Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5
Fragment-based drug design is one of the most promising approaches for discovering novel and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets. The first step of the process consists of identifying fragments that bind the protein target. The determination of the fragment binding mode plays a major role...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e102300 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Aguirre, Clémentine ten Brink, Tim Guichou, Jean-François Cala, Olivier Krimm, Isabelle |
description | Fragment-based drug design is one of the most promising approaches for discovering novel and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets. The first step of the process consists of identifying fragments that bind the protein target. The determination of the fragment binding mode plays a major role in the selection of the fragment hits that will be processed into drug-like compounds. Comparing the binding modes of analogous fragments is a critical task, not only to identify specific interactions between the protein target and the fragment, but also to verify whether the binding mode is conserved or differs according to the fragment modification. While X-ray crystallography is the technique of choice, NMR methods are helpful when this fails. We show here how the ligand-observed saturation transfer difference (STD) experiment and the protein-observed 15N-HSQC experiment, two popular NMR screening experiments, can be used to compare the binding modes of analogous fragments. We discuss the application and limitations of these approaches based on STD-epitope mapping, chemical shift perturbation (CSP) calculation and comparative CSP sign analysis, using the human peroxiredoxin 5 as a protein model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0102300 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1545211087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418529480</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ac6e427c7187469a8cf78c8d421844f7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A418529480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c8f3b5a5199522eeb6713ad6aa15f26ce1c3d4c71b7e1464af29fc7cba87c0763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgrAXM-Y7rRfCMH7swOjK-IF3IU2TToa2qUm76L83dbrDjChILhJOnvc9nJOcJHkMwRxiDl_s3OBbWc871-o5gABhAO4k5zDHaMYQwHePzmfJgxB2AFCcMXY_OUMUIIpxfp7US9d00tu2SgvbluPeuFKH1JlURntXuSGkxsuq0W0f0iGMyIf3m9S2h_CskEGXaemHKo1aW7UvU9l1tVWyt65Ne5d-3Lz-Rh8m94ysg3407RfJl7dvPi-vZuvrd6vlYj1THLF-pjKDCyopzHOKkNYF4xDLkkkJqUFMaahwSRSHBdeQMCINyo3iqpAZV4AzfJE83ft2tQtialQQkBKKIAQZj8RqT5RO7kTnbSP9T-GkFb8DzldC-t6qWgupmCaIx3QZJyyXmTI8U1lJEMwIMaPXqynbUDS6VLEhXtYnpqc3rd2Kyt0IAvIcMxINLvcG2z9kV4u1GGPxdRnPAb2BkX02JfPu-6BD_4_yJqqSsQLbGhcTq8YGJRYEZhTlJAORmv-FiqvUjVXxWxkb4yeCyxNBZHr9o6_kEIJYfdr8P3v99ZR9fsRutaz7bXD1MH6ecAqSPai8C8Frc2gXBGKcittuiHEqxDQVUfbk-IUOotsxwL8Ape4GfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545211087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Aguirre, Clémentine ; ten Brink, Tim ; Guichou, Jean-François ; Cala, Olivier ; Krimm, Isabelle</creator><contributor>Driscoll, Paul C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Clémentine ; ten Brink, Tim ; Guichou, Jean-François ; Cala, Olivier ; Krimm, Isabelle ; Driscoll, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><description>Fragment-based drug design is one of the most promising approaches for discovering novel and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets. The first step of the process consists of identifying fragments that bind the protein target. The determination of the fragment binding mode plays a major role in the selection of the fragment hits that will be processed into drug-like compounds. Comparing the binding modes of analogous fragments is a critical task, not only to identify specific interactions between the protein target and the fragment, but also to verify whether the binding mode is conserved or differs according to the fragment modification. While X-ray crystallography is the technique of choice, NMR methods are helpful when this fails. We show here how the ligand-observed saturation transfer difference (STD) experiment and the protein-observed 15N-HSQC experiment, two popular NMR screening experiments, can be used to compare the binding modes of analogous fragments. We discuss the application and limitations of these approaches based on STD-epitope mapping, chemical shift perturbation (CSP) calculation and comparative CSP sign analysis, using the human peroxiredoxin 5 as a protein model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25025339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Antigenic determinants ; Binding ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemical properties ; Chemical Sciences ; Crystallography ; Crystallography, X-Ray ; Drug Design ; Drug development ; Epitope mapping ; Experiments ; Fragmentation ; Fragments ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Ligands ; Molecular Docking Simulation ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular ; Peroxiredoxin ; Peroxiredoxins - metabolism ; Perturbation methods ; Protein binding ; Proteins ; Research and analysis methods ; Therapeutic applications ; X-ray crystallography</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102300</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Aguirre et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2014 Aguirre et al 2014 Aguirre et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c8f3b5a5199522eeb6713ad6aa15f26ce1c3d4c71b7e1464af29fc7cba87c0763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c8f3b5a5199522eeb6713ad6aa15f26ce1c3d4c71b7e1464af29fc7cba87c0763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5981-109X ; 0000-0002-7699-3235</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099364/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099364/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01067905$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Driscoll, Paul C.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Clémentine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brink, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guichou, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cala, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krimm, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Fragment-based drug design is one of the most promising approaches for discovering novel and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets. The first step of the process consists of identifying fragments that bind the protein target. The determination of the fragment binding mode plays a major role in the selection of the fragment hits that will be processed into drug-like compounds. Comparing the binding modes of analogous fragments is a critical task, not only to identify specific interactions between the protein target and the fragment, but also to verify whether the binding mode is conserved or differs according to the fragment modification. While X-ray crystallography is the technique of choice, NMR methods are helpful when this fails. We show here how the ligand-observed saturation transfer difference (STD) experiment and the protein-observed 15N-HSQC experiment, two popular NMR screening experiments, can be used to compare the binding modes of analogous fragments. We discuss the application and limitations of these approaches based on STD-epitope mapping, chemical shift perturbation (CSP) calculation and comparative CSP sign analysis, using the human peroxiredoxin 5 as a protein model.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Antigenic determinants</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Crystallography</subject><subject>Crystallography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Drug Design</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Epitope mapping</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Molecular Docking Simulation</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular</subject><subject>Peroxiredoxin</subject><subject>Peroxiredoxins - metabolism</subject><subject>Perturbation methods</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Therapeutic applications</subject><subject>X-ray crystallography</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgrAXM-Y7rRfCMH7swOjK-IF3IU2TToa2qUm76L83dbrDjChILhJOnvc9nJOcJHkMwRxiDl_s3OBbWc871-o5gABhAO4k5zDHaMYQwHePzmfJgxB2AFCcMXY_OUMUIIpxfp7US9d00tu2SgvbluPeuFKH1JlURntXuSGkxsuq0W0f0iGMyIf3m9S2h_CskEGXaemHKo1aW7UvU9l1tVWyt65Ne5d-3Lz-Rh8m94ysg3407RfJl7dvPi-vZuvrd6vlYj1THLF-pjKDCyopzHOKkNYF4xDLkkkJqUFMaahwSRSHBdeQMCINyo3iqpAZV4AzfJE83ft2tQtialQQkBKKIAQZj8RqT5RO7kTnbSP9T-GkFb8DzldC-t6qWgupmCaIx3QZJyyXmTI8U1lJEMwIMaPXqynbUDS6VLEhXtYnpqc3rd2Kyt0IAvIcMxINLvcG2z9kV4u1GGPxdRnPAb2BkX02JfPu-6BD_4_yJqqSsQLbGhcTq8YGJRYEZhTlJAORmv-FiqvUjVXxWxkb4yeCyxNBZHr9o6_kEIJYfdr8P3v99ZR9fsRutaz7bXD1MH6ecAqSPai8C8Frc2gXBGKcittuiHEqxDQVUfbk-IUOotsxwL8Ape4GfQ</recordid><startdate>20140715</startdate><enddate>20140715</enddate><creator>Aguirre, Clémentine</creator><creator>ten Brink, Tim</creator><creator>Guichou, Jean-François</creator><creator>Cala, Olivier</creator><creator>Krimm, Isabelle</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-109X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-3235</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140715</creationdate><title>Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5</title><author>Aguirre, Clémentine ; ten Brink, Tim ; Guichou, Jean-François ; Cala, Olivier ; Krimm, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-c8f3b5a5199522eeb6713ad6aa15f26ce1c3d4c71b7e1464af29fc7cba87c0763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Antigenic determinants</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Crystallography</topic><topic>Crystallography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Drug Design</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Epitope mapping</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Molecular Docking Simulation</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular</topic><topic>Peroxiredoxin</topic><topic>Peroxiredoxins - metabolism</topic><topic>Perturbation methods</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Therapeutic applications</topic><topic>X-ray crystallography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Clémentine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brink, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guichou, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cala, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krimm, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguirre, Clémentine</au><au>ten Brink, Tim</au><au>Guichou, Jean-François</au><au>Cala, Olivier</au><au>Krimm, Isabelle</au><au>Driscoll, Paul C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-07-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e102300</spage><pages>e102300-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Fragment-based drug design is one of the most promising approaches for discovering novel and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets. The first step of the process consists of identifying fragments that bind the protein target. The determination of the fragment binding mode plays a major role in the selection of the fragment hits that will be processed into drug-like compounds. Comparing the binding modes of analogous fragments is a critical task, not only to identify specific interactions between the protein target and the fragment, but also to verify whether the binding mode is conserved or differs according to the fragment modification. While X-ray crystallography is the technique of choice, NMR methods are helpful when this fails. We show here how the ligand-observed saturation transfer difference (STD) experiment and the protein-observed 15N-HSQC experiment, two popular NMR screening experiments, can be used to compare the binding modes of analogous fragments. We discuss the application and limitations of these approaches based on STD-epitope mapping, chemical shift perturbation (CSP) calculation and comparative CSP sign analysis, using the human peroxiredoxin 5 as a protein model.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25025339</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0102300</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-109X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-3235</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-07, Vol.9 (7), p.e102300 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1545211087 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Antigenic determinants Binding Biology and Life Sciences Chemical properties Chemical Sciences Crystallography Crystallography, X-Ray Drug Design Drug development Epitope mapping Experiments Fragmentation Fragments Health aspects Humans Ligands Molecular Docking Simulation NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular Peroxiredoxin Peroxiredoxins - metabolism Perturbation methods Protein binding Proteins Research and analysis methods Therapeutic applications X-ray crystallography |
title | Comparing binding modes of analogous fragments using NMR in fragment-based drug design: application to PRDX5 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20binding%20modes%20of%20analogous%20fragments%20using%20NMR%20in%20fragment-based%20drug%20design:%20application%20to%20PRDX5&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Aguirre,%20Cl%C3%A9mentine&rft.date=2014-07-15&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e102300&rft.pages=e102300-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0102300&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA418529480%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545211087&rft_id=info:pmid/25025339&rft_galeid=A418529480&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ac6e427c7187469a8cf78c8d421844f7&rfr_iscdi=true |