Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India

The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child he...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141222-e0141222
Hauptverfasser: Betancourt, Theresa S, Zuilkowski, Stephanie S, Ravichandran, Arathi, Einhorn, Honora, Arora, Nikita, Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna, Brennan, Robert T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0141222
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0141222
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Betancourt, Theresa S
Zuilkowski, Stephanie S
Ravichandran, Arathi
Einhorn, Honora
Arora, Nikita
Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna
Brennan, Robert T
description The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child health status or household functioning for use in low-resource settings, little attention has been paid to a more diverse array of settings in which many children in adversity spend time and how context contributes to threats to child protection. The SAFE model posits that insecurity in any of the following fundamental domains threatens security in the others: Safety/freedom from harm; Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare; Family and connection to others; Education and economic security. Site-level tools are needed in order to monitor the conditions that can dramatically undermine or support healthy child growth, development and emotional and behavioral health. From refugee camps and orphanages to schools and housing complexes, site-level threats exist that are not well captured by commonly used measures of child health and well-being or assessments of single households (e.g., SDQ, HOME). The present study presents a methodology and the development of a scale for assessing site-level child protection threats in various settings of adversity. A modified Delphi panel process was enhanced with two stages of expert review in core content areas as well as review by experts in instrument development, and field pilot testing. Field testing in two diverse sites in India-a construction site and a railway station-revealed that the resulting SAFE instrument was sensitive to the differences between the sites from the standpoint of core child protection issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0141222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1730683590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4a128b7be0064362b8fdfac1ed229003</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1731781392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dfb2ef6d931ca16771f5885fd6ac44f382475b1fd069d6e8cb6481d6b0c88e363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1uEzEUhUcIREvhDRBYYsMmwT8zHg8LpChtIVIQSE3Xlse-Tlyc8WA7RbwJj8tMklYtYmXLPue7PzpF8ZrgKWE1-XATdrFTftqHDqaYlIRS-qQ4JQ2jE04xe_rgflK8SOkG44oJzp8XJ5RXJSZVc1r8OYdb8KHfQpdRsChvAF3NLi_QfAP6h3cpo1UIHtkQ0SwlSMl1a3TlMkyWoxOtNhFUTiiHweK8Qd9jyKCzC91HdJ1ghJ6D7zcOfYW8CSYh1Rk063vvtBplo3X1K-yhCbkOLTrj1MvimVU-wavjeVZcX16s5l8my2-fF_PZcqIryvPE2JaC5aZhRCvC65rYSojKGq50WVomaFlXLbEG88ZwELrlpSCGt1gLAYyzs-Ltgdv7kORxqUmSmmEuWNXgQbE4KExQN7KPbqvibxmUk_uHENdSxey0B1kqQkVbt4AxLxmnrbDGKk3AUNpgzAbWp2O1XbsFo4etR-UfQR__dG4j1-FWlpyVjSAD4P0REMPPHaQsty5p8F51EHb7vkk96Bo6SN_9I_3_dOVBpWNIKYK9b4ZgOQbtziXHoMlj0Abbm4eD3JvuksX-Av2k0g4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730683590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Betancourt, Theresa S ; Zuilkowski, Stephanie S ; Ravichandran, Arathi ; Einhorn, Honora ; Arora, Nikita ; Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna ; Brennan, Robert T</creator><contributor>Tsai, Alexander C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Betancourt, Theresa S ; Zuilkowski, Stephanie S ; Ravichandran, Arathi ; Einhorn, Honora ; Arora, Nikita ; Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna ; Brennan, Robert T ; Tsai, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><description>The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child health status or household functioning for use in low-resource settings, little attention has been paid to a more diverse array of settings in which many children in adversity spend time and how context contributes to threats to child protection. The SAFE model posits that insecurity in any of the following fundamental domains threatens security in the others: Safety/freedom from harm; Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare; Family and connection to others; Education and economic security. Site-level tools are needed in order to monitor the conditions that can dramatically undermine or support healthy child growth, development and emotional and behavioral health. From refugee camps and orphanages to schools and housing complexes, site-level threats exist that are not well captured by commonly used measures of child health and well-being or assessments of single households (e.g., SDQ, HOME). The present study presents a methodology and the development of a scale for assessing site-level child protection threats in various settings of adversity. A modified Delphi panel process was enhanced with two stages of expert review in core content areas as well as review by experts in instrument development, and field pilot testing. Field testing in two diverse sites in India-a construction site and a railway station-revealed that the resulting SAFE instrument was sensitive to the differences between the sites from the standpoint of core child protection issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26540159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Checklist ; Child ; Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry ; Child abuse &amp; neglect ; Child development ; Child Protective Services - methods ; Child Protective Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child welfare ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Construction contracts ; Construction Industry ; Construction sites ; Delphi Technique ; Economic conditions ; Economic indicators ; Emotional behavior ; Families &amp; family life ; Health care ; Health services ; Health status ; Homeless people ; Households ; Housing ; Human rights ; Human settlements ; Humans ; India ; Intervention ; Migration ; Orphanages ; Protection ; Public health ; Railroads ; Railway construction ; Railway stations ; Refugee camps ; Refugees ; Safety - standards ; Schools ; Security ; Studies ; Threat evaluation ; Threats ; Validity ; Well being</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141222-e0141222</ispartof><rights>2015 Betancourt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Betancourt et al 2015 Betancourt et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dfb2ef6d931ca16771f5885fd6ac44f382475b1fd069d6e8cb6481d6b0c88e363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dfb2ef6d931ca16771f5885fd6ac44f382475b1fd069d6e8cb6481d6b0c88e363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634981/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634981/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27323,27903,27904,33753,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26540159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tsai, Alexander C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Betancourt, Theresa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuilkowski, Stephanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Arathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einhorn, Honora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Robert T</creatorcontrib><title>Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child health status or household functioning for use in low-resource settings, little attention has been paid to a more diverse array of settings in which many children in adversity spend time and how context contributes to threats to child protection. The SAFE model posits that insecurity in any of the following fundamental domains threatens security in the others: Safety/freedom from harm; Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare; Family and connection to others; Education and economic security. Site-level tools are needed in order to monitor the conditions that can dramatically undermine or support healthy child growth, development and emotional and behavioral health. From refugee camps and orphanages to schools and housing complexes, site-level threats exist that are not well captured by commonly used measures of child health and well-being or assessments of single households (e.g., SDQ, HOME). The present study presents a methodology and the development of a scale for assessing site-level child protection threats in various settings of adversity. A modified Delphi panel process was enhanced with two stages of expert review in core content areas as well as review by experts in instrument development, and field pilot testing. Field testing in two diverse sites in India-a construction site and a railway station-revealed that the resulting SAFE instrument was sensitive to the differences between the sites from the standpoint of core child protection issues.</description><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Protective Services - methods</subject><subject>Child Protective Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Construction contracts</subject><subject>Construction Industry</subject><subject>Construction sites</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Homeless people</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Orphanages</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Railway construction</subject><subject>Railway stations</subject><subject>Refugee camps</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Safety - standards</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1uEzEUhUcIREvhDRBYYsMmwT8zHg8LpChtIVIQSE3Xlse-Tlyc8WA7RbwJj8tMklYtYmXLPue7PzpF8ZrgKWE1-XATdrFTftqHDqaYlIRS-qQ4JQ2jE04xe_rgflK8SOkG44oJzp8XJ5RXJSZVc1r8OYdb8KHfQpdRsChvAF3NLi_QfAP6h3cpo1UIHtkQ0SwlSMl1a3TlMkyWoxOtNhFUTiiHweK8Qd9jyKCzC91HdJ1ghJ6D7zcOfYW8CSYh1Rk063vvtBplo3X1K-yhCbkOLTrj1MvimVU-wavjeVZcX16s5l8my2-fF_PZcqIryvPE2JaC5aZhRCvC65rYSojKGq50WVomaFlXLbEG88ZwELrlpSCGt1gLAYyzs-Ltgdv7kORxqUmSmmEuWNXgQbE4KExQN7KPbqvibxmUk_uHENdSxey0B1kqQkVbt4AxLxmnrbDGKk3AUNpgzAbWp2O1XbsFo4etR-UfQR__dG4j1-FWlpyVjSAD4P0REMPPHaQsty5p8F51EHb7vkk96Bo6SN_9I_3_dOVBpWNIKYK9b4ZgOQbtziXHoMlj0Abbm4eD3JvuksX-Av2k0g4</recordid><startdate>20151105</startdate><enddate>20151105</enddate><creator>Betancourt, Theresa S</creator><creator>Zuilkowski, Stephanie S</creator><creator>Ravichandran, Arathi</creator><creator>Einhorn, Honora</creator><creator>Arora, Nikita</creator><creator>Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna</creator><creator>Brennan, Robert T</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151105</creationdate><title>Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India</title><author>Betancourt, Theresa S ; Zuilkowski, Stephanie S ; Ravichandran, Arathi ; Einhorn, Honora ; Arora, Nikita ; Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna ; Brennan, Robert T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-dfb2ef6d931ca16771f5885fd6ac44f382475b1fd069d6e8cb6481d6b0c88e363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Protective Services - methods</topic><topic>Child Protective Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Construction contracts</topic><topic>Construction Industry</topic><topic>Construction sites</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Homeless people</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Orphanages</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Railway construction</topic><topic>Railway stations</topic><topic>Refugee camps</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Safety - standards</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Betancourt, Theresa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuilkowski, Stephanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravichandran, Arathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einhorn, Honora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Robert T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Betancourt, Theresa S</au><au>Zuilkowski, Stephanie S</au><au>Ravichandran, Arathi</au><au>Einhorn, Honora</au><au>Arora, Nikita</au><au>Bhattacharya Chakravarty, Aruna</au><au>Brennan, Robert T</au><au>Tsai, Alexander C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-11-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0141222</spage><epage>e0141222</epage><pages>e0141222-e0141222</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child health status or household functioning for use in low-resource settings, little attention has been paid to a more diverse array of settings in which many children in adversity spend time and how context contributes to threats to child protection. The SAFE model posits that insecurity in any of the following fundamental domains threatens security in the others: Safety/freedom from harm; Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare; Family and connection to others; Education and economic security. Site-level tools are needed in order to monitor the conditions that can dramatically undermine or support healthy child growth, development and emotional and behavioral health. From refugee camps and orphanages to schools and housing complexes, site-level threats exist that are not well captured by commonly used measures of child health and well-being or assessments of single households (e.g., SDQ, HOME). The present study presents a methodology and the development of a scale for assessing site-level child protection threats in various settings of adversity. A modified Delphi panel process was enhanced with two stages of expert review in core content areas as well as review by experts in instrument development, and field pilot testing. Field testing in two diverse sites in India-a construction site and a railway station-revealed that the resulting SAFE instrument was sensitive to the differences between the sites from the standpoint of core child protection issues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26540159</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0141222</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141222-e0141222
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1730683590
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Checklist
Child
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Child abuse & neglect
Child development
Child Protective Services - methods
Child Protective Services - statistics & numerical data
Child welfare
Children
Children & youth
Construction contracts
Construction Industry
Construction sites
Delphi Technique
Economic conditions
Economic indicators
Emotional behavior
Families & family life
Health care
Health services
Health status
Homeless people
Households
Housing
Human rights
Human settlements
Humans
India
Intervention
Migration
Orphanages
Protection
Public health
Railroads
Railway construction
Railway stations
Refugee camps
Refugees
Safety - standards
Schools
Security
Studies
Threat evaluation
Threats
Validity
Well being
title Development of the SAFE Checklist Tool for Assessing Site-Level Threats to Child Protection: Use of Delphi Methods and Application to Two Sites in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20the%20SAFE%20Checklist%20Tool%20for%20Assessing%20Site-Level%20Threats%20to%20Child%20Protection:%20Use%20of%20Delphi%20Methods%20and%20Application%20to%20Two%20Sites%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Betancourt,%20Theresa%20S&rft.date=2015-11-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0141222&rft.epage=e0141222&rft.pages=e0141222-e0141222&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1731781392%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730683590&rft_id=info:pmid/26540159&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4a128b7be0064362b8fdfac1ed229003&rfr_iscdi=true