How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?
Most studies dealing with species distribution patterns on fragmented landscapes focus on the characteristics of habitat patches that influence local occurrence and abundance, but they tend to neglect the question of what drives colonization of previously unoccupied patches. In a study of the dryad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0138557-e0138557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0138557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0138557 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Kalarus, Konrad Nowicki, Piotr |
description | Most studies dealing with species distribution patterns on fragmented landscapes focus on the characteristics of habitat patches that influence local occurrence and abundance, but they tend to neglect the question of what drives colonization of previously unoccupied patches. In a study of the dryad butterfly, we combined classical approaches derived from metapopulation theory and landscape ecology to investigate the factors driving colonization from a recent refugium. In three consecutive transect surveys, we recorded the presence and numbers of imagos in 27 patches of xerothermic grassland and 26 patches of wet meadow. Among the predictors affecting the occurrence and abundance of the dryad, we considered environmental variables reflecting (i) habitat patch quality (e.g., goldenrod cover, shrub density, vegetation height); (ii) factors associated with habitat spatial structure (patch size, patch isolation and fragmentation); and (iii) features of patch surroundings (100-m buffers around patches) that potentially pose barriers or provide corridors. Patch colonization by the dryad was strongly limited by the distance from the species refugium in the region; there was a slight positive effect of shrub density in this respect. Butterfly abundance increased in smaller and more fragmented habitat patches; it was negatively impacted by invasive goldenrod cover, and positively influenced by the density of watercourses in patch surroundings. Nectar plant availability was positively related to species abundance in xerothermic grassland, while in wet meadow the effect was the reverse. We conclude that dryad colonization of our study area is very recent, since the most important factor limiting colonization was distance from the refugium, while the habitat quality of target patches had less relevance. In order to preserve the species, conservation managers should focus on enhancing the quality of large patches and should also direct their efforts on smaller and more fragmented ones, including those with relatively low resource availability, because such habitat fragments have an important role to play for specialist species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0138557 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1719285401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A428834172</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6c9ca935ef3044cb86e93f3f6e55d351</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A428834172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31ce0ca88db494e8487c2130ac834c60cd6938c16f68f4d2c7ef6816974c40273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkKbRIsdO47DBWhs7EMqGjDg1jp1TlpXaVxsZ1D-E_8Rd-umFe0C5SL-eM57fF77ZNlTRoeMl-z1zPW-g3a4cB0OKeOqKMp72TareD6QOeX3b423skchzCgtuJLyYbaVS14WlMvt7M-J-0kOHRlBVwcDCyTn0fcm9h5fkY_QwQTn2EWStskJjG2ESD730Nq4JIfeXiCJUyQHrnWd_Q3Ruo645ob8BNFMMZDx8hI79Euoyfs-RvRNuyS7I1zY2i3SFN6Qc4hLbzvAPWI7cuRhssqMNTn2EEKbTvDucfaggTbgk_V_J_t29OHrwclgdHZ8erA_GhhZ5XHAmUFqQKl6LCqBSqjS5IxTMIoLI6mpZcWVYbKRqhF1bkpMIyarUhhB85LvZM-vdBetC3rtdNCsZFWuCpHc3slOr4jawUwvvJ2DX2oHVl8uOD_R4KM1LWppKgMVL7DhVAgzVhIr3vBGYlHUvFhpvV1n68dzrE2q2kO7Ibq509mpnrgLLYoy3aNKArtrAe9-9BiinttgsE2eoesvz80rkVMmEvriH_Tu6tbUBFIBtmtcymtWonpf5Cq5yMo8UcM7qPTVOLcmPcvGpvWNgL2NgMRE_BUn0IegT8-__D979n2TfXmLnSK0cRpc26-eY9gExRVovAvBY3NjMqN61VXXbuhVV-l1V6WwZ7cv6Cbouo34Xy6zHa8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719285401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?</title><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kalarus, Konrad ; Nowicki, Piotr</creator><contributor>Driscoll, Don A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kalarus, Konrad ; Nowicki, Piotr ; Driscoll, Don A.</creatorcontrib><description>Most studies dealing with species distribution patterns on fragmented landscapes focus on the characteristics of habitat patches that influence local occurrence and abundance, but they tend to neglect the question of what drives colonization of previously unoccupied patches. In a study of the dryad butterfly, we combined classical approaches derived from metapopulation theory and landscape ecology to investigate the factors driving colonization from a recent refugium. In three consecutive transect surveys, we recorded the presence and numbers of imagos in 27 patches of xerothermic grassland and 26 patches of wet meadow. Among the predictors affecting the occurrence and abundance of the dryad, we considered environmental variables reflecting (i) habitat patch quality (e.g., goldenrod cover, shrub density, vegetation height); (ii) factors associated with habitat spatial structure (patch size, patch isolation and fragmentation); and (iii) features of patch surroundings (100-m buffers around patches) that potentially pose barriers or provide corridors. Patch colonization by the dryad was strongly limited by the distance from the species refugium in the region; there was a slight positive effect of shrub density in this respect. Butterfly abundance increased in smaller and more fragmented habitat patches; it was negatively impacted by invasive goldenrod cover, and positively influenced by the density of watercourses in patch surroundings. Nectar plant availability was positively related to species abundance in xerothermic grassland, while in wet meadow the effect was the reverse. We conclude that dryad colonization of our study area is very recent, since the most important factor limiting colonization was distance from the refugium, while the habitat quality of target patches had less relevance. In order to preserve the species, conservation managers should focus on enhancing the quality of large patches and should also direct their efforts on smaller and more fragmented ones, including those with relatively low resource availability, because such habitat fragments have an important role to play for specialist species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26375036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Butterflies ; Butterflies & moths ; Butterflies - physiology ; Climate ; Colonization ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Corridors ; Demography ; Density ; Distribution patterns ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Emigration ; Environmental science ; Erebia ; Fragmentation ; Gene mutation ; Genetic aspects ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; Habitats ; Landscape ; Landscape ecology ; Lepidoptera ; Metapopulations ; Models, Biological ; Nectar ; Population Dynamics ; Protection and preservation ; Quality ; Resource availability ; Species ; Time Factors ; Vegetation ; Watercourses ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0138557-e0138557</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Kalarus, Nowicki. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Kalarus, Nowicki 2015 Kalarus, Nowicki</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31ce0ca88db494e8487c2130ac834c60cd6938c16f68f4d2c7ef6816974c40273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31ce0ca88db494e8487c2130ac834c60cd6938c16f68f4d2c7ef6816974c40273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573758/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573758/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Driscoll, Don A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kalarus, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, Piotr</creatorcontrib><title>How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Most studies dealing with species distribution patterns on fragmented landscapes focus on the characteristics of habitat patches that influence local occurrence and abundance, but they tend to neglect the question of what drives colonization of previously unoccupied patches. In a study of the dryad butterfly, we combined classical approaches derived from metapopulation theory and landscape ecology to investigate the factors driving colonization from a recent refugium. In three consecutive transect surveys, we recorded the presence and numbers of imagos in 27 patches of xerothermic grassland and 26 patches of wet meadow. Among the predictors affecting the occurrence and abundance of the dryad, we considered environmental variables reflecting (i) habitat patch quality (e.g., goldenrod cover, shrub density, vegetation height); (ii) factors associated with habitat spatial structure (patch size, patch isolation and fragmentation); and (iii) features of patch surroundings (100-m buffers around patches) that potentially pose barriers or provide corridors. Patch colonization by the dryad was strongly limited by the distance from the species refugium in the region; there was a slight positive effect of shrub density in this respect. Butterfly abundance increased in smaller and more fragmented habitat patches; it was negatively impacted by invasive goldenrod cover, and positively influenced by the density of watercourses in patch surroundings. Nectar plant availability was positively related to species abundance in xerothermic grassland, while in wet meadow the effect was the reverse. We conclude that dryad colonization of our study area is very recent, since the most important factor limiting colonization was distance from the refugium, while the habitat quality of target patches had less relevance. In order to preserve the species, conservation managers should focus on enhancing the quality of large patches and should also direct their efforts on smaller and more fragmented ones, including those with relatively low resource availability, because such habitat fragments have an important role to play for specialist species.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Butterflies - physiology</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Erebia</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Gene mutation</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Watercourses</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkKbRIsdO47DBWhs7EMqGjDg1jp1TlpXaVxsZ1D-E_8Rd-umFe0C5SL-eM57fF77ZNlTRoeMl-z1zPW-g3a4cB0OKeOqKMp72TareD6QOeX3b423skchzCgtuJLyYbaVS14WlMvt7M-J-0kOHRlBVwcDCyTn0fcm9h5fkY_QwQTn2EWStskJjG2ESD730Nq4JIfeXiCJUyQHrnWd_Q3Ruo645ob8BNFMMZDx8hI79Euoyfs-RvRNuyS7I1zY2i3SFN6Qc4hLbzvAPWI7cuRhssqMNTn2EEKbTvDucfaggTbgk_V_J_t29OHrwclgdHZ8erA_GhhZ5XHAmUFqQKl6LCqBSqjS5IxTMIoLI6mpZcWVYbKRqhF1bkpMIyarUhhB85LvZM-vdBetC3rtdNCsZFWuCpHc3slOr4jawUwvvJ2DX2oHVl8uOD_R4KM1LWppKgMVL7DhVAgzVhIr3vBGYlHUvFhpvV1n68dzrE2q2kO7Ibq509mpnrgLLYoy3aNKArtrAe9-9BiinttgsE2eoesvz80rkVMmEvriH_Tu6tbUBFIBtmtcymtWonpf5Cq5yMo8UcM7qPTVOLcmPcvGpvWNgL2NgMRE_BUn0IegT8-__D979n2TfXmLnSK0cRpc26-eY9gExRVovAvBY3NjMqN61VXXbuhVV-l1V6WwZ7cv6Cbouo34Xy6zHa8</recordid><startdate>20150916</startdate><enddate>20150916</enddate><creator>Kalarus, Konrad</creator><creator>Nowicki, Piotr</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150916</creationdate><title>How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?</title><author>Kalarus, Konrad ; Nowicki, Piotr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31ce0ca88db494e8487c2130ac834c60cd6938c16f68f4d2c7ef6816974c40273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Butterflies - physiology</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Erebia</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Gene mutation</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Watercourses</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalarus, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, Piotr</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalarus, Konrad</au><au>Nowicki, Piotr</au><au>Driscoll, Don A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-09-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0138557</spage><epage>e0138557</epage><pages>e0138557-e0138557</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Most studies dealing with species distribution patterns on fragmented landscapes focus on the characteristics of habitat patches that influence local occurrence and abundance, but they tend to neglect the question of what drives colonization of previously unoccupied patches. In a study of the dryad butterfly, we combined classical approaches derived from metapopulation theory and landscape ecology to investigate the factors driving colonization from a recent refugium. In three consecutive transect surveys, we recorded the presence and numbers of imagos in 27 patches of xerothermic grassland and 26 patches of wet meadow. Among the predictors affecting the occurrence and abundance of the dryad, we considered environmental variables reflecting (i) habitat patch quality (e.g., goldenrod cover, shrub density, vegetation height); (ii) factors associated with habitat spatial structure (patch size, patch isolation and fragmentation); and (iii) features of patch surroundings (100-m buffers around patches) that potentially pose barriers or provide corridors. Patch colonization by the dryad was strongly limited by the distance from the species refugium in the region; there was a slight positive effect of shrub density in this respect. Butterfly abundance increased in smaller and more fragmented habitat patches; it was negatively impacted by invasive goldenrod cover, and positively influenced by the density of watercourses in patch surroundings. Nectar plant availability was positively related to species abundance in xerothermic grassland, while in wet meadow the effect was the reverse. We conclude that dryad colonization of our study area is very recent, since the most important factor limiting colonization was distance from the refugium, while the habitat quality of target patches had less relevance. In order to preserve the species, conservation managers should focus on enhancing the quality of large patches and should also direct their efforts on smaller and more fragmented ones, including those with relatively low resource availability, because such habitat fragments have an important role to play for specialist species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26375036</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0138557</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0138557-e0138557 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1719285401 |
source | PLoS; MEDLINE; EZB Free E-Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abundance Animal behavior Animals Butterflies Butterflies & moths Butterflies - physiology Climate Colonization Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Corridors Demography Density Distribution patterns Ecological monitoring Ecology Ecosystem Emigration Environmental science Erebia Fragmentation Gene mutation Genetic aspects Grassland Grasslands Habitats Landscape Landscape ecology Lepidoptera Metapopulations Models, Biological Nectar Population Dynamics Protection and preservation Quality Resource availability Species Time Factors Vegetation Watercourses Wildlife conservation |
title | How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A51%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Do%20Landscape%20Structure,%20Management%20and%20Habitat%20Quality%20Drive%20the%20Colonization%20of%20Habitat%20Patches%20by%20the%20Dryad%20Butterfly%20(Lepidoptera:%20Satyrinae)%20in%20Fragmented%20Grassland?&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kalarus,%20Konrad&rft.date=2015-09-16&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0138557&rft.epage=e0138557&rft.pages=e0138557-e0138557&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0138557&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA428834172%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719285401&rft_id=info:pmid/26375036&rft_galeid=A428834172&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6c9ca935ef3044cb86e93f3f6e55d351&rfr_iscdi=true |