Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores

Given thousands of proteins constituting a eukaryotic pathogen, the principal objective for a high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery pipeline is to select those proteins worthy of laboratory validation. Accurate prediction of T-cell epitopes on protein antigens is one crucial piece of evidence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115745-e115745
Hauptverfasser: Goodswen, Stephen J, Kennedy, Paul J, Ellis, John T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e115745
container_issue 12
container_start_page e115745
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Goodswen, Stephen J
Kennedy, Paul J
Ellis, John T
description Given thousands of proteins constituting a eukaryotic pathogen, the principal objective for a high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery pipeline is to select those proteins worthy of laboratory validation. Accurate prediction of T-cell epitopes on protein antigens is one crucial piece of evidence that would aid in this selection. Prediction of peptides recognised by T-cell receptors have to date proved to be of insufficient accuracy. The in silico approach is consequently reliant on an indirect method, which involves the prediction of peptides binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. There is no guarantee nevertheless that predicted peptide-MHC complexes will be presented by antigen-presenting cells and/or recognised by cognate T-cell receptors. The aim of this study was to determine if predicted peptide-MHC binding scores could provide contributing evidence to establish a protein's potential as a vaccine. Using T-Cell MHC class I binding prediction tools provided by the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, peptide binding affinity to 76 common MHC I alleles were predicted for 160 Toxoplasma gondii proteins: 75 taken from published studies represented proteins known or expected to induce T-cell immune responses and 85 considered less likely vaccine candidates. The results show there is no universal set of rules that can be applied directly to binding scores to distinguish a vaccine from a non-vaccine candidate. We present, however, two proposed strategies exploiting binding scores that provide supporting evidence that a protein is likely to induce a T-cell immune response-one using random forest (a machine learning algorithm) with a 72% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity and the other, using amino acid conservation scores with a 74.6% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity when applied to the 160 benchmark proteins. More importantly, the binding score strategies are valuable evidence contributors to the overall in silico vaccine discovery pool of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0115745
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1640859552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A417323159</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_44de5c0afeaf45aeb6adff8e70bd1e88</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A417323159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3da80a4774a68e61a2cdca6a31edfa005da24467a607d52e3a1fd784da556a8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCIhITgIcVObCd9QZqqwSoNTeLXq3W1L61Lamd2UrH_gj8ZZ-2qBu0B5SHR3ee-l-_ZlyQvKZnQoqQf1q73FppJ6yxOCKW8ZPxRckqnRZ6JnBSPj75PkmchrAnhRSXE0-Qk55xxMaWnyZ8LuwKrjF2mxqbBNEa5tPWuQ2OzBQTU6RZUzGOqTVBui_42rZ1Psf8F_tZ1RqUtdCu3RBvSPgxCrUdtVBdLW2w7ozH7cjlLF8bqIQv2EE-VswH9FjrjYnPlPIbnyZMamoAv9u-z5Meni--zy-zq-vN8dn6VKTHNu6zQUBFgZclAVCgo5EorEFBQ1DVEpxpyxkQJgpSa51gArXVZMQ2cC6igOEte73TbxgW5H2aQVDBS8SnneSTmO0I7WMvWm000LB0YeRdwfinBR_8NSsY0ckWgRqgZB1wI0HVdYUkWmmJVRa2P-279YoNaoe08NCPRccaalVy6rWR5WZW0jALv9gLe3fQYOrmJx4FNAxZdf_ffNCeUExLRN_-gD7vbU0uIBoytXeyrBlF5zmLDvKB8GqnJA1R8NG7iTbFYmxgfFbwfFUSmw9_dEvoQ5Pzb1_9nr3-O2bdH7Aqh6VbBNf1wc8IYZDtQeReCx_owZErksDj305DD4sj94sSyV8cHdCi635TiL_baF2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640859552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Goodswen, Stephen J ; Kennedy, Paul J ; Ellis, John T</creator><contributor>Kestler, Hans A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodswen, Stephen J ; Kennedy, Paul J ; Ellis, John T ; Kestler, Hans A.</creatorcontrib><description>Given thousands of proteins constituting a eukaryotic pathogen, the principal objective for a high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery pipeline is to select those proteins worthy of laboratory validation. Accurate prediction of T-cell epitopes on protein antigens is one crucial piece of evidence that would aid in this selection. Prediction of peptides recognised by T-cell receptors have to date proved to be of insufficient accuracy. The in silico approach is consequently reliant on an indirect method, which involves the prediction of peptides binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. There is no guarantee nevertheless that predicted peptide-MHC complexes will be presented by antigen-presenting cells and/or recognised by cognate T-cell receptors. The aim of this study was to determine if predicted peptide-MHC binding scores could provide contributing evidence to establish a protein's potential as a vaccine. Using T-Cell MHC class I binding prediction tools provided by the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, peptide binding affinity to 76 common MHC I alleles were predicted for 160 Toxoplasma gondii proteins: 75 taken from published studies represented proteins known or expected to induce T-cell immune responses and 85 considered less likely vaccine candidates. The results show there is no universal set of rules that can be applied directly to binding scores to distinguish a vaccine from a non-vaccine candidate. We present, however, two proposed strategies exploiting binding scores that provide supporting evidence that a protein is likely to induce a T-cell immune response-one using random forest (a machine learning algorithm) with a 72% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity and the other, using amino acid conservation scores with a 74.6% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity when applied to the 160 benchmark proteins. More importantly, the binding score strategies are valuable evidence contributors to the overall in silico vaccine discovery pool of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115745</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25545691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>AIDS vaccines ; Algorithms ; Amino acids ; Amino Acids - chemistry ; Amino Acids - classification ; Antigen-presenting cells ; Antigenic determinants ; Antigens ; Apicomplexa ; Artificial Intelligence ; Binding ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computational Biology ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Conservation ; Databases, Protein ; Epitopes ; Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte - immunology ; Genes, MHC Class I - immunology ; Humans ; Immune response ; Immune response (cell-mediated) ; Immune system ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Learning algorithms ; Lymphocytes T ; Machine learning ; Major histocompatibility complex ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Molecular biology ; Neural networks ; Pathogens ; Peptides ; Peptides - chemistry ; Peptides - immunology ; Peptides - metabolism ; Physical Sciences ; Predictions ; Protein binding ; Protein Binding - immunology ; Proteins ; Proteins - immunology ; Proteins - metabolism ; Protozoan Vaccines ; Receptors ; Sensitivity ; T cells ; T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; T-Lymphocytes - parasitology ; Toxoplasma ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115745-e115745</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Goodswen et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Goodswen et al 2014 Goodswen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3da80a4774a68e61a2cdca6a31edfa005da24467a607d52e3a1fd784da556a8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3da80a4774a68e61a2cdca6a31edfa005da24467a607d52e3a1fd784da556a8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278717/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278717/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kestler, Hans A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodswen, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, John T</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Given thousands of proteins constituting a eukaryotic pathogen, the principal objective for a high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery pipeline is to select those proteins worthy of laboratory validation. Accurate prediction of T-cell epitopes on protein antigens is one crucial piece of evidence that would aid in this selection. Prediction of peptides recognised by T-cell receptors have to date proved to be of insufficient accuracy. The in silico approach is consequently reliant on an indirect method, which involves the prediction of peptides binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. There is no guarantee nevertheless that predicted peptide-MHC complexes will be presented by antigen-presenting cells and/or recognised by cognate T-cell receptors. The aim of this study was to determine if predicted peptide-MHC binding scores could provide contributing evidence to establish a protein's potential as a vaccine. Using T-Cell MHC class I binding prediction tools provided by the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, peptide binding affinity to 76 common MHC I alleles were predicted for 160 Toxoplasma gondii proteins: 75 taken from published studies represented proteins known or expected to induce T-cell immune responses and 85 considered less likely vaccine candidates. The results show there is no universal set of rules that can be applied directly to binding scores to distinguish a vaccine from a non-vaccine candidate. We present, however, two proposed strategies exploiting binding scores that provide supporting evidence that a protein is likely to induce a T-cell immune response-one using random forest (a machine learning algorithm) with a 72% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity and the other, using amino acid conservation scores with a 74.6% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity when applied to the 160 benchmark proteins. More importantly, the binding score strategies are valuable evidence contributors to the overall in silico vaccine discovery pool of evidence.</description><subject>AIDS vaccines</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Amino Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Amino Acids - classification</subject><subject>Antigen-presenting cells</subject><subject>Antigenic determinants</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Apicomplexa</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Epitopes</subject><subject>Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte - immunology</subject><subject>Genes, MHC Class I - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune response (cell-mediated)</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lymphocytes T</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Major histocompatibility complex</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Peptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Peptides - immunology</subject><subject>Peptides - metabolism</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Protein Binding - immunology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Protozoan Vaccines</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>T cells</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - parasitology</subject><subject>Toxoplasma</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCIhITgIcVObCd9QZqqwSoNTeLXq3W1L61Lamd2UrH_gj8ZZ-2qBu0B5SHR3ee-l-_ZlyQvKZnQoqQf1q73FppJ6yxOCKW8ZPxRckqnRZ6JnBSPj75PkmchrAnhRSXE0-Qk55xxMaWnyZ8LuwKrjF2mxqbBNEa5tPWuQ2OzBQTU6RZUzGOqTVBui_42rZ1Psf8F_tZ1RqUtdCu3RBvSPgxCrUdtVBdLW2w7ozH7cjlLF8bqIQv2EE-VswH9FjrjYnPlPIbnyZMamoAv9u-z5Meni--zy-zq-vN8dn6VKTHNu6zQUBFgZclAVCgo5EorEFBQ1DVEpxpyxkQJgpSa51gArXVZMQ2cC6igOEte73TbxgW5H2aQVDBS8SnneSTmO0I7WMvWm000LB0YeRdwfinBR_8NSsY0ckWgRqgZB1wI0HVdYUkWmmJVRa2P-279YoNaoe08NCPRccaalVy6rWR5WZW0jALv9gLe3fQYOrmJx4FNAxZdf_ffNCeUExLRN_-gD7vbU0uIBoytXeyrBlF5zmLDvKB8GqnJA1R8NG7iTbFYmxgfFbwfFUSmw9_dEvoQ5Pzb1_9nr3-O2bdH7Aqh6VbBNf1wc8IYZDtQeReCx_owZErksDj305DD4sj94sSyV8cHdCi635TiL_baF2s</recordid><startdate>20141229</startdate><enddate>20141229</enddate><creator>Goodswen, Stephen J</creator><creator>Kennedy, Paul J</creator><creator>Ellis, John T</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141229</creationdate><title>Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores</title><author>Goodswen, Stephen J ; Kennedy, Paul J ; Ellis, John T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3da80a4774a68e61a2cdca6a31edfa005da24467a607d52e3a1fd784da556a8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>AIDS vaccines</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Amino Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Amino Acids - classification</topic><topic>Antigen-presenting cells</topic><topic>Antigenic determinants</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Apicomplexa</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Epitopes</topic><topic>Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte - immunology</topic><topic>Genes, MHC Class I - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune response (cell-mediated)</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lymphocytes T</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Major histocompatibility complex</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Peptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Peptides - immunology</topic><topic>Peptides - metabolism</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Protein Binding - immunology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Protozoan Vaccines</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>T cells</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - parasitology</topic><topic>Toxoplasma</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodswen, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, John T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodswen, Stephen J</au><au>Kennedy, Paul J</au><au>Ellis, John T</au><au>Kestler, Hans A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-12-29</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e115745</spage><epage>e115745</epage><pages>e115745-e115745</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Given thousands of proteins constituting a eukaryotic pathogen, the principal objective for a high-throughput in silico vaccine discovery pipeline is to select those proteins worthy of laboratory validation. Accurate prediction of T-cell epitopes on protein antigens is one crucial piece of evidence that would aid in this selection. Prediction of peptides recognised by T-cell receptors have to date proved to be of insufficient accuracy. The in silico approach is consequently reliant on an indirect method, which involves the prediction of peptides binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. There is no guarantee nevertheless that predicted peptide-MHC complexes will be presented by antigen-presenting cells and/or recognised by cognate T-cell receptors. The aim of this study was to determine if predicted peptide-MHC binding scores could provide contributing evidence to establish a protein's potential as a vaccine. Using T-Cell MHC class I binding prediction tools provided by the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, peptide binding affinity to 76 common MHC I alleles were predicted for 160 Toxoplasma gondii proteins: 75 taken from published studies represented proteins known or expected to induce T-cell immune responses and 85 considered less likely vaccine candidates. The results show there is no universal set of rules that can be applied directly to binding scores to distinguish a vaccine from a non-vaccine candidate. We present, however, two proposed strategies exploiting binding scores that provide supporting evidence that a protein is likely to induce a T-cell immune response-one using random forest (a machine learning algorithm) with a 72% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity and the other, using amino acid conservation scores with a 74.6% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity when applied to the 160 benchmark proteins. More importantly, the binding score strategies are valuable evidence contributors to the overall in silico vaccine discovery pool of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25545691</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0115745</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115745-e115745
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1640859552
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects AIDS vaccines
Algorithms
Amino acids
Amino Acids - chemistry
Amino Acids - classification
Antigen-presenting cells
Antigenic determinants
Antigens
Apicomplexa
Artificial Intelligence
Binding
Bioinformatics
Biology and Life Sciences
Computational Biology
Computer and Information Sciences
Computer Simulation
Conservation
Databases, Protein
Epitopes
Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte - immunology
Genes, MHC Class I - immunology
Humans
Immune response
Immune response (cell-mediated)
Immune system
Infections
Laboratories
Learning algorithms
Lymphocytes T
Machine learning
Major histocompatibility complex
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Molecular biology
Neural networks
Pathogens
Peptides
Peptides - chemistry
Peptides - immunology
Peptides - metabolism
Physical Sciences
Predictions
Protein binding
Protein Binding - immunology
Proteins
Proteins - immunology
Proteins - metabolism
Protozoan Vaccines
Receptors
Sensitivity
T cells
T-Lymphocytes - immunology
T-Lymphocytes - parasitology
Toxoplasma
Vaccines
title Enhancing in silico protein-based vaccine discovery for eukaryotic pathogens using predicted peptide-MHC binding and peptide conservation scores
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20in%20silico%20protein-based%20vaccine%20discovery%20for%20eukaryotic%20pathogens%20using%20predicted%20peptide-MHC%20binding%20and%20peptide%20conservation%20scores&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Goodswen,%20Stephen%20J&rft.date=2014-12-29&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e115745&rft.epage=e115745&rft.pages=e115745-e115745&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115745&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA417323159%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640859552&rft_id=info:pmid/25545691&rft_galeid=A417323159&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_44de5c0afeaf45aeb6adff8e70bd1e88&rfr_iscdi=true