Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2014-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e108611-e108611
Hauptverfasser: Stone, Orrin J, Biette, Kelly M, Murphy, Patrick J M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e108611
container_issue 9
container_start_page e108611
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Stone, Orrin J
Biette, Kelly M
Murphy, Patrick J M
description Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported. Bacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation. Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with >98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0108611
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1565502721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A417793635</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f45aaf4b3bb14fd5ab79862901a20b35</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A417793635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-86d8681eb8761b77ffb71f532f1bd4531a9ac680a9054cc5ad0c20f9732e0d793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk92K1TAQx4so7rr6BqIFQfSix6Rt0vZGWBY_DiwsuOptmKZJm6VNapKq5y18ZNNzusup7IXkomH6m_98ZCaKnmO0wVmB392YyWroN6PRYoMwKinGD6JTXGVpQlOUPTy6n0RPnLtBiGQlpY-jk5SkJM8rehr9uRaDSmDyZgAvmrjbNdaMnakVj5X2wgL3yuiYd3YmTGth7HYxN_006NhxM3ml23hywVfp2Hci9r9M4rwY43GySioOewEjYyu4GWqlQfu4tULoWPaTscJxESyjNV4o_TR6JKF34tnyPYu-ffzw9eJzcnn1aXtxfplwWqU-KWlT0hKLuiworotCyrrAkmSpxHWTkwxDBZyWCCpEcs4JNIinSFZFlgrUFFV2Fr086I69cWxppmOYUEJQWqQ4ENsD0Ri4YaNVA9gdM6DY3mBsy8B6xXvBZE4AZF5ndY1z2RCoi6qkaYUwpKjOSNB6v0Sb6kE0c8EW-pXo-o9WHWvNT5bjoiirOd03i4A1PybhPBtU6FvfgxZm2udNy_ColAb01T_o_dUtVAuhAKWlCXH5LMrO56BVRvd5b-6hwmnC2PAweVIF-8rh7cohMF789i1MzrHt9Zf_Z6--r9nXR2wnoPedC0M4z5Zbg_kB5NY4Z4W8azJGbF6c226weXHYsjjB7cXxA9053W5K9hcS7xcK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1565502721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Stone, Orrin J ; Biette, Kelly M ; Murphy, Patrick J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Orrin J ; Biette, Kelly M ; Murphy, Patrick J M</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported. Bacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation. Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with &gt;98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25254496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Ammonium phosphates ; Automation ; Bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chromatography ; Chromatography - methods ; Chromatography, Gel ; Chromatography, Liquid ; E coli ; Elution ; Escherichia ; Fluorescence ; Fluorimetry ; Gel electrophoresis ; Green fluorescent protein ; Green Fluorescent Proteins - chemistry ; Green Fluorescent Proteins - isolation &amp; purification ; Health sciences ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Hydrophobic surfaces ; Hydrophobicity ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Laboratories ; Ligands ; Mathematical analysis ; Matrix methods ; Molecular biology ; Nursing ; pH effects ; Phosphates ; Protein purification ; Proteins ; Purification ; Recombinant Proteins ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Salts ; Science Policy ; Size exclusion chromatography ; Sodium lauryl sulfate ; Spectrophotometry</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e108611-e108611</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Stone et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Stone et al 2014 Stone et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-86d8681eb8761b77ffb71f532f1bd4531a9ac680a9054cc5ad0c20f9732e0d793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-86d8681eb8761b77ffb71f532f1bd4531a9ac680a9054cc5ad0c20f9732e0d793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177899/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177899/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Orrin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biette, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Patrick J M</creatorcontrib><title>Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported. Bacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation. Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with &gt;98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium phosphates</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gel</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Elution</subject><subject>Escherichia</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorimetry</subject><subject>Gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Green fluorescent protein</subject><subject>Green Fluorescent Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Green Fluorescent Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Hydrophobic surfaces</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Matrix methods</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Protein purification</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Size exclusion chromatography</subject><subject>Sodium lauryl sulfate</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk92K1TAQx4so7rr6BqIFQfSix6Rt0vZGWBY_DiwsuOptmKZJm6VNapKq5y18ZNNzusup7IXkomH6m_98ZCaKnmO0wVmB392YyWroN6PRYoMwKinGD6JTXGVpQlOUPTy6n0RPnLtBiGQlpY-jk5SkJM8rehr9uRaDSmDyZgAvmrjbNdaMnakVj5X2wgL3yuiYd3YmTGth7HYxN_006NhxM3ml23hywVfp2Hci9r9M4rwY43GySioOewEjYyu4GWqlQfu4tULoWPaTscJxESyjNV4o_TR6JKF34tnyPYu-ffzw9eJzcnn1aXtxfplwWqU-KWlT0hKLuiworotCyrrAkmSpxHWTkwxDBZyWCCpEcs4JNIinSFZFlgrUFFV2Fr086I69cWxppmOYUEJQWqQ4ENsD0Ri4YaNVA9gdM6DY3mBsy8B6xXvBZE4AZF5ndY1z2RCoi6qkaYUwpKjOSNB6v0Sb6kE0c8EW-pXo-o9WHWvNT5bjoiirOd03i4A1PybhPBtU6FvfgxZm2udNy_ColAb01T_o_dUtVAuhAKWlCXH5LMrO56BVRvd5b-6hwmnC2PAweVIF-8rh7cohMF789i1MzrHt9Zf_Z6--r9nXR2wnoPedC0M4z5Zbg_kB5NY4Z4W8azJGbF6c226weXHYsjjB7cXxA9053W5K9hcS7xcK</recordid><startdate>20140925</startdate><enddate>20140925</enddate><creator>Stone, Orrin J</creator><creator>Biette, Kelly M</creator><creator>Murphy, Patrick J M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140925</creationdate><title>Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein</title><author>Stone, Orrin J ; Biette, Kelly M ; Murphy, Patrick J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-86d8681eb8761b77ffb71f532f1bd4531a9ac680a9054cc5ad0c20f9732e0d793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium phosphates</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gel</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Elution</topic><topic>Escherichia</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorimetry</topic><topic>Gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Green fluorescent protein</topic><topic>Green Fluorescent Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Green Fluorescent Proteins - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Hydrophobic surfaces</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Matrix methods</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Protein purification</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Size exclusion chromatography</topic><topic>Sodium lauryl sulfate</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Orrin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biette, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Patrick J M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Orrin J</au><au>Biette, Kelly M</au><au>Murphy, Patrick J M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-09-25</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e108611</spage><epage>e108611</epage><pages>e108611-e108611</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported. Bacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation. Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with &gt;98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25254496</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0108611</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e108611-e108611
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1565502721
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Ammonium
Ammonium phosphates
Automation
Bacteria
Biochemistry
Biology and Life Sciences
Chromatography
Chromatography - methods
Chromatography, Gel
Chromatography, Liquid
E coli
Elution
Escherichia
Fluorescence
Fluorimetry
Gel electrophoresis
Green fluorescent protein
Green Fluorescent Proteins - chemistry
Green Fluorescent Proteins - isolation & purification
Health sciences
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Hydrophobic surfaces
Hydrophobicity
Interdisciplinary aspects
Laboratories
Ligands
Mathematical analysis
Matrix methods
Molecular biology
Nursing
pH effects
Phosphates
Protein purification
Proteins
Purification
Recombinant Proteins
Research and Analysis Methods
Salts
Science Policy
Size exclusion chromatography
Sodium lauryl sulfate
Spectrophotometry
title Semi-automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column scouting used in the two-step purification of recombinant green fluorescent protein
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Semi-automated%20hydrophobic%20interaction%20chromatography%20column%20scouting%20used%20in%20the%20two-step%20purification%20of%20recombinant%20green%20fluorescent%20protein&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Stone,%20Orrin%20J&rft.date=2014-09-25&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e108611&rft.epage=e108611&rft.pages=e108611-e108611&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0108611&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA417793635%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1565502721&rft_id=info:pmid/25254496&rft_galeid=A417793635&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f45aaf4b3bb14fd5ab79862901a20b35&rfr_iscdi=true