Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment

Multiple attribute search is a central feature of economic life: we consider much more than price when purchasing a home, and more than wage when choosing a job. An experiment is conducted in order to explore the effects of cognitive limitations on choice in these rich settings, in accordance with t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e0126508-e0126508
1. Verfasser: Sanjurjo, Adam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0126508
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0126508
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Sanjurjo, Adam
description Multiple attribute search is a central feature of economic life: we consider much more than price when purchasing a home, and more than wage when choosing a job. An experiment is conducted in order to explore the effects of cognitive limitations on choice in these rich settings, in accordance with the predictions of a new model of search memory load. In each task, subjects are made to search the same information in one of two orders, which differ in predicted memory load. Despite standard models of choice treating such variations in order of acquisition as irrelevant, lower predicted memory load search orders are found to lead to substantially fewer choice errors. An implication of the result for search behavior, more generally, is that in order to reduce memory load (thus choice error) a limited memory searcher ought to deviate from the search path of an unlimited memory searcher in predictable ways-a mechanism that can explain the systematic deviations from optimal sequential search that have recently been discovered in peoples' behavior. Further, as cognitive load is induced endogenously (within the task), and found to affect choice behavior, this result contributes to the cognitive load literature (in which load is induced exogenously), as well as the cognitive ability literature (in which cognitive ability is measured in a separate task). In addition, while the information overload literature has focused on the detrimental effects of the quantity of information on choice, this result suggests that, holding quantity constant, the order that information is observed in is an essential determinant of choice failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0126508
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1692021068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_11babf6b7c1b434295d4149c9b586cf1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1692754341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-df4a8700a98173812338255383724ef2f1957098c2f780dbf3cdd79fd3bb53593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1PFDEYboxEEP0HRifxwoFd-va7HEzIZhUSjAf13PSTnc3sdG13jfx7Zt2BAOHUpn0-8yD0AfAUqISzZd6W3nbTde7jFAMRHKtX6Ag0JRNBMH396H6I3ta6xJhTJcQbdEgEEKBcHKGzn9EWvzhtvsdVLrenje1DM1vk1sdmXkou581F38z_rWNpV7HfvEMHyXY1vh_PY_T76_zX7HJy_ePb1ezieuI5EZtJSMwqibHVCiRVQChVhA_2VBIWE0mgucRaeZKkwsEl6kOQOgXqHKdc02P0aa-77nI1Y9dqQGiCCWChBsTVHhGyXZr1EM-WW5Nta_4_5HJjbNm0vosGwFmXhJMeHKOMaB4YMO2140r4BIPWl9Ft61Yx-KFosd0T0ac_fbswN_mvYUwNhXZhTkaBkv9sY92YVVt97Drbx7zd55Z88N55fX4Gfbkd26N8ybWWmB7CADa7_e9ZZre_GfcfaB8fF3kg3Q9O7wDMtKrS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692021068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Sanjurjo, Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanjurjo, Adam</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple attribute search is a central feature of economic life: we consider much more than price when purchasing a home, and more than wage when choosing a job. An experiment is conducted in order to explore the effects of cognitive limitations on choice in these rich settings, in accordance with the predictions of a new model of search memory load. In each task, subjects are made to search the same information in one of two orders, which differ in predicted memory load. Despite standard models of choice treating such variations in order of acquisition as irrelevant, lower predicted memory load search orders are found to lead to substantially fewer choice errors. An implication of the result for search behavior, more generally, is that in order to reduce memory load (thus choice error) a limited memory searcher ought to deviate from the search path of an unlimited memory searcher in predictable ways-a mechanism that can explain the systematic deviations from optimal sequential search that have recently been discovered in peoples' behavior. Further, as cognitive load is induced endogenously (within the task), and found to affect choice behavior, this result contributes to the cognitive load literature (in which load is induced exogenously), as well as the cognitive ability literature (in which cognitive ability is measured in a separate task). In addition, while the information overload literature has focused on the detrimental effects of the quantity of information on choice, this result suggests that, holding quantity constant, the order that information is observed in is an essential determinant of choice failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26121356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Beauty contests ; Behavior ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Cooperation ; Decision making ; Exploratory behavior ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Models, Theoretical ; Predictions ; Random variables ; Searching ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e0126508-e0126508</ispartof><rights>2015 Adam Sanjurjo. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Adam Sanjurjo 2015 Adam Sanjurjo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-df4a8700a98173812338255383724ef2f1957098c2f780dbf3cdd79fd3bb53593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-df4a8700a98173812338255383724ef2f1957098c2f780dbf3cdd79fd3bb53593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487248/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487248/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanjurjo, Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Multiple attribute search is a central feature of economic life: we consider much more than price when purchasing a home, and more than wage when choosing a job. An experiment is conducted in order to explore the effects of cognitive limitations on choice in these rich settings, in accordance with the predictions of a new model of search memory load. In each task, subjects are made to search the same information in one of two orders, which differ in predicted memory load. Despite standard models of choice treating such variations in order of acquisition as irrelevant, lower predicted memory load search orders are found to lead to substantially fewer choice errors. An implication of the result for search behavior, more generally, is that in order to reduce memory load (thus choice error) a limited memory searcher ought to deviate from the search path of an unlimited memory searcher in predictable ways-a mechanism that can explain the systematic deviations from optimal sequential search that have recently been discovered in peoples' behavior. Further, as cognitive load is induced endogenously (within the task), and found to affect choice behavior, this result contributes to the cognitive load literature (in which load is induced exogenously), as well as the cognitive ability literature (in which cognitive ability is measured in a separate task). In addition, while the information overload literature has focused on the detrimental effects of the quantity of information on choice, this result suggests that, holding quantity constant, the order that information is observed in is an essential determinant of choice failure.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Beauty contests</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Exploratory behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1PFDEYboxEEP0HRifxwoFd-va7HEzIZhUSjAf13PSTnc3sdG13jfx7Zt2BAOHUpn0-8yD0AfAUqISzZd6W3nbTde7jFAMRHKtX6Ag0JRNBMH396H6I3ta6xJhTJcQbdEgEEKBcHKGzn9EWvzhtvsdVLrenje1DM1vk1sdmXkou581F38z_rWNpV7HfvEMHyXY1vh_PY_T76_zX7HJy_ePb1ezieuI5EZtJSMwqibHVCiRVQChVhA_2VBIWE0mgucRaeZKkwsEl6kOQOgXqHKdc02P0aa-77nI1Y9dqQGiCCWChBsTVHhGyXZr1EM-WW5Nta_4_5HJjbNm0vosGwFmXhJMeHKOMaB4YMO2140r4BIPWl9Ft61Yx-KFosd0T0ac_fbswN_mvYUwNhXZhTkaBkv9sY92YVVt97Drbx7zd55Z88N55fX4Gfbkd26N8ybWWmB7CADa7_e9ZZre_GfcfaB8fF3kg3Q9O7wDMtKrS</recordid><startdate>20150629</startdate><enddate>20150629</enddate><creator>Sanjurjo, Adam</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150629</creationdate><title>Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment</title><author>Sanjurjo, Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-df4a8700a98173812338255383724ef2f1957098c2f780dbf3cdd79fd3bb53593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Beauty contests</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Exploratory behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanjurjo, Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanjurjo, Adam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-06-29</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0126508</spage><epage>e0126508</epage><pages>e0126508-e0126508</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Multiple attribute search is a central feature of economic life: we consider much more than price when purchasing a home, and more than wage when choosing a job. An experiment is conducted in order to explore the effects of cognitive limitations on choice in these rich settings, in accordance with the predictions of a new model of search memory load. In each task, subjects are made to search the same information in one of two orders, which differ in predicted memory load. Despite standard models of choice treating such variations in order of acquisition as irrelevant, lower predicted memory load search orders are found to lead to substantially fewer choice errors. An implication of the result for search behavior, more generally, is that in order to reduce memory load (thus choice error) a limited memory searcher ought to deviate from the search path of an unlimited memory searcher in predictable ways-a mechanism that can explain the systematic deviations from optimal sequential search that have recently been discovered in peoples' behavior. Further, as cognitive load is induced endogenously (within the task), and found to affect choice behavior, this result contributes to the cognitive load literature (in which load is induced exogenously), as well as the cognitive ability literature (in which cognitive ability is measured in a separate task). In addition, while the information overload literature has focused on the detrimental effects of the quantity of information on choice, this result suggests that, holding quantity constant, the order that information is observed in is an essential determinant of choice failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26121356</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0126508</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e0126508-e0126508
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1692021068
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Alternatives
Beauty contests
Behavior
Choice Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Cooperation
Decision making
Exploratory behavior
Humans
Mathematical models
Memory
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Models, Theoretical
Predictions
Random variables
Searching
Welfare economics
title Search, Memory, and Choice Error: An Experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Search,%20Memory,%20and%20Choice%20Error:%20An%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sanjurjo,%20Adam&rft.date=2015-06-29&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0126508&rft.epage=e0126508&rft.pages=e0126508-e0126508&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0126508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1692754341%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692021068&rft_id=info:pmid/26121356&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_11babf6b7c1b434295d4149c9b586cf1&rfr_iscdi=true