The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new blood pressure (BP) measurement method (Pulse method). This study enrolled 45 patients for selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via right radial artery. A BP device using either oscillometric (Microlife 3AC1-1) or Pulse method...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2014-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e100287-e100287 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e100287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | e100287 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Xu, Jinsong Wu, Yanqing Su, Hai Hu, Weitong Li, Juxiang Wang, Wenying Liu, Xin Cheng, Xiaoshu |
| description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new blood pressure (BP) measurement method (Pulse method).
This study enrolled 45 patients for selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via right radial artery. A BP device using either oscillometric (Microlife 3AC1-1) or Pulse method(RG-BP11)was used. At the beginning of each PCI, intra-radial BP was measured before Microlife BP or Pulse BP measurement as its own reference, respectively. At the end of PCI, BP was measured again with the measurement order of Microlife BP and Pulse BP reversed. The differences between intra-radial and Microlife (BPi-M) or Pulse BP (BPi-P) on SBP, DBP and mean artery pressure (MAP) were calculated. Meanwhile, in 48 patients the intra-brachial BP and intra-radial artery BP were measured to calculate the brachial -radial BP difference (BPr-b).
The intra-radial SBP references used prior to both the Microlife and Pulse SBP that were similar (145.1±27.7 vs 145.8±24.2 mmHg), but the Microlife SBP was significantly lower than the Pulse SBP (127.7±20.5 vs 130.3±22.7 mmHg, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0100287 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1539494691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418127662</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f661876653aa4c1dba42335c019da4a8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A418127662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3698be4e7cc337794113f3a1e13589999657c900366cd177bd9a18be7e7415453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTJs2NsC5-DCys6OptOJOezmRpk9mmLfrvTZ3uMJW9sIE2zXneNz2nOUnynJIlZZK-u_F966Be7rzDJaGEZIV8kJxSxbKFyAh7eDQ_SZ6EcENIzgohHicnGVd5nkt5mvTXW0wHqHtMfZVC-uFrWmKHbWMddNa7tMFu68u0D9ZtYtz5Aet4dwvrBgh2wL1ksAZT2IB1oUu76HkIG4iv0TE6QehbbNB1T5NHFdQBn03Ps-THp4_XF18Wl1efVxfnlwsjVNYtmFDFGjlKYxiTUnFKWcWAImV5oeIlcmkUIUwIU1Ip16UCGhUSJac5z9lZ8nLvu6t90FPFgqY5U1xxoWgkVnui9HCjd61toP2tPVj9d8G3Gw1tZ02NuhKCFlKInAFwQ8s18Iyx3BCqSuBQRK_30279usHSxERbqGem84izW73xg-ZEyEyNBm8mg9bf9hg63dhgsK7Boe_H7-aEUiIFj-irf9D7s5uoDcQErKt83NeMpvqc04JmMZ0sUst7qDhKbKyJx6uycX0meDsTRKbDX90G-hD06vu3_2evfs7Z10fsFqHutsHX_XgQwxzke9C0PoQWq0ORKdFjd9xVQ4_doafuiLIXxz_oILprB_YHTXEI7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1539494691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Xu, Jinsong ; Wu, Yanqing ; Su, Hai ; Hu, Weitong ; Li, Juxiang ; Wang, Wenying ; Liu, Xin ; Cheng, Xiaoshu</creator><contributor>Chen, Xiongwen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinsong ; Wu, Yanqing ; Su, Hai ; Hu, Weitong ; Li, Juxiang ; Wang, Wenying ; Liu, Xin ; Cheng, Xiaoshu ; Chen, Xiongwen</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new blood pressure (BP) measurement method (Pulse method).
This study enrolled 45 patients for selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via right radial artery. A BP device using either oscillometric (Microlife 3AC1-1) or Pulse method(RG-BP11)was used. At the beginning of each PCI, intra-radial BP was measured before Microlife BP or Pulse BP measurement as its own reference, respectively. At the end of PCI, BP was measured again with the measurement order of Microlife BP and Pulse BP reversed. The differences between intra-radial and Microlife (BPi-M) or Pulse BP (BPi-P) on SBP, DBP and mean artery pressure (MAP) were calculated. Meanwhile, in 48 patients the intra-brachial BP and intra-radial artery BP were measured to calculate the brachial -radial BP difference (BPr-b).
The intra-radial SBP references used prior to both the Microlife and Pulse SBP that were similar (145.1±27.7 vs 145.8±24.2 mmHg), but the Microlife SBP was significantly lower than the Pulse SBP (127.7±20.5 vs 130.3±22.7 mmHg, P<0.05), thus the SBPi-M was higher than SBPi-P (18.1±11.8 vs 14.8±12.8 mmHg, P<0.05). As the mean SBPr-b was 12.4 mmHg, the Pulse SBP was closer to expected intra-brachial SBP by about 3.3 mmHg than was Microlife SBP to expected intra-brachial SBP. Meanwhile, Bland-Altman plots showed that the 95% limits of agreement for intra-radial SBP by Pulse SBP were narrower than those by Microlife SBP (12.0∼17.5 vs 15.5∼20.6 mmHg). However, the 95% limits of agreement for Pulse DBP and MAP were similar to those for Microlife DBP and MAP.
Against the invasive BP measurement, the pulse method may provide more accurate SBP and comparable DBP and MAP as compared with the oscillometric method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24955577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Balloon angioplasty ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood pressure ; Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation ; Blood Pressure Determination - methods ; Bus interconnections ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac patients ; Cardiology ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inventors ; Male ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Medical instruments ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Systematic review ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e100287-e100287</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Xu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Xu et al 2014 Xu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3698be4e7cc337794113f3a1e13589999657c900366cd177bd9a18be7e7415453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3698be4e7cc337794113f3a1e13589999657c900366cd177bd9a18be7e7415453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067298/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4067298/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24955577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Xiongwen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Hai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Weitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoshu</creatorcontrib><title>The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new blood pressure (BP) measurement method (Pulse method).
This study enrolled 45 patients for selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via right radial artery. A BP device using either oscillometric (Microlife 3AC1-1) or Pulse method(RG-BP11)was used. At the beginning of each PCI, intra-radial BP was measured before Microlife BP or Pulse BP measurement as its own reference, respectively. At the end of PCI, BP was measured again with the measurement order of Microlife BP and Pulse BP reversed. The differences between intra-radial and Microlife (BPi-M) or Pulse BP (BPi-P) on SBP, DBP and mean artery pressure (MAP) were calculated. Meanwhile, in 48 patients the intra-brachial BP and intra-radial artery BP were measured to calculate the brachial -radial BP difference (BPr-b).
The intra-radial SBP references used prior to both the Microlife and Pulse SBP that were similar (145.1±27.7 vs 145.8±24.2 mmHg), but the Microlife SBP was significantly lower than the Pulse SBP (127.7±20.5 vs 130.3±22.7 mmHg, P<0.05), thus the SBPi-M was higher than SBPi-P (18.1±11.8 vs 14.8±12.8 mmHg, P<0.05). As the mean SBPr-b was 12.4 mmHg, the Pulse SBP was closer to expected intra-brachial SBP by about 3.3 mmHg than was Microlife SBP to expected intra-brachial SBP. Meanwhile, Bland-Altman plots showed that the 95% limits of agreement for intra-radial SBP by Pulse SBP were narrower than those by Microlife SBP (12.0∼17.5 vs 15.5∼20.6 mmHg). However, the 95% limits of agreement for Pulse DBP and MAP were similar to those for Microlife DBP and MAP.
Against the invasive BP measurement, the pulse method may provide more accurate SBP and comparable DBP and MAP as compared with the oscillometric method.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Balloon angioplasty</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</subject><subject>Bus interconnections</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac patients</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inventors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTJs2NsC5-DCys6OptOJOezmRpk9mmLfrvTZ3uMJW9sIE2zXneNz2nOUnynJIlZZK-u_F966Be7rzDJaGEZIV8kJxSxbKFyAh7eDQ_SZ6EcENIzgohHicnGVd5nkt5mvTXW0wHqHtMfZVC-uFrWmKHbWMddNa7tMFu68u0D9ZtYtz5Aet4dwvrBgh2wL1ksAZT2IB1oUu76HkIG4iv0TE6QehbbNB1T5NHFdQBn03Ps-THp4_XF18Wl1efVxfnlwsjVNYtmFDFGjlKYxiTUnFKWcWAImV5oeIlcmkUIUwIU1Ip16UCGhUSJac5z9lZ8nLvu6t90FPFgqY5U1xxoWgkVnui9HCjd61toP2tPVj9d8G3Gw1tZ02NuhKCFlKInAFwQ8s18Iyx3BCqSuBQRK_30279usHSxERbqGem84izW73xg-ZEyEyNBm8mg9bf9hg63dhgsK7Boe_H7-aEUiIFj-irf9D7s5uoDcQErKt83NeMpvqc04JmMZ0sUst7qDhKbKyJx6uycX0meDsTRKbDX90G-hD06vu3_2evfs7Z10fsFqHutsHX_XgQwxzke9C0PoQWq0ORKdFjd9xVQ4_doafuiLIXxz_oILprB_YHTXEI7Q</recordid><startdate>20140623</startdate><enddate>20140623</enddate><creator>Xu, Jinsong</creator><creator>Wu, Yanqing</creator><creator>Su, Hai</creator><creator>Hu, Weitong</creator><creator>Li, Juxiang</creator><creator>Wang, Wenying</creator><creator>Liu, Xin</creator><creator>Cheng, Xiaoshu</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140623</creationdate><title>The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement</title><author>Xu, Jinsong ; Wu, Yanqing ; Su, Hai ; Hu, Weitong ; Li, Juxiang ; Wang, Wenying ; Liu, Xin ; Cheng, Xiaoshu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3698be4e7cc337794113f3a1e13589999657c900366cd177bd9a18be7e7415453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Balloon angioplasty</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</topic><topic>Bus interconnections</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac patients</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inventors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinsong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Hai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Weitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaoshu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Jinsong</au><au>Wu, Yanqing</au><au>Su, Hai</au><au>Hu, Weitong</au><au>Li, Juxiang</au><au>Wang, Wenying</au><au>Liu, Xin</au><au>Cheng, Xiaoshu</au><au>Chen, Xiongwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-06-23</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e100287</spage><epage>e100287</epage><pages>e100287-e100287</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new blood pressure (BP) measurement method (Pulse method).
This study enrolled 45 patients for selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via right radial artery. A BP device using either oscillometric (Microlife 3AC1-1) or Pulse method(RG-BP11)was used. At the beginning of each PCI, intra-radial BP was measured before Microlife BP or Pulse BP measurement as its own reference, respectively. At the end of PCI, BP was measured again with the measurement order of Microlife BP and Pulse BP reversed. The differences between intra-radial and Microlife (BPi-M) or Pulse BP (BPi-P) on SBP, DBP and mean artery pressure (MAP) were calculated. Meanwhile, in 48 patients the intra-brachial BP and intra-radial artery BP were measured to calculate the brachial -radial BP difference (BPr-b).
The intra-radial SBP references used prior to both the Microlife and Pulse SBP that were similar (145.1±27.7 vs 145.8±24.2 mmHg), but the Microlife SBP was significantly lower than the Pulse SBP (127.7±20.5 vs 130.3±22.7 mmHg, P<0.05), thus the SBPi-M was higher than SBPi-P (18.1±11.8 vs 14.8±12.8 mmHg, P<0.05). As the mean SBPr-b was 12.4 mmHg, the Pulse SBP was closer to expected intra-brachial SBP by about 3.3 mmHg than was Microlife SBP to expected intra-brachial SBP. Meanwhile, Bland-Altman plots showed that the 95% limits of agreement for intra-radial SBP by Pulse SBP were narrower than those by Microlife SBP (12.0∼17.5 vs 15.5∼20.6 mmHg). However, the 95% limits of agreement for Pulse DBP and MAP were similar to those for Microlife DBP and MAP.
Against the invasive BP measurement, the pulse method may provide more accurate SBP and comparable DBP and MAP as compared with the oscillometric method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24955577</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0100287</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2014-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e100287-e100287 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1539494691 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Accuracy Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis Balloon angioplasty Biology and Life Sciences Blood pressure Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation Blood Pressure Determination - methods Bus interconnections Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiac patients Cardiology Female Hospitals Humans Inventors Male Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Medical instruments Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Middle Aged Patients Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Sensitivity and Specificity Systematic review Veins & arteries |
| title | The value of a BP determination method using a novel non-invasive BP device against the invasive catheter measurement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20a%20BP%20determination%20method%20using%20a%20novel%20non-invasive%20BP%20device%20against%20the%20invasive%20catheter%20measurement&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Xu,%20Jinsong&rft.date=2014-06-23&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e100287&rft.epage=e100287&rft.pages=e100287-e100287&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0100287&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA418127662%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1539494691&rft_id=info:pmid/24955577&rft_galeid=A418127662&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f661876653aa4c1dba42335c019da4a8&rfr_iscdi=true |