Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder

Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision-making not only in their real life but also in laboratory tasks. Decision-making is a complex multifaceted function and different cognitive processes are involved in decision-making for gains and losses. H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-01, Vol.10 (1), p.e0116471-e0116471
Hauptverfasser: Yao, Yuan-Wei, Chen, Pin-Ru, Li, Song, Wang, Ling-Jiao, Zhang, Jin-Tao, Yip, Sarah W, Chen, Gang, Deng, Lin-Yuan, Liu, Qin-Xue, Fang, Xiao-Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0116471
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0116471
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Yao, Yuan-Wei
Chen, Pin-Ru
Li, Song
Wang, Ling-Jiao
Zhang, Jin-Tao
Yip, Sarah W
Chen, Gang
Deng, Lin-Yuan
Liu, Qin-Xue
Fang, Xiao-Yi
description Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision-making not only in their real life but also in laboratory tasks. Decision-making is a complex multifaceted function and different cognitive processes are involved in decision-making for gains and losses. However, the relationship between impaired decision-making and gain versus loss processing in the context of IGD is poorly understood. The main aim of the present study was to separately evaluate decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with IGD using the Cups task. Additionally, we further examined the effects of outcome magnitude and probability level on decision-making related to risky gains and losses respectively. Sixty college students with IGD and 42 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated. Results indicated that IGD subjects exhibited generally greater risk taking tendencies than HCs. In comparison to HCs, IGD subjects made more disadvantageous risky choices in the loss domain (but not in the gain domain). Follow-up analyses indicated that the impairment was associated to insensitivity to changes in outcome magnitude and probability level for risky losses among IGD subjects. In addition, higher Internet addiction severity scores were associated with percentage of disadvantageous risky options in the loss domain. These findings emphasize the effect of insensitivity to losses on disadvantageous decisions under risk in the context of IGD, which has implications for future intervention studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0116471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1651730691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A422547753</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5818dca1fab645518545c1282ff91b5c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A422547753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1c8cf4c0d2a21a0a80fc5ea1725b13ac67c75c5be531ee0cc0036a7c9b5ea45b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1trFDEUxwdRbK1-A9EBQfRh15xc5vIilHpbKBS8vYZMJjObbSbZJhm1395sd1p2pA-Sh4Tk9_-f5OScLHsOaAmkhHcbN3orzHLrrFoigIKW8CA7hprgRYEReXiwPsqehLBBiJGqKB5nR5gVwFjNjjP-QUkdtLOLQVxq2-ed87nX4fI674W2IRe2zY0LQaXl4BIgnTGqV3mIY6tsDPlvHdf5ykblrYpJNexsWh2cb5V_mj3qhAnq2TSfZD8-ffx-9mVxfvF5dXZ6vpBFjeMCZCU7KlGLBQaBRIU6yZSAErMGiJBFKUsmWaMYAaWQlAiRQpSybhJFWUNOspd73226LJ9yEzgUDEqCihoSsdoTrRMbvvV6EP6aO6H5zYbzPRc-amkUZxVUrRTQiaagjEHFKJOAK9x1NTRMJq_3U7SxGVQrUx68MDPT-YnVa967X5wSRMuaJoM3k4F3V6MKkQ86SGWMsMqNN_fGFGqGSUJf_YPe_7qJ6kV6gLadS3HlzpSfUowZLUu281reQ6XRqkHLVEidTvszwduZIDFR_Ym9GEPgq29f_5-9-DlnXx-wayVMXAdnxpgqMcxBugelT0XoVXeXZEB81we32eC7PuBTHyTZi8MPuhPdFj75Cx4jA3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651730691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Yao, Yuan-Wei ; Chen, Pin-Ru ; Li, Song ; Wang, Ling-Jiao ; Zhang, Jin-Tao ; Yip, Sarah W ; Chen, Gang ; Deng, Lin-Yuan ; Liu, Qin-Xue ; Fang, Xiao-Yi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuan-Wei ; Chen, Pin-Ru ; Li, Song ; Wang, Ling-Jiao ; Zhang, Jin-Tao ; Yip, Sarah W ; Chen, Gang ; Deng, Lin-Yuan ; Liu, Qin-Xue ; Fang, Xiao-Yi</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision-making not only in their real life but also in laboratory tasks. Decision-making is a complex multifaceted function and different cognitive processes are involved in decision-making for gains and losses. However, the relationship between impaired decision-making and gain versus loss processing in the context of IGD is poorly understood. The main aim of the present study was to separately evaluate decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with IGD using the Cups task. Additionally, we further examined the effects of outcome magnitude and probability level on decision-making related to risky gains and losses respectively. Sixty college students with IGD and 42 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated. Results indicated that IGD subjects exhibited generally greater risk taking tendencies than HCs. In comparison to HCs, IGD subjects made more disadvantageous risky choices in the loss domain (but not in the gain domain). Follow-up analyses indicated that the impairment was associated to insensitivity to changes in outcome magnitude and probability level for risky losses among IGD subjects. In addition, higher Internet addiction severity scores were associated with percentage of disadvantageous risky options in the loss domain. These findings emphasize the effect of insensitivity to losses on disadvantageous decisions under risk in the context of IGD, which has implications for future intervention studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25615595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Analysis ; Brain research ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognitive ability ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Gambling ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin D ; Internet ; Neurosciences ; Risk taking ; Somatotropin ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Studies ; Task complexity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-01, Vol.10 (1), p.e0116471-e0116471</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”) Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1c8cf4c0d2a21a0a80fc5ea1725b13ac67c75c5be531ee0cc0036a7c9b5ea45b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1c8cf4c0d2a21a0a80fc5ea1725b13ac67c75c5be531ee0cc0036a7c9b5ea45b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304794/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304794/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25615595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuan-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pin-Ru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ling-Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin-Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Sarah W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lin-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qin-Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Xiao-Yi</creatorcontrib><title>Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision-making not only in their real life but also in laboratory tasks. Decision-making is a complex multifaceted function and different cognitive processes are involved in decision-making for gains and losses. However, the relationship between impaired decision-making and gain versus loss processing in the context of IGD is poorly understood. The main aim of the present study was to separately evaluate decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with IGD using the Cups task. Additionally, we further examined the effects of outcome magnitude and probability level on decision-making related to risky gains and losses respectively. Sixty college students with IGD and 42 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated. Results indicated that IGD subjects exhibited generally greater risk taking tendencies than HCs. In comparison to HCs, IGD subjects made more disadvantageous risky choices in the loss domain (but not in the gain domain). Follow-up analyses indicated that the impairment was associated to insensitivity to changes in outcome magnitude and probability level for risky losses among IGD subjects. In addition, higher Internet addiction severity scores were associated with percentage of disadvantageous risky options in the loss domain. These findings emphasize the effect of insensitivity to losses on disadvantageous decisions under risk in the context of IGD, which has implications for future intervention studies.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin D</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Somatotropin</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task complexity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1trFDEUxwdRbK1-A9EBQfRh15xc5vIilHpbKBS8vYZMJjObbSbZJhm1395sd1p2pA-Sh4Tk9_-f5OScLHsOaAmkhHcbN3orzHLrrFoigIKW8CA7hprgRYEReXiwPsqehLBBiJGqKB5nR5gVwFjNjjP-QUkdtLOLQVxq2-ed87nX4fI674W2IRe2zY0LQaXl4BIgnTGqV3mIY6tsDPlvHdf5ykblrYpJNexsWh2cb5V_mj3qhAnq2TSfZD8-ffx-9mVxfvF5dXZ6vpBFjeMCZCU7KlGLBQaBRIU6yZSAErMGiJBFKUsmWaMYAaWQlAiRQpSybhJFWUNOspd73226LJ9yEzgUDEqCihoSsdoTrRMbvvV6EP6aO6H5zYbzPRc-amkUZxVUrRTQiaagjEHFKJOAK9x1NTRMJq_3U7SxGVQrUx68MDPT-YnVa967X5wSRMuaJoM3k4F3V6MKkQ86SGWMsMqNN_fGFGqGSUJf_YPe_7qJ6kV6gLadS3HlzpSfUowZLUu281reQ6XRqkHLVEidTvszwduZIDFR_Ym9GEPgq29f_5-9-DlnXx-wayVMXAdnxpgqMcxBugelT0XoVXeXZEB81we32eC7PuBTHyTZi8MPuhPdFj75Cx4jA3k</recordid><startdate>20150123</startdate><enddate>20150123</enddate><creator>Yao, Yuan-Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Pin-Ru</creator><creator>Li, Song</creator><creator>Wang, Ling-Jiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Jin-Tao</creator><creator>Yip, Sarah W</creator><creator>Chen, Gang</creator><creator>Deng, Lin-Yuan</creator><creator>Liu, Qin-Xue</creator><creator>Fang, Xiao-Yi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150123</creationdate><title>Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder</title><author>Yao, Yuan-Wei ; Chen, Pin-Ru ; Li, Song ; Wang, Ling-Jiao ; Zhang, Jin-Tao ; Yip, Sarah W ; Chen, Gang ; Deng, Lin-Yuan ; Liu, Qin-Xue ; Fang, Xiao-Yi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1c8cf4c0d2a21a0a80fc5ea1725b13ac67c75c5be531ee0cc0036a7c9b5ea45b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin D</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Somatotropin</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task complexity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuan-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pin-Ru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ling-Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin-Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yip, Sarah W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lin-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qin-Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Xiao-Yi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Yuan-Wei</au><au>Chen, Pin-Ru</au><au>Li, Song</au><au>Wang, Ling-Jiao</au><au>Zhang, Jin-Tao</au><au>Yip, Sarah W</au><au>Chen, Gang</au><au>Deng, Lin-Yuan</au><au>Liu, Qin-Xue</au><au>Fang, Xiao-Yi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-01-23</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0116471</spage><epage>e0116471</epage><pages>e0116471-e0116471</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Individuals with Internet gaming disorder (IGD) tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision-making not only in their real life but also in laboratory tasks. Decision-making is a complex multifaceted function and different cognitive processes are involved in decision-making for gains and losses. However, the relationship between impaired decision-making and gain versus loss processing in the context of IGD is poorly understood. The main aim of the present study was to separately evaluate decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with IGD using the Cups task. Additionally, we further examined the effects of outcome magnitude and probability level on decision-making related to risky gains and losses respectively. Sixty college students with IGD and 42 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated. Results indicated that IGD subjects exhibited generally greater risk taking tendencies than HCs. In comparison to HCs, IGD subjects made more disadvantageous risky choices in the loss domain (but not in the gain domain). Follow-up analyses indicated that the impairment was associated to insensitivity to changes in outcome magnitude and probability level for risky losses among IGD subjects. In addition, higher Internet addiction severity scores were associated with percentage of disadvantageous risky options in the loss domain. These findings emphasize the effect of insensitivity to losses on disadvantageous decisions under risk in the context of IGD, which has implications for future intervention studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25615595</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0116471</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-01, Vol.10 (1), p.e0116471-e0116471
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1651730691
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Addictions
Analysis
Brain research
Case-Control Studies
Cognitive ability
College students
Colleges & universities
Decision making
Decision Making - physiology
Gambling
Humans
Immunoglobulin D
Internet
Neurosciences
Risk taking
Somatotropin
Students
Students - psychology
Studies
Task complexity
Young Adult
title Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T05%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision-making%20for%20risky%20gains%20and%20losses%20among%20college%20students%20with%20Internet%20gaming%20disorder&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yao,%20Yuan-Wei&rft.date=2015-01-23&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0116471&rft.epage=e0116471&rft.pages=e0116471-e0116471&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116471&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA422547753%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651730691&rft_id=info:pmid/25615595&rft_galeid=A422547753&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5818dca1fab645518545c1282ff91b5c&rfr_iscdi=true