Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial
The Hutchinson Study of High School Smoking was the first randomized trial to show effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention on 6-months prolonged smoking abstinence at one year post-intervention in a large population-based sample of adolescent smokers. An important question remains: Do the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0146459 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0146459 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Peterson, Jr, Arthur V Marek, Patrick M Kealey, Kathleen A Bricker, Jonathan B Ludman, Evette J Heffner, Jaimee L |
description | The Hutchinson Study of High School Smoking was the first randomized trial to show effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention on 6-months prolonged smoking abstinence at one year post-intervention in a large population-based sample of adolescent smokers. An important question remains: Do the positive effects from teen smoking cessation interventions seen at up to 12 months post-intervention endure into young adulthood? This study examines for the first time whether such positive early effects from teen smoking cessation intervention can endure into young adulthood in the absence of additional intervention.
High school smokers (n = 2,151) were proactively recruited into the trial from fifty randomly selected Washington State high schools randomized to the experimental (Motivational Interviewing + Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training telephone counseling intervention) or control (no intervention) condition. These smokers were followed to 7 years post high school to ascertain rates of six-year prolonged smoking abstinence in young adulthood. All statistical tests are two-sided.
No evidence of intervention impact at seven years post high school was observed for the main endpoint of six-year prolonged abstinence, neither among all smokers (14.2% in the experimental condition vs. 13.1% in the control condition, difference = +1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.4 to 5.8, p = .61), nor among the subgroups of daily smokers and less-than-daily smokers, nor among other a priori subgroups. But, observed among males was some evidence of an intervention impact on two endpoints related to progress towards quitting: reduction in number of days smoked in the past month, and increase in the length of the longest quit attempt in the past year.
There was no evidence from this trial among adolescent smokers that positive effectiveness of the proactive telephone intervention for smoking abstinence, observed previously at one year post-intervention, was sustained for the long-term into young adulthood. In light of the positive short-term effectiveness consistently observed from this and other trials for teen smokers, together with the lack of evidence from this study that such short-term impact can endure into young adulthood, sustained interventions that continue into young adulthood should be developed and tested for long-term impact.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115882. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0146459 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1761667304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A442007601</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82d20ba6a3374258ab7282ea41049b80</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A442007601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5f7d9e9781840a23df00495969303ef26e9c67c88b9b4bce71088d89714d5e333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLts_2BsgsFgF870FUm-2QhZ2wUKhbQd9ErI1nGqzrYyye4-_sb-8JQmLQlsMHwh-5znfX04OifLXhI8JkyS9zd-CJ1pxivfwRgTLvikeJQdkoLRXFDMHu-8H2TPYrzBeMKUEE-zAyoULTBhh9nvTx4iOqprqHp3Cx3EiHyNptY3ECvoenTe-q-uW-azlDK98x2adz2ExN59HHV2CLCOeXTlh26ZtEPTX3tvPyKZX4EJ6Ng3jf-eX67QAmJKRlQH3yKDToIfVvnCdNa37hdYdBGcaZ5nT2rTRHixPUfZ5fHRxexzfnp2Mp9NT_NKFLTPJ7W0BRRSEcWxoczWGPNiUoiCYQY1FVBUQlZKlUXJywokwUpZVUjC7QQYY6Ps9cZ31fiot_2MmkhBhJAM80TMN4T15kavgmtN-Km9cfou4MNSm9C7qgGtqKW4NMIwJjmdKFNKqigYTlJRpcLJ68P2b0PZgl33Nphmz3Q_07lrvfS3mkvGJV-X-2ZrEPy3AWL_j5K31NKkqlxX-2RWtS5Weso5xViKdPGjbPwXKj0WWleliapdiu8J3u0JEtPDj35phhj1_Hzx_-zZl3327Q57DSaNTvTNsJ6tuA_yDVgFH2OA-qFzBOv1Qtx3Q68XQm8XIsle7Xb9QXS_AewPBoQF0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761667304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V ; Marek, Patrick M ; Kealey, Kathleen A ; Bricker, Jonathan B ; Ludman, Evette J ; Heffner, Jaimee L</creator><contributor>Le Foll, Bernard</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V ; Marek, Patrick M ; Kealey, Kathleen A ; Bricker, Jonathan B ; Ludman, Evette J ; Heffner, Jaimee L ; Le Foll, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>The Hutchinson Study of High School Smoking was the first randomized trial to show effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention on 6-months prolonged smoking abstinence at one year post-intervention in a large population-based sample of adolescent smokers. An important question remains: Do the positive effects from teen smoking cessation interventions seen at up to 12 months post-intervention endure into young adulthood? This study examines for the first time whether such positive early effects from teen smoking cessation intervention can endure into young adulthood in the absence of additional intervention.
High school smokers (n = 2,151) were proactively recruited into the trial from fifty randomly selected Washington State high schools randomized to the experimental (Motivational Interviewing + Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training telephone counseling intervention) or control (no intervention) condition. These smokers were followed to 7 years post high school to ascertain rates of six-year prolonged smoking abstinence in young adulthood. All statistical tests are two-sided.
No evidence of intervention impact at seven years post high school was observed for the main endpoint of six-year prolonged abstinence, neither among all smokers (14.2% in the experimental condition vs. 13.1% in the control condition, difference = +1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.4 to 5.8, p = .61), nor among the subgroups of daily smokers and less-than-daily smokers, nor among other a priori subgroups. But, observed among males was some evidence of an intervention impact on two endpoints related to progress towards quitting: reduction in number of days smoked in the past month, and increase in the length of the longest quit attempt in the past year.
There was no evidence from this trial among adolescent smokers that positive effectiveness of the proactive telephone intervention for smoking abstinence, observed previously at one year post-intervention, was sustained for the long-term into young adulthood. In light of the positive short-term effectiveness consistently observed from this and other trials for teen smokers, together with the lack of evidence from this study that such short-term impact can endure into young adulthood, sustained interventions that continue into young adulthood should be developed and tested for long-term impact.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115882.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146459</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26829013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cancer ; Cognitive ability ; Confidence intervals ; Control ; Drug addiction ; Endpoint Determination ; Engineering and Technology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Intervention ; Males ; Medical research ; Methods ; Nicotine ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Population (statistical) ; Public health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; School principals ; Schools ; Smoking ; Smoking Cessation ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Studies ; Subgroups ; Teenagers ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Use Disorder ; Young Adult ; Young adults ; Youth smoking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0146459</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Peterson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Peterson et al 2016 Peterson et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5f7d9e9781840a23df00495969303ef26e9c67c88b9b4bce71088d89714d5e333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5f7d9e9781840a23df00495969303ef26e9c67c88b9b4bce71088d89714d5e333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734743/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734743/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26829013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Le Foll, Bernard</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealey, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bricker, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludman, Evette J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffner, Jaimee L</creatorcontrib><title>Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The Hutchinson Study of High School Smoking was the first randomized trial to show effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention on 6-months prolonged smoking abstinence at one year post-intervention in a large population-based sample of adolescent smokers. An important question remains: Do the positive effects from teen smoking cessation interventions seen at up to 12 months post-intervention endure into young adulthood? This study examines for the first time whether such positive early effects from teen smoking cessation intervention can endure into young adulthood in the absence of additional intervention.
High school smokers (n = 2,151) were proactively recruited into the trial from fifty randomly selected Washington State high schools randomized to the experimental (Motivational Interviewing + Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training telephone counseling intervention) or control (no intervention) condition. These smokers were followed to 7 years post high school to ascertain rates of six-year prolonged smoking abstinence in young adulthood. All statistical tests are two-sided.
No evidence of intervention impact at seven years post high school was observed for the main endpoint of six-year prolonged abstinence, neither among all smokers (14.2% in the experimental condition vs. 13.1% in the control condition, difference = +1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.4 to 5.8, p = .61), nor among the subgroups of daily smokers and less-than-daily smokers, nor among other a priori subgroups. But, observed among males was some evidence of an intervention impact on two endpoints related to progress towards quitting: reduction in number of days smoked in the past month, and increase in the length of the longest quit attempt in the past year.
There was no evidence from this trial among adolescent smokers that positive effectiveness of the proactive telephone intervention for smoking abstinence, observed previously at one year post-intervention, was sustained for the long-term into young adulthood. In light of the positive short-term effectiveness consistently observed from this and other trials for teen smokers, together with the lack of evidence from this study that such short-term impact can endure into young adulthood, sustained interventions that continue into young adulthood should be developed and tested for long-term impact.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115882.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>School principals</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Use Disorder</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><subject>Youth smoking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLts_2BsgsFgF870FUm-2QhZ2wUKhbQd9ErI1nGqzrYyye4-_sb-8JQmLQlsMHwh-5znfX04OifLXhI8JkyS9zd-CJ1pxivfwRgTLvikeJQdkoLRXFDMHu-8H2TPYrzBeMKUEE-zAyoULTBhh9nvTx4iOqprqHp3Cx3EiHyNptY3ECvoenTe-q-uW-azlDK98x2adz2ExN59HHV2CLCOeXTlh26ZtEPTX3tvPyKZX4EJ6Ng3jf-eX67QAmJKRlQH3yKDToIfVvnCdNa37hdYdBGcaZ5nT2rTRHixPUfZ5fHRxexzfnp2Mp9NT_NKFLTPJ7W0BRRSEcWxoczWGPNiUoiCYQY1FVBUQlZKlUXJywokwUpZVUjC7QQYY6Ps9cZ31fiot_2MmkhBhJAM80TMN4T15kavgmtN-Km9cfou4MNSm9C7qgGtqKW4NMIwJjmdKFNKqigYTlJRpcLJ68P2b0PZgl33Nphmz3Q_07lrvfS3mkvGJV-X-2ZrEPy3AWL_j5K31NKkqlxX-2RWtS5Weso5xViKdPGjbPwXKj0WWleliapdiu8J3u0JEtPDj35phhj1_Hzx_-zZl3327Q57DSaNTvTNsJ6tuA_yDVgFH2OA-qFzBOv1Qtx3Q68XQm8XIsle7Xb9QXS_AewPBoQF0g</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V</creator><creator>Marek, Patrick M</creator><creator>Kealey, Kathleen A</creator><creator>Bricker, Jonathan B</creator><creator>Ludman, Evette J</creator><creator>Heffner, Jaimee L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial</title><author>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V ; Marek, Patrick M ; Kealey, Kathleen A ; Bricker, Jonathan B ; Ludman, Evette J ; Heffner, Jaimee L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5f7d9e9781840a23df00495969303ef26e9c67c88b9b4bce71088d89714d5e333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>School principals</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Use Disorder</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><topic>Youth smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealey, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bricker, Jonathan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludman, Evette J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffner, Jaimee L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Jr, Arthur V</au><au>Marek, Patrick M</au><au>Kealey, Kathleen A</au><au>Bricker, Jonathan B</au><au>Ludman, Evette J</au><au>Heffner, Jaimee L</au><au>Le Foll, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0146459</spage><pages>e0146459-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The Hutchinson Study of High School Smoking was the first randomized trial to show effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention on 6-months prolonged smoking abstinence at one year post-intervention in a large population-based sample of adolescent smokers. An important question remains: Do the positive effects from teen smoking cessation interventions seen at up to 12 months post-intervention endure into young adulthood? This study examines for the first time whether such positive early effects from teen smoking cessation intervention can endure into young adulthood in the absence of additional intervention.
High school smokers (n = 2,151) were proactively recruited into the trial from fifty randomly selected Washington State high schools randomized to the experimental (Motivational Interviewing + Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training telephone counseling intervention) or control (no intervention) condition. These smokers were followed to 7 years post high school to ascertain rates of six-year prolonged smoking abstinence in young adulthood. All statistical tests are two-sided.
No evidence of intervention impact at seven years post high school was observed for the main endpoint of six-year prolonged abstinence, neither among all smokers (14.2% in the experimental condition vs. 13.1% in the control condition, difference = +1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.4 to 5.8, p = .61), nor among the subgroups of daily smokers and less-than-daily smokers, nor among other a priori subgroups. But, observed among males was some evidence of an intervention impact on two endpoints related to progress towards quitting: reduction in number of days smoked in the past month, and increase in the length of the longest quit attempt in the past year.
There was no evidence from this trial among adolescent smokers that positive effectiveness of the proactive telephone intervention for smoking abstinence, observed previously at one year post-intervention, was sustained for the long-term into young adulthood. In light of the positive short-term effectiveness consistently observed from this and other trials for teen smokers, together with the lack of evidence from this study that such short-term impact can endure into young adulthood, sustained interventions that continue into young adulthood should be developed and tested for long-term impact.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115882.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26829013</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0146459</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0146459 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1761667304 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Biology and Life Sciences Cancer Cognitive ability Confidence intervals Control Drug addiction Endpoint Determination Engineering and Technology Follow-Up Studies Health sciences Humans Intervention Males Medical research Methods Nicotine People and Places Physical Sciences Population (statistical) Public health Research and Analysis Methods School principals Schools Smoking Smoking Cessation Social Sciences Statistical analysis Statistical tests Studies Subgroups Teenagers Tobacco Tobacco Use Disorder Young Adult Young adults Youth smoking |
title | Does Effectiveness of Adolescent Smoking-Cessation Intervention Endure Into Young Adulthood? 7-Year Follow-Up Results from a Group-Randomized Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Effectiveness%20of%20Adolescent%20Smoking-Cessation%20Intervention%20Endure%20Into%20Young%20Adulthood?%207-Year%20Follow-Up%20Results%20from%20a%20Group-Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Peterson,%20Jr,%20Arthur%20V&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0146459&rft.pages=e0146459-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0146459&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA442007601%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761667304&rft_id=info:pmid/26829013&rft_galeid=A442007601&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_82d20ba6a3374258ab7282ea41049b80&rfr_iscdi=true |