How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

One way to increase physical activity is to stimulate a shift from car use to walking or cycling. In single-purpose trips, purpose was found to be an important predictor of transport choice. However, as far as known, no studies have been conducted to see how trips with combined purposes affect this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e114797-e114797
Hauptverfasser: Scheepers, Eline, Slinger, Minke, Wendel-Vos, Wanda, Schuit, Jantine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e114797
container_issue 12
container_start_page e114797
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Scheepers, Eline
Slinger, Minke
Wendel-Vos, Wanda
Schuit, Jantine
description One way to increase physical activity is to stimulate a shift from car use to walking or cycling. In single-purpose trips, purpose was found to be an important predictor of transport choice. However, as far as known, no studies have been conducted to see how trips with combined purposes affect this decision. This study was designed to provide insight into associations between combined purposes and transport choice. An online questionnaire (N = 3,663) was used to collect data concerning transport choice for four primary purposes: shopping, going to public natural spaces, sports, and commuting. Per combination of primary trip purpose and transport choice, participants were asked to give examples of secondary purposes that they combine with the primary purpose. Logistic regression analyses were used to model the odds of both cycling and walking versus car use. Primary trip purposes combined with commuting, shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care were more likely to be made by car than by cycling or walking. Combinations with visiting catering facilities, trips to social infrastructure facilities, recreational outings, trips to facilities for the provision of daily requirements or private contacts during the trip were more likely to be made by walking and/or cycling than by car. Combined trip purposes were found to be associated with transport choice. When stimulating active transport focus should be on the combined-trip purposes which were more likely to be made by car, namely trips combined with commuting, other shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0114797
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1630366710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A416975468</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_59acebd8f59f467c9a5c5fe3bc5eca7e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A416975468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-32c625245be75b9786ffd915be55174d55394081e0ad0256f32a43f34171e383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEomXhDRBYQkJwsUscnzY3SFUFtFJFpVJxa3md8cZVNk49DqWPwRvjtNuqi3qBIuUw_ub3-M9MUbym5YIyRT9dhDH2plsMoYdFSSlXtXpS7NOaVXNZlezpg_e94gXiRVkKtpTyebFXCa64FGy_-HMUrogNm5XvoSEp-oEMYxwCAhITgRjEYL1JefHKpzYTpschxERsG7wF4kIk2E6BxmMyfQ5NKrggZ4Bjl5C4GDbEEBsD4hzBJh9y3QTT2FwT35PUAvkO-R470zf4snjmTIfwavucFedfv5wfHs1PTr8dHx6czK2sqzRnlZWVqLhYgRKrWi2lc01N86cQVPFGCFbzckmhNE1ZCelYZThzjFNFgS3ZrHh7Kzt0AfXWTNRUspJJqWiZieNbognmQg_Rb0y81sF4fRMIca1NTN52oEVtLKyapRO141LZ2ggrHLCVFWCNgqz1ebvbuNpAY6HPRnY7orsrvW_1OvzSPJfO81lmxYetQAyXI2DSG48WumwZhPGmbl4tK8Wmut_9gz5-ui21NvkAvnch72snUX3AqayV4HJyafEIla8GNt7mznM-x3cSPu4kZCbB77Q2I6I-_nH2_-zpz132_QO2BdOlFkM3Ts2EuyC_BW_6LYK7N5mWehqcOzf0NDh6Ozg57c3DH3SfdDcp7C-4UhXH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1630366710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Scheepers, Eline ; Slinger, Minke ; Wendel-Vos, Wanda ; Schuit, Jantine</creator><contributor>Du, Wen-Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Eline ; Slinger, Minke ; Wendel-Vos, Wanda ; Schuit, Jantine ; Du, Wen-Bo</creatorcontrib><description>One way to increase physical activity is to stimulate a shift from car use to walking or cycling. In single-purpose trips, purpose was found to be an important predictor of transport choice. However, as far as known, no studies have been conducted to see how trips with combined purposes affect this decision. This study was designed to provide insight into associations between combined purposes and transport choice. An online questionnaire (N = 3,663) was used to collect data concerning transport choice for four primary purposes: shopping, going to public natural spaces, sports, and commuting. Per combination of primary trip purpose and transport choice, participants were asked to give examples of secondary purposes that they combine with the primary purpose. Logistic regression analyses were used to model the odds of both cycling and walking versus car use. Primary trip purposes combined with commuting, shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care were more likely to be made by car than by cycling or walking. Combinations with visiting catering facilities, trips to social infrastructure facilities, recreational outings, trips to facilities for the provision of daily requirements or private contacts during the trip were more likely to be made by walking and/or cycling than by car. Combined trip purposes were found to be associated with transport choice. When stimulating active transport focus should be on the combined-trip purposes which were more likely to be made by car, namely trips combined with commuting, other shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114797</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25474653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Active transport ; Adult ; Bicycling ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Commuting ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Exercise ; Female ; Health care ; Health sciences ; Health services ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Nutrition ; People and Places ; Physical activity ; Prevention ; Public health ; Recreational facilities ; Regression analysis ; Shopping ; Transport ; Transportation ; Travel ; Trip generation ; Walking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e114797-e114797</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Scheepers et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Scheepers et al 2014 Scheepers et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-32c625245be75b9786ffd915be55174d55394081e0ad0256f32a43f34171e383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-32c625245be75b9786ffd915be55174d55394081e0ad0256f32a43f34171e383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256455/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256455/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25474653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Du, Wen-Bo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slinger, Minke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendel-Vos, Wanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuit, Jantine</creatorcontrib><title>How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>One way to increase physical activity is to stimulate a shift from car use to walking or cycling. In single-purpose trips, purpose was found to be an important predictor of transport choice. However, as far as known, no studies have been conducted to see how trips with combined purposes affect this decision. This study was designed to provide insight into associations between combined purposes and transport choice. An online questionnaire (N = 3,663) was used to collect data concerning transport choice for four primary purposes: shopping, going to public natural spaces, sports, and commuting. Per combination of primary trip purpose and transport choice, participants were asked to give examples of secondary purposes that they combine with the primary purpose. Logistic regression analyses were used to model the odds of both cycling and walking versus car use. Primary trip purposes combined with commuting, shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care were more likely to be made by car than by cycling or walking. Combinations with visiting catering facilities, trips to social infrastructure facilities, recreational outings, trips to facilities for the provision of daily requirements or private contacts during the trip were more likely to be made by walking and/or cycling than by car. Combined trip purposes were found to be associated with transport choice. When stimulating active transport focus should be on the combined-trip purposes which were more likely to be made by car, namely trips combined with commuting, other shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care.</description><subject>Active transport</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Recreational facilities</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Trip generation</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEomXhDRBYQkJwsUscnzY3SFUFtFJFpVJxa3md8cZVNk49DqWPwRvjtNuqi3qBIuUw_ub3-M9MUbym5YIyRT9dhDH2plsMoYdFSSlXtXpS7NOaVXNZlezpg_e94gXiRVkKtpTyebFXCa64FGy_-HMUrogNm5XvoSEp-oEMYxwCAhITgRjEYL1JefHKpzYTpschxERsG7wF4kIk2E6BxmMyfQ5NKrggZ4Bjl5C4GDbEEBsD4hzBJh9y3QTT2FwT35PUAvkO-R470zf4snjmTIfwavucFedfv5wfHs1PTr8dHx6czK2sqzRnlZWVqLhYgRKrWi2lc01N86cQVPFGCFbzckmhNE1ZCelYZThzjFNFgS3ZrHh7Kzt0AfXWTNRUspJJqWiZieNbognmQg_Rb0y81sF4fRMIca1NTN52oEVtLKyapRO141LZ2ggrHLCVFWCNgqz1ebvbuNpAY6HPRnY7orsrvW_1OvzSPJfO81lmxYetQAyXI2DSG48WumwZhPGmbl4tK8Wmut_9gz5-ui21NvkAvnch72snUX3AqayV4HJyafEIla8GNt7mznM-x3cSPu4kZCbB77Q2I6I-_nH2_-zpz132_QO2BdOlFkM3Ts2EuyC_BW_6LYK7N5mWehqcOzf0NDh6Ozg57c3DH3SfdDcp7C-4UhXH</recordid><startdate>20141204</startdate><enddate>20141204</enddate><creator>Scheepers, Eline</creator><creator>Slinger, Minke</creator><creator>Wendel-Vos, Wanda</creator><creator>Schuit, Jantine</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141204</creationdate><title>How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands</title><author>Scheepers, Eline ; Slinger, Minke ; Wendel-Vos, Wanda ; Schuit, Jantine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-32c625245be75b9786ffd915be55174d55394081e0ad0256f32a43f34171e383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Active transport</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Recreational facilities</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Trip generation</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slinger, Minke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendel-Vos, Wanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuit, Jantine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheepers, Eline</au><au>Slinger, Minke</au><au>Wendel-Vos, Wanda</au><au>Schuit, Jantine</au><au>Du, Wen-Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-12-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e114797</spage><epage>e114797</epage><pages>e114797-e114797</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>One way to increase physical activity is to stimulate a shift from car use to walking or cycling. In single-purpose trips, purpose was found to be an important predictor of transport choice. However, as far as known, no studies have been conducted to see how trips with combined purposes affect this decision. This study was designed to provide insight into associations between combined purposes and transport choice. An online questionnaire (N = 3,663) was used to collect data concerning transport choice for four primary purposes: shopping, going to public natural spaces, sports, and commuting. Per combination of primary trip purpose and transport choice, participants were asked to give examples of secondary purposes that they combine with the primary purpose. Logistic regression analyses were used to model the odds of both cycling and walking versus car use. Primary trip purposes combined with commuting, shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care were more likely to be made by car than by cycling or walking. Combinations with visiting catering facilities, trips to social infrastructure facilities, recreational outings, trips to facilities for the provision of daily requirements or private contacts during the trip were more likely to be made by walking and/or cycling than by car. Combined trip purposes were found to be associated with transport choice. When stimulating active transport focus should be on the combined-trip purposes which were more likely to be made by car, namely trips combined with commuting, other shopping, visiting private contacts or medical care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25474653</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0114797</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e114797-e114797
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1630366710
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Active transport
Adult
Bicycling
Biology and Life Sciences
Choice Behavior
Commuting
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise
Female
Health care
Health sciences
Health services
Humans
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Nutrition
People and Places
Physical activity
Prevention
Public health
Recreational facilities
Regression analysis
Shopping
Transport
Transportation
Travel
Trip generation
Walking
title How combined trip purposes are associated with transport choice for short distance trips. Results from a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20combined%20trip%20purposes%20are%20associated%20with%20transport%20choice%20for%20short%20distance%20trips.%20Results%20from%20a%20cross-sectional%20study%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Scheepers,%20Eline&rft.date=2014-12-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e114797&rft.epage=e114797&rft.pages=e114797-e114797&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0114797&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA416975468%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1630366710&rft_id=info:pmid/25474653&rft_galeid=A416975468&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_59acebd8f59f467c9a5c5fe3bc5eca7e&rfr_iscdi=true