Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups
Habitat fragmentation is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but observed effects vary and may depend on the group examined. Time since fragmentation may explain some differences between taxonomical groups, as some species and thus species composition respond with a delay to changes in their enviro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0149567-e0149567 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0149567 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0149567 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Braschler, Brigitte Baur, Bruno |
description | Habitat fragmentation is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but observed effects vary and may depend on the group examined. Time since fragmentation may explain some differences between taxonomical groups, as some species and thus species composition respond with a delay to changes in their environment. Impacts of drivers of global change may thus be underestimated in short-term studies. In our study we experimentally fragmented nutrient-poor dry calcareous grasslands and studied the response of species richness, individual density and species composition of various groups of invertebrates (gastropods, ants, ground beetles, rove beetles, orthoptera, spiders, woodlice) in 12 small (1.5 m * 1.5 m) and 12 large (4.5 m * 4.5 m) fragments and their corresponding control plots after 7 years. We further examined responses to fragmentation in relation to body size and habitat preferences. Responses to fragmentation varied between taxonomical groups. While spider species richness and individual density were lower in fragments, the opposite was true for an orthopteran species and woodlice. Species composition and β-diversity differed between fragments and control plots for some groups. However, the interaction treatment*plot size was rarely significant. Species with high occupancy rates in undisturbed control plots responded more negatively to the fragmentation, while species with large body size were relatively more abundant in fragments in some groups. No effect of the fragmentation was found for ants, which may have the longest lag times because of long-lived colonies. However, relationships between abundance and the species' preferences for environmental factors affected by edge effects indicate that ant diversity too may be affected in the longer-term. Our results show the importance of considering different groups in conservation management in times of widespread fragmentation of landscapes. While species richness may respond slowly, changes in abundance related to habitat preferences or morphology may allow insights into likely long-term changes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0149567 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1771271334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A443614628</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d1a5ef66bef540e383cf09ffec75bedb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A443614628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d585982c2dd69dbebc288cbad8307f43cfbdbd8bd46609628140a21df1451b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk29v0zAQxiMEYmPwDRBEQkLwosWOHdt5gzSNblQamsQAiVeW_5y7VGnc2Uk1vj1Om00t2guUSLEuv3su9-Quy15jNMWE409L34dWNdO1b2GKMK1Kxp9kx7gixYQViDzdOx9lL2JcIlQSwdjz7KhgosKIVseZ-lJvIETIZ86B6WLuXa7ya9hAO_kNKuSzuzWEegVtp5r8IqgYG9Xa_DyoxTbY1b7N0_1NLX3I521S60AH1UGifb-OL7NnTjURXo3Pk-zn-ezH2dfJ5dXF_Oz0cmJYVXQTW4qyEoUprGWV1aBNIYTRygqCuKPEOG21FdpSxlDFCoEpUgW2DtMS64KSk-ztTnfd-ChHd6LEnOOCY0IGYr4jrFdLuU5dqfBHelXLbcCHhVShq00D0mJVgmNMgyspAiJSfVQNFvFSg9VJ6_NYrdcrsCZZEVRzIHr4pq1v5MJvJOWl4AQngQ-jQPC3PcROrupooEnugu-H72YccS626Lt_0Me7G6mFSg3UrfOprhlE5SmlhGGaTEvU9BEqXRZWtUmj5OoUP0j4eJCQmA7uuoXqY5Tz6-__z179OmTf77E3oJruJvqmH-YpHoJ0B5rgYwzgHkzGSA6bcO-GHDZBjpuQ0t7s_6CHpPvRJ38BftkEqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771271334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Braschler, Brigitte ; Baur, Bruno</creator><contributor>Kroll, Andrew J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Braschler, Brigitte ; Baur, Bruno ; Kroll, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat fragmentation is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but observed effects vary and may depend on the group examined. Time since fragmentation may explain some differences between taxonomical groups, as some species and thus species composition respond with a delay to changes in their environment. Impacts of drivers of global change may thus be underestimated in short-term studies. In our study we experimentally fragmented nutrient-poor dry calcareous grasslands and studied the response of species richness, individual density and species composition of various groups of invertebrates (gastropods, ants, ground beetles, rove beetles, orthoptera, spiders, woodlice) in 12 small (1.5 m * 1.5 m) and 12 large (4.5 m * 4.5 m) fragments and their corresponding control plots after 7 years. We further examined responses to fragmentation in relation to body size and habitat preferences. Responses to fragmentation varied between taxonomical groups. While spider species richness and individual density were lower in fragments, the opposite was true for an orthopteran species and woodlice. Species composition and β-diversity differed between fragments and control plots for some groups. However, the interaction treatment*plot size was rarely significant. Species with high occupancy rates in undisturbed control plots responded more negatively to the fragmentation, while species with large body size were relatively more abundant in fragments in some groups. No effect of the fragmentation was found for ants, which may have the longest lag times because of long-lived colonies. However, relationships between abundance and the species' preferences for environmental factors affected by edge effects indicate that ant diversity too may be affected in the longer-term. Our results show the importance of considering different groups in conservation management in times of widespread fragmentation of landscapes. While species richness may respond slowly, changes in abundance related to habitat preferences or morphology may allow insights into likely long-term changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26891049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Ants ; Ants - physiology ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body Size ; Colonies ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Endangered & extinct species ; Environmental factors ; Environmental impact ; Fragmentation ; Fragments ; Gastropoda ; Gastropods ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Helicella ; Invertebrates ; Invertebrates - anatomy & histology ; Invertebrates - physiology ; Landscape preservation ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Physiological aspects ; Response time ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Species Specificity ; Spiders ; Spiders - physiology ; Studies ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0149567-e0149567</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Braschler, Baur. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Braschler, Baur 2016 Braschler, Baur</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d585982c2dd69dbebc288cbad8307f43cfbdbd8bd46609628140a21df1451b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d585982c2dd69dbebc288cbad8307f43cfbdbd8bd46609628140a21df1451b243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758731/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758731/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26891049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kroll, Andrew J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Braschler, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Bruno</creatorcontrib><title>Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Habitat fragmentation is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but observed effects vary and may depend on the group examined. Time since fragmentation may explain some differences between taxonomical groups, as some species and thus species composition respond with a delay to changes in their environment. Impacts of drivers of global change may thus be underestimated in short-term studies. In our study we experimentally fragmented nutrient-poor dry calcareous grasslands and studied the response of species richness, individual density and species composition of various groups of invertebrates (gastropods, ants, ground beetles, rove beetles, orthoptera, spiders, woodlice) in 12 small (1.5 m * 1.5 m) and 12 large (4.5 m * 4.5 m) fragments and their corresponding control plots after 7 years. We further examined responses to fragmentation in relation to body size and habitat preferences. Responses to fragmentation varied between taxonomical groups. While spider species richness and individual density were lower in fragments, the opposite was true for an orthopteran species and woodlice. Species composition and β-diversity differed between fragments and control plots for some groups. However, the interaction treatment*plot size was rarely significant. Species with high occupancy rates in undisturbed control plots responded more negatively to the fragmentation, while species with large body size were relatively more abundant in fragments in some groups. No effect of the fragmentation was found for ants, which may have the longest lag times because of long-lived colonies. However, relationships between abundance and the species' preferences for environmental factors affected by edge effects indicate that ant diversity too may be affected in the longer-term. Our results show the importance of considering different groups in conservation management in times of widespread fragmentation of landscapes. While species richness may respond slowly, changes in abundance related to habitat preferences or morphology may allow insights into likely long-term changes.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Ants - physiology</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>Gastropods</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Helicella</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Invertebrates - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Invertebrates - physiology</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Spiders - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk29v0zAQxiMEYmPwDRBEQkLwosWOHdt5gzSNblQamsQAiVeW_5y7VGnc2Uk1vj1Om00t2guUSLEuv3su9-Quy15jNMWE409L34dWNdO1b2GKMK1Kxp9kx7gixYQViDzdOx9lL2JcIlQSwdjz7KhgosKIVseZ-lJvIETIZ86B6WLuXa7ya9hAO_kNKuSzuzWEegVtp5r8IqgYG9Xa_DyoxTbY1b7N0_1NLX3I521S60AH1UGifb-OL7NnTjURXo3Pk-zn-ezH2dfJ5dXF_Oz0cmJYVXQTW4qyEoUprGWV1aBNIYTRygqCuKPEOG21FdpSxlDFCoEpUgW2DtMS64KSk-ztTnfd-ChHd6LEnOOCY0IGYr4jrFdLuU5dqfBHelXLbcCHhVShq00D0mJVgmNMgyspAiJSfVQNFvFSg9VJ6_NYrdcrsCZZEVRzIHr4pq1v5MJvJOWl4AQngQ-jQPC3PcROrupooEnugu-H72YccS626Lt_0Me7G6mFSg3UrfOprhlE5SmlhGGaTEvU9BEqXRZWtUmj5OoUP0j4eJCQmA7uuoXqY5Tz6-__z179OmTf77E3oJruJvqmH-YpHoJ0B5rgYwzgHkzGSA6bcO-GHDZBjpuQ0t7s_6CHpPvRJ38BftkEqg</recordid><startdate>20160218</startdate><enddate>20160218</enddate><creator>Braschler, Brigitte</creator><creator>Baur, Bruno</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160218</creationdate><title>Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups</title><author>Braschler, Brigitte ; Baur, Bruno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d585982c2dd69dbebc288cbad8307f43cfbdbd8bd46609628140a21df1451b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Ants - physiology</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>Gastropods</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Helicella</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Invertebrates - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Invertebrates - physiology</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Spiders - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braschler, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Bruno</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braschler, Brigitte</au><au>Baur, Bruno</au><au>Kroll, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-02-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0149567</spage><epage>e0149567</epage><pages>e0149567-e0149567</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Habitat fragmentation is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but observed effects vary and may depend on the group examined. Time since fragmentation may explain some differences between taxonomical groups, as some species and thus species composition respond with a delay to changes in their environment. Impacts of drivers of global change may thus be underestimated in short-term studies. In our study we experimentally fragmented nutrient-poor dry calcareous grasslands and studied the response of species richness, individual density and species composition of various groups of invertebrates (gastropods, ants, ground beetles, rove beetles, orthoptera, spiders, woodlice) in 12 small (1.5 m * 1.5 m) and 12 large (4.5 m * 4.5 m) fragments and their corresponding control plots after 7 years. We further examined responses to fragmentation in relation to body size and habitat preferences. Responses to fragmentation varied between taxonomical groups. While spider species richness and individual density were lower in fragments, the opposite was true for an orthopteran species and woodlice. Species composition and β-diversity differed between fragments and control plots for some groups. However, the interaction treatment*plot size was rarely significant. Species with high occupancy rates in undisturbed control plots responded more negatively to the fragmentation, while species with large body size were relatively more abundant in fragments in some groups. No effect of the fragmentation was found for ants, which may have the longest lag times because of long-lived colonies. However, relationships between abundance and the species' preferences for environmental factors affected by edge effects indicate that ant diversity too may be affected in the longer-term. Our results show the importance of considering different groups in conservation management in times of widespread fragmentation of landscapes. While species richness may respond slowly, changes in abundance related to habitat preferences or morphology may allow insights into likely long-term changes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26891049</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0149567</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0149567-e0149567 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1771271334 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abundance Analysis Animal behavior Animals Ants Ants - physiology Beetles Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Biology and Life Sciences Body Size Colonies Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Ecology and Environmental Sciences Endangered & extinct species Environmental factors Environmental impact Fragmentation Fragments Gastropoda Gastropods Grassland Grasslands Habitat fragmentation Habitat preferences Habitats Helicella Invertebrates Invertebrates - anatomy & histology Invertebrates - physiology Landscape preservation Medicine and Health Sciences Models, Theoretical Physiological aspects Response time Species composition Species diversity Species richness Species Specificity Spiders Spiders - physiology Studies Wildlife conservation |
title | Diverse Effects of a Seven-Year Experimental Grassland Fragmentation on Major Invertebrate Groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A18%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diverse%20Effects%20of%20a%20Seven-Year%20Experimental%20Grassland%20Fragmentation%20on%20Major%20Invertebrate%20Groups&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Braschler,%20Brigitte&rft.date=2016-02-18&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0149567&rft.epage=e0149567&rft.pages=e0149567-e0149567&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0149567&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA443614628%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771271334&rft_id=info:pmid/26891049&rft_galeid=A443614628&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d1a5ef66bef540e383cf09ffec75bedb&rfr_iscdi=true |