Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest
Riparian ecosystems integrate aquatic and terrestrial communities and often contain unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Retention of forested buffers along riparian habitats is a commonly employed practice to reduce potential negative effects of land use on aquatic systems. However, very few stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e0143241-e0143241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0143241 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0143241 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Pearson, Scott F Giovanini, Jack Jones, Jay E Kroll, Andrew J |
description | Riparian ecosystems integrate aquatic and terrestrial communities and often contain unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Retention of forested buffers along riparian habitats is a commonly employed practice to reduce potential negative effects of land use on aquatic systems. However, very few studies have examined long-term population and community responses to buffers, leading to considerable uncertainty about effectiveness of this practice for achieving conservation and management outcomes. We examined short- (1-2 years) and long-term (~10 years) avian community responses (occupancy and abundance) to riparian buffer prescriptions to clearcut logging silvicultural practices in the Pacific Northwest USA. We used a Before-After-Control-Impact experimental approach and temporally replicated point counts analyzed within a Bayesian framework. Our experimental design consisted of forested control sites with no harvest, sites with relatively narrow (~13 m) forested buffers on each side of the stream, and sites with wider (~30 m) and more variable width unharvested buffer. Buffer treatments exhibited a 31-44% increase in mean species richness in the post-harvest years, a pattern most evident 10 years post-harvest. Post-harvest, species turnover was much higher on both treatments (63-74%) relative to the controls (29%). We did not find evidence of local extinction for any species but found strong evidence (no overlap in 95% credible intervals) for an increase in site occupancy on both Narrow (short-term: 7%; long-term 29%) and Wide buffers (short-term: 21%; long-term 93%) relative to controls after harvest. We did not find a treatment effect on total avian abundance. When assessing relationships between buffer width and site level abundance of four riparian specialists, we did not find strong evidence of reduced abundance in Narrow or Wide buffers. Silviculture regulations in this region dictate average buffer widths on small and large permanent streams that range from ~22-25 m. Guidelines for this region are within the range of buffers included in our study, in which we observed no evidence for avian species loss or for a decline in species abundance (including riparian associated species). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0143241 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1739314563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A436568975</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_397eb5a63d1840d6a203f9a093b35648</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A436568975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-67d1b2d968c57053215c2cf6ff8ee6ef029fe0a7fb8b58ac42dac1a54398214a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAcE8WVrvmfmReguagsFQargU7gzc7ObZTbZJplC_fVm3WnZFZ9yk5yce-7JKYrXlJxTXtGPaz8GB8P51js8J1RwJuiT4pQ2nM0UI_zpQX1SvIhxTYjktVLPixOmVKZg5LT4OQ-IvXXLcm5DXy78ZjM6m-5z5ZJ1I8Yy-bwZvLO_sfxutxAsuHI-GoMhljfoyl8IuQKTMJSXEO4wppfFMwNDxFfTelb8-PL5ZnE5u_729WpxcT3rZC3TTFU9bVnfqLqTVVbHqOxYZ5QxNaJCQ1hjkEBl2rqVNXSC9dBRkII3NaMC-Fnxds-7HXzUkyVR04o3nAqpeEZc7RG9h7XeBruBcK89WP33wIelhpBsN6DmTYWtBMV7WgvSK8jOmQZIw1sulagz16ep29husO_QpQDDEenxjbMrvfR3Wqgq_xDLBB8mguBvs7dJb2zscBjAoR93uoWqVSP5Tve7f6D_n25CLSEPYJ3xuW-3I9UXgiup6qaSGfX-ALVCGNIq-mFM1rt4DBR7YBd8jAHN42yU6F3qHkToXer0lLr87M2hL4-PHmLG_wDem9NH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1739314563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Pearson, Scott F ; Giovanini, Jack ; Jones, Jay E ; Kroll, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Scott F ; Giovanini, Jack ; Jones, Jay E ; Kroll, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian ecosystems integrate aquatic and terrestrial communities and often contain unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Retention of forested buffers along riparian habitats is a commonly employed practice to reduce potential negative effects of land use on aquatic systems. However, very few studies have examined long-term population and community responses to buffers, leading to considerable uncertainty about effectiveness of this practice for achieving conservation and management outcomes. We examined short- (1-2 years) and long-term (~10 years) avian community responses (occupancy and abundance) to riparian buffer prescriptions to clearcut logging silvicultural practices in the Pacific Northwest USA. We used a Before-After-Control-Impact experimental approach and temporally replicated point counts analyzed within a Bayesian framework. Our experimental design consisted of forested control sites with no harvest, sites with relatively narrow (~13 m) forested buffers on each side of the stream, and sites with wider (~30 m) and more variable width unharvested buffer. Buffer treatments exhibited a 31-44% increase in mean species richness in the post-harvest years, a pattern most evident 10 years post-harvest. Post-harvest, species turnover was much higher on both treatments (63-74%) relative to the controls (29%). We did not find evidence of local extinction for any species but found strong evidence (no overlap in 95% credible intervals) for an increase in site occupancy on both Narrow (short-term: 7%; long-term 29%) and Wide buffers (short-term: 21%; long-term 93%) relative to controls after harvest. We did not find a treatment effect on total avian abundance. When assessing relationships between buffer width and site level abundance of four riparian specialists, we did not find strong evidence of reduced abundance in Narrow or Wide buffers. Silviculture regulations in this region dictate average buffer widths on small and large permanent streams that range from ~22-25 m. Guidelines for this region are within the range of buffers included in our study, in which we observed no evidence for avian species loss or for a decline in species abundance (including riparian associated species).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26637120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Alnus rubra ; Animal breeding ; Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic environment ; Associated species ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bird migration ; Birds - physiology ; Breeding ; Buffers ; Clearcutting ; Communities ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Ecosystem ; Environmental aspects ; Experimental design ; Fauna ; Fisheries management ; Flora ; Forests ; Harvest ; Land use ; Local extinction ; Logging ; Natural resources ; Northwestern United States ; Pearson, Jack ; Population decline ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Riparian areas ; Riparian buffers ; Riparian ecology ; Riparian environments ; Riparian land ; River networks ; Rivers ; Silvicultural practices ; Silviculture ; Species extinction ; Species richness ; Terrestrial environments ; Thuja plicata ; Trees ; Tsuga heterophylla</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e0143241-e0143241</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Pearson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Pearson et al 2015 Pearson et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-67d1b2d968c57053215c2cf6ff8ee6ef029fe0a7fb8b58ac42dac1a54398214a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-67d1b2d968c57053215c2cf6ff8ee6ef029fe0a7fb8b58ac42dac1a54398214a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670142/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670142/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Scott F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanini, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jay E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroll, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Riparian ecosystems integrate aquatic and terrestrial communities and often contain unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Retention of forested buffers along riparian habitats is a commonly employed practice to reduce potential negative effects of land use on aquatic systems. However, very few studies have examined long-term population and community responses to buffers, leading to considerable uncertainty about effectiveness of this practice for achieving conservation and management outcomes. We examined short- (1-2 years) and long-term (~10 years) avian community responses (occupancy and abundance) to riparian buffer prescriptions to clearcut logging silvicultural practices in the Pacific Northwest USA. We used a Before-After-Control-Impact experimental approach and temporally replicated point counts analyzed within a Bayesian framework. Our experimental design consisted of forested control sites with no harvest, sites with relatively narrow (~13 m) forested buffers on each side of the stream, and sites with wider (~30 m) and more variable width unharvested buffer. Buffer treatments exhibited a 31-44% increase in mean species richness in the post-harvest years, a pattern most evident 10 years post-harvest. Post-harvest, species turnover was much higher on both treatments (63-74%) relative to the controls (29%). We did not find evidence of local extinction for any species but found strong evidence (no overlap in 95% credible intervals) for an increase in site occupancy on both Narrow (short-term: 7%; long-term 29%) and Wide buffers (short-term: 21%; long-term 93%) relative to controls after harvest. We did not find a treatment effect on total avian abundance. When assessing relationships between buffer width and site level abundance of four riparian specialists, we did not find strong evidence of reduced abundance in Narrow or Wide buffers. Silviculture regulations in this region dictate average buffer widths on small and large permanent streams that range from ~22-25 m. Guidelines for this region are within the range of buffers included in our study, in which we observed no evidence for avian species loss or for a decline in species abundance (including riparian associated species).</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Alnus rubra</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>Associated species</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Local extinction</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Northwestern United States</subject><subject>Pearson, Jack</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Riparian areas</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>Riparian environments</subject><subject>Riparian land</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Silvicultural practices</subject><subject>Silviculture</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Thuja plicata</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Tsuga heterophylla</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAcE8WVrvmfmReguagsFQargU7gzc7ObZTbZJplC_fVm3WnZFZ9yk5yce-7JKYrXlJxTXtGPaz8GB8P51js8J1RwJuiT4pQ2nM0UI_zpQX1SvIhxTYjktVLPixOmVKZg5LT4OQ-IvXXLcm5DXy78ZjM6m-5z5ZJ1I8Yy-bwZvLO_sfxutxAsuHI-GoMhljfoyl8IuQKTMJSXEO4wppfFMwNDxFfTelb8-PL5ZnE5u_729WpxcT3rZC3TTFU9bVnfqLqTVVbHqOxYZ5QxNaJCQ1hjkEBl2rqVNXSC9dBRkII3NaMC-Fnxds-7HXzUkyVR04o3nAqpeEZc7RG9h7XeBruBcK89WP33wIelhpBsN6DmTYWtBMV7WgvSK8jOmQZIw1sulagz16ep29husO_QpQDDEenxjbMrvfR3Wqgq_xDLBB8mguBvs7dJb2zscBjAoR93uoWqVSP5Tve7f6D_n25CLSEPYJ3xuW-3I9UXgiup6qaSGfX-ALVCGNIq-mFM1rt4DBR7YBd8jAHN42yU6F3qHkToXer0lLr87M2hL4-PHmLG_wDem9NH</recordid><startdate>20151204</startdate><enddate>20151204</enddate><creator>Pearson, Scott F</creator><creator>Giovanini, Jack</creator><creator>Jones, Jay E</creator><creator>Kroll, Andrew J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151204</creationdate><title>Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest</title><author>Pearson, Scott F ; Giovanini, Jack ; Jones, Jay E ; Kroll, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-67d1b2d968c57053215c2cf6ff8ee6ef029fe0a7fb8b58ac42dac1a54398214a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Alnus rubra</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>Associated species</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Local extinction</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Northwestern United States</topic><topic>Pearson, Jack</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Riparian areas</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>Riparian environments</topic><topic>Riparian land</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Silvicultural practices</topic><topic>Silviculture</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Thuja plicata</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Tsuga heterophylla</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Scott F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanini, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jay E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroll, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Scott F</au><au>Giovanini, Jack</au><au>Jones, Jay E</au><au>Kroll, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-12-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0143241</spage><epage>e0143241</epage><pages>e0143241-e0143241</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Riparian ecosystems integrate aquatic and terrestrial communities and often contain unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Retention of forested buffers along riparian habitats is a commonly employed practice to reduce potential negative effects of land use on aquatic systems. However, very few studies have examined long-term population and community responses to buffers, leading to considerable uncertainty about effectiveness of this practice for achieving conservation and management outcomes. We examined short- (1-2 years) and long-term (~10 years) avian community responses (occupancy and abundance) to riparian buffer prescriptions to clearcut logging silvicultural practices in the Pacific Northwest USA. We used a Before-After-Control-Impact experimental approach and temporally replicated point counts analyzed within a Bayesian framework. Our experimental design consisted of forested control sites with no harvest, sites with relatively narrow (~13 m) forested buffers on each side of the stream, and sites with wider (~30 m) and more variable width unharvested buffer. Buffer treatments exhibited a 31-44% increase in mean species richness in the post-harvest years, a pattern most evident 10 years post-harvest. Post-harvest, species turnover was much higher on both treatments (63-74%) relative to the controls (29%). We did not find evidence of local extinction for any species but found strong evidence (no overlap in 95% credible intervals) for an increase in site occupancy on both Narrow (short-term: 7%; long-term 29%) and Wide buffers (short-term: 21%; long-term 93%) relative to controls after harvest. We did not find a treatment effect on total avian abundance. When assessing relationships between buffer width and site level abundance of four riparian specialists, we did not find strong evidence of reduced abundance in Narrow or Wide buffers. Silviculture regulations in this region dictate average buffer widths on small and large permanent streams that range from ~22-25 m. Guidelines for this region are within the range of buffers included in our study, in which we observed no evidence for avian species loss or for a decline in species abundance (including riparian associated species).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26637120</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0143241</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e0143241-e0143241 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1739314563 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Abundance Alnus rubra Animal breeding Animals Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic environment Associated species Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Bird migration Birds - physiology Breeding Buffers Clearcutting Communities Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Ecosystem Environmental aspects Experimental design Fauna Fisheries management Flora Forests Harvest Land use Local extinction Logging Natural resources Northwestern United States Pearson, Jack Population decline Pseudotsuga menziesii Riparian areas Riparian buffers Riparian ecology Riparian environments Riparian land River networks Rivers Silvicultural practices Silviculture Species extinction Species richness Terrestrial environments Thuja plicata Trees Tsuga heterophylla |
title | Breeding Bird Community Continues to Colonize Riparian Buffers Ten Years after Harvest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T07%3A00%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breeding%20Bird%20Community%20Continues%20to%20Colonize%20Riparian%20Buffers%20Ten%20Years%20after%20Harvest&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pearson,%20Scott%20F&rft.date=2015-12-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0143241&rft.epage=e0143241&rft.pages=e0143241-e0143241&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0143241&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA436568975%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1739314563&rft_id=info:pmid/26637120&rft_galeid=A436568975&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_397eb5a63d1840d6a203f9a093b35648&rfr_iscdi=true |