Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients

The thinning of prelaminar tissue and prelamina cupping is known to occur by ischemia, as we see in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Since normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is thought to be more related to vascular factor than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), we hypothesized that prelamina thin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120634-e0120634
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Youn Hea, Park, Hae-Young L, Jung, Kyoung In, Park, Chan Kee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0120634
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0120634
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Jung, Youn Hea
Park, Hae-Young L
Jung, Kyoung In
Park, Chan Kee
description The thinning of prelaminar tissue and prelamina cupping is known to occur by ischemia, as we see in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Since normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is thought to be more related to vascular factor than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), we hypothesized that prelamina thinning may occur prominently in NTG patients. This study investigated the difference in prelaminar tissue thickness between patients with POAG and NTG and verified the factors related to prelaminar thinning. Complete ophthalmic examination including standard automatic perimetry was performed in all patients. The prelaminar tissue thickness was measured in all patients by performing enhanced depth imaging with a Heidelberg Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography. The retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters were obtained using the Heidelberg Retina Tomography II and Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography. Various ocular factors and their relationships with prelaminar thickness were analyzed. The mean prelaminar tissue thickness was significantly thinner in patients with POAG than in those with NTG. The difference in the prelaminar thickness between patients with POAG and those with NTG was greater in the early field defect group than in the moderate and severe field groups. In multivariate analysis, the mean prelaminar thickness was related to the intraocular pressure, mean deviation, cup-disc ratio, and cup volume. The prelaminar tissue was thinner in patients with POAG than in patients with NTG, and intraocular pressure had a strong influence on the prelaminar thickness in both POAG and NTG. This may indicate that mechanical compression is the main pathogenic factor in both POAG and NTG.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0120634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1664930530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A423859293</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d7311eddef8a4a81ba1f01f5abbf5841</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A423859293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-183bdf451cb2ce0eb5c2d57844219f6ae92fbc5bcb05c59234d72b3b8a14615c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F7u1DtbaN4Ww9LAQCPR0K0ay5NVGlhxL7uHtq02cZV1yUXRhSfPNL81vTZY9R8USkRV6t_Pj4MAue-_UskC4YIQ-yE5RTfCC4YI8PJqfZE9C2BVFSSrGHmcnuFzVZEXoaXa19l0Pgwne5V7n_aAsdMbBkMetkVdOhZALFX8p5VLQdDD8yX2fFuBaq_LWwih9B2nZ5M4PHdg8KhdMkjvEeohGuRieZo802KCeTd-z7PvHD9_WnxcXl5826_OLhWQ1jgtUEdFoWiIpsFSFEqXETbmqKMWo1gxUjbWQpZCiKGVZY0KbFRZEVIAoQ6UkZ9nLW93e-sAnnwJHjNGaJA-KRGxuicbDjk91cQ-G32z4oeUwRCOt4s2KIKSaRukKKFRIANIF0iUIocuKoqT1fjptFJ1qZKp0ADsTnUec2fLW_-SUsKoq9pd5MwkM_npUIfLOBKmsBaf8eHNvhmtaMZzQV_-g91c3US2kAozTPp0r96L8nGJSJc9qkqjlPVQajeqMTI9Km7Q_S3g7S0hMVL9jC2MIfPP1y_-zlz_m7OsjdqvAxm3wdozpEYU5SG9BOfgQBqUPJqOC73vizg2-7wk-9URKe3H8gw5Jd01A_gKhTwkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664930530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Jung, Youn Hea ; Park, Hae-Young L ; Jung, Kyoung In ; Park, Chan Kee</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Youn Hea ; Park, Hae-Young L ; Jung, Kyoung In ; Park, Chan Kee</creatorcontrib><description>The thinning of prelaminar tissue and prelamina cupping is known to occur by ischemia, as we see in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Since normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is thought to be more related to vascular factor than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), we hypothesized that prelamina thinning may occur prominently in NTG patients. This study investigated the difference in prelaminar tissue thickness between patients with POAG and NTG and verified the factors related to prelaminar thinning. Complete ophthalmic examination including standard automatic perimetry was performed in all patients. The prelaminar tissue thickness was measured in all patients by performing enhanced depth imaging with a Heidelberg Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography. The retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters were obtained using the Heidelberg Retina Tomography II and Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography. Various ocular factors and their relationships with prelaminar thickness were analyzed. The mean prelaminar tissue thickness was significantly thinner in patients with POAG than in those with NTG. The difference in the prelaminar thickness between patients with POAG and those with NTG was greater in the early field defect group than in the moderate and severe field groups. In multivariate analysis, the mean prelaminar thickness was related to the intraocular pressure, mean deviation, cup-disc ratio, and cup volume. The prelaminar tissue was thinner in patients with POAG than in patients with NTG, and intraocular pressure had a strong influence on the prelaminar thickness in both POAG and NTG. This may indicate that mechanical compression is the main pathogenic factor in both POAG and NTG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120634</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25793734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Compression ; Extracellular matrix ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intraocular pressure ; Ischemia ; Low Tension Glaucoma - pathology ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Multivariate analysis ; Neuropathy ; Optic nerve ; Optic neuropathy ; Optical Coherence Tomography ; Optics ; Patients ; Pressure ; Retina ; Retina - pathology ; Surgery ; Tension ; Thinning ; Tissues ; Tomography ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120634-e0120634</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Jung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Jung et al 2015 Jung et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-183bdf451cb2ce0eb5c2d57844219f6ae92fbc5bcb05c59234d72b3b8a14615c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-183bdf451cb2ce0eb5c2d57844219f6ae92fbc5bcb05c59234d72b3b8a14615c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368800/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368800/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Youn Hea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hae-Young L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoung In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan Kee</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The thinning of prelaminar tissue and prelamina cupping is known to occur by ischemia, as we see in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Since normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is thought to be more related to vascular factor than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), we hypothesized that prelamina thinning may occur prominently in NTG patients. This study investigated the difference in prelaminar tissue thickness between patients with POAG and NTG and verified the factors related to prelaminar thinning. Complete ophthalmic examination including standard automatic perimetry was performed in all patients. The prelaminar tissue thickness was measured in all patients by performing enhanced depth imaging with a Heidelberg Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography. The retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters were obtained using the Heidelberg Retina Tomography II and Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography. Various ocular factors and their relationships with prelaminar thickness were analyzed. The mean prelaminar tissue thickness was significantly thinner in patients with POAG than in those with NTG. The difference in the prelaminar thickness between patients with POAG and those with NTG was greater in the early field defect group than in the moderate and severe field groups. In multivariate analysis, the mean prelaminar thickness was related to the intraocular pressure, mean deviation, cup-disc ratio, and cup volume. The prelaminar tissue was thinner in patients with POAG than in patients with NTG, and intraocular pressure had a strong influence on the prelaminar thickness in both POAG and NTG. This may indicate that mechanical compression is the main pathogenic factor in both POAG and NTG.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Low Tension Glaucoma - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neuropathy</subject><subject>Optic nerve</subject><subject>Optic neuropathy</subject><subject>Optical Coherence Tomography</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Retina - pathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Thinning</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F7u1DtbaN4Ww9LAQCPR0K0ay5NVGlhxL7uHtq02cZV1yUXRhSfPNL81vTZY9R8USkRV6t_Pj4MAue-_UskC4YIQ-yE5RTfCC4YI8PJqfZE9C2BVFSSrGHmcnuFzVZEXoaXa19l0Pgwne5V7n_aAsdMbBkMetkVdOhZALFX8p5VLQdDD8yX2fFuBaq_LWwih9B2nZ5M4PHdg8KhdMkjvEeohGuRieZo802KCeTd-z7PvHD9_WnxcXl5826_OLhWQ1jgtUEdFoWiIpsFSFEqXETbmqKMWo1gxUjbWQpZCiKGVZY0KbFRZEVIAoQ6UkZ9nLW93e-sAnnwJHjNGaJA-KRGxuicbDjk91cQ-G32z4oeUwRCOt4s2KIKSaRukKKFRIANIF0iUIocuKoqT1fjptFJ1qZKp0ADsTnUec2fLW_-SUsKoq9pd5MwkM_npUIfLOBKmsBaf8eHNvhmtaMZzQV_-g91c3US2kAozTPp0r96L8nGJSJc9qkqjlPVQajeqMTI9Km7Q_S3g7S0hMVL9jC2MIfPP1y_-zlz_m7OsjdqvAxm3wdozpEYU5SG9BOfgQBqUPJqOC73vizg2-7wk-9URKe3H8gw5Jd01A_gKhTwkQ</recordid><startdate>20150320</startdate><enddate>20150320</enddate><creator>Jung, Youn Hea</creator><creator>Park, Hae-Young L</creator><creator>Jung, Kyoung In</creator><creator>Park, Chan Kee</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150320</creationdate><title>Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients</title><author>Jung, Youn Hea ; Park, Hae-Young L ; Jung, Kyoung In ; Park, Chan Kee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-183bdf451cb2ce0eb5c2d57844219f6ae92fbc5bcb05c59234d72b3b8a14615c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Low Tension Glaucoma - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neuropathy</topic><topic>Optic nerve</topic><topic>Optic neuropathy</topic><topic>Optical Coherence Tomography</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Retina - pathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Thinning</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Youn Hea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hae-Young L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoung In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chan Kee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Youn Hea</au><au>Park, Hae-Young L</au><au>Jung, Kyoung In</au><au>Park, Chan Kee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-03-20</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0120634</spage><epage>e0120634</epage><pages>e0120634-e0120634</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The thinning of prelaminar tissue and prelamina cupping is known to occur by ischemia, as we see in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Since normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is thought to be more related to vascular factor than in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), we hypothesized that prelamina thinning may occur prominently in NTG patients. This study investigated the difference in prelaminar tissue thickness between patients with POAG and NTG and verified the factors related to prelaminar thinning. Complete ophthalmic examination including standard automatic perimetry was performed in all patients. The prelaminar tissue thickness was measured in all patients by performing enhanced depth imaging with a Heidelberg Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography. The retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters were obtained using the Heidelberg Retina Tomography II and Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography. Various ocular factors and their relationships with prelaminar thickness were analyzed. The mean prelaminar tissue thickness was significantly thinner in patients with POAG than in those with NTG. The difference in the prelaminar thickness between patients with POAG and those with NTG was greater in the early field defect group than in the moderate and severe field groups. In multivariate analysis, the mean prelaminar thickness was related to the intraocular pressure, mean deviation, cup-disc ratio, and cup volume. The prelaminar tissue was thinner in patients with POAG than in patients with NTG, and intraocular pressure had a strong influence on the prelaminar thickness in both POAG and NTG. This may indicate that mechanical compression is the main pathogenic factor in both POAG and NTG.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25793734</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0120634</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120634-e0120634
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1664930530
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Compression
Extracellular matrix
Female
Glaucoma
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - pathology
Hospitals
Humans
Intraocular pressure
Ischemia
Low Tension Glaucoma - pathology
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
Morphology
Multivariate analysis
Neuropathy
Optic nerve
Optic neuropathy
Optical Coherence Tomography
Optics
Patients
Pressure
Retina
Retina - pathology
Surgery
Tension
Thinning
Tissues
Tomography
Tomography, Optical Coherence
title Comparison of prelaminar thickness between primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20prelaminar%20thickness%20between%20primary%20open%20angle%20glaucoma%20and%20normal%20tension%20glaucoma%20patients&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Jung,%20Youn%20Hea&rft.date=2015-03-20&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0120634&rft.epage=e0120634&rft.pages=e0120634-e0120634&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0120634&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA423859293%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664930530&rft_id=info:pmid/25793734&rft_galeid=A423859293&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d7311eddef8a4a81ba1f01f5abbf5841&rfr_iscdi=true