Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos
Restoration of extirpated species via captive breeding has typically relied on population viability as the primary criterion for evaluating success. This criterion is inadequate when species reintroduction is undertaken to restore ecological functions and interactions. Herein we report on the demogr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-10, Vol.9 (10), p.e110742-e110742 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e110742 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e110742 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Gibbs, James P Hunter, Elizabeth A Shoemaker, Kevin T Tapia, Washington H Cayot, Linda J |
description | Restoration of extirpated species via captive breeding has typically relied on population viability as the primary criterion for evaluating success. This criterion is inadequate when species reintroduction is undertaken to restore ecological functions and interactions. Herein we report on the demographic and ecological outcomes of a five-decade-long population restoration program for a critically endangered species of "ecosystem engineer": the endemic Española giant Galapagos tortoise (Chelonoidis hoodensis). Our analysis of complementary datasets on tortoise demography and movement, tortoise-plant interactions and Española Island's vegetation history indicated that the repatriated tortoise population is secure from a strictly demographic perspective: about half of tortoises released on the island since 1975 were still alive in 2007, in situ reproduction is now significant, and future extinction risk is low with or without continued repatriation. Declining survival rates, somatic growth rates, and body condition of repatriates suggests, however, that resources for continued population growth are increasingly limited. Soil stable carbon isotope analyses indicated a pronounced shift toward woody plants in the recent history of the island's plant community, likely a legacy of changes in competitive relations between woody and herbaceous plants induced by now-eradicated feral goats and prolonged absence of tortoises. Woody plants are of concern because they block tortoise movement and hinder recruitment of cactus--a critical resource for tortoises. Tortoises restrict themselves to remnant cactus patches and areas of low woody plant density in the center of the island despite an apparent capacity to colonize a far greater range, likely because of a lack of cactus elsewhere on the island. We conclude that ecosystem-level criteria for success of species reintroduction efforts take much longer to achieve than population-level criteria; moreover, reinstatement of endangered species as fully functioning ecosystem engineers may often require large-scale habitat restoration efforts in concert with population restoration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0110742 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1617901724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a0109cf566c24949b965a1cc6bebb083</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1618826915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-8278b18eeeef28ae7523d08d97aad30155db7853d8df5e39afaa5124499cb6583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwBggssWHBDL7Ejr2phEopI1ViA2vrxHGmHiU5wU6Q-lg8Q1-snk5atQhvbB1_5z8X_UXxltE1ExX7vMM5DtCtRxz8mjJGq5I_K46ZEXylOBXPH72Pilcp7SiVQiv1sjjiUsjMl8cFfvU9biOMV8ERnCeHvU8EhoZ4h-k6Tb4noR-74GAKOCSCLdkGGCYyYZwwJE-iD8MUsZndnshxcp5GuPmLHZBN6rLWJ3IBHYywxfS6eNFCl_yb5T4pfn07_3n2fXX542Jz9uVy5SRX00rzStdM-3xarsFXkouG6sZUAI2gTMqmrrQUjW5a6YWBFkAyXpbGuFpJLU6K9wfdscNkl10lyxSrDGUVLzOxORANws6OMfQQry1CsHcBjFsLcQqu8xYoo8a1UinHS1Oa2igJzDlV-7qmWmSt06XaXPe-cT4vBLonok9_hnBlt_jHlpwxZVgW-LgIRPw9-zTZPiTnu7w9j_Nd31rzTMqMfvgH_f905YFyEVOKvn1ohlG79899lt37xy7-yWnvHg_ykHRvGHELbQHGqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1617901724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Gibbs, James P ; Hunter, Elizabeth A ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Tapia, Washington H ; Cayot, Linda J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, James P ; Hunter, Elizabeth A ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Tapia, Washington H ; Cayot, Linda J</creatorcontrib><description>Restoration of extirpated species via captive breeding has typically relied on population viability as the primary criterion for evaluating success. This criterion is inadequate when species reintroduction is undertaken to restore ecological functions and interactions. Herein we report on the demographic and ecological outcomes of a five-decade-long population restoration program for a critically endangered species of "ecosystem engineer": the endemic Española giant Galapagos tortoise (Chelonoidis hoodensis). Our analysis of complementary datasets on tortoise demography and movement, tortoise-plant interactions and Española Island's vegetation history indicated that the repatriated tortoise population is secure from a strictly demographic perspective: about half of tortoises released on the island since 1975 were still alive in 2007, in situ reproduction is now significant, and future extinction risk is low with or without continued repatriation. Declining survival rates, somatic growth rates, and body condition of repatriates suggests, however, that resources for continued population growth are increasingly limited. Soil stable carbon isotope analyses indicated a pronounced shift toward woody plants in the recent history of the island's plant community, likely a legacy of changes in competitive relations between woody and herbaceous plants induced by now-eradicated feral goats and prolonged absence of tortoises. Woody plants are of concern because they block tortoise movement and hinder recruitment of cactus--a critical resource for tortoises. Tortoises restrict themselves to remnant cactus patches and areas of low woody plant density in the center of the island despite an apparent capacity to colonize a far greater range, likely because of a lack of cactus elsewhere on the island. We conclude that ecosystem-level criteria for success of species reintroduction efforts take much longer to achieve than population-level criteria; moreover, reinstatement of endangered species as fully functioning ecosystem engineers may often require large-scale habitat restoration efforts in concert with population restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110742</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25350744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breeding ; Captive breeding ; Carbon isotopes ; Chelonoidis hoodensis ; Chelonoidis nigra ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Criteria ; Demographics ; Demography ; Ecological function ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystems ; Endangered Species ; Endemic species ; Engineers ; Environmental changes ; Environmental restoration ; Feral populations ; Herbivores ; Islands ; Male ; National parks ; Plant communities ; Planting density ; Plants ; Population ; Population growth ; Population viability ; Reinstatement ; Reintroduction ; Repatriation ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Restoration ; Soil analysis ; Spatio-Temporal Analysis ; Species extinction ; Success ; Survival ; Testudines ; Tortoises ; Turtles ; Vegetation mapping ; Wildlife conservation ; Woody plants</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-10, Vol.9 (10), p.e110742-e110742</ispartof><rights>2014 Gibbs et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Gibbs et al 2014 Gibbs et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-8278b18eeeef28ae7523d08d97aad30155db7853d8df5e39afaa5124499cb6583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-8278b18eeeef28ae7523d08d97aad30155db7853d8df5e39afaa5124499cb6583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211691/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211691/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia, Washington H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayot, Linda J</creatorcontrib><title>Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Restoration of extirpated species via captive breeding has typically relied on population viability as the primary criterion for evaluating success. This criterion is inadequate when species reintroduction is undertaken to restore ecological functions and interactions. Herein we report on the demographic and ecological outcomes of a five-decade-long population restoration program for a critically endangered species of "ecosystem engineer": the endemic Española giant Galapagos tortoise (Chelonoidis hoodensis). Our analysis of complementary datasets on tortoise demography and movement, tortoise-plant interactions and Española Island's vegetation history indicated that the repatriated tortoise population is secure from a strictly demographic perspective: about half of tortoises released on the island since 1975 were still alive in 2007, in situ reproduction is now significant, and future extinction risk is low with or without continued repatriation. Declining survival rates, somatic growth rates, and body condition of repatriates suggests, however, that resources for continued population growth are increasingly limited. Soil stable carbon isotope analyses indicated a pronounced shift toward woody plants in the recent history of the island's plant community, likely a legacy of changes in competitive relations between woody and herbaceous plants induced by now-eradicated feral goats and prolonged absence of tortoises. Woody plants are of concern because they block tortoise movement and hinder recruitment of cactus--a critical resource for tortoises. Tortoises restrict themselves to remnant cactus patches and areas of low woody plant density in the center of the island despite an apparent capacity to colonize a far greater range, likely because of a lack of cactus elsewhere on the island. We conclude that ecosystem-level criteria for success of species reintroduction efforts take much longer to achieve than population-level criteria; moreover, reinstatement of endangered species as fully functioning ecosystem engineers may often require large-scale habitat restoration efforts in concert with population restoration.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Captive breeding</subject><subject>Carbon isotopes</subject><subject>Chelonoidis hoodensis</subject><subject>Chelonoidis nigra</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Feral populations</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Population viability</subject><subject>Reinstatement</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>Repatriation</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Spatio-Temporal Analysis</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Testudines</subject><subject>Tortoises</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Woody plants</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwBggssWHBDL7Ejr2phEopI1ViA2vrxHGmHiU5wU6Q-lg8Q1-snk5atQhvbB1_5z8X_UXxltE1ExX7vMM5DtCtRxz8mjJGq5I_K46ZEXylOBXPH72Pilcp7SiVQiv1sjjiUsjMl8cFfvU9biOMV8ERnCeHvU8EhoZ4h-k6Tb4noR-74GAKOCSCLdkGGCYyYZwwJE-iD8MUsZndnshxcp5GuPmLHZBN6rLWJ3IBHYywxfS6eNFCl_yb5T4pfn07_3n2fXX542Jz9uVy5SRX00rzStdM-3xarsFXkouG6sZUAI2gTMqmrrQUjW5a6YWBFkAyXpbGuFpJLU6K9wfdscNkl10lyxSrDGUVLzOxORANws6OMfQQry1CsHcBjFsLcQqu8xYoo8a1UinHS1Oa2igJzDlV-7qmWmSt06XaXPe-cT4vBLonok9_hnBlt_jHlpwxZVgW-LgIRPw9-zTZPiTnu7w9j_Nd31rzTMqMfvgH_f905YFyEVOKvn1ohlG79899lt37xy7-yWnvHg_ykHRvGHELbQHGqQ</recordid><startdate>20141028</startdate><enddate>20141028</enddate><creator>Gibbs, James P</creator><creator>Hunter, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creator><creator>Tapia, Washington H</creator><creator>Cayot, Linda J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141028</creationdate><title>Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos</title><author>Gibbs, James P ; Hunter, Elizabeth A ; Shoemaker, Kevin T ; Tapia, Washington H ; Cayot, Linda J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-8278b18eeeef28ae7523d08d97aad30155db7853d8df5e39afaa5124499cb6583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Captive breeding</topic><topic>Carbon isotopes</topic><topic>Chelonoidis hoodensis</topic><topic>Chelonoidis nigra</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Feral populations</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Population viability</topic><topic>Reinstatement</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>Repatriation</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Spatio-Temporal Analysis</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Testudines</topic><topic>Tortoises</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Woody plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapia, Washington H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayot, Linda J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibbs, James P</au><au>Hunter, Elizabeth A</au><au>Shoemaker, Kevin T</au><au>Tapia, Washington H</au><au>Cayot, Linda J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-10-28</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e110742</spage><epage>e110742</epage><pages>e110742-e110742</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Restoration of extirpated species via captive breeding has typically relied on population viability as the primary criterion for evaluating success. This criterion is inadequate when species reintroduction is undertaken to restore ecological functions and interactions. Herein we report on the demographic and ecological outcomes of a five-decade-long population restoration program for a critically endangered species of "ecosystem engineer": the endemic Española giant Galapagos tortoise (Chelonoidis hoodensis). Our analysis of complementary datasets on tortoise demography and movement, tortoise-plant interactions and Española Island's vegetation history indicated that the repatriated tortoise population is secure from a strictly demographic perspective: about half of tortoises released on the island since 1975 were still alive in 2007, in situ reproduction is now significant, and future extinction risk is low with or without continued repatriation. Declining survival rates, somatic growth rates, and body condition of repatriates suggests, however, that resources for continued population growth are increasingly limited. Soil stable carbon isotope analyses indicated a pronounced shift toward woody plants in the recent history of the island's plant community, likely a legacy of changes in competitive relations between woody and herbaceous plants induced by now-eradicated feral goats and prolonged absence of tortoises. Woody plants are of concern because they block tortoise movement and hinder recruitment of cactus--a critical resource for tortoises. Tortoises restrict themselves to remnant cactus patches and areas of low woody plant density in the center of the island despite an apparent capacity to colonize a far greater range, likely because of a lack of cactus elsewhere on the island. We conclude that ecosystem-level criteria for success of species reintroduction efforts take much longer to achieve than population-level criteria; moreover, reinstatement of endangered species as fully functioning ecosystem engineers may often require large-scale habitat restoration efforts in concert with population restoration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25350744</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0110742</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-10, Vol.9 (10), p.e110742-e110742 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1617901724 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Animals Biodiversity Biology and Life Sciences Breeding Captive breeding Carbon isotopes Chelonoidis hoodensis Chelonoidis nigra Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Criteria Demographics Demography Ecological function Ecology Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Ecosystem biology Ecosystems Endangered Species Endemic species Engineers Environmental changes Environmental restoration Feral populations Herbivores Islands Male National parks Plant communities Planting density Plants Population Population growth Population viability Reinstatement Reintroduction Repatriation Reptiles & amphibians Restoration Soil analysis Spatio-Temporal Analysis Species extinction Success Survival Testudines Tortoises Turtles Vegetation mapping Wildlife conservation Woody plants |
title | Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Española Island, Galapagos |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Demographic%20outcomes%20and%20ecosystem%20implications%20of%20giant%20tortoise%20reintroduction%20to%20Espa%C3%B1ola%20Island,%20Galapagos&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gibbs,%20James%20P&rft.date=2014-10-28&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e110742&rft.epage=e110742&rft.pages=e110742-e110742&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0110742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1618826915%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1617901724&rft_id=info:pmid/25350744&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a0109cf566c24949b965a1cc6bebb083&rfr_iscdi=true |