Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation
Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition. In view of the reported impact of gut microbial species on drug metabolism, we investi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0122399-e0122399 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0122399 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0122399 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Lee, John R Muthukumar, Thangamani Dadhania, Darshana Taur, Ying Jenq, Robert R Toussaint, Nora C Ling, Lilan Pamer, Eric Suthanthiran, Manikkam |
description | Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition. In view of the reported impact of gut microbial species on drug metabolism, we investigated the relationship between the gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing requirements in this pilot study of adult kidney transplant recipients. Serial fecal specimens were collected during the first month of transplantation from 19 kidney transplant recipients who either required a 50% increase from initial tacrolimus dosing during the first month of transplantation (Dose Escalation Group, n=5) or did not require such an increase (Dose Stable Group, n=14). We characterized bacterial composition in the fecal specimens by deep sequencing of the PCR amplified 16S rRNA V4-V5 region and we investigated the hypothesis that gut microbial composition is associated with tacrolimus dosing requirements. Initial tacrolimus dosing was similar in the Dose Escalation Group and in the Stable Group (4.2 ± 1.1 mg/day vs. 3.8 ± 0.8 mg/day, respectively, P=0.61, two-way between-group ANOVA using contrasts) but became higher in the Dose Escalation Group than in the Dose Stable Group by the end of the first transplantation month (9.6 ± 2.4 mg/day vs. 3.3 ± 1.5 mg/day, respectively, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0122399 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1667159966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A421800560</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_05d785d5ef4d43e7a5343958f6c9e583</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A421800560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-fe0b29faaaff97dc062ef232898e61999e3cd2ae33f8a5aafd6258d3a3fb7d123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0RLbsRPfTJomGJUmTeLr1jqNj1uX1O5iB7F_j0OzqUG7QLlI7DznPV9vlr0kxYKwinzY-r5z0C723uGiIJQyKR9lp0QyOhe0YI-Pvk-yZyFsi4KzWoin2QnlNeGVEKfZ2WUf851tOr-yPkIOTucR0rG1uz7k2gfr1rl1-U-rHd7msQMX9i24CNF69zx7YqAN-GJ8z7Lvnz5-u_g8v7q-XF6cX82bitdxbrBYUWkAwBhZ6aYQFA1ltJY1CiKlRNZoCsiYqYEnSotUombAzKrShLJZ9vqgu299UGPrQREhKsKlFCIRywOhPWzVvrM76G6VB6v-XvhuraCLtmlRFVxXNdccTalLhhVwVjLJayMaibxmSetszNavdqgbdKntdiI6_ePsRq39L1WySshyKPfdKND5mx5DVDsbGmzT3ND3h7ql4Cwlm2Vv_kEf7m6k1pAasM74lLcZRNV5SUmdViuKRC0eoNKjMa04-cTYdD8JeD8JSEzE33ENfQhq-fXL_7PXP6bs2yN2g9DGTfBtP1gmTMHyACbHhdChuR8yKdRg87tpqMHmarR5Cnt1vKD7oDtfsz_4y_e2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667159966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Lee, John R ; Muthukumar, Thangamani ; Dadhania, Darshana ; Taur, Ying ; Jenq, Robert R ; Toussaint, Nora C ; Ling, Lilan ; Pamer, Eric ; Suthanthiran, Manikkam</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, John R ; Muthukumar, Thangamani ; Dadhania, Darshana ; Taur, Ying ; Jenq, Robert R ; Toussaint, Nora C ; Ling, Lilan ; Pamer, Eric ; Suthanthiran, Manikkam</creatorcontrib><description>Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition. In view of the reported impact of gut microbial species on drug metabolism, we investigated the relationship between the gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing requirements in this pilot study of adult kidney transplant recipients. Serial fecal specimens were collected during the first month of transplantation from 19 kidney transplant recipients who either required a 50% increase from initial tacrolimus dosing during the first month of transplantation (Dose Escalation Group, n=5) or did not require such an increase (Dose Stable Group, n=14). We characterized bacterial composition in the fecal specimens by deep sequencing of the PCR amplified 16S rRNA V4-V5 region and we investigated the hypothesis that gut microbial composition is associated with tacrolimus dosing requirements. Initial tacrolimus dosing was similar in the Dose Escalation Group and in the Stable Group (4.2 ± 1.1 mg/day vs. 3.8 ± 0.8 mg/day, respectively, P=0.61, two-way between-group ANOVA using contrasts) but became higher in the Dose Escalation Group than in the Dose Stable Group by the end of the first transplantation month (9.6 ± 2.4 mg/day vs. 3.3 ± 1.5 mg/day, respectively, P<0.001). Our systematic characterization of the gut microbial composition identified that fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was 11.8% in the Dose Escalation Group and 0.8% in the Dose Stable Group (P=0.002, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, P<0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple hypotheses). Fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was positively correlated with future tacrolimus dosing at 1 month (R=0.57, P=0.01) and had a coefficient ± standard error of 1.0 ± 0.6 (P=0.08) after multivariable linear regression. Our novel observations may help further explain inter-individual differences in tacrolimus dosing to achieve therapeutic levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122399</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25815766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bioinformatics ; Cancer ; Composition ; Dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug dosages ; Drug metabolism ; Enterococcus ; Faecalibacterium prausnitzii ; Feces ; Feces - microbiology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics ; Graft Rejection - drug therapy ; Graft Rejection - genetics ; Graft Rejection - microbiology ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Infectious diseases ; Inflammation ; Intestinal microflora ; Kidney Transplantation ; Kidney transplants ; Kidneys ; Male ; Medicine ; Metabolism ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Organ transplant recipients ; Physiological aspects ; RNA ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Standard error ; Systematic review ; Tacrolimus ; Tacrolimus - administration & dosage ; Transplant Recipients ; Transplantation ; Transplants ; Transplants & implants ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0122399-e0122399</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Lee et al 2015 Lee et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-fe0b29faaaff97dc062ef232898e61999e3cd2ae33f8a5aafd6258d3a3fb7d123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-fe0b29faaaff97dc062ef232898e61999e3cd2ae33f8a5aafd6258d3a3fb7d123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376942/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376942/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthukumar, Thangamani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadhania, Darshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taur, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenq, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, Nora C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Lilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamer, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suthanthiran, Manikkam</creatorcontrib><title>Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition. In view of the reported impact of gut microbial species on drug metabolism, we investigated the relationship between the gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing requirements in this pilot study of adult kidney transplant recipients. Serial fecal specimens were collected during the first month of transplantation from 19 kidney transplant recipients who either required a 50% increase from initial tacrolimus dosing during the first month of transplantation (Dose Escalation Group, n=5) or did not require such an increase (Dose Stable Group, n=14). We characterized bacterial composition in the fecal specimens by deep sequencing of the PCR amplified 16S rRNA V4-V5 region and we investigated the hypothesis that gut microbial composition is associated with tacrolimus dosing requirements. Initial tacrolimus dosing was similar in the Dose Escalation Group and in the Stable Group (4.2 ± 1.1 mg/day vs. 3.8 ± 0.8 mg/day, respectively, P=0.61, two-way between-group ANOVA using contrasts) but became higher in the Dose Escalation Group than in the Dose Stable Group by the end of the first transplantation month (9.6 ± 2.4 mg/day vs. 3.3 ± 1.5 mg/day, respectively, P<0.001). Our systematic characterization of the gut microbial composition identified that fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was 11.8% in the Dose Escalation Group and 0.8% in the Dose Stable Group (P=0.002, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, P<0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple hypotheses). Fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was positively correlated with future tacrolimus dosing at 1 month (R=0.57, P=0.01) and had a coefficient ± standard error of 1.0 ± 0.6 (P=0.08) after multivariable linear regression. Our novel observations may help further explain inter-individual differences in tacrolimus dosing to achieve therapeutic levels.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug metabolism</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - genetics</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - microbiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Organ transplant recipients</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tacrolimus</subject><subject>Tacrolimus - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0RLbsRPfTJomGJUmTeLr1jqNj1uX1O5iB7F_j0OzqUG7QLlI7DznPV9vlr0kxYKwinzY-r5z0C723uGiIJQyKR9lp0QyOhe0YI-Pvk-yZyFsi4KzWoin2QnlNeGVEKfZ2WUf851tOr-yPkIOTucR0rG1uz7k2gfr1rl1-U-rHd7msQMX9i24CNF69zx7YqAN-GJ8z7Lvnz5-u_g8v7q-XF6cX82bitdxbrBYUWkAwBhZ6aYQFA1ltJY1CiKlRNZoCsiYqYEnSotUombAzKrShLJZ9vqgu299UGPrQREhKsKlFCIRywOhPWzVvrM76G6VB6v-XvhuraCLtmlRFVxXNdccTalLhhVwVjLJayMaibxmSetszNavdqgbdKntdiI6_ePsRq39L1WySshyKPfdKND5mx5DVDsbGmzT3ND3h7ql4Cwlm2Vv_kEf7m6k1pAasM74lLcZRNV5SUmdViuKRC0eoNKjMa04-cTYdD8JeD8JSEzE33ENfQhq-fXL_7PXP6bs2yN2g9DGTfBtP1gmTMHyACbHhdChuR8yKdRg87tpqMHmarR5Cnt1vKD7oDtfsz_4y_e2</recordid><startdate>20150327</startdate><enddate>20150327</enddate><creator>Lee, John R</creator><creator>Muthukumar, Thangamani</creator><creator>Dadhania, Darshana</creator><creator>Taur, Ying</creator><creator>Jenq, Robert R</creator><creator>Toussaint, Nora C</creator><creator>Ling, Lilan</creator><creator>Pamer, Eric</creator><creator>Suthanthiran, Manikkam</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150327</creationdate><title>Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation</title><author>Lee, John R ; Muthukumar, Thangamani ; Dadhania, Darshana ; Taur, Ying ; Jenq, Robert R ; Toussaint, Nora C ; Ling, Lilan ; Pamer, Eric ; Suthanthiran, Manikkam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-fe0b29faaaff97dc062ef232898e61999e3cd2ae33f8a5aafd6258d3a3fb7d123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug metabolism</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - genetics</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - microbiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Organ transplant recipients</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tacrolimus</topic><topic>Tacrolimus - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthukumar, Thangamani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadhania, Darshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taur, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenq, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, Nora C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Lilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamer, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suthanthiran, Manikkam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, John R</au><au>Muthukumar, Thangamani</au><au>Dadhania, Darshana</au><au>Taur, Ying</au><au>Jenq, Robert R</au><au>Toussaint, Nora C</au><au>Ling, Lilan</au><au>Pamer, Eric</au><au>Suthanthiran, Manikkam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-03-27</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0122399</spage><epage>e0122399</epage><pages>e0122399-e0122399</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Tacrolimus dosing to establish therapeutic levels in recipients of organ transplants is a challenging task because of much interpatient and intrapatient variability in drug absorption, metabolism, and disposition. In view of the reported impact of gut microbial species on drug metabolism, we investigated the relationship between the gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing requirements in this pilot study of adult kidney transplant recipients. Serial fecal specimens were collected during the first month of transplantation from 19 kidney transplant recipients who either required a 50% increase from initial tacrolimus dosing during the first month of transplantation (Dose Escalation Group, n=5) or did not require such an increase (Dose Stable Group, n=14). We characterized bacterial composition in the fecal specimens by deep sequencing of the PCR amplified 16S rRNA V4-V5 region and we investigated the hypothesis that gut microbial composition is associated with tacrolimus dosing requirements. Initial tacrolimus dosing was similar in the Dose Escalation Group and in the Stable Group (4.2 ± 1.1 mg/day vs. 3.8 ± 0.8 mg/day, respectively, P=0.61, two-way between-group ANOVA using contrasts) but became higher in the Dose Escalation Group than in the Dose Stable Group by the end of the first transplantation month (9.6 ± 2.4 mg/day vs. 3.3 ± 1.5 mg/day, respectively, P<0.001). Our systematic characterization of the gut microbial composition identified that fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was 11.8% in the Dose Escalation Group and 0.8% in the Dose Stable Group (P=0.002, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, P<0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple hypotheses). Fecal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance in the first week of transplantation was positively correlated with future tacrolimus dosing at 1 month (R=0.57, P=0.01) and had a coefficient ± standard error of 1.0 ± 0.6 (P=0.08) after multivariable linear regression. Our novel observations may help further explain inter-individual differences in tacrolimus dosing to achieve therapeutic levels.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25815766</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0122399</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0122399-e0122399 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1667159966 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Abundance Adult Aged Antibiotics Bacteria - drug effects Bioinformatics Cancer Composition Dosage Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug dosages Drug metabolism Enterococcus Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Feces Feces - microbiology Female Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics Graft Rejection - drug therapy Graft Rejection - genetics Graft Rejection - microbiology Health aspects Hospitals Humans Hypertension Infectious diseases Inflammation Intestinal microflora Kidney Transplantation Kidney transplants Kidneys Male Medicine Metabolism Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microorganisms Middle Aged Nephrology Organ transplant recipients Physiological aspects RNA RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics rRNA 16S Standard error Systematic review Tacrolimus Tacrolimus - administration & dosage Transplant Recipients Transplantation Transplants Transplants & implants Variance analysis |
title | Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A58%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gut%20microbiota%20and%20tacrolimus%20dosing%20in%20kidney%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lee,%20John%20R&rft.date=2015-03-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0122399&rft.epage=e0122399&rft.pages=e0122399-e0122399&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122399&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA421800560%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667159966&rft_id=info:pmid/25815766&rft_galeid=A421800560&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_05d785d5ef4d43e7a5343958f6c9e583&rfr_iscdi=true |