A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models
Linear-bilinear models, especially the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, are widely applicable to genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) studies in plant breeding programs. These models allow a parsimonious modeling of GE interactions, retaining a small number of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0131414-e0131414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0131414 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0131414 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | da Silva, Carlos Pereira de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio Nuvunga, Joel Jorge Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves Balestre, Marcio |
description | Linear-bilinear models, especially the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, are widely applicable to genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) studies in plant breeding programs. These models allow a parsimonious modeling of GE interactions, retaining a small number of principal components in the analysis. However, one aspect of the AMMI model that is still debated is the selection criteria for determining the number of multiplicative terms required to describe the GE interaction pattern. Shrinkage estimators have been proposed as selection criteria for the GE interaction components. In this study, a Bayesian approach was combined with the AMMI model with shrinkage estimators for the principal components. A total of 55 maize genotypes were evaluated in nine different environments using a complete blocks design with three replicates. The results show that the traditional Bayesian AMMI model produces low shrinkage of singular values but avoids the usual pitfalls in determining the credible intervals in the biplot. On the other hand, Bayesian shrinkage AMMI models have difficulty with the credible interval for model parameters, but produce stronger shrinkage of the principal components, converging to GE matrices that have more shrinkage than those obtained using mixed models. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen, and resulted in models being selected that were similar to those obtained by the Cornelius F-test (α = 0.05) in traditional AMMI models and cross validation based on leave-one-out. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen and more GEI pattern retained on the first two components. The resulting model chosen by posterior distribution of singular value was also similar to those produced by the cross-validation approach in traditional AMMI models. Our method enables the estimation of credible interval for AMMI biplot plus the choice of AMMI model based on direct posterior distribution retaining more GEI pattern in the first components and discarding noise without Gaussian assumption as requested in F-based tests or deal with parametric problems as observed in traditional AMMI shrinkage method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0131414 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1695157053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A421173171</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e980ed67ad7b4b56b716d72ada528021</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A421173171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbc5d260c6c353fef5bad7c47dcb619d52603978de398888fc3d7c19e34210853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJwyOKP2E4uSKHiY6WuKlHgajm2k3jxxqmdIPrv8bJptUE9EB9ieZ55PTN-k-Q5BCuIGXy3dZPvhV0NrtcrADHMYf4gOYUlRhlFAD882p8kT0LYAkBwQenj5ARRSIqcoNMkq9IP4kYHI_r0qvOm_ylanVbD4J2QXdo4n1abzTrdOKVteJo8aoQN-tn8P0u-f_r47fxLdnH5eX1eXWSSlmjMVC2JQhRIKjHBjW5ILRSTOVOyprBUJMZwyQqlcVnEr5E4hmGpcY4gKAg-S14edAfrAp87DRzSkkDCYhuRWB8I5cSWD97shL_hThj-98D5lgs_Gmk112UBtKIsllDnNaE1g1QxJJQgqAAIRq33821TvdNK6n70wi5El5HedLx1v3iel4yiPAq8mQW8u550GPnOBKmtFb1206FuRkhRoIi--ge9v7uZakVswPSNi_fKvSiv4oggw5Dt617dQ8Wl9M7IaIvGxPNFwttFQmRG_XtsxRQCX199_X_28seSfX3EdlrYsQvOTqNxfViC-QGU3oXgdXM3ZAj43tW30-B7V_PZ1THtxfED3SXd2hj_Aa277mk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695157053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>da Silva, Carlos Pereira ; de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio ; Nuvunga, Joel Jorge ; Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves ; Balestre, Marcio</creator><contributor>Hsiao, Chuhsing Kate</contributor><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carlos Pereira ; de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio ; Nuvunga, Joel Jorge ; Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves ; Balestre, Marcio ; Hsiao, Chuhsing Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Linear-bilinear models, especially the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, are widely applicable to genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) studies in plant breeding programs. These models allow a parsimonious modeling of GE interactions, retaining a small number of principal components in the analysis. However, one aspect of the AMMI model that is still debated is the selection criteria for determining the number of multiplicative terms required to describe the GE interaction pattern. Shrinkage estimators have been proposed as selection criteria for the GE interaction components. In this study, a Bayesian approach was combined with the AMMI model with shrinkage estimators for the principal components. A total of 55 maize genotypes were evaluated in nine different environments using a complete blocks design with three replicates. The results show that the traditional Bayesian AMMI model produces low shrinkage of singular values but avoids the usual pitfalls in determining the credible intervals in the biplot. On the other hand, Bayesian shrinkage AMMI models have difficulty with the credible interval for model parameters, but produce stronger shrinkage of the principal components, converging to GE matrices that have more shrinkage than those obtained using mixed models. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen, and resulted in models being selected that were similar to those obtained by the Cornelius F-test (α = 0.05) in traditional AMMI models and cross validation based on leave-one-out. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen and more GEI pattern retained on the first two components. The resulting model chosen by posterior distribution of singular value was also similar to those produced by the cross-validation approach in traditional AMMI models. Our method enables the estimation of credible interval for AMMI biplot plus the choice of AMMI model based on direct posterior distribution retaining more GEI pattern in the first components and discarding noise without Gaussian assumption as requested in F-based tests or deal with parametric problems as observed in traditional AMMI shrinkage method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131414</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26158452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Corn ; Criteria ; Crop science ; Environment ; Estimators ; Gene-Environment Interaction ; Genes, Plant - genetics ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Markov analysis ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Models, Genetic ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Multivariate analysis ; Plant breeding ; Plant Breeding - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Shrinkage ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Zea mays - genetics</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0131414-e0131414</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 da Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 da Silva et al 2015 da Silva et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbc5d260c6c353fef5bad7c47dcb619d52603978de398888fc3d7c19e34210853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbc5d260c6c353fef5bad7c47dcb619d52603978de398888fc3d7c19e34210853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497624/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4497624/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26158452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hsiao, Chuhsing Kate</contributor><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carlos Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuvunga, Joel Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestre, Marcio</creatorcontrib><title>A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Linear-bilinear models, especially the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, are widely applicable to genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) studies in plant breeding programs. These models allow a parsimonious modeling of GE interactions, retaining a small number of principal components in the analysis. However, one aspect of the AMMI model that is still debated is the selection criteria for determining the number of multiplicative terms required to describe the GE interaction pattern. Shrinkage estimators have been proposed as selection criteria for the GE interaction components. In this study, a Bayesian approach was combined with the AMMI model with shrinkage estimators for the principal components. A total of 55 maize genotypes were evaluated in nine different environments using a complete blocks design with three replicates. The results show that the traditional Bayesian AMMI model produces low shrinkage of singular values but avoids the usual pitfalls in determining the credible intervals in the biplot. On the other hand, Bayesian shrinkage AMMI models have difficulty with the credible interval for model parameters, but produce stronger shrinkage of the principal components, converging to GE matrices that have more shrinkage than those obtained using mixed models. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen, and resulted in models being selected that were similar to those obtained by the Cornelius F-test (α = 0.05) in traditional AMMI models and cross validation based on leave-one-out. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen and more GEI pattern retained on the first two components. The resulting model chosen by posterior distribution of singular value was also similar to those produced by the cross-validation approach in traditional AMMI models. Our method enables the estimation of credible interval for AMMI biplot plus the choice of AMMI model based on direct posterior distribution retaining more GEI pattern in the first components and discarding noise without Gaussian assumption as requested in F-based tests or deal with parametric problems as observed in traditional AMMI shrinkage method.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Gene-Environment Interaction</subject><subject>Genes, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant Breeding - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Shrinkage</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Zea mays - genetics</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJwyOKP2E4uSKHiY6WuKlHgajm2k3jxxqmdIPrv8bJptUE9EB9ieZ55PTN-k-Q5BCuIGXy3dZPvhV0NrtcrADHMYf4gOYUlRhlFAD882p8kT0LYAkBwQenj5ARRSIqcoNMkq9IP4kYHI_r0qvOm_ylanVbD4J2QXdo4n1abzTrdOKVteJo8aoQN-tn8P0u-f_r47fxLdnH5eX1eXWSSlmjMVC2JQhRIKjHBjW5ILRSTOVOyprBUJMZwyQqlcVnEr5E4hmGpcY4gKAg-S14edAfrAp87DRzSkkDCYhuRWB8I5cSWD97shL_hThj-98D5lgs_Gmk112UBtKIsllDnNaE1g1QxJJQgqAAIRq33821TvdNK6n70wi5El5HedLx1v3iel4yiPAq8mQW8u550GPnOBKmtFb1206FuRkhRoIi--ge9v7uZakVswPSNi_fKvSiv4oggw5Dt617dQ8Wl9M7IaIvGxPNFwttFQmRG_XtsxRQCX199_X_28seSfX3EdlrYsQvOTqNxfViC-QGU3oXgdXM3ZAj43tW30-B7V_PZ1THtxfED3SXd2hj_Aa277mk</recordid><startdate>20150709</startdate><enddate>20150709</enddate><creator>da Silva, Carlos Pereira</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio</creator><creator>Nuvunga, Joel Jorge</creator><creator>Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves</creator><creator>Balestre, Marcio</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150709</creationdate><title>A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models</title><author>da Silva, Carlos Pereira ; de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio ; Nuvunga, Joel Jorge ; Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves ; Balestre, Marcio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-dbc5d260c6c353fef5bad7c47dcb619d52603978de398888fc3d7c19e34210853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Gene-Environment Interaction</topic><topic>Genes, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant Breeding - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Shrinkage</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Zea mays - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carlos Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuvunga, Joel Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestre, Marcio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva, Carlos Pereira</au><au>de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio</au><au>Nuvunga, Joel Jorge</au><au>Pamplona, Andrezza Kéllen Alves</au><au>Balestre, Marcio</au><au>Hsiao, Chuhsing Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-07-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0131414</spage><epage>e0131414</epage><pages>e0131414-e0131414</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Linear-bilinear models, especially the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, are widely applicable to genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) studies in plant breeding programs. These models allow a parsimonious modeling of GE interactions, retaining a small number of principal components in the analysis. However, one aspect of the AMMI model that is still debated is the selection criteria for determining the number of multiplicative terms required to describe the GE interaction pattern. Shrinkage estimators have been proposed as selection criteria for the GE interaction components. In this study, a Bayesian approach was combined with the AMMI model with shrinkage estimators for the principal components. A total of 55 maize genotypes were evaluated in nine different environments using a complete blocks design with three replicates. The results show that the traditional Bayesian AMMI model produces low shrinkage of singular values but avoids the usual pitfalls in determining the credible intervals in the biplot. On the other hand, Bayesian shrinkage AMMI models have difficulty with the credible interval for model parameters, but produce stronger shrinkage of the principal components, converging to GE matrices that have more shrinkage than those obtained using mixed models. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen, and resulted in models being selected that were similar to those obtained by the Cornelius F-test (α = 0.05) in traditional AMMI models and cross validation based on leave-one-out. This characteristic allowed more parsimonious models to be chosen and more GEI pattern retained on the first two components. The resulting model chosen by posterior distribution of singular value was also similar to those produced by the cross-validation approach in traditional AMMI models. Our method enables the estimation of credible interval for AMMI biplot plus the choice of AMMI model based on direct posterior distribution retaining more GEI pattern in the first components and discarding noise without Gaussian assumption as requested in F-based tests or deal with parametric problems as observed in traditional AMMI shrinkage method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26158452</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0131414</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-07, Vol.10 (7), p.e0131414-e0131414 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1695157053 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Corn Criteria Crop science Environment Estimators Gene-Environment Interaction Genes, Plant - genetics Genotype Genotypes Markov analysis Mathematical models Methods Models, Genetic Monte Carlo simulation Multivariate analysis Plant breeding Plant Breeding - methods Reproducibility of Results Shrinkage Statistical analysis Studies Zea mays - genetics |
title | A Bayesian Shrinkage Approach for AMMI Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T15%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Bayesian%20Shrinkage%20Approach%20for%20AMMI%20Models&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=da%20Silva,%20Carlos%20Pereira&rft.date=2015-07-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0131414&rft.epage=e0131414&rft.pages=e0131414-e0131414&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0131414&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA421173171%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695157053&rft_id=info:pmid/26158452&rft_galeid=A421173171&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e980ed67ad7b4b56b716d72ada528021&rfr_iscdi=true |