Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?

The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120960-e0120960
Hauptverfasser: Heurich, Marco, Brand, Tom T G, Kaandorp, Manon Y, Šustr, Pavel, Müller, Jörg, Reineking, Björn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0120960
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0120960
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Heurich, Marco
Brand, Tom T G
Kaandorp, Manon Y
Šustr, Pavel
Müller, Jörg
Reineking, Björn
description The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0120960
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1664224862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A425367196</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_450f598409ed44088ed0bdf7564d32b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A425367196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-1b649789bbd78b928b0c6a40d23c875fc5251081f02a233a1b879d67490ba1443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAYhSMEYmPwDxBYQkJMosVfcRwuQKXaWKVKk_i6tRzbaTKlcbGdQv89TpNN7bQLlIvEr59zHB_7TZKXCE4RydCHG9u5VjbTjW3NFCIMcwYfJacoJ3jCMCSPD75Pkmfe30CYEs7Y0-QEpxlHOcWnSTe3XRvc7j1QdmscsA5snA1Ghdq2H8GfSgbgK7kxHoTKAF374Oqi62eBLYEzGmgTdbLVwFkzDOp2D3-xlVnXsgWX1hkfwIWyfueDWX9-njwpZePNi_F9lvy8vPgxv5osr78u5rPlRGWYhQkqGM0znheFzniRY15AxSSFGhPFs7RUKU4R5KiEWGJCJCp4lmuW0RwWElFKzpLXg--msV6MiXmBGKMYU85wJBYDoa28ERtXr6XbCStrsS9YtxLShVo1RtAUlmnOKcyNphRybjQsdJmljGqCizx6fRpX64q10crEYGVzZHo809aVWNmtoIQRwnqD88Gguie7mi1FX4MoJZAitkWRfTcu5uzvLsYr1rVXpmlka2w37DHLGOMsom_uoQ8nMVIrGTdbt6WN_6h6UzGjOCUsQ3nvNX2Aio-OR63iVSzrWD8SnB8JIhPM37CSnfdi8f3b_7PXv47ZtwdsZWQTKm-b_c30xyAdQOWs986Ud8kiKPpOuk1D9J0kxk6KsleHh3knum0d8g-rzxZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664224862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Heurich, Marco ; Brand, Tom T G ; Kaandorp, Manon Y ; Šustr, Pavel ; Müller, Jörg ; Reineking, Björn</creator><contributor>Reed, Aaron W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heurich, Marco ; Brand, Tom T G ; Kaandorp, Manon Y ; Šustr, Pavel ; Müller, Jörg ; Reineking, Björn ; Reed, Aaron W.</creatorcontrib><description>The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120960</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25781942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Capreolus capreolus ; Cervus elaphus ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Czech Republic ; Deer ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; Environmental factors ; Environmental management ; Environmental Sciences ; Forest ecology ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Germany ; Humans ; Hunting ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Lynx lynx ; Management systems ; Mountain regions ; Mountainous areas ; Mountains ; National parks ; Parks ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Parks, Recreational ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Spatial distribution ; Standing crop ; Sus scrofa ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120960-e0120960</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Heurich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2015 Heurich et al 2015 Heurich et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-1b649789bbd78b928b0c6a40d23c875fc5251081f02a233a1b879d67490ba1443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-1b649789bbd78b928b0c6a40d23c875fc5251081f02a233a1b879d67490ba1443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5277-9181</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363369/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363369/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01530416$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Reed, Aaron W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heurich, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Tom T G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaandorp, Manon Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šustr, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reineking, Björn</creatorcontrib><title>Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Czech Republic</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Lynx lynx</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountainous areas</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Standing crop</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAYhSMEYmPwDxBYQkJMosVfcRwuQKXaWKVKk_i6tRzbaTKlcbGdQv89TpNN7bQLlIvEr59zHB_7TZKXCE4RydCHG9u5VjbTjW3NFCIMcwYfJacoJ3jCMCSPD75Pkmfe30CYEs7Y0-QEpxlHOcWnSTe3XRvc7j1QdmscsA5snA1Ghdq2H8GfSgbgK7kxHoTKAF374Oqi62eBLYEzGmgTdbLVwFkzDOp2D3-xlVnXsgWX1hkfwIWyfueDWX9-njwpZePNi_F9lvy8vPgxv5osr78u5rPlRGWYhQkqGM0znheFzniRY15AxSSFGhPFs7RUKU4R5KiEWGJCJCp4lmuW0RwWElFKzpLXg--msV6MiXmBGKMYU85wJBYDoa28ERtXr6XbCStrsS9YtxLShVo1RtAUlmnOKcyNphRybjQsdJmljGqCizx6fRpX64q10crEYGVzZHo809aVWNmtoIQRwnqD88Gguie7mi1FX4MoJZAitkWRfTcu5uzvLsYr1rVXpmlka2w37DHLGOMsom_uoQ8nMVIrGTdbt6WN_6h6UzGjOCUsQ3nvNX2Aio-OR63iVSzrWD8SnB8JIhPM37CSnfdi8f3b_7PXv47ZtwdsZWQTKm-b_c30xyAdQOWs986Ud8kiKPpOuk1D9J0kxk6KsleHh3knum0d8g-rzxZ4</recordid><startdate>20150317</startdate><enddate>20150317</enddate><creator>Heurich, Marco</creator><creator>Brand, Tom T G</creator><creator>Kaandorp, Manon Y</creator><creator>Šustr, Pavel</creator><creator>Müller, Jörg</creator><creator>Reineking, Björn</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-9181</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150317</creationdate><title>Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?</title><author>Heurich, Marco ; Brand, Tom T G ; Kaandorp, Manon Y ; Šustr, Pavel ; Müller, Jörg ; Reineking, Björn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-1b649789bbd78b928b0c6a40d23c875fc5251081f02a233a1b879d67490ba1443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Czech Republic</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Lynx lynx</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountainous areas</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Standing crop</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heurich, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Tom T G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaandorp, Manon Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šustr, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reineking, Björn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heurich, Marco</au><au>Brand, Tom T G</au><au>Kaandorp, Manon Y</au><au>Šustr, Pavel</au><au>Müller, Jörg</au><au>Reineking, Björn</au><au>Reed, Aaron W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-03-17</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0120960</spage><epage>e0120960</epage><pages>e0120960-e0120960</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25781942</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0120960</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-9181</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0120960-e0120960
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1664224862
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Animal behavior
Animals
Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Czech Republic
Deer
Ecosystem management
Ecosystems
Environmental factors
Environmental management
Environmental Sciences
Forest ecology
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Forests
Germany
Humans
Hunting
Laws, regulations and rules
Lynx lynx
Management systems
Mountain regions
Mountainous areas
Mountains
National parks
Parks
Parks & recreation areas
Parks, Recreational
Protected areas
Protection and preservation
Spatial distribution
Standing crop
Sus scrofa
Terrestrial ecosystems
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A00%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Country,%20cover%20or%20protection:%20what%20shapes%20the%20distribution%20of%20red%20deer%20and%20roe%20deer%20in%20the%20Bohemian%20Forest%20Ecosystem?&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Heurich,%20Marco&rft.date=2015-03-17&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0120960&rft.epage=e0120960&rft.pages=e0120960-e0120960&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0120960&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA425367196%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664224862&rft_id=info:pmid/25781942&rft_galeid=A425367196&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_450f598409ed44088ed0bdf7564d32b9&rfr_iscdi=true