Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models
Quantifying epidemiological dynamics is crucial for understanding and forecasting the spread of an epidemic. The coalescent and the birth-death model are used interchangeably to infer epidemiological parameters from the genealogical relationships of the pathogen population under study, which in turn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS computational biology 2014-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e1003913-e1003913 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1003913 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e1003913 |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Boskova, Veronika Bonhoeffer, Sebastian Stadler, Tanja |
description | Quantifying epidemiological dynamics is crucial for understanding and forecasting the spread of an epidemic. The coalescent and the birth-death model are used interchangeably to infer epidemiological parameters from the genealogical relationships of the pathogen population under study, which in turn are inferred from the pathogen genetic sequencing data. To compare the performance of these widely applied models, we performed a simulation study. We simulated phylogenetic trees under the constant rate birth-death model and the coalescent model with a deterministic exponentially growing infected population. For each tree, we re-estimated the epidemiological parameters using both a birth-death and a coalescent based method, implemented as an MCMC procedure in BEAST v2.0. In our analyses that estimate the growth rate of an epidemic based on simulated birth-death trees, the point estimates such as the maximum a posteriori/maximum likelihood estimates are not very different. However, the estimates of uncertainty are very different. The birth-death model had a higher coverage than the coalescent model, i.e. contained the true value in the highest posterior density (HPD) interval more often (2-13% vs. 31-75% error). The coverage of the coalescent decreases with decreasing basic reproductive ratio and increasing sampling probability of infecteds. We hypothesize that the biases in the coalescent are due to the assumption of deterministic rather than stochastic population size changes. Both methods performed reasonably well when analyzing trees simulated under the coalescent. The methods can also identify other key epidemiological parameters as long as one of the parameters is fixed to its true value. In summary, when using genetic data to estimate epidemic dynamics, our results suggest that the birth-death method will be less sensitive to population fluctuations of early outbreaks than the coalescent method that assumes a deterministic exponentially growing infected population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1685033153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_28e54ddc671047c9b11249a03f2a2f6f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1622063449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-57c0f24b9bc4259b6446f72e4b3917c36ab3041669d67bf1d345ad36327717013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUstu1DAUjRCItgN_gMBLNhn8drJBQhXQkSqxgbXlV2Y8cuxgJ0jz9_UwadWu_Drn3HuuT9N8QHCLiEBfjmnJUYXtZLTfIghJj8ir5hoxRlpBWPf62f6quSnlWDGs6_nb5gozIljlXDdhFweXXTQOpAG4yVs3-hTS3hsVgD1FNXpTgFbFWZAiKH5cgprrYTqcKsxF7wpYio97oH2eD611aj4AFS0wSQVXjIszGJN1obxr3gwqFPd-XTfNnx_ff9_etfe_fu5uv923hvbd3DJh4ICp7rWhmPWaU8oHgR3V1aMwhCtNIEWc95YLPSBLKFOWcIKFQAIismk-XXSnkIpcB1Uk4h2DhCBGKmJ3QdikjnLKflT5JJPy8v9Fynup8uxNcBJ3jlFrDRcIUmF6jRCmvYJkwAoPfKhaX9dqix6dPfvNKrwQffkS_UHu0z9JMca8ftGm-bwK5PR3cWWWo69jC0FFl5Zz3xhDTijtK5ReoCanUrIbnsogKM-xeHQrz7GQaywq7ePzFp9IjzkgD7y9tz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1622063449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Boskova, Veronika ; Bonhoeffer, Sebastian ; Stadler, Tanja</creator><contributor>Koelle, Katia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Boskova, Veronika ; Bonhoeffer, Sebastian ; Stadler, Tanja ; Koelle, Katia</creatorcontrib><description>Quantifying epidemiological dynamics is crucial for understanding and forecasting the spread of an epidemic. The coalescent and the birth-death model are used interchangeably to infer epidemiological parameters from the genealogical relationships of the pathogen population under study, which in turn are inferred from the pathogen genetic sequencing data. To compare the performance of these widely applied models, we performed a simulation study. We simulated phylogenetic trees under the constant rate birth-death model and the coalescent model with a deterministic exponentially growing infected population. For each tree, we re-estimated the epidemiological parameters using both a birth-death and a coalescent based method, implemented as an MCMC procedure in BEAST v2.0. In our analyses that estimate the growth rate of an epidemic based on simulated birth-death trees, the point estimates such as the maximum a posteriori/maximum likelihood estimates are not very different. However, the estimates of uncertainty are very different. The birth-death model had a higher coverage than the coalescent model, i.e. contained the true value in the highest posterior density (HPD) interval more often (2-13% vs. 31-75% error). The coverage of the coalescent decreases with decreasing basic reproductive ratio and increasing sampling probability of infecteds. We hypothesize that the biases in the coalescent are due to the assumption of deterministic rather than stochastic population size changes. Both methods performed reasonably well when analyzing trees simulated under the coalescent. The methods can also identify other key epidemiological parameters as long as one of the parameters is fixed to its true value. In summary, when using genetic data to estimate epidemic dynamics, our results suggest that the birth-death method will be less sensitive to population fluctuations of early outbreaks than the coalescent method that assumes a deterministic exponentially growing infected population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25375100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth Rate ; Computational Biology ; Computer Simulation ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Epidemiology ; Estimates ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Models, Biological ; Mortality ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Population ; Population Dynamics ; Probability ; Trees</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2014-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e1003913-e1003913</ispartof><rights>2014 Boskova et al 2014 Boskova et al</rights><rights>2014 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Boskova V, Bonhoeffer S, Stadler T (2014) Inference of Epidemiological Dynamics Based on Simulated Phylogenies Using Birth-Death and Coalescent Models. PLoS Comput Biol 10(11): e1003913. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-57c0f24b9bc4259b6446f72e4b3917c36ab3041669d67bf1d345ad36327717013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-57c0f24b9bc4259b6446f72e4b3917c36ab3041669d67bf1d345ad36327717013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222655/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4222655/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25375100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Koelle, Katia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Boskova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhoeffer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Tanja</creatorcontrib><title>Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>Quantifying epidemiological dynamics is crucial for understanding and forecasting the spread of an epidemic. The coalescent and the birth-death model are used interchangeably to infer epidemiological parameters from the genealogical relationships of the pathogen population under study, which in turn are inferred from the pathogen genetic sequencing data. To compare the performance of these widely applied models, we performed a simulation study. We simulated phylogenetic trees under the constant rate birth-death model and the coalescent model with a deterministic exponentially growing infected population. For each tree, we re-estimated the epidemiological parameters using both a birth-death and a coalescent based method, implemented as an MCMC procedure in BEAST v2.0. In our analyses that estimate the growth rate of an epidemic based on simulated birth-death trees, the point estimates such as the maximum a posteriori/maximum likelihood estimates are not very different. However, the estimates of uncertainty are very different. The birth-death model had a higher coverage than the coalescent model, i.e. contained the true value in the highest posterior density (HPD) interval more often (2-13% vs. 31-75% error). The coverage of the coalescent decreases with decreasing basic reproductive ratio and increasing sampling probability of infecteds. We hypothesize that the biases in the coalescent are due to the assumption of deterministic rather than stochastic population size changes. Both methods performed reasonably well when analyzing trees simulated under the coalescent. The methods can also identify other key epidemiological parameters as long as one of the parameters is fixed to its true value. In summary, when using genetic data to estimate epidemic dynamics, our results suggest that the birth-death method will be less sensitive to population fluctuations of early outbreaks than the coalescent method that assumes a deterministic exponentially growing infected population.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUstu1DAUjRCItgN_gMBLNhn8drJBQhXQkSqxgbXlV2Y8cuxgJ0jz9_UwadWu_Drn3HuuT9N8QHCLiEBfjmnJUYXtZLTfIghJj8ir5hoxRlpBWPf62f6quSnlWDGs6_nb5gozIljlXDdhFweXXTQOpAG4yVs3-hTS3hsVgD1FNXpTgFbFWZAiKH5cgprrYTqcKsxF7wpYio97oH2eD611aj4AFS0wSQVXjIszGJN1obxr3gwqFPd-XTfNnx_ff9_etfe_fu5uv923hvbd3DJh4ICp7rWhmPWaU8oHgR3V1aMwhCtNIEWc95YLPSBLKFOWcIKFQAIismk-XXSnkIpcB1Uk4h2DhCBGKmJ3QdikjnLKflT5JJPy8v9Fynup8uxNcBJ3jlFrDRcIUmF6jRCmvYJkwAoPfKhaX9dqix6dPfvNKrwQffkS_UHu0z9JMca8ftGm-bwK5PR3cWWWo69jC0FFl5Zz3xhDTijtK5ReoCanUrIbnsogKM-xeHQrz7GQaywq7ePzFp9IjzkgD7y9tz4</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Boskova, Veronika</creator><creator>Bonhoeffer, Sebastian</creator><creator>Stadler, Tanja</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models</title><author>Boskova, Veronika ; Bonhoeffer, Sebastian ; Stadler, Tanja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-57c0f24b9bc4259b6446f72e4b3917c36ab3041669d67bf1d345ad36327717013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boskova, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonhoeffer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Tanja</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boskova, Veronika</au><au>Bonhoeffer, Sebastian</au><au>Stadler, Tanja</au><au>Koelle, Katia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e1003913</spage><epage>e1003913</epage><pages>e1003913-e1003913</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>Quantifying epidemiological dynamics is crucial for understanding and forecasting the spread of an epidemic. The coalescent and the birth-death model are used interchangeably to infer epidemiological parameters from the genealogical relationships of the pathogen population under study, which in turn are inferred from the pathogen genetic sequencing data. To compare the performance of these widely applied models, we performed a simulation study. We simulated phylogenetic trees under the constant rate birth-death model and the coalescent model with a deterministic exponentially growing infected population. For each tree, we re-estimated the epidemiological parameters using both a birth-death and a coalescent based method, implemented as an MCMC procedure in BEAST v2.0. In our analyses that estimate the growth rate of an epidemic based on simulated birth-death trees, the point estimates such as the maximum a posteriori/maximum likelihood estimates are not very different. However, the estimates of uncertainty are very different. The birth-death model had a higher coverage than the coalescent model, i.e. contained the true value in the highest posterior density (HPD) interval more often (2-13% vs. 31-75% error). The coverage of the coalescent decreases with decreasing basic reproductive ratio and increasing sampling probability of infecteds. We hypothesize that the biases in the coalescent are due to the assumption of deterministic rather than stochastic population size changes. Both methods performed reasonably well when analyzing trees simulated under the coalescent. The methods can also identify other key epidemiological parameters as long as one of the parameters is fixed to its true value. In summary, when using genetic data to estimate epidemic dynamics, our results suggest that the birth-death method will be less sensitive to population fluctuations of early outbreaks than the coalescent method that assumes a deterministic exponentially growing infected population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25375100</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7358 |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2014-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e1003913-e1003913 |
issn | 1553-7358 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1685033153 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Birth Rate Computational Biology Computer Simulation Epidemiologic Methods Epidemiology Estimates Growth rate Humans Mathematical models Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Models, Biological Mortality Phylogenetics Phylogeny Population Population Dynamics Probability Trees |
title | Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inference%20of%20epidemiological%20dynamics%20based%20on%20simulated%20phylogenies%20using%20birth-death%20and%20coalescent%20models&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Boskova,%20Veronika&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e1003913&rft.epage=e1003913&rft.pages=e1003913-e1003913&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1622063449%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1622063449&rft_id=info:pmid/25375100&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_28e54ddc671047c9b11249a03f2a2f6f&rfr_iscdi=true |