Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control

Continuity of care is an important quality outcome of patient care. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between personal continuity and blood pressure (BP) control among the patients with hypertension in an academic primary care centre. Between January and May 2012, we conducted a retro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0134030-e0134030
Hauptverfasser: Hanafi, Nik Sherina, Abdullah, Adina, Lee, Ping Yein, Liew, Su May, Chia, Yook Chin, Khoo, Ee Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0134030
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0134030
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Hanafi, Nik Sherina
Abdullah, Adina
Lee, Ping Yein
Liew, Su May
Chia, Yook Chin
Khoo, Ee Ming
description Continuity of care is an important quality outcome of patient care. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between personal continuity and blood pressure (BP) control among the patients with hypertension in an academic primary care centre. Between January and May 2012, we conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with hypertension who had been followed up for at least 1 year in the Primary Care Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. In this setting, doctors who provided care for hypertension included postgraduate family medicine trainees, non-trainee doctors and academic staff. Systematic random sampling (1:4) was used for patient selection. BP control was defined as less than 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease and less than 140/90 mm Hg for all other patients. Continuity of care was assessed using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), which is the ratio of patient visits to the usual provider to the total number of visits to all providers in 1 year. A UPC index of zero denotes no continuity while an index of one reflects perfect continuity with only the usual provider. We reviewed a total of 1060 medical records. The patients' mean age was 62.0 years (SD 10.4). The majority was women (59.2%) and married (85.7%). The mean number of visits in a year was 3.85 (SD 1.36). A total of 72 doctors had provided consultations (55 postgraduate family medicine trainees, 8 non-trainee doctors and 9 academic staff). The mean UPCI was 0.43 (SD 0.34). Target BP was achieved in 42% of the patients. There was no significant relationship between BP control and personal continuity after adjustment for total number of visits. Continuity of care was not associated with BP control in our centre. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0134030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1699201179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A423309681</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1821249199fe41afaed4a9f30bdd1fac</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A423309681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e3a85680d6ed030879fa46119550c230f6fab3fb28c49cb483a774cc3914c61c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKvODEXSFvFR6VJq4Bxa506dusqtYudTNu_n7NmU4N2gXJh6_g57_F7nJNlrzGaYlriTxvfBQfNdOedniJMGaLoSXaMBSUTThB9erA_yl7EuEGooBXnz7MjwglmFLHjzC50iD7p5DPvWus6297k3uQzCDq3Lof80tmrxKT45AyirvNFsFsIN3tkEUC1VunP-Xy7S9vcu_ys8b7HdIxdQnrh4JuX2TMDTdSvhvUku_z29ffsx-T84vt8dno-UVyQdqIpVAWvUM11nRxVpTDAOMaiKJAiFBluYEnNklSKCbVkFYWyZEpRgZniWNGT7O1ed9f4KIcuRYm5EARhXIpEzPdE7WEjd3s70oOVdwEfVhJCMtVoiSuCCRNYCKMZBgO6ZiAMRcu6xgb6al-Gat1yq2ulk1doRqLjE2fXcuWvJCswJ7RIAh8GgeD_djq2cmuj0k0DTvsu3btECKOC3d373T_o4-4GagXJgHXGp7qqF5WnjFCKBK9woqaPUOmr9daq9EsZm-KjhI-jhMS0-rpdQRejnP_6-f_sxZ8x-_6AXWto2nX0Tdda7-IYZHtQBR9j0OahyRjJfiLuuyH7iZDDRKS0N4cP9JB0PwL0FnlvBTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1699201179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Hanafi, Nik Sherina ; Abdullah, Adina ; Lee, Ping Yein ; Liew, Su May ; Chia, Yook Chin ; Khoo, Ee Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanafi, Nik Sherina ; Abdullah, Adina ; Lee, Ping Yein ; Liew, Su May ; Chia, Yook Chin ; Khoo, Ee Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Continuity of care is an important quality outcome of patient care. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between personal continuity and blood pressure (BP) control among the patients with hypertension in an academic primary care centre. Between January and May 2012, we conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with hypertension who had been followed up for at least 1 year in the Primary Care Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. In this setting, doctors who provided care for hypertension included postgraduate family medicine trainees, non-trainee doctors and academic staff. Systematic random sampling (1:4) was used for patient selection. BP control was defined as less than 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease and less than 140/90 mm Hg for all other patients. Continuity of care was assessed using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), which is the ratio of patient visits to the usual provider to the total number of visits to all providers in 1 year. A UPC index of zero denotes no continuity while an index of one reflects perfect continuity with only the usual provider. We reviewed a total of 1060 medical records. The patients' mean age was 62.0 years (SD 10.4). The majority was women (59.2%) and married (85.7%). The mean number of visits in a year was 3.85 (SD 1.36). A total of 72 doctors had provided consultations (55 postgraduate family medicine trainees, 8 non-trainee doctors and 9 academic staff). The mean UPCI was 0.43 (SD 0.34). Target BP was achieved in 42% of the patients. There was no significant relationship between BP control and personal continuity after adjustment for total number of visits. Continuity of care was not associated with BP control in our centre. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26214304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory care ; Blood ; Blood Pressure ; Chronic illnesses ; Clinics ; Continuity ; Continuity of care ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Family medicine ; Female ; Graduate studies ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertension - epidemiology ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Hypertension - therapy ; Malaysia - epidemiology ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Patient care ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Physicians ; Physicians, Family ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Proteinuria ; Public health ; Random sampling ; Sex Factors ; Universities and colleges</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0134030-e0134030</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Hanafi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Hanafi et al 2015 Hanafi et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e3a85680d6ed030879fa46119550c230f6fab3fb28c49cb483a774cc3914c61c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e3a85680d6ed030879fa46119550c230f6fab3fb28c49cb483a774cc3914c61c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516235/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516235/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26214304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanafi, Nik Sherina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Adina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ping Yein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Su May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Yook Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ee Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Continuity of care is an important quality outcome of patient care. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between personal continuity and blood pressure (BP) control among the patients with hypertension in an academic primary care centre. Between January and May 2012, we conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with hypertension who had been followed up for at least 1 year in the Primary Care Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. In this setting, doctors who provided care for hypertension included postgraduate family medicine trainees, non-trainee doctors and academic staff. Systematic random sampling (1:4) was used for patient selection. BP control was defined as less than 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease and less than 140/90 mm Hg for all other patients. Continuity of care was assessed using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), which is the ratio of patient visits to the usual provider to the total number of visits to all providers in 1 year. A UPC index of zero denotes no continuity while an index of one reflects perfect continuity with only the usual provider. We reviewed a total of 1060 medical records. The patients' mean age was 62.0 years (SD 10.4). The majority was women (59.2%) and married (85.7%). The mean number of visits in a year was 3.85 (SD 1.36). A total of 72 doctors had provided consultations (55 postgraduate family medicine trainees, 8 non-trainee doctors and 9 academic staff). The mean UPCI was 0.43 (SD 0.34). Target BP was achieved in 42% of the patients. There was no significant relationship between BP control and personal continuity after adjustment for total number of visits. Continuity of care was not associated with BP control in our centre. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Continuity</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graduate studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypertension - therapy</subject><subject>Malaysia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Family</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Proteinuria</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Universities and colleges</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKvODEXSFvFR6VJq4Bxa506dusqtYudTNu_n7NmU4N2gXJh6_g57_F7nJNlrzGaYlriTxvfBQfNdOedniJMGaLoSXaMBSUTThB9erA_yl7EuEGooBXnz7MjwglmFLHjzC50iD7p5DPvWus6297k3uQzCDq3Lof80tmrxKT45AyirvNFsFsIN3tkEUC1VunP-Xy7S9vcu_ys8b7HdIxdQnrh4JuX2TMDTdSvhvUku_z29ffsx-T84vt8dno-UVyQdqIpVAWvUM11nRxVpTDAOMaiKJAiFBluYEnNklSKCbVkFYWyZEpRgZniWNGT7O1ed9f4KIcuRYm5EARhXIpEzPdE7WEjd3s70oOVdwEfVhJCMtVoiSuCCRNYCKMZBgO6ZiAMRcu6xgb6al-Gat1yq2ulk1doRqLjE2fXcuWvJCswJ7RIAh8GgeD_djq2cmuj0k0DTvsu3btECKOC3d373T_o4-4GagXJgHXGp7qqF5WnjFCKBK9woqaPUOmr9daq9EsZm-KjhI-jhMS0-rpdQRejnP_6-f_sxZ8x-_6AXWto2nX0Tdda7-IYZHtQBR9j0OahyRjJfiLuuyH7iZDDRKS0N4cP9JB0PwL0FnlvBTE</recordid><startdate>20150727</startdate><enddate>20150727</enddate><creator>Hanafi, Nik Sherina</creator><creator>Abdullah, Adina</creator><creator>Lee, Ping Yein</creator><creator>Liew, Su May</creator><creator>Chia, Yook Chin</creator><creator>Khoo, Ee Ming</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150727</creationdate><title>Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control</title><author>Hanafi, Nik Sherina ; Abdullah, Adina ; Lee, Ping Yein ; Liew, Su May ; Chia, Yook Chin ; Khoo, Ee Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e3a85680d6ed030879fa46119550c230f6fab3fb28c49cb483a774cc3914c61c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Continuity</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graduate studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypertension - therapy</topic><topic>Malaysia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Family</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Proteinuria</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Universities and colleges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanafi, Nik Sherina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Adina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ping Yein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Su May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Yook Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ee Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanafi, Nik Sherina</au><au>Abdullah, Adina</au><au>Lee, Ping Yein</au><au>Liew, Su May</au><au>Chia, Yook Chin</au><au>Khoo, Ee Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-07-27</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0134030</spage><epage>e0134030</epage><pages>e0134030-e0134030</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Continuity of care is an important quality outcome of patient care. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between personal continuity and blood pressure (BP) control among the patients with hypertension in an academic primary care centre. Between January and May 2012, we conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with hypertension who had been followed up for at least 1 year in the Primary Care Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. In this setting, doctors who provided care for hypertension included postgraduate family medicine trainees, non-trainee doctors and academic staff. Systematic random sampling (1:4) was used for patient selection. BP control was defined as less than 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease and less than 140/90 mm Hg for all other patients. Continuity of care was assessed using the usual provider continuity index (UPCI), which is the ratio of patient visits to the usual provider to the total number of visits to all providers in 1 year. A UPC index of zero denotes no continuity while an index of one reflects perfect continuity with only the usual provider. We reviewed a total of 1060 medical records. The patients' mean age was 62.0 years (SD 10.4). The majority was women (59.2%) and married (85.7%). The mean number of visits in a year was 3.85 (SD 1.36). A total of 72 doctors had provided consultations (55 postgraduate family medicine trainees, 8 non-trainee doctors and 9 academic staff). The mean UPCI was 0.43 (SD 0.34). Target BP was achieved in 42% of the patients. There was no significant relationship between BP control and personal continuity after adjustment for total number of visits. Continuity of care was not associated with BP control in our centre. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for this.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26214304</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0134030</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0134030-e0134030
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1699201179
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Adult
Aged
Ambulatory care
Blood
Blood Pressure
Chronic illnesses
Clinics
Continuity
Continuity of care
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Family medicine
Female
Graduate studies
Health care
Health care facilities
Hospitals, University
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension - epidemiology
Hypertension - physiopathology
Hypertension - therapy
Malaysia - epidemiology
Male
Medical personnel
Medical records
Medicine
Middle Aged
Patient care
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Physicians
Physicians, Family
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Proteinuria
Public health
Random sampling
Sex Factors
Universities and colleges
title Personal Continuity of Care in a University-Based Primary Care Practice: Impact on Blood Pressure Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personal%20Continuity%20of%20Care%20in%20a%20University-Based%20Primary%20Care%20Practice:%20Impact%20on%20Blood%20Pressure%20Control&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hanafi,%20Nik%20Sherina&rft.date=2015-07-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0134030&rft.epage=e0134030&rft.pages=e0134030-e0134030&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134030&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA423309681%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1699201179&rft_id=info:pmid/26214304&rft_galeid=A423309681&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1821249199fe41afaed4a9f30bdd1fac&rfr_iscdi=true