Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation

Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954
Hauptverfasser: Grendelmeier, Alex, Arlettaz, Raphaël, Gerber, Michael, Pasinelli, Gilberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0130954
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0130954
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Grendelmeier, Alex
Arlettaz, Raphaël
Gerber, Michael
Pasinelli, Gilberto
description Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0130954
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1696243365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_486202b9019e492ea45232905aac5bdd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3743391261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QGCJDZsEv2fMAgmlDUSqRNXC2nI8d4Ijjz21J5H4iv4yzqNVi9jY1r3nnPvwqaq3BE8Jq8mnddykYPx0iAGmmDCsBH9WnRLF6ERSzJ4_ep9Ur3JeYyxYI-XL6oRKUtOCP63urmFIsd3Y0W0BXUHqYupNsIBihww6B-tdcGGF5jFBHtGVyRmSC4BcQNfgzehiQGNEF2HrUgw9hNF4ZEKLbqJ15Tk3dowpf0aLfvDO7gkZlTLoZgDrIKNZCUDa7jOvqxed8RneHO-z6tf84ufs--Tyx7fF7OvlxAoqx4kq4yojMF8a1qlayFYo1dJWNg1moiaqqZeEks4q2hqQvKk55xhzWZtaEtuxs-r9QXfwMevjLrMmUknKGZOiIBYHRBvNWg_J9Sb90dE4vQ_EtNImjc560LwpS6ZLhYkCrigYLiijCgtjrFi2bdH6cqy2WfbQ2rKkZPwT0aeZ4H7rVdxqLjCpVV0EPh4FUrzdlI_QvcsWvDcB4mbfd01JOXd9f_gH-v_p-AFlU8w5QffQDMF65697lt75Sx_9VWjvHg_yQLo3FPsLzujPSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696243365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto</creator><contributor>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto ; Peter, Hans-Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130954</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26172954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Accounting ; Animal behavior ; Animal breeding ; Animals ; Birds ; Breeding ; Cameras ; Clutch Size ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Demographics ; Demography ; Density dependence ; Ecological effects ; Ecological niches ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Exposure ; Female ; Ficedula albicollis ; Forest management ; Forests ; Grasses ; Habitats ; Juveniles ; Male ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior ; Nests ; Parus major ; Passeriformes - physiology ; Phylloscopus sibilatrix ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Reproduction ; Risk ; Social factors ; Species ; Survival ; Time Factors ; Weather ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954</ispartof><rights>2015 Grendelmeier et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Grendelmeier et al 2015 Grendelmeier et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501797/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501797/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</contributor><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Clutch Size</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ficedula albicollis</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Parus major</subject><subject>Passeriformes - physiology</subject><subject>Phylloscopus sibilatrix</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QGCJDZsEv2fMAgmlDUSqRNXC2nI8d4Ijjz21J5H4iv4yzqNVi9jY1r3nnPvwqaq3BE8Jq8mnddykYPx0iAGmmDCsBH9WnRLF6ERSzJ4_ep9Ur3JeYyxYI-XL6oRKUtOCP63urmFIsd3Y0W0BXUHqYupNsIBihww6B-tdcGGF5jFBHtGVyRmSC4BcQNfgzehiQGNEF2HrUgw9hNF4ZEKLbqJ15Tk3dowpf0aLfvDO7gkZlTLoZgDrIKNZCUDa7jOvqxed8RneHO-z6tf84ufs--Tyx7fF7OvlxAoqx4kq4yojMF8a1qlayFYo1dJWNg1moiaqqZeEks4q2hqQvKk55xhzWZtaEtuxs-r9QXfwMevjLrMmUknKGZOiIBYHRBvNWg_J9Sb90dE4vQ_EtNImjc560LwpS6ZLhYkCrigYLiijCgtjrFi2bdH6cqy2WfbQ2rKkZPwT0aeZ4H7rVdxqLjCpVV0EPh4FUrzdlI_QvcsWvDcB4mbfd01JOXd9f_gH-v_p-AFlU8w5QffQDMF65697lt75Sx_9VWjvHg_yQLo3FPsLzujPSw</recordid><startdate>20150714</startdate><enddate>20150714</enddate><creator>Grendelmeier, Alex</creator><creator>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creator><creator>Gerber, Michael</creator><creator>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150714</creationdate><title>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</title><author>Grendelmeier, Alex ; Arlettaz, Raphaël ; Gerber, Michael ; Pasinelli, Gilberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-93099a504ba3f9756d599d2d68803571987b121fc92dae648744400467a761cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Clutch Size</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ficedula albicollis</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Parus major</topic><topic>Passeriformes - physiology</topic><topic>Phylloscopus sibilatrix</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grendelmeier, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlettaz, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasinelli, Gilberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grendelmeier, Alex</au><au>Arlettaz, Raphaël</au><au>Gerber, Michael</au><au>Pasinelli, Gilberto</au><au>Peter, Hans-Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-07-14</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0130954</spage><epage>e0130954</epage><pages>e0130954-e0130954</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Identifying factors influencing a species' ecological niche and demography is a prerequisite for species conservation. However, our understanding of the interplay between demographic rates and biotic/abiotic factors is still poor for most species of conservation concern. We evaluated relevance of eight hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, temporal nest exposure, nest concealment, topography, tree structure, predation risk and disturbance, density dependence and weather for explaining variation in reproductive performance of the declining wood warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix in northern Switzerland. Reproductive performance was monitored with cameras at 136 nests from 2010 to 2012 and was associated to temporal exposure, timing of breeding and concealment of nests. Daily nest survival was positively related to the number of grass and sedge tussocks, nest concealment and nest age. Clutch size and number of fledglings decreased, the later in the season a nest was initiated. Nest survival over an average nesting period of 31 days was 46.9 ± 0.07% (mean ± SE), daily nest survival rate was 0.976 ± 0.002. As for many ground-breeding birds, nest predation was the principal cause of nest failure, accounting for 79% of all nest losses. Conservation measures should aim at increasing the area of relatively homogenous forest stands featuring suitable habitats characterized by abundant and accessible grass and sedge tussocks. In managed forests, such conditions can be found in stands of middle age (i.e. pole wood) with little to no shrub layer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26172954</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0130954</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0130954-e0130954
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1696243365
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Abiotic factors
Accounting
Animal behavior
Animal breeding
Animals
Birds
Breeding
Cameras
Clutch Size
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Demographics
Demography
Density dependence
Ecological effects
Ecological niches
Ecosystem
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Exposure
Female
Ficedula albicollis
Forest management
Forests
Grasses
Habitats
Juveniles
Male
Nesting
Nesting Behavior
Nests
Parus major
Passeriformes - physiology
Phylloscopus sibilatrix
Predation
Predatory Behavior
Reproduction
Risk
Social factors
Species
Survival
Time Factors
Weather
Wildlife conservation
title Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A08%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20Performance%20of%20a%20Declining%20Forest%20Passerine%20in%20Relation%20to%20Environmental%20and%20Social%20Factors:%20Implications%20for%20Species%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Grendelmeier,%20Alex&rft.date=2015-07-14&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0130954&rft.epage=e0130954&rft.pages=e0130954-e0130954&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3743391261%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696243365&rft_id=info:pmid/26172954&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_486202b9019e492ea45232905aac5bdd&rfr_iscdi=true