Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases
Bovine abortion surveillance is essential for human and animal health because it plays an important role in the early warning of several diseases. Due to the limited sensitivity of traditional surveillance systems, there is a growing interest for the development of syndromic surveillance. Our object...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0119012-e0119012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0119012 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0119012 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bronner, Anne Morignat, Eric Hénaux, Viviane Madouasse, Aurélien Gay, Emilie Calavas, Didier |
description | Bovine abortion surveillance is essential for human and animal health because it plays an important role in the early warning of several diseases. Due to the limited sensitivity of traditional surveillance systems, there is a growing interest for the development of syndromic surveillance. Our objective was to assess whether, routinely collected, artificial insemination (AI) data could be used, as part of a syndromic surveillance system, to devise an indicator of mid-term abortions in dairy cattle herds in France. A mid-term abortion incidence rate (MAIR) was computed as the ratio of the number of mid-term abortions to the number of female-weeks at risk. A mid-term abortion was defined as a return-to-service (i.e., a new AI) taking place 90 to 180 days after the previous AI. Weekly variations in the MAIR in heifers and parous cows were modeled with a time-dependent Poisson model at the département level (French administrative division) during the period of 2004 to 2010. The usefulness of monitoring this indicator to detect a disease-related increase in mid-term abortions was evaluated using data from the 2007-2008 episode of bluetongue serotype 8 (BT8) in France. An increase in the MAIR was identified in heifers and parous cows in 47% (n = 24) and 71% (n = 39) of the departements. On average, the weekly MAIR among heifers increased by 3.8% (min-max: 0.02-57.9%) when the mean number of BT8 cases that occurred in the previous 8 to 13 weeks increased by one. The weekly MAIR among parous cows increased by 1.4% (0.01-8.5%) when the mean number of BT8 cases occurring in the previous 6 to 12 weeks increased by one. These results underline the potential of the MAIR to identify an increase in mid-term abortions and suggest that it is a good candidate for the implementation of a syndromic surveillance system for bovine abortions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0119012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1661102131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A429778439</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3e9169e466cb46749defa1946cd23992</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A429778439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c93b7447c96e0c0341340de1aa584059fa985ead4327be5edfcf5f278f35499e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0gkJpDrvVl2Wrh8KSfiQQCPTrKrTSeFfBa20kedu994dXm3VCHHIoOliMn_fVaDRTFC8JnhJWkfeXvg-dbqdr38EUEyIxoY-KQyIZnQiK2eM7-4PiWYyXGJesFuJpcUDLigsu5GHx9xNsXHTdAukOuc46o5MPKHlkIYFJaOXsJEFYIT33ITnfxYwhq13YosymFj4gjRoXYkIxwTpLf-tgI4rbzga_cgbFPmzAta3uDCDfDE4bQNZF0BHi8-JJo9sIL4bvUfHzy-cfJ6eT84uvZyez84mpqEgTI9m84rwyUgA2mHHCOLZAtC5rjkvZaFmXoC1ntJpDCbYxTdnQqm5YyaUEdlS83vuuWx_VUMCoiBCEYEoYycTZnrBeX6p1cCsdtsprp64DPiyUzrmbFhQDSYQELoSZc1FxaaHRRHJhLGVS0uz1cTitn6_AGuhS0O3IdPync0u18BvFWUkxwdngeG-wvCc7nZ2rXQxTwYio-WaX-LvhsOCveohJrVw0sCs6-H5_R1nL3AEZfXMPfbgSA7XQ-bKua3zO0exM1YxTWVU1ZzJT0weovCzkl8-d2bgcHwmOR4LMJPiTFrqPUZ19__b_7MWvMfv2DrsE3aZl9G1_3bFjkO9BE3yMAZrbyhKsdoN1Uw21Gyw1DFaWvbr7mLeim0li_wCpYh5V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661102131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bronner, Anne ; Morignat, Eric ; Hénaux, Viviane ; Madouasse, Aurélien ; Gay, Emilie ; Calavas, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Bronner, Anne ; Morignat, Eric ; Hénaux, Viviane ; Madouasse, Aurélien ; Gay, Emilie ; Calavas, Didier</creatorcontrib><description>Bovine abortion surveillance is essential for human and animal health because it plays an important role in the early warning of several diseases. Due to the limited sensitivity of traditional surveillance systems, there is a growing interest for the development of syndromic surveillance. Our objective was to assess whether, routinely collected, artificial insemination (AI) data could be used, as part of a syndromic surveillance system, to devise an indicator of mid-term abortions in dairy cattle herds in France. A mid-term abortion incidence rate (MAIR) was computed as the ratio of the number of mid-term abortions to the number of female-weeks at risk. A mid-term abortion was defined as a return-to-service (i.e., a new AI) taking place 90 to 180 days after the previous AI. Weekly variations in the MAIR in heifers and parous cows were modeled with a time-dependent Poisson model at the département level (French administrative division) during the period of 2004 to 2010. The usefulness of monitoring this indicator to detect a disease-related increase in mid-term abortions was evaluated using data from the 2007-2008 episode of bluetongue serotype 8 (BT8) in France. An increase in the MAIR was identified in heifers and parous cows in 47% (n = 24) and 71% (n = 39) of the departements. On average, the weekly MAIR among heifers increased by 3.8% (min-max: 0.02-57.9%) when the mean number of BT8 cases that occurred in the previous 8 to 13 weeks increased by one. The weekly MAIR among parous cows increased by 1.4% (0.01-8.5%) when the mean number of BT8 cases occurring in the previous 6 to 12 weeks increased by one. These results underline the potential of the MAIR to identify an increase in mid-term abortions and suggest that it is a good candidate for the implementation of a syndromic surveillance system for bovine abortions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25746469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Veterinary - diagnosis ; Abortion, Veterinary - epidemiology ; Abortion, Veterinary - etiology ; Analysis ; Animal health ; Animals ; Artificial insemination ; Bluetongue ; Bovidae ; Brucellosis ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases ; Dairy cattle ; Dairying ; Disease ; Epidemics ; Epidemiology ; Farmers ; Female ; Health aspects ; Indicators ; Life Sciences ; Medical laboratories ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Reproduction (biology) ; Risk factors ; Surveillance systems ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0119012-e0119012</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Bronner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2015 Bronner et al 2015 Bronner et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c93b7447c96e0c0341340de1aa584059fa985ead4327be5edfcf5f278f35499e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c93b7447c96e0c0341340de1aa584059fa985ead4327be5edfcf5f278f35499e3</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-2702-7631 ; 0000-0001-5983-9263 ; 0000-0002-8630-3066 ; 0000-0002-9254-5707</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352010/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352010/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79570,79571</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25746469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02631684$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bronner, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morignat, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hénaux, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madouasse, Aurélien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gay, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calavas, Didier</creatorcontrib><title>Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Bovine abortion surveillance is essential for human and animal health because it plays an important role in the early warning of several diseases. Due to the limited sensitivity of traditional surveillance systems, there is a growing interest for the development of syndromic surveillance. Our objective was to assess whether, routinely collected, artificial insemination (AI) data could be used, as part of a syndromic surveillance system, to devise an indicator of mid-term abortions in dairy cattle herds in France. A mid-term abortion incidence rate (MAIR) was computed as the ratio of the number of mid-term abortions to the number of female-weeks at risk. A mid-term abortion was defined as a return-to-service (i.e., a new AI) taking place 90 to 180 days after the previous AI. Weekly variations in the MAIR in heifers and parous cows were modeled with a time-dependent Poisson model at the département level (French administrative division) during the period of 2004 to 2010. The usefulness of monitoring this indicator to detect a disease-related increase in mid-term abortions was evaluated using data from the 2007-2008 episode of bluetongue serotype 8 (BT8) in France. An increase in the MAIR was identified in heifers and parous cows in 47% (n = 24) and 71% (n = 39) of the departements. On average, the weekly MAIR among heifers increased by 3.8% (min-max: 0.02-57.9%) when the mean number of BT8 cases that occurred in the previous 8 to 13 weeks increased by one. The weekly MAIR among parous cows increased by 1.4% (0.01-8.5%) when the mean number of BT8 cases occurring in the previous 6 to 12 weeks increased by one. These results underline the potential of the MAIR to identify an increase in mid-term abortions and suggest that it is a good candidate for the implementation of a syndromic surveillance system for bovine abortions.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Veterinary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Abortion, Veterinary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Abortion, Veterinary - etiology</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial insemination</subject><subject>Bluetongue</subject><subject>Bovidae</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Surveillance systems</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0gkJpDrvVl2Wrh8KSfiQQCPTrKrTSeFfBa20kedu994dXm3VCHHIoOliMn_fVaDRTFC8JnhJWkfeXvg-dbqdr38EUEyIxoY-KQyIZnQiK2eM7-4PiWYyXGJesFuJpcUDLigsu5GHx9xNsXHTdAukOuc46o5MPKHlkIYFJaOXsJEFYIT33ITnfxYwhq13YosymFj4gjRoXYkIxwTpLf-tgI4rbzga_cgbFPmzAta3uDCDfDE4bQNZF0BHi8-JJo9sIL4bvUfHzy-cfJ6eT84uvZyez84mpqEgTI9m84rwyUgA2mHHCOLZAtC5rjkvZaFmXoC1ntJpDCbYxTdnQqm5YyaUEdlS83vuuWx_VUMCoiBCEYEoYycTZnrBeX6p1cCsdtsprp64DPiyUzrmbFhQDSYQELoSZc1FxaaHRRHJhLGVS0uz1cTitn6_AGuhS0O3IdPync0u18BvFWUkxwdngeG-wvCc7nZ2rXQxTwYio-WaX-LvhsOCveohJrVw0sCs6-H5_R1nL3AEZfXMPfbgSA7XQ-bKua3zO0exM1YxTWVU1ZzJT0weovCzkl8-d2bgcHwmOR4LMJPiTFrqPUZ19__b_7MWvMfv2DrsE3aZl9G1_3bFjkO9BE3yMAZrbyhKsdoN1Uw21Gyw1DFaWvbr7mLeim0li_wCpYh5V</recordid><startdate>20150306</startdate><enddate>20150306</enddate><creator>Bronner, Anne</creator><creator>Morignat, Eric</creator><creator>Hénaux, Viviane</creator><creator>Madouasse, Aurélien</creator><creator>Gay, Emilie</creator><creator>Calavas, Didier</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2702-7631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5983-9263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8630-3066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-5707</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150306</creationdate><title>Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases</title><author>Bronner, Anne ; Morignat, Eric ; Hénaux, Viviane ; Madouasse, Aurélien ; Gay, Emilie ; Calavas, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c93b7447c96e0c0341340de1aa584059fa985ead4327be5edfcf5f278f35499e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Veterinary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Abortion, Veterinary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Abortion, Veterinary - etiology</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial insemination</topic><topic>Bluetongue</topic><topic>Bovidae</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Surveillance systems</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bronner, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morignat, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hénaux, Viviane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madouasse, Aurélien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gay, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calavas, Didier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bronner, Anne</au><au>Morignat, Eric</au><au>Hénaux, Viviane</au><au>Madouasse, Aurélien</au><au>Gay, Emilie</au><au>Calavas, Didier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-03-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0119012</spage><epage>e0119012</epage><pages>e0119012-e0119012</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Bovine abortion surveillance is essential for human and animal health because it plays an important role in the early warning of several diseases. Due to the limited sensitivity of traditional surveillance systems, there is a growing interest for the development of syndromic surveillance. Our objective was to assess whether, routinely collected, artificial insemination (AI) data could be used, as part of a syndromic surveillance system, to devise an indicator of mid-term abortions in dairy cattle herds in France. A mid-term abortion incidence rate (MAIR) was computed as the ratio of the number of mid-term abortions to the number of female-weeks at risk. A mid-term abortion was defined as a return-to-service (i.e., a new AI) taking place 90 to 180 days after the previous AI. Weekly variations in the MAIR in heifers and parous cows were modeled with a time-dependent Poisson model at the département level (French administrative division) during the period of 2004 to 2010. The usefulness of monitoring this indicator to detect a disease-related increase in mid-term abortions was evaluated using data from the 2007-2008 episode of bluetongue serotype 8 (BT8) in France. An increase in the MAIR was identified in heifers and parous cows in 47% (n = 24) and 71% (n = 39) of the departements. On average, the weekly MAIR among heifers increased by 3.8% (min-max: 0.02-57.9%) when the mean number of BT8 cases that occurred in the previous 8 to 13 weeks increased by one. The weekly MAIR among parous cows increased by 1.4% (0.01-8.5%) when the mean number of BT8 cases occurring in the previous 6 to 12 weeks increased by one. These results underline the potential of the MAIR to identify an increase in mid-term abortions and suggest that it is a good candidate for the implementation of a syndromic surveillance system for bovine abortions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25746469</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0119012</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2702-7631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5983-9263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8630-3066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-5707</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0119012-e0119012 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1661102131 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abortion Abortion, Veterinary - diagnosis Abortion, Veterinary - epidemiology Abortion, Veterinary - etiology Analysis Animal health Animals Artificial insemination Bluetongue Bovidae Brucellosis Cattle Cattle Diseases Dairy cattle Dairying Disease Epidemics Epidemiology Farmers Female Health aspects Indicators Life Sciences Medical laboratories Pregnancy Public health Reproduction (biology) Risk factors Surveillance systems Zoonoses |
title | Devising an indicator to detect mid-term abortions in dairy cattle: a first step towards syndromic surveillance of abortive diseases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T08%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Devising%20an%20indicator%20to%20detect%20mid-term%20abortions%20in%20dairy%20cattle:%20a%20first%20step%20towards%20syndromic%20surveillance%20of%20abortive%20diseases&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bronner,%20Anne&rft.date=2015-03-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0119012&rft.epage=e0119012&rft.pages=e0119012-e0119012&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0119012&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA429778439%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661102131&rft_id=info:pmid/25746469&rft_galeid=A429778439&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3e9169e466cb46749defa1946cd23992&rfr_iscdi=true |