The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-04, Vol.10 (4), p.e0124791-e0124791
Hauptverfasser: Razzouk, Denise, Kayo, Monica, Sousa, Aglaé, Gregorio, Guilherme, Cogo-Moreira, Hugo, Cardoso, Andrea Alves, Mari, Jair de Jesus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0124791
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0124791
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Razzouk, Denise
Kayo, Monica
Sousa, Aglaé
Gregorio, Guilherme
Cogo-Moreira, Hugo
Cardoso, Andrea Alves
Mari, Jair de Jesus
description Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce. To estimate the costs of antipsychotic polytherapy and its impact on public health costs in a sample of subjects with psychotic disorders living in residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A cross-sectional study that used a bottom-up approach for collecting costs data in a public health provider's perspective. Subjects with psychosis living in 20 fully-staffed residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo were assessed for clinical and psychosocial profile, severity of symptoms, quality of life, use of health services and pharmacological treatment. The impact of polytherapy on total direct costs was evaluated. 147 subjects were included, 134 used antipsychotics regularly and 38% were in use of antipsychotic polytherapy. There were no significant differences in clinical and psychosocial characteristics between polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Four variables explained 30% of direct costs: the number of antipsychotics, location of the residential facility, time living in the facility and use of olanzapine. The costs of antipsychotics corresponded to 94.4% of the total psychotropic costs and to 49.5% of all health services use when excluding accommodation costs. Olanzapine costs corresponded to 51% of all psychotropic costs. Antipsychotic polytherapy is a huge economic burden to public health service, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Great variations on antipsychotic costs explicit the need of establishing protocols for rational antipsychotic prescriptions and consequently optimising resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to estimate the best value for money among antipsychotics, especially in low and middle income countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0124791
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1671208166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A429374364</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d3a56817335341b6a72caf20b5ae9cbe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A429374364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74e1c2c70f8933e5d1db8c5d1f9e14a048dd1f637d21e383e2a251f13a430eeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk21r1EAQx4Motp5-A9GAIAreuU_ZJG-EWnw4KFRs9ZWwTDaTuy172bibiOend6-Xlov0heTFLjO_-c_OZCZJnlKyoDynb6_c4Fuwi861uCCUibyk95JjWnI2l4zw-wf3o-RRCFeEZLyQ8mFyxLIi4zkpj5Mfl2tMzaYD3aeuSaHtTRe2eu16o9PO2W2_Rg_dNtUu9CE1bRoNaTdUNvrXCLZfpxo87jwX4NIvMFj3Jn3v4Y-xj5MHDdiAT8Zzlnz7-OHy9PP87PzT8vTkbK5lyfp5LpBqpnPSFCXnmNW0rgodj6ZEKoCIoo53yfOaUeQFRwYsow3lIDhBrPgseb7X7awLamxMUFTmlJGCShmJ5Z6oHVypzpsN-K1yYNS1wfmVAh9LtqhqDpksaM55xgWtJORMQ8NIlQGWusKo9W7MNlQbrDW2vQc7EZ16WrNWK_dLCV4SKkQUeDUKePdzwNCrjQkarYUW3XD9biaJzGMzZsmLf9C7qxupFcQCTNu4mFfvRNWJYCXPBZe7tIs7qPjVuDE6TlFjon0S8HoSEJkef_crGEJQy4uv_8-ef5-yLw_Y_RAFZ4feuDZMQbEHtXcheGxum0yJ2i3BTTfUbgnUuAQx7NnhD7oNupl6_hdS_AEx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671208166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Razzouk, Denise ; Kayo, Monica ; Sousa, Aglaé ; Gregorio, Guilherme ; Cogo-Moreira, Hugo ; Cardoso, Andrea Alves ; Mari, Jair de Jesus</creator><contributor>Stewart, Robert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Razzouk, Denise ; Kayo, Monica ; Sousa, Aglaé ; Gregorio, Guilherme ; Cogo-Moreira, Hugo ; Cardoso, Andrea Alves ; Mari, Jair de Jesus ; Stewart, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce. To estimate the costs of antipsychotic polytherapy and its impact on public health costs in a sample of subjects with psychotic disorders living in residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A cross-sectional study that used a bottom-up approach for collecting costs data in a public health provider's perspective. Subjects with psychosis living in 20 fully-staffed residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo were assessed for clinical and psychosocial profile, severity of symptoms, quality of life, use of health services and pharmacological treatment. The impact of polytherapy on total direct costs was evaluated. 147 subjects were included, 134 used antipsychotics regularly and 38% were in use of antipsychotic polytherapy. There were no significant differences in clinical and psychosocial characteristics between polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Four variables explained 30% of direct costs: the number of antipsychotics, location of the residential facility, time living in the facility and use of olanzapine. The costs of antipsychotics corresponded to 94.4% of the total psychotropic costs and to 49.5% of all health services use when excluding accommodation costs. Olanzapine costs corresponded to 51% of all psychotropic costs. Antipsychotic polytherapy is a huge economic burden to public health service, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Great variations on antipsychotic costs explicit the need of establishing protocols for rational antipsychotic prescriptions and consequently optimising resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to estimate the best value for money among antipsychotics, especially in low and middle income countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25853709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antipsychotic agents ; Antipsychotic Agents - economics ; Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antipsychotics ; Benzodiazepines - economics ; Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use ; Brazil ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care costs ; Health care policy ; Health services ; Humans ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental Health Services - economics ; Olanzapine ; Pharmacology ; Polypharmacy ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics ; Psychiatry ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - drug therapy ; Psychotic Disorders - economics ; Psychotic Disorders - physiopathology ; Psychotropic drugs ; Public health ; Public Health - economics ; Quality of Life ; Residential location ; Resource allocation ; Schizophrenia ; Signs and symptoms</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-04, Vol.10 (4), p.e0124791-e0124791</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Razzouk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Razzouk et al 2015 Razzouk et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74e1c2c70f8933e5d1db8c5d1f9e14a048dd1f637d21e383e2a251f13a430eeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74e1c2c70f8933e5d1db8c5d1f9e14a048dd1f637d21e383e2a251f13a430eeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390144/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390144/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25853709$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Stewart, Robert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Razzouk, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayo, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Aglaé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogo-Moreira, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Andrea Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Jair de Jesus</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce. To estimate the costs of antipsychotic polytherapy and its impact on public health costs in a sample of subjects with psychotic disorders living in residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A cross-sectional study that used a bottom-up approach for collecting costs data in a public health provider's perspective. Subjects with psychosis living in 20 fully-staffed residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo were assessed for clinical and psychosocial profile, severity of symptoms, quality of life, use of health services and pharmacological treatment. The impact of polytherapy on total direct costs was evaluated. 147 subjects were included, 134 used antipsychotics regularly and 38% were in use of antipsychotic polytherapy. There were no significant differences in clinical and psychosocial characteristics between polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Four variables explained 30% of direct costs: the number of antipsychotics, location of the residential facility, time living in the facility and use of olanzapine. The costs of antipsychotics corresponded to 94.4% of the total psychotropic costs and to 49.5% of all health services use when excluding accommodation costs. Olanzapine costs corresponded to 51% of all psychotropic costs. Antipsychotic polytherapy is a huge economic burden to public health service, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Great variations on antipsychotic costs explicit the need of establishing protocols for rational antipsychotic prescriptions and consequently optimising resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to estimate the best value for money among antipsychotics, especially in low and middle income countries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antipsychotic agents</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines - economics</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Olanzapine</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - economics</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - economics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Residential location</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk21r1EAQx4Motp5-A9GAIAreuU_ZJG-EWnw4KFRs9ZWwTDaTuy172bibiOend6-Xlov0heTFLjO_-c_OZCZJnlKyoDynb6_c4Fuwi861uCCUibyk95JjWnI2l4zw-wf3o-RRCFeEZLyQ8mFyxLIi4zkpj5Mfl2tMzaYD3aeuSaHtTRe2eu16o9PO2W2_Rg_dNtUu9CE1bRoNaTdUNvrXCLZfpxo87jwX4NIvMFj3Jn3v4Y-xj5MHDdiAT8Zzlnz7-OHy9PP87PzT8vTkbK5lyfp5LpBqpnPSFCXnmNW0rgodj6ZEKoCIoo53yfOaUeQFRwYsow3lIDhBrPgseb7X7awLamxMUFTmlJGCShmJ5Z6oHVypzpsN-K1yYNS1wfmVAh9LtqhqDpksaM55xgWtJORMQ8NIlQGWusKo9W7MNlQbrDW2vQc7EZ16WrNWK_dLCV4SKkQUeDUKePdzwNCrjQkarYUW3XD9biaJzGMzZsmLf9C7qxupFcQCTNu4mFfvRNWJYCXPBZe7tIs7qPjVuDE6TlFjon0S8HoSEJkef_crGEJQy4uv_8-ef5-yLw_Y_RAFZ4feuDZMQbEHtXcheGxum0yJ2i3BTTfUbgnUuAQx7NnhD7oNupl6_hdS_AEx</recordid><startdate>20150408</startdate><enddate>20150408</enddate><creator>Razzouk, Denise</creator><creator>Kayo, Monica</creator><creator>Sousa, Aglaé</creator><creator>Gregorio, Guilherme</creator><creator>Cogo-Moreira, Hugo</creator><creator>Cardoso, Andrea Alves</creator><creator>Mari, Jair de Jesus</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150408</creationdate><title>The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil</title><author>Razzouk, Denise ; Kayo, Monica ; Sousa, Aglaé ; Gregorio, Guilherme ; Cogo-Moreira, Hugo ; Cardoso, Andrea Alves ; Mari, Jair de Jesus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74e1c2c70f8933e5d1db8c5d1f9e14a048dd1f637d21e383e2a251f13a430eeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antipsychotic agents</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines - economics</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Olanzapine</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - economics</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - economics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Residential location</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Razzouk, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayo, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Aglaé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregorio, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cogo-Moreira, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Andrea Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Jair de Jesus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Razzouk, Denise</au><au>Kayo, Monica</au><au>Sousa, Aglaé</au><au>Gregorio, Guilherme</au><au>Cogo-Moreira, Hugo</au><au>Cardoso, Andrea Alves</au><au>Mari, Jair de Jesus</au><au>Stewart, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-04-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0124791</spage><epage>e0124791</epage><pages>e0124791-e0124791</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Guidelines for the treatment of psychoses recommend antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the rate of antipsychotic polytherapy has increased over the last decade, reaching up to 60% in some settings. Studies evaluating the costs and impact of antipsychotic polytherapy in the health system are scarce. To estimate the costs of antipsychotic polytherapy and its impact on public health costs in a sample of subjects with psychotic disorders living in residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A cross-sectional study that used a bottom-up approach for collecting costs data in a public health provider's perspective. Subjects with psychosis living in 20 fully-staffed residential facilities in the city of Sao Paulo were assessed for clinical and psychosocial profile, severity of symptoms, quality of life, use of health services and pharmacological treatment. The impact of polytherapy on total direct costs was evaluated. 147 subjects were included, 134 used antipsychotics regularly and 38% were in use of antipsychotic polytherapy. There were no significant differences in clinical and psychosocial characteristics between polytherapy and monotherapy groups. Four variables explained 30% of direct costs: the number of antipsychotics, location of the residential facility, time living in the facility and use of olanzapine. The costs of antipsychotics corresponded to 94.4% of the total psychotropic costs and to 49.5% of all health services use when excluding accommodation costs. Olanzapine costs corresponded to 51% of all psychotropic costs. Antipsychotic polytherapy is a huge economic burden to public health service, despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. Great variations on antipsychotic costs explicit the need of establishing protocols for rational antipsychotic prescriptions and consequently optimising resource allocation. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to estimate the best value for money among antipsychotics, especially in low and middle income countries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25853709</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0124791</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-04, Vol.10 (4), p.e0124791-e0124791
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1671208166
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Antipsychotic agents
Antipsychotic Agents - economics
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
Antipsychotics
Benzodiazepines - economics
Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use
Brazil
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug therapy
Drug Therapy, Combination
Economic aspects
Economic impact
Female
Health aspects
Health care
Health care costs
Health care policy
Health services
Humans
Male
Mental disorders
Mental health care
Mental Health Services - economics
Olanzapine
Pharmacology
Polypharmacy
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics
Psychiatry
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders - drug therapy
Psychotic Disorders - economics
Psychotic Disorders - physiopathology
Psychotropic drugs
Public health
Public Health - economics
Quality of Life
Residential location
Resource allocation
Schizophrenia
Signs and symptoms
title The impact of antipsychotic polytherapy costs in the public health care in Sao Paulo, Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20antipsychotic%20polytherapy%20costs%20in%20the%20public%20health%20care%20in%20Sao%20Paulo,%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Razzouk,%20Denise&rft.date=2015-04-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0124791&rft.epage=e0124791&rft.pages=e0124791-e0124791&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124791&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA429374364%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671208166&rft_id=info:pmid/25853709&rft_galeid=A429374364&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d3a56817335341b6a72caf20b5ae9cbe&rfr_iscdi=true