Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course
Peer-assisted learning encourages students to participate more actively in the dissection process and promotes thoughtful dissection. We implemented peer-assisted dissection in 2012 and compared its effects on students' self-assessments of learning and their academic achievement with those of f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0142988-e0142988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0142988 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0142988 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Han, Eui-Ryoung Chung, Eun-Kyung Nam, Kwang-Il |
description | Peer-assisted learning encourages students to participate more actively in the dissection process and promotes thoughtful dissection. We implemented peer-assisted dissection in 2012 and compared its effects on students' self-assessments of learning and their academic achievement with those of faculty-led dissection. All subjects performed dissections after a lecture about upper-limb gross anatomy. Experimental group (n = 134) dissected a cadaver while guided by peer tutors who had prepared for the dissection in advance, and control group (n = 71) dissected a cadaver after the introduction by a faculty via prosection. Self-assessment scores regarding the learning objectives related to upper limbs were significantly higher in experimental group than in control group. Additionally, experimental group received significantly higher academic scores than did control group. The students in peer-assisted learning perceived themselves as having a better understanding of course content and achieved better academic results compared with those who participated in faculty-led dissection. Peer-assisted dissection contributed to self-perception and to the ability to retain and explain anatomical knowledge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0142988 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1732948232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A434486011</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cde517d82a5b4f67aa6c6b1467181b20</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A434486011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-35ef25c11da35e20b72ee7ef870d033a25ce6d33d488964bebb6bce4bfaba5623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLguhFx-ajaYogDKOuAwMrft2GJD2dydBJZpNW3H9vutNdprIXkouEk-e8J-fkTZLnKJ8jUqJ3O9d7K9v5wVmY54jiivMHyTmqCM4YzsnDk_NZ8iSEXZ4XhDP2ODnDrIgLsfPk_VcAny1CMKGDOl2D9NbYTWpsKtML70JIF1Z2bn-dfjQhgO6Ms-ky1g7wNHnUyDbAs3GfJT8_f_qx_JKtLy9Wy8U606zCXUYKaHChEaplPOJclRighIaXeZ0TIuMdsJqQmnJeMapAKaY0UNVIJQuGySx5edQ9tC6Ise8gUElwRTkmA7E6ErWTO3HwZi_9tXDSiJuA8xshfWd0C0LXUKCy5lgWijaslJJpphBlJeJIxVnNkg9jtV7todZgOy_biej0xpqt2LjfgjJKKlxFgTejgHdXPYRO7E3Q0LbSgutv3k0xJ6ikEX31D3p_dyO1kbEBYxsX6-pBVCwooZSzHKFIze-h4qphb3Q0SWNifJLwdpIQmQ7-dBvZhyBW37_9P3v5a8q-PmG3INtuG1zbD84JU5AeQT34zENzN2SUi8Hjt9MQg8fF6PGY9uL0g-6Sbk1N_gL7nfVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732948232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Han, Eui-Ryoung ; Chung, Eun-Kyung ; Nam, Kwang-Il</creator><contributor>Mihlbachler, Matthew C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Han, Eui-Ryoung ; Chung, Eun-Kyung ; Nam, Kwang-Il ; Mihlbachler, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><description>Peer-assisted learning encourages students to participate more actively in the dissection process and promotes thoughtful dissection. We implemented peer-assisted dissection in 2012 and compared its effects on students' self-assessments of learning and their academic achievement with those of faculty-led dissection. All subjects performed dissections after a lecture about upper-limb gross anatomy. Experimental group (n = 134) dissected a cadaver while guided by peer tutors who had prepared for the dissection in advance, and control group (n = 71) dissected a cadaver after the introduction by a faculty via prosection. Self-assessment scores regarding the learning objectives related to upper limbs were significantly higher in experimental group than in control group. Additionally, experimental group received significantly higher academic scores than did control group. The students in peer-assisted learning perceived themselves as having a better understanding of course content and achieved better academic results compared with those who participated in faculty-led dissection. Peer-assisted dissection contributed to self-perception and to the ability to retain and explain anatomical knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142988</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26565616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Adult ; Anatomy ; Anatomy - education ; Cadaver ; Clinical trials ; Comprehension ; Cooperative learning ; Curricula ; Dissection ; Dissection - methods ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; Educational Measurement ; Female ; Health education ; Humans ; Interactive learning ; Laboratories ; Learning ; Male ; Medical schools ; Models, Statistical ; Objectives ; Peer Group ; Peer tutoring ; Perception ; Problem based learning ; Self-assessment ; Students ; Students, Medical ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0142988-e0142988</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Han et al 2015 Han et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-35ef25c11da35e20b72ee7ef870d033a25ce6d33d488964bebb6bce4bfaba5623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-35ef25c11da35e20b72ee7ef870d033a25ce6d33d488964bebb6bce4bfaba5623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643929/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643929/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26565616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mihlbachler, Matthew C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Han, Eui-Ryoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Eun-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Kwang-Il</creatorcontrib><title>Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Peer-assisted learning encourages students to participate more actively in the dissection process and promotes thoughtful dissection. We implemented peer-assisted dissection in 2012 and compared its effects on students' self-assessments of learning and their academic achievement with those of faculty-led dissection. All subjects performed dissections after a lecture about upper-limb gross anatomy. Experimental group (n = 134) dissected a cadaver while guided by peer tutors who had prepared for the dissection in advance, and control group (n = 71) dissected a cadaver after the introduction by a faculty via prosection. Self-assessment scores regarding the learning objectives related to upper limbs were significantly higher in experimental group than in control group. Additionally, experimental group received significantly higher academic scores than did control group. The students in peer-assisted learning perceived themselves as having a better understanding of course content and achieved better academic results compared with those who participated in faculty-led dissection. Peer-assisted dissection contributed to self-perception and to the ability to retain and explain anatomical knowledge.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Dissection - methods</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Peer tutoring</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Self-assessment</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLguhFx-ajaYogDKOuAwMrft2GJD2dydBJZpNW3H9vutNdprIXkouEk-e8J-fkTZLnKJ8jUqJ3O9d7K9v5wVmY54jiivMHyTmqCM4YzsnDk_NZ8iSEXZ4XhDP2ODnDrIgLsfPk_VcAny1CMKGDOl2D9NbYTWpsKtML70JIF1Z2bn-dfjQhgO6Ms-ky1g7wNHnUyDbAs3GfJT8_f_qx_JKtLy9Wy8U606zCXUYKaHChEaplPOJclRighIaXeZ0TIuMdsJqQmnJeMapAKaY0UNVIJQuGySx5edQ9tC6Ise8gUElwRTkmA7E6ErWTO3HwZi_9tXDSiJuA8xshfWd0C0LXUKCy5lgWijaslJJpphBlJeJIxVnNkg9jtV7todZgOy_biej0xpqt2LjfgjJKKlxFgTejgHdXPYRO7E3Q0LbSgutv3k0xJ6ikEX31D3p_dyO1kbEBYxsX6-pBVCwooZSzHKFIze-h4qphb3Q0SWNifJLwdpIQmQ7-dBvZhyBW37_9P3v5a8q-PmG3INtuG1zbD84JU5AeQT34zENzN2SUi8Hjt9MQg8fF6PGY9uL0g-6Sbk1N_gL7nfVQ</recordid><startdate>20151113</startdate><enddate>20151113</enddate><creator>Han, Eui-Ryoung</creator><creator>Chung, Eun-Kyung</creator><creator>Nam, Kwang-Il</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151113</creationdate><title>Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course</title><author>Han, Eui-Ryoung ; Chung, Eun-Kyung ; Nam, Kwang-Il</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-35ef25c11da35e20b72ee7ef870d033a25ce6d33d488964bebb6bce4bfaba5623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Dissection - methods</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Peer tutoring</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Self-assessment</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Eui-Ryoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Eun-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Kwang-Il</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Eui-Ryoung</au><au>Chung, Eun-Kyung</au><au>Nam, Kwang-Il</au><au>Mihlbachler, Matthew C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-11-13</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0142988</spage><epage>e0142988</epage><pages>e0142988-e0142988</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Peer-assisted learning encourages students to participate more actively in the dissection process and promotes thoughtful dissection. We implemented peer-assisted dissection in 2012 and compared its effects on students' self-assessments of learning and their academic achievement with those of faculty-led dissection. All subjects performed dissections after a lecture about upper-limb gross anatomy. Experimental group (n = 134) dissected a cadaver while guided by peer tutors who had prepared for the dissection in advance, and control group (n = 71) dissected a cadaver after the introduction by a faculty via prosection. Self-assessment scores regarding the learning objectives related to upper limbs were significantly higher in experimental group than in control group. Additionally, experimental group received significantly higher academic scores than did control group. The students in peer-assisted learning perceived themselves as having a better understanding of course content and achieved better academic results compared with those who participated in faculty-led dissection. Peer-assisted dissection contributed to self-perception and to the ability to retain and explain anatomical knowledge.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26565616</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0142988</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0142988-e0142988 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1732948232 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Academic achievement Adult Anatomy Anatomy - education Cadaver Clinical trials Comprehension Cooperative learning Curricula Dissection Dissection - methods Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods Educational Measurement Female Health education Humans Interactive learning Laboratories Learning Male Medical schools Models, Statistical Objectives Peer Group Peer tutoring Perception Problem based learning Self-assessment Students Students, Medical Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching Young Adult |
title | Peer-Assisted Learning in a Gross Anatomy Dissection Course |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A11%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer-Assisted%20Learning%20in%20a%20Gross%20Anatomy%20Dissection%20Course&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Han,%20Eui-Ryoung&rft.date=2015-11-13&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0142988&rft.epage=e0142988&rft.pages=e0142988-e0142988&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142988&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA434486011%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732948232&rft_id=info:pmid/26565616&rft_galeid=A434486011&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_cde517d82a5b4f67aa6c6b1467181b20&rfr_iscdi=true |