM1LVuwffHdwuas4Il9M0_6MPdjdRWpwZca32qawZRtcwZZRQTQhK1eIBKq4LGmeQN61J8kvB-kpCYCD_jVvchqPX11_9nNz-m7NsTdge6jrvg636wTJiC-RE0nQ-hA3s_ZIzUYO27aajB2mq0dkp7dfpB90l3XqZ_AIL-8mc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772157111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization</title><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zawbaa, Hossam M ; Emary, E ; Grosan, Crina</creator><creatorcontrib>Zawbaa, Hossam M ; Emary, E ; Grosan, Crina</creatorcontrib><description>Selecting a subset of relevant properties from a large set of features that describe a dataset is a challenging machine learning task. In biology, for instance, the advances in the available technologies enable the generation of a very large number of biomarkers that describe the data. Choosing the more informative markers along with performing a high-accuracy classification over the data can be a daunting task, particularly if the data are high dimensional. An often adopted approach is to formulate the feature selection problem as a biobjective optimization problem, with the aim of maximizing the performance of the data analysis model (the quality of the data training fitting) while minimizing the number of features used. We propose an optimization approach for the feature selection problem that considers a "chaotic" version of the antlion optimizer method, a nature-inspired algorithm that mimics the hunting mechanism of antlions in nature. The balance between exploration of the search space and exploitation of the best solutions is a challenge in multi-objective optimization. The exploration/exploitation rate is controlled by the parameter I that limits the random walk range of the ants/prey. This variable is increased iteratively in a quasi-linear manner to decrease the exploration rate as the optimization progresses. The quasi-linear decrease in the variable I may lead to immature convergence in some cases and trapping in local minima in other cases. The chaotic system proposed here attempts to improve the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. The methodology is evaluated using different chaotic maps on a number of feature selection datasets. To ensure generality, we used ten biological datasets, but we also used other types of data from various sources. The results are compared with the particle swarm optimizer and with genetic algorithm variants for feature selection using a set of quality metrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26963715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Archives &amp; records ; Artificial intelligence ; Bioindicators ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomarkers ; Chaos theory ; Classification ; Computer science ; Computers ; Curie, Marie (1867-1934) ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Engineering ; Exploitation ; Gene mapping ; Genetic algorithms ; Hunting ; Integer programming ; International conferences ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Mathematical problems ; Mathematics ; Methods ; Models, Biological ; Multiple objective analysis ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Optimization ; Physical Sciences ; Prey ; Random walk ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Time series</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0150652-e0150652</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Zawbaa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Zawbaa et al 2016 Zawbaa et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e923bd7d964f18cb3c09aa0baf4822ce6d6c79d9c8aef8ee2ffc9951e6a485833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e923bd7d964f18cb3c09aa0baf4822ce6d6c79d9c8aef8ee2ffc9951e6a485833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786139/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786139/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26963715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zawbaa, Hossam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emary, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosan, Crina</creatorcontrib><title>Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Selecting a subset of relevant properties from a large set of features that describe a dataset is a challenging machine learning task. In biology, for instance, the advances in the available technologies enable the generation of a very large number of biomarkers that describe the data. Choosing the more informative markers along with performing a high-accuracy classification over the data can be a daunting task, particularly if the data are high dimensional. An often adopted approach is to formulate the feature selection problem as a biobjective optimization problem, with the aim of maximizing the performance of the data analysis model (the quality of the data training fitting) while minimizing the number of features used. We propose an optimization approach for the feature selection problem that considers a "chaotic" version of the antlion optimizer method, a nature-inspired algorithm that mimics the hunting mechanism of antlions in nature. The balance between exploration of the search space and exploitation of the best solutions is a challenge in multi-objective optimization. The exploration/exploitation rate is controlled by the parameter I that limits the random walk range of the ants/prey. This variable is increased iteratively in a quasi-linear manner to decrease the exploration rate as the optimization progresses. The quasi-linear decrease in the variable I may lead to immature convergence in some cases and trapping in local minima in other cases. The chaotic system proposed here attempts to improve the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. The methodology is evaluated using different chaotic maps on a number of feature selection datasets. To ensure generality, we used ten biological datasets, but we also used other types of data from various sources. The results are compared with the particle swarm optimizer and with genetic algorithm variants for feature selection using a set of quality metrics.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bioindicators</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Chaos theory</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Curie, Marie (1867-1934)</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Gene mapping</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Random walk</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBNGLGfPRpMmNMAyuDiwMuOptSNOTmQxtM9uki_rrTZ3uMpW9kFwknDznPTknb5a9xGiBaYE_7H3ftbpeHHwLC4QZ4ow8ys6xpGTOCaKPT85n2bMQ9ggxKjh_mp0RLnnSYOcZuQQd-w5m11CDic63s1unZ6ud9tGZ2bKN9RDbHKJr3G89AM-zJ1bXAV6M-0X2_fLTt9WX-dXm83q1vJobLkmcgyS0rIpK8txiYUpqkNQaldrmghADvOKmkJU0QoMVAMRaIyXDwHUumKD0Int91D3UPqix3aBwURDMCoxxItZHovJ6rw6da3T3S3nt1N-A77ZKd6mNGlSeF1gKVpZQ6twUTFqkS2apKJCwHOdJ6-NYrS8bqAy0sdP1RHR607qd2vpblReCYyqTwLtRoPM3PYSoGhcM1LVuwffHdwuas4Il9M0_6MPdjdRWpwZca32qawZRtcwZZRQTQhK1eIBKq4LGmeQN61J8kvB-kpCYCD_jVvchqPX11_9nNz-m7NsTdge6jrvg636wTJiC-RE0nQ-hA3s_ZIzUYO27aajB2mq0dkp7dfpB90l3XqZ_AIL-8mc</recordid><startdate>20160310</startdate><enddate>20160310</enddate><creator>Zawbaa, Hossam M</creator><creator>Emary, E</creator><creator>Grosan, Crina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160310</creationdate><title>Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization</title><author>Zawbaa, Hossam M ; Emary, E ; Grosan, Crina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e923bd7d964f18cb3c09aa0baf4822ce6d6c79d9c8aef8ee2ffc9951e6a485833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bioindicators</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Chaos theory</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Curie, Marie (1867-1934)</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Gene mapping</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Random walk</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zawbaa, Hossam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emary, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosan, Crina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zawbaa, Hossam M</au><au>Emary, E</au><au>Grosan, Crina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-03-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0150652</spage><epage>e0150652</epage><pages>e0150652-e0150652</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Selecting a subset of relevant properties from a large set of features that describe a dataset is a challenging machine learning task. In biology, for instance, the advances in the available technologies enable the generation of a very large number of biomarkers that describe the data. Choosing the more informative markers along with performing a high-accuracy classification over the data can be a daunting task, particularly if the data are high dimensional. An often adopted approach is to formulate the feature selection problem as a biobjective optimization problem, with the aim of maximizing the performance of the data analysis model (the quality of the data training fitting) while minimizing the number of features used. We propose an optimization approach for the feature selection problem that considers a "chaotic" version of the antlion optimizer method, a nature-inspired algorithm that mimics the hunting mechanism of antlions in nature. The balance between exploration of the search space and exploitation of the best solutions is a challenge in multi-objective optimization. The exploration/exploitation rate is controlled by the parameter I that limits the random walk range of the ants/prey. This variable is increased iteratively in a quasi-linear manner to decrease the exploration rate as the optimization progresses. The quasi-linear decrease in the variable I may lead to immature convergence in some cases and trapping in local minima in other cases. The chaotic system proposed here attempts to improve the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. The methodology is evaluated using different chaotic maps on a number of feature selection datasets. To ensure generality, we used ten biological datasets, but we also used other types of data from various sources. The results are compared with the particle swarm optimizer and with genetic algorithm variants for feature selection using a set of quality metrics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26963715</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0150652</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0150652-e0150652
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1772157111
source PLoS; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Accuracy
Analysis
Archives & records
Artificial intelligence
Bioindicators
Biology and Life Sciences
Biomarkers
Chaos theory
Classification
Computer science
Computers
Curie, Marie (1867-1934)
Data analysis
Data processing
Datasets
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Engineering
Exploitation
Gene mapping
Genetic algorithms
Hunting
Integer programming
International conferences
Learning algorithms
Machine Learning
Mathematical problems
Mathematics
Methods
Models, Biological
Multiple objective analysis
Nonlinear Dynamics
Optimization
Physical Sciences
Prey
Random walk
Research and Analysis Methods
Time series
title Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20Selection%20via%20Chaotic%20Antlion%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zawbaa,%20Hossam%20M&rft.date=2016-03-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0150652&rft.epage=e0150652&rft.pages=e0150652-e0150652&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0150652&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453531222%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772157111&rft_id=info:pmid/26963715&rft_galeid=A453531222&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4471985bbeba4c759f0ab5f38708f614&rfr_iscdi=true