Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that clinical sequencing laboratories return secondary findings in 56 genes associated with medically actionable conditions. Our goal was to apply a systematic, stringent approach consistent with clinical standards to estimate t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0135193-e0135193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0135193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0135193 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Olfson, Emily Cottrell, Catherine E Davidson, Nicholas O Gurnett, Christina A Heusel, Jonathan W Stitziel, Nathan O Chen, Li-Shiun Hartz, Sarah Nagarajan, Rakesh Saccone, Nancy L Bierut, Laura J |
description | The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that clinical sequencing laboratories return secondary findings in 56 genes associated with medically actionable conditions. Our goal was to apply a systematic, stringent approach consistent with clinical standards to estimate the prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with such conditions using a diverse sequencing reference sample. Candidate variants in the 56 ACMG genes were selected from Phase 1 of the 1000 Genomes dataset, which contains sequencing information on 1,092 unrelated individuals from across the world. These variants were filtered using the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) Professional version and defined parameters, appraised through literature review, and examined by a clinical laboratory specialist and expert physician. Over 70,000 genetic variants were extracted from the 56 genes, and filtering identified 237 variants annotated as disease causing by HGMD Professional. Literature review and expert evaluation determined that 7 of these variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Furthermore, 5 additional truncating variants not listed as disease causing in HGMD Professional were identified as likely pathogenic. These 12 secondary findings are associated with diseases that could inform medical follow-up, including cancer predisposition syndromes, cardiac conditions, and familial hypercholesterolemia. The majority of the identified medically actionable findings were in individuals from the European (5/379) and Americas (4/181) ancestry groups, with fewer findings in Asian (2/286) and African (1/246) ancestry groups. Our results suggest that medically relevant secondary findings can be identified in approximately 1% (12/1092) of individuals in a diverse reference sample. As clinical sequencing laboratories continue to implement the ACMG recommendations, our results highlight that at least a small number of potentially important secondary findings can be selected for return. Our results also confirm that understudied populations will not reap proportionate benefits of genomic medicine, highlighting the need for continued research efforts on genetic diseases in these populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0135193 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1710982486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427517574</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_40bf9737cb68458c9e0171ff7d959e50</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A427517574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-3c45c70136bf27c67a8add20b6de349c5816d8b54b9600ebf048c46337a36ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkLw0GLH_1-QqomNSpsmsYlXy7Gd1JVrlzhB7Nvj0GxqEA-8OI7zu8fn3pyieA3BEiIGP23j0AXll_sY7BJARKBAT4rTvFYLWgH09Gh_UrxIaQsAQZzS58VJRRGqiMCnxfXa2NC7xmnVuxjK2JTX1uQ37-_LlR7PVO1teWt1DEZ19-WFC8aFNpUulP3GlhAAUF7aEHc2vSyeNcon-2p6nhV3F1_uzr8urm4u1-erq4VmUPQLpDHRLHumdVMxTZniypgK1NRYhIUmHFLDa4JrQQGwdQMw1zh7ZgpRVaOz4u1Bdu9jktMgkoQMAsErzGkm1gfCRLWV-87tsnUZlZN_DmLXStX1TnsrMagbwRDTNeWYcC0syEJNw4wgwhKQtT5Ptw31zhqd59UpPxOdfwluI9v4U2JCOOAkC3yYBLr4Y7CplzuXtPVeBRuH0TcQ2TpiIqPv_kL_3d1EtSo34EIT8716FJUrXDECGWE4Ux9nVP6Bvf3Vt2pISa5vv_0_e_N9zr4_YjdW-X6Toh_GrKQ5iA-g7mJKnW0eZwaBHDP80JwcMyynDOeyN8fzfix6CC36DUUR6iM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710982486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Olfson, Emily ; Cottrell, Catherine E ; Davidson, Nicholas O ; Gurnett, Christina A ; Heusel, Jonathan W ; Stitziel, Nathan O ; Chen, Li-Shiun ; Hartz, Sarah ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Saccone, Nancy L ; Bierut, Laura J</creator><creatorcontrib>Olfson, Emily ; Cottrell, Catherine E ; Davidson, Nicholas O ; Gurnett, Christina A ; Heusel, Jonathan W ; Stitziel, Nathan O ; Chen, Li-Shiun ; Hartz, Sarah ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Saccone, Nancy L ; Bierut, Laura J</creatorcontrib><description>The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that clinical sequencing laboratories return secondary findings in 56 genes associated with medically actionable conditions. Our goal was to apply a systematic, stringent approach consistent with clinical standards to estimate the prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with such conditions using a diverse sequencing reference sample. Candidate variants in the 56 ACMG genes were selected from Phase 1 of the 1000 Genomes dataset, which contains sequencing information on 1,092 unrelated individuals from across the world. These variants were filtered using the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) Professional version and defined parameters, appraised through literature review, and examined by a clinical laboratory specialist and expert physician. Over 70,000 genetic variants were extracted from the 56 genes, and filtering identified 237 variants annotated as disease causing by HGMD Professional. Literature review and expert evaluation determined that 7 of these variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Furthermore, 5 additional truncating variants not listed as disease causing in HGMD Professional were identified as likely pathogenic. These 12 secondary findings are associated with diseases that could inform medical follow-up, including cancer predisposition syndromes, cardiac conditions, and familial hypercholesterolemia. The majority of the identified medically actionable findings were in individuals from the European (5/379) and Americas (4/181) ancestry groups, with fewer findings in Asian (2/286) and African (1/246) ancestry groups. Our results suggest that medically relevant secondary findings can be identified in approximately 1% (12/1092) of individuals in a diverse reference sample. As clinical sequencing laboratories continue to implement the ACMG recommendations, our results highlight that at least a small number of potentially important secondary findings can be selected for return. Our results also confirm that understudied populations will not reap proportionate benefits of genomic medicine, highlighting the need for continued research efforts on genetic diseases in these populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135193</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26332594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Databases, Genetic ; Datasets ; DNA sequencing ; Ethics ; Filtration ; Gene sequencing ; Genes ; Genetic disorders ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic research ; Genetic Testing ; Genetic variance ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics ; Genome, Human ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Genomics - methods ; Heart diseases ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia ; Immunology ; Informatics ; Laboratories ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Mutation ; Pathology ; Point mutation ; Population genetics ; Populations ; Psychiatry ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0135193-e0135193</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Olfson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Olfson et al 2015 Olfson et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-3c45c70136bf27c67a8add20b6de349c5816d8b54b9600ebf048c46337a36ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-3c45c70136bf27c67a8add20b6de349c5816d8b54b9600ebf048c46337a36ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558085/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558085/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olfson, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Nicholas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurnett, Christina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusel, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitziel, Nathan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li-Shiun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartz, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccone, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierut, Laura J</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that clinical sequencing laboratories return secondary findings in 56 genes associated with medically actionable conditions. Our goal was to apply a systematic, stringent approach consistent with clinical standards to estimate the prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with such conditions using a diverse sequencing reference sample. Candidate variants in the 56 ACMG genes were selected from Phase 1 of the 1000 Genomes dataset, which contains sequencing information on 1,092 unrelated individuals from across the world. These variants were filtered using the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) Professional version and defined parameters, appraised through literature review, and examined by a clinical laboratory specialist and expert physician. Over 70,000 genetic variants were extracted from the 56 genes, and filtering identified 237 variants annotated as disease causing by HGMD Professional. Literature review and expert evaluation determined that 7 of these variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Furthermore, 5 additional truncating variants not listed as disease causing in HGMD Professional were identified as likely pathogenic. These 12 secondary findings are associated with diseases that could inform medical follow-up, including cancer predisposition syndromes, cardiac conditions, and familial hypercholesterolemia. The majority of the identified medically actionable findings were in individuals from the European (5/379) and Americas (4/181) ancestry groups, with fewer findings in Asian (2/286) and African (1/246) ancestry groups. Our results suggest that medically relevant secondary findings can be identified in approximately 1% (12/1092) of individuals in a diverse reference sample. As clinical sequencing laboratories continue to implement the ACMG recommendations, our results highlight that at least a small number of potentially important secondary findings can be selected for return. Our results also confirm that understudied populations will not reap proportionate benefits of genomic medicine, highlighting the need for continued research efforts on genetic diseases in these populations.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Databases, Genetic</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Genetic variance</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genome, Human</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genomics - methods</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypercholesterolemia</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Point mutation</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkLw0GLH_1-QqomNSpsmsYlXy7Gd1JVrlzhB7Nvj0GxqEA-8OI7zu8fn3pyieA3BEiIGP23j0AXll_sY7BJARKBAT4rTvFYLWgH09Gh_UrxIaQsAQZzS58VJRRGqiMCnxfXa2NC7xmnVuxjK2JTX1uQ37-_LlR7PVO1teWt1DEZ19-WFC8aFNpUulP3GlhAAUF7aEHc2vSyeNcon-2p6nhV3F1_uzr8urm4u1-erq4VmUPQLpDHRLHumdVMxTZniypgK1NRYhIUmHFLDa4JrQQGwdQMw1zh7ZgpRVaOz4u1Bdu9jktMgkoQMAsErzGkm1gfCRLWV-87tsnUZlZN_DmLXStX1TnsrMagbwRDTNeWYcC0syEJNw4wgwhKQtT5Ptw31zhqd59UpPxOdfwluI9v4U2JCOOAkC3yYBLr4Y7CplzuXtPVeBRuH0TcQ2TpiIqPv_kL_3d1EtSo34EIT8716FJUrXDECGWE4Ux9nVP6Bvf3Vt2pISa5vv_0_e_N9zr4_YjdW-X6Toh_GrKQ5iA-g7mJKnW0eZwaBHDP80JwcMyynDOeyN8fzfix6CC36DUUR6iM</recordid><startdate>20150902</startdate><enddate>20150902</enddate><creator>Olfson, Emily</creator><creator>Cottrell, Catherine E</creator><creator>Davidson, Nicholas O</creator><creator>Gurnett, Christina A</creator><creator>Heusel, Jonathan W</creator><creator>Stitziel, Nathan O</creator><creator>Chen, Li-Shiun</creator><creator>Hartz, Sarah</creator><creator>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creator><creator>Saccone, Nancy L</creator><creator>Bierut, Laura J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150902</creationdate><title>Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes</title><author>Olfson, Emily ; Cottrell, Catherine E ; Davidson, Nicholas O ; Gurnett, Christina A ; Heusel, Jonathan W ; Stitziel, Nathan O ; Chen, Li-Shiun ; Hartz, Sarah ; Nagarajan, Rakesh ; Saccone, Nancy L ; Bierut, Laura J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-3c45c70136bf27c67a8add20b6de349c5816d8b54b9600ebf048c46337a36ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Databases, Genetic</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Genetic variance</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genome, Human</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genomics - methods</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypercholesterolemia</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Point mutation</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olfson, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Nicholas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurnett, Christina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusel, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitziel, Nathan O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li-Shiun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartz, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajan, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccone, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierut, Laura J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olfson, Emily</au><au>Cottrell, Catherine E</au><au>Davidson, Nicholas O</au><au>Gurnett, Christina A</au><au>Heusel, Jonathan W</au><au>Stitziel, Nathan O</au><au>Chen, Li-Shiun</au><au>Hartz, Sarah</au><au>Nagarajan, Rakesh</au><au>Saccone, Nancy L</au><au>Bierut, Laura J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-09-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0135193</spage><epage>e0135193</epage><pages>e0135193-e0135193</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that clinical sequencing laboratories return secondary findings in 56 genes associated with medically actionable conditions. Our goal was to apply a systematic, stringent approach consistent with clinical standards to estimate the prevalence of pathogenic variants associated with such conditions using a diverse sequencing reference sample. Candidate variants in the 56 ACMG genes were selected from Phase 1 of the 1000 Genomes dataset, which contains sequencing information on 1,092 unrelated individuals from across the world. These variants were filtered using the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) Professional version and defined parameters, appraised through literature review, and examined by a clinical laboratory specialist and expert physician. Over 70,000 genetic variants were extracted from the 56 genes, and filtering identified 237 variants annotated as disease causing by HGMD Professional. Literature review and expert evaluation determined that 7 of these variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Furthermore, 5 additional truncating variants not listed as disease causing in HGMD Professional were identified as likely pathogenic. These 12 secondary findings are associated with diseases that could inform medical follow-up, including cancer predisposition syndromes, cardiac conditions, and familial hypercholesterolemia. The majority of the identified medically actionable findings were in individuals from the European (5/379) and Americas (4/181) ancestry groups, with fewer findings in Asian (2/286) and African (1/246) ancestry groups. Our results suggest that medically relevant secondary findings can be identified in approximately 1% (12/1092) of individuals in a diverse reference sample. As clinical sequencing laboratories continue to implement the ACMG recommendations, our results highlight that at least a small number of potentially important secondary findings can be selected for return. Our results also confirm that understudied populations will not reap proportionate benefits of genomic medicine, highlighting the need for continued research efforts on genetic diseases in these populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26332594</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0135193</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0135193-e0135193 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1710982486 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Cancer Databases, Genetic Datasets DNA sequencing Ethics Filtration Gene sequencing Genes Genetic disorders Genetic diversity Genetic Predisposition to Disease Genetic research Genetic Testing Genetic variance Genetic Variation Genetics Genome, Human Genomes Genomics Genomics - methods Heart diseases Humans Hypercholesterolemia Immunology Informatics Laboratories Literature reviews Medicine Mutation Pathology Point mutation Population genetics Populations Psychiatry Studies |
title | Identification of Medically Actionable Secondary Findings in the 1000 Genomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20Medically%20Actionable%20Secondary%20Findings%20in%20the%201000%20Genomes&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Olfson,%20Emily&rft.date=2015-09-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0135193&rft.epage=e0135193&rft.pages=e0135193-e0135193&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0135193&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA427517574%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710982486&rft_id=info:pmid/26332594&rft_galeid=A427517574&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_40bf9737cb68458c9e0171ff7d959e50&rfr_iscdi=true |