Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation
Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0130954 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0130954 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Grendelmeier, Alex Arlettaz, Raphaël Gerber, Michael Pasinelli, Gilberto |
description | Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0130954 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1696243365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_486202b9019e492ea45232905aac5bdd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3743391261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QGCJDZsEv2fMAgmlDUSqRNXC2nI8d4Ijjz21J5H4iv4yzqNVi9jY1r3nnPvwqaq3BE8Jq8mnddykYPx0iAGmmDCsBH9WnRLF6ERSzJ4_ep9Ur3JeYyxYI-XL6oRKUtOCP63urmFIsd3Y0W0BXUHqYupNsIBihww6B-tdcGGF5jFBHtGVyRmSC4BcQNfgzehiQGNEF2HrUgw9hNF4ZEKLbqJ15Tk3dowpf0aLfvDO7gkZlTLoZgDrIKNZCUDa7jOvqxed8RneHO-z6tf84ufs--Tyx7fF7OvlxAoqx4kq4yojMF8a1qlayFYo1dJWNg1moiaqqZeEks4q2hqQvKk55xhzWZtaEtuxs-r9QXfwMevjLrMmUknKGZOiIBYHRBvNWg_J9Sb90dE4vQ_EtNImjc560LwpS6ZLhYkCrigYLiijCgtjrFi2bdH6cqy2WfbQ2rKkZPwT0aeZ4H7rVdxqLjCpVV0EPh4FUrzdlI_QvcsWvDcB4mbfd01JOXd9f_gH-v_p-AFlU8w5QffQDMF65697lt75Sx_9VWjvHg_yQLo3FPsLzujPSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696243365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto</creator><contributor>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto ; Peter, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26172954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Accounting ; Animal behavior ; Animal breeding ; Animals ; Birds ; Breeding ; Cameras ; Clutch Size ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Demographics ; Demography ; Density dependence ; Ecological effects ; Ecological niches ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Exposure ; Female ; Ficedula albicollis ; Forest management ; Forests ; Grasses ; Habitats ; Juveniles ; Male ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior ; Nests ; Parus major ; Passeriformes - physiology ; Phylloscopus sibilatrix ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Reproduction ; Risk ; Social factors ; Species ; Survival ; Time Factors ; Weather ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954</ispartof><rights>2015 Grendelmeier et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Grendelmeier et al 2015 Grendelmeier et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501797/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501797/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Clutch Size</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ficedula albicollis</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Parus major</subject><subject>Passeriformes - physiology</subject><subject>Phylloscopus sibilatrix</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QGCJDZsEv2fMAgmlDUSqRNXC2nI8d4Ijjz21J5H4iv4yzqNVi9jY1r3nnPvwqaq3BE8Jq8mnddykYPx0iAGmmDCsBH9WnRLF6ERSzJ4_ep9Ur3JeYyxYI-XL6oRKUtOCP63urmFIsd3Y0W0BXUHqYupNsIBihww6B-tdcGGF5jFBHtGVyRmSC4BcQNfgzehiQGNEF2HrUgw9hNF4ZEKLbqJ15Tk3dowpf0aLfvDO7gkZlTLoZgDrIKNZCUDa7jOvqxed8RneHO-z6tf84ufs--Tyx7fF7OvlxAoqx4kq4yojMF8a1qlayFYo1dJWNg1moiaqqZeEks4q2hqQvKk55xhzWZtaEtuxs-r9QXfwMevjLrMmUknKGZOiIBYHRBvNWg_J9Sb90dE4vQ_EtNImjc560LwpS6ZLhYkCrigYLiijCgtjrFi2bdH6cqy2WfbQ2rKkZPwT0aeZ4H7rVdxqLjCpVV0EPh4FUrzdlI_QvcsWvDcB4mbfd01JOXd9f_gH-v_p-AFlU8w5QffQDMF65697lt75Sx_9VWjvHg_yQLo3FPsLzujPSw</recordid><startdate>20150714</startdate><enddate>20150714</enddate><creator>Grendelmeier, Alex</creator><creator>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creator><creator>Gerber, Michael</creator><creator>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150714</creationdate><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><author>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Clutch Size</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ficedula albicollis</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Parus major</topic><topic>Passeriformes - physiology</topic><topic>Phylloscopus sibilatrix</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grendelmeier, Alex</au><au>Arlettaz, Raphaël</au><au>Gerber, Michael</au><au>Pasinelli, Gilberto</au><au>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-07-14</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0130954</spage><epage>e0130954</epage><pages>e0130954-e0130954</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26172954</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0130954</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1696243365 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abiotic factors Accounting Animal behavior Animal breeding Animals Birds Breeding Cameras Clutch Size Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Demographics Demography Density dependence Ecological effects Ecological niches Ecosystem Environment Environmental monitoring Exposure Female Ficedula albicollis Forest management Forests Grasses Habitats Juveniles Male Nesting Nesting Behavior Nests Parus major Passeriformes - physiology Phylloscopus sibilatrix Predation Predatory Behavior Reproduction Risk Social factors Species Survival Time Factors Weather Wildlife conservation |
title | Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A08%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20Performance%20of%20a%20Declining%20Forest%20Passerine%20in%20Relation%20to%20Environmental%20and%20Social%20Factors:%20Implications%20for%20Species%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Grendelmeier,%20Alex&rft.date=2015-07-14&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0130954&rft.epage=e0130954&rft.pages=e0130954-e0130954&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3743391261%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696243365&rft_id=info:pmid/26172954&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_486202b9019e492ea45232905aac5bdd&rfr_iscdi=true |