Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability
Humans receive multiple benefits from various landscapes that foster ecological services and aesthetic attractiveness. In this study, a hybrid framework was proposed to evaluate ecological and aesthetic values of five landscape types in Houguanhu Region of central China. Data from the public aesthet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102437-e102437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e102437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e102437 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yang, Dewei Luo, Tao Lin, Tao Qiu, Quanyi Luo, Yunjian |
description | Humans receive multiple benefits from various landscapes that foster ecological services and aesthetic attractiveness. In this study, a hybrid framework was proposed to evaluate ecological and aesthetic values of five landscape types in Houguanhu Region of central China. Data from the public aesthetic survey and professional ecological assessment were converted into a two-dimensional coordinate system and distribution maps of landscape values. Results showed that natural landscapes (i.e. water body and forest) contributed positively more to both aesthetic and ecological values than semi-natural and human-dominated landscapes (i.e. farmland and non-ecological land). The distribution maps of landscape values indicated that the aesthetic, ecological and integrated landscape values were significantly associated with landscape attributes and human activity intensity. To combine aesthetic preferences with ecological services, the methods (i.e. field survey, landscape value coefficients, normalized method, a two-dimensional coordinate system, and landscape value distribution maps) were employed in landscape assessment. Our results could facilitate to identify the underlying structure-function-value chain, and also improve the understanding of multiple functions in landscape planning. The situation context could also be emphasized to bring ecological and aesthetic goals into better alignment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0102437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1547695957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418126732</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a8da02dd5c604c5584a3ee7f7abe3433</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A418126732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a1bed14be20808a1101a864348e52131faa79bb34184d4d97a19a8bf80b038253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHoxY76b3gjLoOvAwoJft-E0TTsZMs3YpKv77zcz012msheSi4TkOW9y3rxZ9gqjOaYF_rj2Q9-Bm299Z-YII8Jo8SQ7xSUlM0EQfXq0PsnOQlgjxKkU4nl2QjjiSEpxml0u_Kayne3aHEyIKxOtzv_YuMqN9s63VoPLb8ANJuSN73MHXR00bE0ehhDBdlBZZ-Pti-xZAy6Yl-N8nv388vnH4uvs6vpyubi4mmlRkjgDXJkas8oQJJEEjBEGKRhl0nCCKW4AirKqKMOS1awuC8AlyKqRqEJUEk7PszcH3a3zQY0eBIU5K0TJS14kYnkgag9rte3tBvpb5cGq_YbvWwV96tIZBbIGROqaa4GY5lwyoMYUTQGVoYzSpPVpvG2oNqbWpos9uIno9KSzK9X6G8UwEkWJk8D7UaD3v5OHUW1s0MYlG40f9u-WggqxR9_-gz7e3Ui1kBqwXePTvXonqi6SaZiIgpJEzR-h0qjNxuoUmMam_UnBh0lBYqL5G1sYQlDL79_-n73-NWXfHbErAy6ugndDtL4LU5AdQN37EHrTPJiMkdrl_d4Ntcu7GvOeyl4ff9BD0X3A6R1Y_foB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547695957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Yang, Dewei ; Luo, Tao ; Lin, Tao ; Qiu, Quanyi ; Luo, Yunjian</creator><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dewei ; Luo, Tao ; Lin, Tao ; Qiu, Quanyi ; Luo, Yunjian ; Bond-Lamberty, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Humans receive multiple benefits from various landscapes that foster ecological services and aesthetic attractiveness. In this study, a hybrid framework was proposed to evaluate ecological and aesthetic values of five landscape types in Houguanhu Region of central China. Data from the public aesthetic survey and professional ecological assessment were converted into a two-dimensional coordinate system and distribution maps of landscape values. Results showed that natural landscapes (i.e. water body and forest) contributed positively more to both aesthetic and ecological values than semi-natural and human-dominated landscapes (i.e. farmland and non-ecological land). The distribution maps of landscape values indicated that the aesthetic, ecological and integrated landscape values were significantly associated with landscape attributes and human activity intensity. To combine aesthetic preferences with ecological services, the methods (i.e. field survey, landscape value coefficients, normalized method, a two-dimensional coordinate system, and landscape value distribution maps) were employed in landscape assessment. Our results could facilitate to identify the underlying structure-function-value chain, and also improve the understanding of multiple functions in landscape planning. The situation context could also be emphasized to bring ecological and aesthetic goals into better alignment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102437</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25050886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Agricultural land ; Biology and Life Sciences ; China ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Esthetics ; Human-environment interactions ; Landscape ; Landscape architecture ; Metabolism ; Planning ; Preferences ; Structure-function relationships ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Water bodies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102437-e102437</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Yang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Yang et al 2014 Yang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a1bed14be20808a1101a864348e52131faa79bb34184d4d97a19a8bf80b038253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a1bed14be20808a1101a864348e52131faa79bb34184d4d97a19a8bf80b038253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106791/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106791/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Quanyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yunjian</creatorcontrib><title>Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Humans receive multiple benefits from various landscapes that foster ecological services and aesthetic attractiveness. In this study, a hybrid framework was proposed to evaluate ecological and aesthetic values of five landscape types in Houguanhu Region of central China. Data from the public aesthetic survey and professional ecological assessment were converted into a two-dimensional coordinate system and distribution maps of landscape values. Results showed that natural landscapes (i.e. water body and forest) contributed positively more to both aesthetic and ecological values than semi-natural and human-dominated landscapes (i.e. farmland and non-ecological land). The distribution maps of landscape values indicated that the aesthetic, ecological and integrated landscape values were significantly associated with landscape attributes and human activity intensity. To combine aesthetic preferences with ecological services, the methods (i.e. field survey, landscape value coefficients, normalized method, a two-dimensional coordinate system, and landscape value distribution maps) were employed in landscape assessment. Our results could facilitate to identify the underlying structure-function-value chain, and also improve the understanding of multiple functions in landscape planning. The situation context could also be emphasized to bring ecological and aesthetic goals into better alignment.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Human-environment interactions</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape architecture</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Water bodies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHoxY76b3gjLoOvAwoJft-E0TTsZMs3YpKv77zcz012msheSi4TkOW9y3rxZ9gqjOaYF_rj2Q9-Bm299Z-YII8Jo8SQ7xSUlM0EQfXq0PsnOQlgjxKkU4nl2QjjiSEpxml0u_Kayne3aHEyIKxOtzv_YuMqN9s63VoPLb8ANJuSN73MHXR00bE0ehhDBdlBZZ-Pti-xZAy6Yl-N8nv388vnH4uvs6vpyubi4mmlRkjgDXJkas8oQJJEEjBEGKRhl0nCCKW4AirKqKMOS1awuC8AlyKqRqEJUEk7PszcH3a3zQY0eBIU5K0TJS14kYnkgag9rte3tBvpb5cGq_YbvWwV96tIZBbIGROqaa4GY5lwyoMYUTQGVoYzSpPVpvG2oNqbWpos9uIno9KSzK9X6G8UwEkWJk8D7UaD3v5OHUW1s0MYlG40f9u-WggqxR9_-gz7e3Ui1kBqwXePTvXonqi6SaZiIgpJEzR-h0qjNxuoUmMam_UnBh0lBYqL5G1sYQlDL79_-n73-NWXfHbErAy6ugndDtL4LU5AdQN37EHrTPJiMkdrl_d4Ntcu7GvOeyl4ff9BD0X3A6R1Y_foB</recordid><startdate>20140722</startdate><enddate>20140722</enddate><creator>Yang, Dewei</creator><creator>Luo, Tao</creator><creator>Lin, Tao</creator><creator>Qiu, Quanyi</creator><creator>Luo, Yunjian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140722</creationdate><title>Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability</title><author>Yang, Dewei ; Luo, Tao ; Lin, Tao ; Qiu, Quanyi ; Luo, Yunjian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a1bed14be20808a1101a864348e52131faa79bb34184d4d97a19a8bf80b038253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Human-environment interactions</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape architecture</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Water bodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Quanyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yunjian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Dewei</au><au>Luo, Tao</au><au>Lin, Tao</au><au>Qiu, Quanyi</au><au>Luo, Yunjian</au><au>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-07-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e102437</spage><epage>e102437</epage><pages>e102437-e102437</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Humans receive multiple benefits from various landscapes that foster ecological services and aesthetic attractiveness. In this study, a hybrid framework was proposed to evaluate ecological and aesthetic values of five landscape types in Houguanhu Region of central China. Data from the public aesthetic survey and professional ecological assessment were converted into a two-dimensional coordinate system and distribution maps of landscape values. Results showed that natural landscapes (i.e. water body and forest) contributed positively more to both aesthetic and ecological values than semi-natural and human-dominated landscapes (i.e. farmland and non-ecological land). The distribution maps of landscape values indicated that the aesthetic, ecological and integrated landscape values were significantly associated with landscape attributes and human activity intensity. To combine aesthetic preferences with ecological services, the methods (i.e. field survey, landscape value coefficients, normalized method, a two-dimensional coordinate system, and landscape value distribution maps) were employed in landscape assessment. Our results could facilitate to identify the underlying structure-function-value chain, and also improve the understanding of multiple functions in landscape planning. The situation context could also be emphasized to bring ecological and aesthetic goals into better alignment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25050886</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0102437</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102437-e102437 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1547695957 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aesthetics Agricultural land Biology and Life Sciences China Computer and Information Sciences Conservation of Natural Resources Earth Sciences Ecological monitoring Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Ecosystems Esthetics Human-environment interactions Landscape Landscape architecture Metabolism Planning Preferences Structure-function relationships Sustainability Sustainable development Water bodies |
title | Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A51%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20aesthetic%20with%20ecological%20values%20for%20landscape%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yang,%20Dewei&rft.date=2014-07-22&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e102437&rft.epage=e102437&rft.pages=e102437-e102437&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0102437&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA418126732%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547695957&rft_id=info:pmid/25050886&rft_galeid=A418126732&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a8da02dd5c604c5584a3ee7f7abe3433&rfr_iscdi=true |