Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance
[...]the universe of experiments performed, let alone possible, far exceeds the stamina of even the most earnest committees to promulgate definitions and criteria. The early successes of the Dublin Core (administrative metadata), Gene Ontology, and macromolecular crystallographic information file...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS computational biology 2015-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e1004384-e1004384 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1004384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e1004384 |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Kazic, Toni |
description |
[...]the universe of experiments performed, let alone possible, far exceeds the stamina of even the most earnest committees to promulgate definitions and criteria. The early successes of the Dublin Core (administrative metadata), Gene Ontology, and macromolecular crystallographic information file (mmCIF) (the latter two, descriptive metadata) encouraged the idea that metadata would naturally arise from ontologies and be exchanged through the web [27-29]. Workflow systems Increasingly, wet-bench and computational work form an integrated whole, but current workflow systems address either a portion of the wet-bench work--such as LabView's abilities to interconnect multiple instruments and their data--or computations [41]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1733462440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A434689219</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f654e8a8f4b74cbeb5f47d59eb8a68e2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A434689219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-77b397693a9fe62fadf13aace23f6e3cdfdc0e87082676c2d0d8ccdcd274ed073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUsFu1DAUtBCIloU_QJAbILGLHTu2c0GqqgIrVYDacrYc-3nxKolTO6nav6-XTavuEfngp-eZ8ZunQegtwStCBfmyDVPsdbsaTONXBGNGJXuGjklV0aWglXz-pD5Cr1LaYpzLmr9ERyVnsuKCHqPPV9AXl74bWiguphZS4UIszm4HiL6Dfkwfit8x3ECvewOv0Qun2wRv5nuB_nw7uzr9sTz_9X19enK-NBxX41KIhtaC11TXDnjptHWEam2gpI4DNdZZg0EKLEsuuCktttIYa2wpGFgs6AK93-sObUhqNpoUEZQyXjKGM2K9R9igt2rIs-p4p4L26l8jxI3ScfSmBeV4xUBq6VgjmGmgqRwTtqqhkZrLPNMCfZ1_m5oOrMmuo24PRA9fev9XbcKNYpzUGO8EPs4CMVxPkEbV-WSgbXUPYdrNXVYVoXVNM3S1h250Hs33LmRFk4-FzpvQg_O5f8KyT1mXpM6ETweEjBnhdtzoKSW1vrz4D-zPQyzbY00MKUVwj34JVrt8Paxd7fKl5nxl2runu3okPQSK3gOMGcz6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725513993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kazic, Toni</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazic, Toni</creatorcontrib><description>
[...]the universe of experiments performed, let alone possible, far exceeds the stamina of even the most earnest committees to promulgate definitions and criteria. The early successes of the Dublin Core (administrative metadata), Gene Ontology, and macromolecular crystallographic information file (mmCIF) (the latter two, descriptive metadata) encouraged the idea that metadata would naturally arise from ontologies and be exchanged through the web [27-29]. Workflow systems Increasingly, wet-bench and computational work form an integrated whole, but current workflow systems address either a portion of the wet-bench work--such as LabView's abilities to interconnect multiple instruments and their data--or computations [41].</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26485673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Archives & records ; Automation ; Biologists ; Biology ; Computational biology ; Data Accuracy ; Databases, Factual ; Datasets ; Documentation - standards ; Experiments ; Guidelines as Topic ; Information Storage and Retrieval - standards ; Laboratories ; Metadata ; Ontology ; Ownership - standards ; Product development ; Provenance (Geology) ; Research Design - standards ; Semantic web ; Terminology as Topic</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2015-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e1004384-e1004384</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Toni Kazic 2015 Toni Kazic</rights><rights>2015 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Kazic T (2015) Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance. PLoS Comput Biol 11(10): e1004384. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-77b397693a9fe62fadf13aace23f6e3cdfdc0e87082676c2d0d8ccdcd274ed073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-77b397693a9fe62fadf13aace23f6e3cdfdc0e87082676c2d0d8ccdcd274ed073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619002/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619002/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26485673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazic, Toni</creatorcontrib><title>Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>
[...]the universe of experiments performed, let alone possible, far exceeds the stamina of even the most earnest committees to promulgate definitions and criteria. The early successes of the Dublin Core (administrative metadata), Gene Ontology, and macromolecular crystallographic information file (mmCIF) (the latter two, descriptive metadata) encouraged the idea that metadata would naturally arise from ontologies and be exchanged through the web [27-29]. Workflow systems Increasingly, wet-bench and computational work form an integrated whole, but current workflow systems address either a portion of the wet-bench work--such as LabView's abilities to interconnect multiple instruments and their data--or computations [41].</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biologists</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Computational biology</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Documentation - standards</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval - standards</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Ownership - standards</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Provenance (Geology)</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUsFu1DAUtBCIloU_QJAbILGLHTu2c0GqqgIrVYDacrYc-3nxKolTO6nav6-XTavuEfngp-eZ8ZunQegtwStCBfmyDVPsdbsaTONXBGNGJXuGjklV0aWglXz-pD5Cr1LaYpzLmr9ERyVnsuKCHqPPV9AXl74bWiguphZS4UIszm4HiL6Dfkwfit8x3ECvewOv0Qun2wRv5nuB_nw7uzr9sTz_9X19enK-NBxX41KIhtaC11TXDnjptHWEam2gpI4DNdZZg0EKLEsuuCktttIYa2wpGFgs6AK93-sObUhqNpoUEZQyXjKGM2K9R9igt2rIs-p4p4L26l8jxI3ScfSmBeV4xUBq6VgjmGmgqRwTtqqhkZrLPNMCfZ1_m5oOrMmuo24PRA9fev9XbcKNYpzUGO8EPs4CMVxPkEbV-WSgbXUPYdrNXVYVoXVNM3S1h250Hs33LmRFk4-FzpvQg_O5f8KyT1mXpM6ETweEjBnhdtzoKSW1vrz4D-zPQyzbY00MKUVwj34JVrt8Paxd7fKl5nxl2runu3okPQSK3gOMGcz6</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Kazic, Toni</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance</title><author>Kazic, Toni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-77b397693a9fe62fadf13aace23f6e3cdfdc0e87082676c2d0d8ccdcd274ed073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biologists</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Computational biology</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Documentation - standards</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval - standards</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Ownership - standards</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Provenance (Geology)</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazic, Toni</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazic, Toni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e1004384</spage><epage>e1004384</epage><pages>e1004384-e1004384</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>
[...]the universe of experiments performed, let alone possible, far exceeds the stamina of even the most earnest committees to promulgate definitions and criteria. The early successes of the Dublin Core (administrative metadata), Gene Ontology, and macromolecular crystallographic information file (mmCIF) (the latter two, descriptive metadata) encouraged the idea that metadata would naturally arise from ontologies and be exchanged through the web [27-29]. Workflow systems Increasingly, wet-bench and computational work form an integrated whole, but current workflow systems address either a portion of the wet-bench work--such as LabView's abilities to interconnect multiple instruments and their data--or computations [41].</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26485673</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7358 |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2015-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e1004384-e1004384 |
issn | 1553-7358 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1733462440 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Analysis Archives & records Automation Biologists Biology Computational biology Data Accuracy Databases, Factual Datasets Documentation - standards Experiments Guidelines as Topic Information Storage and Retrieval - standards Laboratories Metadata Ontology Ownership - standards Product development Provenance (Geology) Research Design - standards Semantic web Terminology as Topic |
title | Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten%20Simple%20Rules%20for%20Experiments'%20Provenance&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Kazic,%20Toni&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e1004384&rft.epage=e1004384&rft.pages=e1004384-e1004384&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA434689219%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725513993&rft_id=info:pmid/26485673&rft_galeid=A434689219&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f654e8a8f4b74cbeb5f47d59eb8a68e2&rfr_iscdi=true |